Powerhouse to Parramatta: a news chronology: 2020 – now

For Inquiry into Museums and Galleries webpage: Read more
For the Inquiry Committee’s Final Report: Read more  and media release Read more
For informed research, analysis and opinions, see What the Experts SayRead more
To read about Museum history and issues with a recent Heritage nomination, Read here.

‘Letters to Editors’: for related letters to the editors of newspapers, see the PMA web site, here: Read more
This includes recent examples of outrage and suggestions from people who recognise that the government and business leaders in Parramatta have ignored the 6-year campaign for a more appropriate cultural facility in Parramatta, while retaining the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo. And there is clear evidence that the space in Parramatta is inappropriate for a state museum and appears more as an entertainment precinct. And – on 4 July, 2020,  the government announced that the Powerhouse Museum would remain in Ultimo, with support for a facility in Parramatta! But many concerns continue to be expressed about details of the futures for both sites, notably in the hearings for the Select Committee for the Second Inquiry, starting on 29 July 2020. On 15 June, 2021 it was announced that $500million was allocated to an overhaul of the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo (with concerns expressed about an emphasis on the minister’s preference for fashion.) And in Parramatta continuing efforts are made to save the historic building, Willow Grove, from demolition to make way for the ‘new Powerhouse’.
Continuing controversies regarding the Powerhouse Ultimo Renewal are documented below.


25 August, 2022
‘Powerhouse to lower historic flying boat from the ceiling after 30 years’
Tim Barlass reports in the Sydney Morning Herald about further strong concerns about development plans for the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, writing that  ‘The Powerhouse’s Catalina flying boat prize exhibit will be lowered from the ceiling after more than 30 years amid concerns about the redevelopment of the museum. The museum has been enveloped in controversy since it was announced that a new site would be built in Parramatta and the Ultimo location transformed into a centre for art and design. The Catalina, which has been suspended from the ceiling of the Boiler Hall since 1988, will be lowered for an exhibition opening in October. But beyond the exhibition it could be relocated out of the Boiler Hall, the museum’s chief executive said.’
‘In 1951, the Catalina completed the first return flight from Australia to South America, piloted by Sir P G [Patrick Gordon] Taylor…Taylor donated the Catalina flying boat Frigate Bird II to Powerhouse in 1961. The aircraft was restored, and it has since been the centrepiece of the transport exhibition for more than 30 years. .. One of Taylor’s four daughters, Gai Taylor, said at the time that the aircraft would be “irreparably damaged” by moving to Parramatta. She said: “I think it shows an incredible lack of appreciation, understanding and love of our aviation history.”’
‘But Kylie Winkworth, a former trustee of the museum, said she couldn’t see the point and expense of lowering it unless the intention was to move it out. “They have announced that they will continue to display technology, science engineering and design,” she said. “But that’s not true because we find out there will only be three objects permanently retained at the Powerhouse in Ultimo, the Catalina, the Boulton & Watt steam engine and Loco No 1 which is the first train of NSW.”
Andrew Grant, former senior curator of transport at the Powerhouse questioned whether the three very large objects might just be turned into impressive objet d’art. “Decisions that are made, and made public, reveal more about knee-jerk reaction than they do about long-term planning,” he said… Community group Pyrmont Action said: “It is clear that the primary purpose of this so-called ‘renewal’ is for the Powerhouse at Ultimo to operate as a glorified function and exhibition centre – for hire.” ‘ Read More Here, or Here :  SMH Catalina 25 August

22 August, 2022
‘Willow Grove could be relocated to Cumberland Hospital, Robin Thomas Reserve or Lake Parramatta’
Joanne Vella writes in the Parramatta Advertiser that: ‘Plans to rebuild the heritage-listed Parramatta building that was bulldozed for the Powerhouse Museum have emerged but critics likened it to shooting someone’s dog and then offering to stuff it. Heritage advocates are imploring the State Government not to rebuild Willow Grove a year after the 140-year-old property was torn apart to make way for the $915 million Powerhouse Museum at Parramatta. Heritage advocates are imploring the State Government not to rebuild Willow Grove a year after the 140-year-old property was torn apart to make way for the $915 million Powerhouse Museum at Parramatta.
Create NSW has called for community input to choose from a shortlist of locations for a rebuilt Willow Grove, a grand double-storey Italianate property that was once used as a maternity hospital between 1919 and 1953 before it was dismantled. Daily T Willow Grove 22 AugThe sites are Lake Parramatta where it would be set amid open lawns and bushland, Parramatta Council-owned Robin Thomas Reserve where heritage house Ellagowan also stands, and the grounds of the Cumberland Health Precinct where Sydney University will open a campus.
‘But North Parramatta Residents’ Action Group spokeswoman Suzette Meade said reconstructing the villa to the latter two locations would threaten their heritage value and questioned why the government wanted to restore Willow Grove now. “NPRAG has always opposed Willow Grove being removed from its garden grounds or a rebuild anywhere, but especially desecrating another heritage site,’’ she said. … Unfortunately, the Arts Minister Ben Franklin stating Willow Grove is culturally significant now, is about two years too late.’’ Now the group is urging the government to dump the plans and spend the $7 million on other cultural projects such as creating botanic gardens in Parramatta around the Female Factory and restoring “scores of heritage buildings”. Ms Meade said Willow Grove’s story, centred on Parramatta businesswoman Annie Gallagher building her successful drapery business and elegant family home from the villa, and its use as a maternity hospital, had been lost. “Parramatta is one of the most significant heritage sites in this country, setting a precedent that heritage can be moved around at the whim of any development should be cause for concern for everyone.’’’ Read More Here,  or Here : Daily T Willow Grove 22 Aug   And read NPRAG’s media release Here: NPRAG Media Release 20082022 Dont Rebuild WillowGrove

19 August, 2022
‘Architectural orphan’: Historic Willow Grove villa closer to relocation
Linda Morris reports in the Sydney Morning Herald that ‘Three riverside sites have been shortlisted as the potential final resting home for the historic villa of Willow Grove, brought down to make way for the $915 million Parramatta Powerhouse. An address within a health precinct near the old Parramatta Gaol tops the shortlist of sites identified as suitable to relocate the Victorian Italianate villa, now lying in pieces in a storage facility in south-western Sydney following its dismantling in 2020. The 1891-built home came down last year amid public protests when the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union lifted a green ban that had protected it from relocation … But in April, the National Trust withdrew from the Willow Grove Community Reference Group, after it concluded that the Victorian mansion could not be “authentically reconstructed”… Heritage advocates are, however, seeking clarification that Willow Grove will not be located within the boundaries of the Parramatta North Heritage Precinct, of which there may be some crossover with the Westmead Health Precinct. It’s feared the location of the architectural orphan in these parts would undermine the heritage integrity and continuity of Parramatta Female Factory and other historical colonial buildings in their parkland settings. These are considered so significant as to be worthy of UNESCO World Heritage listing…. [North Parramatta Residents Action Group (NPRAG) spokesperson Suzette] Meade said other questions remained unanswered: “Who’s going to pay for the new site, who’s going to pay for its ongoing use? The problem is this government has no community buy-in because the people of Parramatta didn’t want Willow Grove gone. No one asked for it to be relocated.” The City of Parramatta Council will forward a submission on the proposed locations to the NSW government. “We encourage the community to share their feedback on the project via Create NSW.” Read More Here:  or Here:  SMH Architectural orphan 18 Aug 22

14 August, 2022
‘Move over Melbourne: Sydney’s push to be nation’s culture capital’
In the Sydney Morning Herald, Andrew Taylor reports: ‘Sydney’s tourism marketing needs an overhaul to revive the ailing CBD and knock Melbourne off its perch as Australia’s cultural capital, according to the city’s peak business chamber.’ [Without appearing to mention the contribution the Powerhouse Museum makes to Sydney CBD and NSW…]‘A report commissioned by Business Sydney says the harbour city is missing out on tourists and risks being a “second division” city because it relies too heavily on the Opera House, harbour and beaches, while downplaying arts and culture… The Creating Australia’s Arts and Cultural Capital report said Sydney did not “see itself as a cultural city and cedes that role to Melbourne. Sydney’s brand doesn’t reflect the maturity and sophistication of the city”.’
‘It also refers to an earlier report that said the global perception and identity of Sydney was narrowly associated with its tourism icons and natural environment “while its distinctive people, histories, culture, diversity and creativity are less visible”. If culture was not made the focus of Sydney’s branding, the city’s reputation would diminish and “become permanently stuck in the ‘second division’ of cities,” the report added… The report calls for a Sydney Arts Precinct linking the city’s cultural institutions such as theatres, museums and major arts companies under an identifiable brand and collaborative body. “A primary aim of the Sydney Arts Precinct is to attract visitation to the CBD from Sydney and NSW residents using rich cultural content and experiences as the driver,” the report said. Read More Here, or Here:  SMH Sydney’s push 14 Aug 22

12 August, 2022
PMA: ‘Threat to Your Powerhouse Museum!’
The Powerhouse Museum Alliance distributed a document updating current issues about the future of the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, and recommending communication with Government Ministers and Members about issues associated with current government plans. It says:
‘The Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo is being split up – Parramatta is not a museum – Ultimo will be nothing like the people’s museum that we know and love. Our Powerhouse Museum is being disappeared, replaced by a so called ‘Ultimo Creative Industries Precinct’ of fashion and design. The Transport exhibition has been stripped out, the Museum’s technology icons: No 1 Locomotive, the 1785 Boulton & Watt engine, the Steam Revolution exhibition, the Catalina, the Flight of Aircraft and Space are all at risk of removal. The magnificent Wran Building and Galleria, landmarks of the award winning Powerhouse Museum, are at risk of demolition The Powerhouse Museum’s best practice, essential museum workspaces, including its impressive workshop in the Harwood Building (old Ultimo Tram Depot), are being replaced with subsidised studios for ‘creatives’ and ‘artists’ – seriously? Museum professionals – curators, conservators, registrars, exhibition designers etc – the Museum’s collection store, conservation facilities, library and archives – all this and more, are being moved off site to distant, less accessible Castle Hill, risking the Museum’s valuable collection. The former Ultimo Power House is uniquely suitable for the Museum’s much loved transport, science and technology exhibitions which are essential to the complete Powerhouse Museum – not just fashion.’
Read More Here: PMA Threat to Your Powerhouse Museum UPDATE 12 August 2022

11 August, 2022
‘Powerhouse Museum upgrades: public overwhelmingly disapproves plans’
In City Hub, Sasha Foot confirms that: ‘Community members and groups have overwhelmingly opposed the NSW Government’s Powerhouse Museum redevelopment plans in submissions made to the Department of Planning in July. Public feedback shows that objections – mostly centered on shifting the museum’s focus from science to fashion – strongly overrule statements approving the Ultimo site renewal 87% of the submissions stated their disapproval, while those who supported the concept plans were mostly government organisations like the Sydney Living Museums and the Australian Museum. … Save the Powerhouse, a community group opposing the site’s renewal, called the concept plan “destructive” ‘, and while expressing support ‘for a site refurbishment (such as updating the exhibition spaces), they believe a planned renewal will “completely change and degrade” the existing museum.
State member for Sydney, Alex Greenwich, opposed the draft plans as he said it would “intensify overdevelopment.” The City of Sydney’s submission neither supported nor opposed the plans; instead, they requested more clarity on the proposal.‘  Read more, or here: 11 August City Hub

c8-9 August, 2022
‘PSA social media clip’

Senior Public Service Association members speak about the ways in which they have argued over recent years, to save the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, and maintain it in the way audiences continue to expect it to operate. Juli-Anne Bond, PSA industrial manager; Stewart Little, PSA general secretary; and Troy Right, assistant general secretary, speak strongly about the need to properly consider the importance of the museum in its Ultimo precinct and maintenance of all significant buildings; access to the broad collection through exhibitions and appropriate storage; and concerns about staff and audiences.  Listen here.

8 August, 2022
Save the Powerhouse community campaign has summarised the responses to the NSW Planning Department’s submissions in response to the ‘Powerhouse Renewal’ proposals and emailed them to its mailing list. The report can also be read on their Facebook page. They say:
‘The Planning Department received a total of 102 submissions – See summary here http://tiny.cc/w4avuz – in response to its proposals for ‘Renewal’ of Ultimo’s Powerhouse Museum – a respectable number, including 86 from individuals – and the results could not have been clearer.
A conclusive 89 submissions (87%) OBJECTED to the changes proposed. Specifically, they opposed –
– the concept (obviously cherished by NSW’s profit-fixated government) of turning Australia’s  only Applied Arts and Sciences Museum into a “Fashion and Design “ facility (89  submissions against  =100%)
– changes proposed (or implied) to current building forms (44 submissions against = 50%) including
– demolition of the Wran Building and Galleria
– exclusion of the historic Harwood Building from renewal plans
– new high rise buildings along Harris St, including a 35 -storey monster to fill the forecourt, which submitters valued as a unique public gathering space in Ultimo
– closure of the Galleria entrance which (they thought) amounts to “the Museum turning its back on Ultimo”
– the huge waste of taxpayers’ money, when the Museum could have been ‘renewed’ for half the sum, and the rest better spent on other projects (31 submissions against = 35 %)
See submissions from Save the Powerhouse http://tiny.cc/u3avuz and MPs Jamie Parker http://tiny.cc/v3avuz and Alex Greenwich http://tiny.cc/04avuz
Although the overwhelming majority of submissions was made by community members (individuals). smaller contributions came from 7 community groups. all except one OBJECTING, government (3 supporting the proposals, one OBJECTING), professional institutions (3, none supporting) and one (supporting) from the business sector.
During this whole seven-year campaign to Save the Powerhouse., the museum-loving community has repeatedly sent the same consistent message to the NSW Government that the Powerhouse Museum should stay in Ultimo , its traditional home, with its original purpose and functions preserved, and only essential changes necessary for repairs and maintenance . Now, with State elections on the horizon in seven months’ time and the threat of a change of government, will they decide -at last- to listen to the people’s voice? We shall see.

2 August, 2022
‘Glorified function centre’: Powerhouse plans condemned in public submissions
Linda Morris reports in the Sydney Morning Herald on public responses to ‘the published concept environmental impact statement that has been released for public comment ahead of a national design competition, expected to be called this month, for the renewal of the home of the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences. Though not prescribing any specific proposal, the statement and accompanying documents show what’s possible on the site in an approach similar to that adopted for the $915 million Parramatta Powerhouse.’
She notes that (despite government and museum management support for the proposal) ‘New $500 million scoping plans for the Powerhouse at Ultimo have been condemned as an attempt to transform the museum into an entertainment centre by the overwhelming majority of public submissions. Only six of 104 public submissions backed the concept plans for the 2.4-hectare site that potentially allow for a new public square, entrance, and a multistorey annex on the museum’s Harris Street forecourt.’ She quotes from many of those professional submissions, including ‘The International Council of Museums made one of the 91 objections lodged with the Department of Planning: “This looks to be the removal rather than the redevelopment of a Museum,” its vice chair Alex Marsden said.’
‘The site comprises a cluster of heritage-listed buildings that formed the Ultimo Power Station and the old post office united by an arched galleria on Harris Street, which went up in the same era as Darling Harbour and the National Maritime Museum.’ … Design guidelines now on public exhibition do not sufficiently protect the fabric of these additions, known collectively as the Wran Building, which have great significance for the NSW architectural profession, the NSW Chapter of the Australian Institute of Architects said. The Institute said the 1988 redevelopment was one of the most successful and renowned adaptive reuse projects in Australia, an international benchmark for a museum of this type and a fine example of NSW public architecture in the post-modern style.
‘Statements of heritage impacts and the Conservation Management Plan downplayed the architectural significance of the Wran Building. Indeed, there was so much confusion between heritage, urban design, and architectural guidelines that it was preferable that they should be redrafted and re-exhibited for public comment, City of Sydney planners said.’
And former president and Museum trustee Nicholas Pappas said ‘the renewal project was “in its essence, nothing more than the unjustified and catastrophic destruction of a beloved and award-winning public edifice and cultural institution”.’
For Morris’s full story Read here or here: Glorified function centre 2 Aug 2022
To read the 104 submissions, open the Portal website  here, and go to ‘Submissions’.

1 August, 2022
‘Powerhouse Museum ‘rejuvenation’ threatens to destroy its historic character’
Jim McIlroy writes in the Green Left, Issue 1355, that ‘The campaign to save the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo continues after the New South Wales Coalition government announced plans to close it for “rejuvenation”. It is proposed to be a “creative industries precinct”, and reopen at the end of 2023 as “Ultimo Powerhouse”. The word “museum” will go. Spokesperson for the Powerhouse Museum Alliance (PMA) Kylie Winkworth criticised the plan on July 14, saying it fundamentally changes its use and “breaks with the Powerhouse Museum’s historic mission as Australia’s only museum of applied arts and sciences”… Campaigner Tom Lockley criticised the government for declaring the project “state significant” — which means it can steamroll its plans through without local government approval. “The process required public consultation,” Lockley said. “The comprehensive investigations of the huge first Legislative Council Inquiry produced clear evidence of malpractice, and the government has simply ignored it and carried on.”… Greens MLA Jamie Parker said at the time that more than five years of campaigning had “built a powerful alliance” to defend the Powerhouse, promote arts and culture and protect Sydney’s heritage. However, he warned then that “much work lies ahead”. Now, Premier Dominic Perrottet’s government wants to destroy the character of the Ultimo museum, while claiming it wants to “rejuvenate” the site… Winkworth said in May last year that “the NSW government has hacked away at the Powerhouse Museum for the last 10 years, relentlessly cutting its budget, gutting the museum of expertise, competent leadership and good governance, undermining public trust and making museum policy on impulse round the campfire”. Read More Here,   or Here: Green Left – Powerhouse rejuvenation threatens August 1.docx

July/August 2022
‘Powerhouse Ultimo Renewal’
The MAAS website identifies the current project status of the controversial ‘Powerhouse Ultimo Renewal. It says: ‘A transformative $480–$500 million investment by the NSW Government to reinvigorate one of Australia’s most revered and loved museums, Powerhouse Ultimo. The renewal will see Powerhouse Ultimo deliver a dynamic applied arts and sciences programming with a focus on design and fashion, presenting exhibitions that showcase the Powerhouse collection, international exclusive exhibitions and programs that support the creative industries. It will deliver new and refurbished exhibition and public spaces, connecting Powerhouse Ultimo to the Sydney CBD, exploring opportunities to re-orient the Powerhouse to the Goods Line and connecting it to nearby dining, entertaining and cultural precincts. Powerhouse Ultimo will become a vitalising force in a vibrant precinct that actively contributes to the growing night-time and visitor economies.’
– A Concept State Significant Development Application (SSDA) was submitted to the NSW Department of Planning and Environment for the renewal of Powerhouse Ultimo in June 2022.
– On Monday 25 July, the NSW Government launched an Expression of Interest for the future national Design Competition for the Powerhouse Ultimo Renewal.
– View the Powerhouse Ultimo Draft Consultation Management Plan submitted as part of the Concept State Significant Development Application for Powerhouse Ultimo.
Read more:  or here:  Powerhouse Ultimo Renewal MAAS web

11 July, 2022
‘Powerhouse Ultimo upgrades revealed in draft plan, meets community push back’
Sharlotte Thou, in City Hub, reports that: ‘The release of the draft plans for the renewal of the Powerhouse Museum Ultimo shows the first glimpse at what the museum will look like after its $500 million upgrade. Notable upgrades include the construction of a new six storey building on the Harris Street forecourt, as well as the implementation of a public square and outdoor programs near the museum entrance. The architect for the project will be selected through a design competition, which Create NSW Interim Chief Executive Annette Pitman hopes will help “reimagine one of the country’s most revered cultural institution through new and expanded exhibition and public space”.’
However, in noting that there are ‘ “No signs” community voices have been heard’, Thou says: ‘Community groups such as Save the Powerhouse and the Powerhouse Museum Alliance have protested resolutely against these proposed plans. Save the Powerhouse (STP) told CityHub that “despite consistent protests against the government’s plans for [the Powerhouse Museum] …they appear to have had no effect”. They stated that while community members dissented at community consultations organised by the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences “there are no signs that their voices were heard”. STP maintained that the draft plans will “downgrade” the museum into a “fashion and design information and education facility”… They additionally criticised the proposed focus on fashion, which “targets a very narrow section of the public”.’…’ The concept plans for the Ultimo Powerhouse Museum will be on public exhibition until July 21.’ Read more and here: City Hub 11 July

June, 2022
Kylie Winkworth: ‘The Powerhouse Museum is Not Saved’
In a detailed paper, museum expert Kylie Winkworth notes the urgency for public response to ‘the recently lodged Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the redevelopment of the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, into a creative industries precinct.’
She argues that: ‘The Powerhouse Museum Alliance opposes the NSW Government’s wasteful, destructive and unnecessary plans to erase all trace of the Powerhouse Museum (PHM) via a $500 million design competition and redevelopment. This is not museum renewal but museum erasure. The NSW Government quietly lodged the EIS for the redevelopment of the Powerhouse Museum into a creative industries precinct while everyone was distracted by the NSW budget. The Government is giving the community just 28 days to review and comment on more than 2,000 pages of reports and plans. Read the papers here.   Submissions close on 21 July. If you care about the future of the Powerhouse Museum please lodge a submission stating that you object to the development plans.’
‘The Powerhouse Museum is at risk in the Government’s plans to turn the PHM into a creative industries precinct at a cost of $500 million. This is a fundamental change of use and abandonment of the Powerhouse Museum’s historic mission as Australia’s only museum of applied arts and sciences. The project is a broken promise by the NSW Premier, see attached. Two years ago the now Premier announced that the Powerhouse Museum would be staying, and would continue to welcome visitors to its world renowned exhibits. The media release stated that the Powerhouse Museum would continue to provide an outstanding visitor experience in the areas of technology, science, engineering and design…  would complement the future focussed Parramatta facility….would retain jobs at Ultimo and would explore if some of the funds earmarked for relocation costs could be used on renovations. None of these commitments have been kept. In June 2021, behind closed doors, and without consultation, explanation or a transparent policy process, Premier Berejiklian decreed the PHM would be a fashion, design and creative industries precinct.’
After discussing extensive well-researched details, Winkworth concludes: ‘Everyone supports – and expected – genuine renewal of the Powerhouse Museum’s exhibitions, infrastructure and public domain. No one is arguing for a museum set in aspic. But there is no explanation, demonstrated cultural need or policy justification for the ‘Ultimo Renewal’ creative industries project. Instead of museum renewal we are getting renewal of the Government’s internationally embarrassing vendetta to gut the Powerhouse Museum.  After seven and a half years of battling to save the Powerhouse Museum the Government is proposing another wasteful, destructive, ad hoc, policy-free museum infrastructure decision, once again made without considering options, museum needs and opportunities, and without the benefit of a museum strategy or policy for NSW. ‘ for the full story Read here: Winkworth The PHM is Not Saved June 2022

21 June, 2022
‘POWERHOUSE ULTIMO RENEWAL’: The project has many flaws
Save the Powerhouse group notes of the Department of Planning’s State Significant Development (SSD) project “Powerhouse Ultimo Renewal”, that ‘the project has many flaws and a great deal of time will require time to analyse the thousands of pages of documentation.’
They summarise that: ‘The EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) comprises 39 documents including a Conservation Management Plan, a set of Architectural Plans…and a Consultation Outcome Report. in which we learn that the “renewed” Powerhouse Ultimo is designed as a “presentation and education facility” (which is NOT the official definition of a “museum”) but nonetheless that “comments that a focus on fashion and design is inadequate, and that the museum should have a broader focus” had been noted.
An initial reading of the architectural plans indicates that:
– the Harwood building is excluded from the Powerhouse Ultimo Renewal
– the project involves the entire gutting of the “Heritage Core” (Turbine, Engine and Boiler Halls and Switch House).
– a new 30m tall building on the current forecourt location (dwarfing the adjacent Wran Building) will be constructed – a new entrance at the end of the Goods Line will be created.’
They remind readers that: ‘the State Significant Development (SSD) project “Powerhouse Ultimo Renewal” is now on exhibition on the NSW Planning Portal site and open for Public submissions until 20 July 2022.Read more: 21 July Save the P re SSD Ultimo Renewal project

8 June, 2022
Legislative Council: Walt Secord calls for more transparency in provision of documents
Shadow Minster for the Arts, Walt Secord, moved in the Legislative Council that previously withheld  documents associated with decisions made about the new Museum in Parramatta, and the ‘renewal’ of the existing Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, be made available. The new Minister for Arts, Ben Franklin, opposed the motion, but the Council members voted for the motion, with 24 Ayes and 17 Noes. Extracts from Hansard include:
The Hon. WALT SECORD (Shadow Minster for the Arts):
That, under standing order 52, there be laid upon the table of the House within 42 days of the date of the passing of this resolution the following documents, excluding any documents previously returned under an order of the House, in searchable electronic form if possible, in the possession, custody or control of the Department of Enterprise, Investment and Trade (Create NSW) and Trustees of the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences Staff Agency, or the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Minister for the Arts and Minister for Regional Youth relating to the Powerhouse Ultimo Renewal, Powerhouse Parramatta and Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences ‘(documents listed)… ‘The project has leapt from crisis to crisis and these documents will give the Opposition and the crossbench, as well as community groups that are following the matter very closely, more information which will contribute to transparency. The documents being requested relate to the Powerhouse Ultimo renewal business case, the master plan and the renewal conservation plan.
The Hon. BEN FRANKLIN (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Minister for the Arts, and Minister for Regional Youth):
‘The Government opposes the motion. Powerhouse Parramatta and the renewal of Powerhouse Ultimo represent the largest investment in cultural infrastructure in this State since the Sydney Opera House. Furthermore, Powerhouse Parramatta will be the first cultural institution to be established in western Sydney, and the Ultimo renewal will refresh and enliven one of our oldest institutions. We have remained accountable and transparent on this project since we announced it in 2015. We have justified our decision-making and our expenditure and we are proud to provide evidence to articulate our investment in both of these extraordinary projects and we will continue to do so. However, we have some concerns about the detail and the breadth of this order for the production of documents.
The Hon. SCOTT FARLOW: I thank the Hon. Walt Secord for his amendment to the motion, as mentioned by the Minister. The slight concession of 42 days from 21 days is welcome—it would probably take 21 days to read the motion, given the length of it! As the Hon. Walt Secord and the Hon. Ben Franklin said in their contributions, this issue has been ventilated in this place for some time—seven years, in fact. … Whilst I acknowledge the department’s job is to be transparent with all information, this motion would frankly be an unsolicited use of the time and resources of the departments, institutions and ministerial offices involved. It would compromise the time of taxpayer-funded staff to organise all the information in the order, constraining staff capacity to work on the project. That would delay the time line of this wonderful project, which is vitally needed by the people of western Sydney. Those opposite claim to want to create jobs; this order would simply delay the jobs being delivered in western Sydney. I note paragraphs (h) and (i) of the motion. These requests are unreasonably broad. Read full report.

3 June, 2022
Powerhouse Ultimo community consultations fall short with museum advocates’
Erin Modaro, in City Hub, reports that ‘In a continuation of the push against the NSW government’s vision for the renewal of the Powerhouse Museum Ultimo, community members backing the ‘save the powerhouse’ movement have once again raised their concerns, after two public information seminars were held on May 16 and 18. The seminars, carried out by state government consultant Ethos Urban, informed attendees about the direction of Powerhouse Museum Ultimo’s transformation and discussed a December 2021 Scoping Report put out by Ethos Urban.
Tom Lockley, who attended the information seminar, expressed that the meeting felt inauthentic, and said that “the recent consultations have been carried out as usual, just to tick the boxes.” Lockley has been vocal in the community about preserving the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo for 7 years. “I asked if they could provide details of any person with museum qualifications and or experience who had given input [into the scoping plan]… and this question was completely ignored.”
Other Powerhouse Museum advocacy members in attendance at the meetings outlined how the direction of the museum to “focus on fashion and design”, as detailed in the scooping report, was a concern.
Patricia Johnson and Jean-Pierre Alexandre, who lead the Save the Powerhouse community group, said that the community as well as museum specialists, “are strongly opposed to trivialising the Powerhouse” through “turning it into a ‘creative industries hub’ with a ‘focus on fashion.’” “We must now focus on overturning the ludicrous idea that our time-honored Powerhouse Museum can become a mere “fashion hub”” Johnson and Alexandre said.
Member of the Powerhouse Museum Alliance group, Grace Cochrane, attended the seminar and expressed similar concerns about the management of the renewal project. Cochrane had questions during the seminar about the future of certain historic buildings such as the Wran Building, the Galleria and Hardwood Building. She stated that the current building plans had no “clear description of exactly what the content, scope and programs of the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo are intended to be.”
‘… Create NSW responded to the discussion from the public consultations, stating that the feedback they received “included comments on the project’s Concept SSDA” and questions about “operational elements relating to future exhibits or management of the site.” “Consultation will continue with the community and feedback will be considered as part of the planning for the project” Create NSW said.
The Ethos Urban scoping report also included a section outlining community feedback that has “informed the project”, including the preference for Powerhouse Ultimo to “continue operating as a museum”, and the recognising the need for “community connection.” Going forward, attendees at the public information seminars were told to expect that a draft conservation report would soon be going up for public exhibition, followed by an architectural competition for the design of the upgrades.. Read more here,  or Here: City HUb on consultations

20 May, 2022
POWERHOUSE ULTIMO “More unanswered questions”
Save the Powerhouse group asks in a circulated email: WHAT HAVE WE REALLY LEARNED ABOUT THE “POWERHOUSE RENEWAL? Two questionably-named “Community Consultations held recently about the future of the Powerhouse have left us – as usual- with as many questions as answers. Even if the object of both exercises was clearly to enable the Government to tick the (required) “public consultation” box, Powerhouse loyalists were able to gather some useful information about planned future directions. Based on numerous comments received from people who attended the “open weekend” and/or “community consultation sessions” (including our own experience), and/or who completed MAAS’ associated flawed survey, we can confirm a high level of agreement on what the local community wants, and more importantly, does NOT want!
Despite moderator Kyle Cochrane’s firm refusal in the closed sessions to tolerate any discussion except for preselected subjects listed, attendees unanimously REJECTED.
[In summary, they discuss:]
-1- The proposed NAME CHANGES to “Powerhouse Ultimo” and “Powerhouse Parramatta”….
‘The format of the May online “Information Seminar” appeared designed to limit attendees’ interaction by preventing them from knowing who else was present or seeing their questions. We nonetheless learned that:
– DA STAGE 1 (concept and envelope, including a DRAFT CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN will “soon” be placed on exhibition for 4 weeks, followed by an ARCHITECTURAL COMPETITION, and then a DA STAGE 2 (detailed design).
– MAAS cannot yet fully detail the future use of the “museum” but there will be exhibitions of the collections as well as national and international exhibitions. Some spaces will be used for COMMERCIAL purpose but there will not be any private residential component.’ Read more: Save the Powerhouse 20 May

18 May, 2022
Brief Report on Powerhouse Museum, Ultimo, Webinar Zoom meetings
Ross Hornsey, Michael Oliver, Ethos Urban; Thomas Klobucar, Create NSW; Simon Walkcom, Powerhouse Museum, and Natalie Vinton, Curio, led two webinar Zoom presentations on 16th and 17th May 2022 where: ‘Consultation is informing the preparation of a Concept State Significant Development Application for the NSW Department of Planning and Environment that places a revitalised museum at the heart of a vibrant Creative Industries Precinct. Find out more about the plans and have your say by joining a public information webinar where members of the project team will present plans and respond to community feedback.’
After explanations associated with Screen presentations were provided, questions were then possible through online submissions made during the session. It is understood that recordings were made of the sessions. Attached here for reference are Screen Shots from the 16th May session (including questions), and the same initial images were displayed on the 17th May. View Here: Webinar, MAAS 16 May 2022
Questions from the audience in both sessions included concerns about the future use and/or existence of the Wran Building, the Galleria and the Harwood Building; and the development of a design competition and building plans without a clear description of exactly what the content, scope and programs of the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo are intended to be (given that its reputation is as an integrated museum of applied arts, science and technology and social history).

16-17 May 2022
‘Powerhouse Ultimo Consultation Sessions’
Following the Live Consultation sessions run at the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo in March, by consultancy firm Aurecon, announcements have now been made that further webinar consultations would be held on 12-1.30 on 16 May, or 6-7.30 on 17 May. An advertisement was made in the Sydney Morning Herald on 11 May, ad 11 May  and Registration can be made on the Museum’s website HERE,  which also provides more information about the Zoom meetings: ‘Consultation is informing the preparation of a Concept State Significant Development Application for the NSW Department of Planning and Environment that places a revitalised museum at the heart of a vibrant Creative Industries Precinct. Find out more about the plans and have your say by joining a public information webinar where members of the project team will present plans and respond to community feedback.’
The event is carried out this time by the NSW government’s consulting firm Ethos Urban, who refer to their Scoping Report on the ‘Powerhouse Ultimo Renewal’, made in December 2021. To read their Report, go to the government Planning Portal Here. Click ‘Request for Sears’ then ‘View’, or go directly to Here.

In contrast to the strong opposition made over many years to the recommended changes to the Museum’s reduced cross-collection and exhibition role in Ultimo, the Report places the proposed changes within the wider plans for Pyrmont and the city, noting: ‘Alongside the renewal a Creative Industries Precinct will be created that will integrated into the operations of the Powerhouse Museum.’ As well, ‘The renewal will see Powerhouse Ultimo deliver a programming focus on design and fashion, presenting exhibitions that showcase the Powerhouse Collection, international exclusive exhibitions and programs that support the design and fashion industries.’ With little mention of the collection, under ‘Main uses and activities’ it notes: ‘The purpose of the development is to provide for the renewal of Powerhouse Ultimo, which is defined as an ‘information and education facility’. It is expected that the development will also comprise a range of related and ancillary uses such as office and co-working spaces, creative industry studios, retail facilities and public domain.’
And (referring to a very narrow collection focus, and no mention of significant industrial items best suited to this site) the Conclusion includes:
– The renewal of Powerhouse Ultimo and the creation of the Powerhouse Creative Industries Precinct will be a significant investment in the delivery of the NSW Government’s Cultural Infrastructure Plan 2025+ and the Pyrmont Peninsula Pace Strategy.
– Complementing the future flagship Powerhouse Parramatta, Powerhouse Castle Hill, and the Sydney Observatory, the project will see Powerhouse Ultimo focus on design and fashion, presenting exhibitions that showcase the museum’s significant collections, international exclusive exhibitions and programs that support the design and fashion industries, reinvigorating one of Australia’s most revered and much loved museums.’
Long-time supporters of the Powerhouse Museum will have the opportunity to listen to the presentations, and submit questions and comments on the Zoom page (as well as at the time of Registration).

2 May, 2022
‘Willow Grove stuff-up ‘one of the worst in NSW history’
On Radio 2GB, ‘Ben Fordham has slammed “one of the worst ideas in political history” that has left the ruins of a 152-year-old historic building gathering dust. Parramatta’s Willow Grove, built circa 1886, was dismantled to make way for the Western Sydney branch of the Powerhouse Museum. The government insisted it would rebuild the historic building elsewhere but the National Trust NSW has withdrawn from the project after an inspection of the building’s remains indicate it “could not be authentically reconstructed.”
“There was never an appetite to rebuild it,” Ben said, “It was all damage control over one of the dopiest ideas we’ve ever heard! It is one of the worst policy stuff-ups in NSW history.” Then-arts minister Don Harwin had rejected Ben Fordham’s critique of the idea at the time. Mr Harwin assured the building would be restored “to its former glory”. Read/listen here.

1 May, 2022
‘May Day – Twelve Months On’
The Greater Cities Community Facebook site reports: ‘A year after last year’s incredible May Day Rally, when communities, unions & heritage lovers across Sydney linked up to Save Willow Grove, the much loved and treasured building having been demolished now lies in thousands of bits under plastic in a location unknown, with the Minister and Premier responsible for its ruin having now gone from politics. With the National Trust, this week reiterating its fears that reassembling Willow Grove elsewhere has also gone, the government’s contentious plans for the Ultimo site are back on the agenda following the publication of the Scoping Report for the Request for a SEARS (Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements) for “the renewal of the Powerhouse Ultimo”. Read report here: Powerhouse Ultimo Renewal – Scoping Report
‘With the absence of the usual detail in a Scoping Report, the report however does indicate the plans for Ultimo are back to the contentious 2019 plans, ie for a fashion, creativity & architectural precinct with the project defined as an “information and education facility”. Moreover, the report states it is “expected that the development will also comprise a range of related and ancillary uses such as office and co-working spaces, creative industry studios, retail facilities and public domain”. Significantly too, the Report indicates the Harwood Building will be “decoupled”, with speculation rife that its sale is now back on the agenda. Likewise, the redevelopment of the Harris Street frontage is indicated “with more significant alterations/additions and new built form to be provided in locations which are less constrained by heritage factors, such as the Harris Street site frontage [aka Wran Building] and forecourt”, with overshadowing for the “loose fit” envelope expected to be kept at an “acceptable level”.
While the request indicates the Concept Plan is expected to comply with the current controls under the City of Sydney’s LEP, namely 28 metre height limit and an FSR of 4:1, this could change following the architectural design competition which will be managed by Create NSW. Notably, a Development Application to be lodged for Stage 1 Early Works. Timing for “work on the project is expected to commence following the receipt of development consent for the Detailed DA”.
In the meantime, the more recent devastating floods in NSW serve as a reminder of what’s at stake, when floodwaters will invariably strike the Powerhouse Parramatta.” ‘

29/30 April, 2022
‘Willow Grove relocation process in turmoil after National Trust pulls out’
Linda Morris reports in The Sydney Morning Herald that: ‘The historic villa of Willow Grove, which was pulled down to make way for the $915 million Parramatta Powerhouse, is lying in bits in a storage facility in south-western Sydney and seems unlikely to be reconstructed anytime soon.
National Trust NSW has withdrawn from the reference group set up by the Perrottet government to find it a new site, saying that on inspection of the building’s stored remains and catalogues, it had concluded that the mansion could not be “authentically reconstructed” ’… Salvaged ‘elements are housed in a storage facility that was clean and secure, and wrapped in thick plastic to protect from dust, the Trust’s advocacy manager Jane Alexander said … Adequacy of storage was not the issue. “When you reconstruct something you have to take an extraordinary level of detail and we didn’t think the amount of detail taken would adequately allow for a reconstruction,” … “The Trust felt it would be more of a recreation of the building using salvaged elements from Willow Grove, especially when you take into consideration new builds have to meet building codes and new accessibility standards.”’
‘The Trust has long opposed the dismantling of Willow Grove but its withdrawal from the Willow Grove Community Reference Group is a blow to the credibility of the government relocation process … Once a new site for Willow Grove is decided, planning and design approval has still to be obtained.…“Parramatta has a remarkable heritage, but with the loss of so many heritage buildings, that unique history is fast diminishing,” she said.’ Morris notes that ‘Options to relocate the Willow Grove building include sites near historic places, such as the Parramatta Female Factory, which is subject to a business case for use as an interpretative museum. “The National Trust NSW remains concerned that this will negatively impact the significance of the [historic] precinct and that it would be inappropriate to place a replica building on this site or others like it,” Alexander said.’ Morris also published comments about relocation options from Powerhouse Museum president Peter Collins and North Parramatta Residents Action Group spokesperson Suzette Meade, while ‘The Sydney Morning Herald has contacted Arts Minister Ben Franklin for comment.’ Read more  or here:  SMH 29 April 2022

9 April, 2022
‘Rags-to-riches developer makes hefty donation to Parramatta Powerhouse’
A media release from the Museum of Applied Arts & Sciences (MAAS) announced: ‘The Powerhouse today announced a $10 million investment in Powerhouse Parramatta by Sarkis Nassif, founder and Chief Executive of Holdmark Property Group.’ Linda Morris followed up in the Sydney Morning Herald: ‘Rags-to-riches western Sydney property developer Sarkis Nassif has made a hefty $10 million donation to the $915 million Parramatta Powerhouse, edging the region’s first major cultural institution closer to its target of raising $75 million from private philanthropy. Nassif’s company, the Holdmark Property Group, has been awarded naming rights over the Powerhouse’s second-largest exhibition space and will be the principal sponsor of the museum’s Sydney Design Festival, focusing on innovation in design, engineering and architecture. …Nassif’s $10 million donation through the Holdmark Foundation is the self-made multimillionaire’s first foray into arts philanthropy … The donation has been hailed as an example of the emerging capacity of western Sydney’s new wealthy class to support a region that is home to 2.5 million people – 35 per cent of whom were born overseas… Arts minister Ben Franklin said private donations to the once-in-a-generation cultural institution now totalled $45 million.’ In working towards the government-required private funding target: ‘Billionaire property developer Lang Walker kicked off the Parramatta Powerhouse’s philanthropic fund in October with a $20 million donation to fund in-school STEM education across Campbelltown, Liverpool, Bankstown, Penrith and Parramatta this year and overnight stays at the museum for regional students. The University of Western Sydney has invested $10 million as an institutional partner. Holdmark will sponsor a design summit and partner with the university to establish a multi-disciplinary summer school with students partnering with a western Sydney council to find solutions to challenges around climate change.’ Media Release: MAAS Parramatta-Holdmark  Read more SMH, or  9 April Sarkis Nassif hefty donation 
[We are reminded that on 18 December, 2019, Linda Morris and Megan Gorrey wrote in the Sydney Morning Herald that: The Powerhouse Museum will need to raise around $75 million from private philanthropists and corporations to meet the multi-million dollar cost of relocating to Parramatta. The contribution is necessary to offset the overall cost of building, operating and moving the institution to new premises in western Sydney, estimated by the government’s own economic analysis of 2018 to be $1.17 billion. Taxpayers will need to contribute $645 million towards the relocation project, the difference to be made up through philanthropy and the redevelopment of the Ultimo site, which is the subject of a new business case.’ In relation to the 9 April 2022 report, above, PMA readers note that to date philanthropic donations appear to meet the donor’s interests rather than programs associated with the Museum’s known collections.] Read more.

March 2022
Reports on ‘Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo’:  Survey and Live Consultation Sessions
Many people attended the Consultation Sessions offered at the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo on 19/20 March. They were chaired by Kylie Cochrane, Communication and Stakeholder Engagement technical lead partner for engineering and infrastructure advisory firm Aurecon, alongside Alan Croker, Heritage architect and director of Design 5 architects and Thomas Klobucar, Project Director at Create NSW. It was confirmed that: ‘Powerhouse Ultimo is going through a historic period of Renewal. As part of this process, a Conservation Management Plan is being prepared to help guide the future design, use and management of the museum. We invite you to be part of this process.’ And in line with questions on the on-line Survey, saying ‘We want to understand what you value most about the museum’, questions included: ‘What works well at Powerhouse Ultimo; What doesn’t work at Powerhouse Ultimo; What are the opportunities for change/improvement/efficiencies?’ Questions and comments were encouraged from all in the audience, and it was noted that the comments would be documented (without names) for future reference.
From observations at the time, and reports later sent in to the Powerhouse Museum Alliance, it appears that, as well as a desire to maintain the heritage aspects of the buildings, including the 1988 award-winning additions and the early tramshed Harwood Building, alongside the Power Station buildings, a great audience emphasis was placed on the significance of representing the broad collection across Science and Technology, Decorative Arts and Design and Social History – on this site – which should continue to be identified as the Powerhouse Museum, in Ultimo, not just Powerhouse Ultimo! Concern was expressed about the possible relocation of significant large machines and aeroplanes, the removal of the full collection to Castle Hill which is poorly accessible for museum staff and audiences, and the tendency to replace exhibition spaces and museum workshops with artist residencies and other temporary projects that are not necessarily focussed on the stories behind objects in the collection. Also at issue was the expressed need to change the current ‘Fashion and Design’ identity to something more inclusive of all the collection. However, it was disconcerting to be advised by the organisers, that their task was to do with the buildings in Ultimo, and not the collection.
See questions in the On-line Questionnaire: or in comments below.
Read here for responses to the Survey and Consultations sent to the Powerhouse Museum Alliance:  Consultation comments 1 May 2022

19/20 March 2022
Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo:
Live Consultation Sessions
In early March, the Museum of Applied Arts & Sciences (MAAS) announced a free Open Weekend, and also Consultation sessions about the future of the Ultimo site on Saturday 19 at 11 am, 1 pm and 3 pm and on Sunday 20 March at 1 pm and 3 pm.
The Museum advertised on line: Powerhouse Ultimo Open Weekend (not now accessible)
‘Powerhouse Ultimo is going through a historic period of Renewal. As part of this process, a Conservation Management Plan is being prepared to help guide the future design, use and management of the museum. We invite you to be part of this process. We want to understand what you value most about the museum.’ It also gave access to an On-line Questionnaire or at Powerhouse Ultimo survey March 2022
‘What to expect on the day:

  • Live Consultation Sessions – Find out more about the renewal project and have your say about what you value most about the museum in a live consultation session. Book your seat here. Or Register here  for consultation sessions.
  • Memory Lane – Look into the archives through an interactive multimedia exhibit.
  • Creative Industry Residents – Meet the faces of the Powerhouse Ultimo Creative Industries Precinct and learn more about their practice.
  • Family Adventure Trails – Explore the museum with your family and discover significant collection objects.
  • Guided tours – Join tours of heritage highlights, current exhibitions, the Boulton and Watt, Textile Centre and other rarely seen areas of the museum.’

17 March, 2022
The 6th hearing of the (second) Select Committee for the Inquiry into the Government’s Management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects in NSW
In its 6th hearing since 29 July 2020, and following an earlier Inquiry on the same subject, the Committee met for what has been suggested is its final hearing for the Committee (not fully confirmed). The focus was on the future of Powerhouse Museum, part of the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences.
For members, and hearing schedules: Read
For full Transcript, Read:  or here: Transcript – 17 March 2022
Chair, The Hon. Robert Borsak, introduced the hearing: ‘Today we will hear from a range of stakeholders including the Minister for Arts, the Hon. Ben Franklin, MLC, the Powerhouse Museum board and management and an expert flood panel. Today’s hearing is being broadcast live via the Parliament’s website. A transcript of today’s hearing will be placed on the Committee’s website..’
(Note: New Arts Minister Ben Franklin, was a former member of this committee; and former Arts Minister, Don Harwin, was included in it this time.)
Witnesses, in three sessions, were:
The Hon. BEN FRANKLIN, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Minister for the Arts, and Minister for Regional Youth
ANNETTE PITMAN, Acting Chief Executive, Create NSW, Department of Premier and Cabinet
KATE FOY, Group Deputy Secretary, Tourism, Sport and Arts, Department of Enterprise, Investment and Trade
Ms LISA HAVILAH, Chief Executive, Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences
The Hon. PETER COLLINS, President, Board of Trustees, Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences
Mr GREG ROGENCAMP, Associate Principal, Surface Water Engineering Leader, Arup
Mr TOM GELLIBRAND, Head of Projects NSW, Infrastructure NSW
Mr RICHARD DEWAR, Technical Director, WMA Water
Dr JOHN MACINTOSH, Flood/Hydrological Engineer, Water Solutions, via videoconference
Ms DONNA DAVIS, Lord Mayor, City of Parramatta
Ms SUZETTE MEADE, North Parramatta Residents Action Group
Arts Minister, Ben Franklin opened discussion: ‘The Powerhouse is in a period of extraordinary transformation. With the establishment of Powerhouse Parramatta, the renewal of Powerhouse Ultimo, the expansion of the Museums Discovery Centre in Castle Hill and the ongoing operation at Sydney Observatory, the Powerhouse is designing a new approach to museums. Leading with a place in history, the Powerhouse and its venues will set a global benchmark for museums and cultural precincts, rewriting how institutions represent and reflect their communities. The investment by the New South Wales Government will cement the Powerhouse as Australia’s leading museum of applied arts and sciences with the development of two world-class facilities, in Ultimo and the museum’s flagship in Parramatta. As the first New South Wales State cultural institution to be based in western Sydney, Powerhouse Parramatta will be a transformational cultural precinct in Australia’s fastest growing city. Leading in science and technology and fostering our future STEM leaders, Powerhouse Parramatta will be the largest museum in New South Wales, with over 18,000 square metres of exhibition and public space, attracting two million visitors annually. Furthermore, Powerhouse Ultimo will undergo a renewal that would put the museum’s notable design and fashion collection at the forefront. Presenting exhibitions that feature the museum’s significant collections alongside iconic objects, Powerhouse Ultimo is an ideal site to host exclusive international exhibitions and programs that support the fashion and design industries. The expansion will deliver a new and increased exhibition and public space and a significant investment in the development of a creative industries precinct that will generate subsidised commercial studios and workspaces. Lastly, the Museums Discovery Centre is home to the Powerhouse collection. A key component of the Powerhouse renewal is the development of new storage facilities with a research workshop and community spaces that will provide new levels of access to collections on one consolidated site.’
Discussion with witnesses:
Critical discussions followed this address, about the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences across all sites, and included questions and responses about: the existence of and access to business cases; the proposed development and use of significant buildings in Ultimo; the status, representation, exhibition and location of the broad collection; the identification of the Ultimo site as a ‘Fashion and Design’ museum; as yet unclear programs intended for all future sites; the purpose of donated funds in relation to the Museum’s role; and issues about the dangers of a flood-prone Parramatta site and the destruction of historic buildings.
Later comments:
Save the Powerhouse community group wrote by email and Facebook:
– Other than confirmation that the Locomotive No1, the Catalina flying boat and the Boulton and Watt engine will stay and be displayed, we learned little new.
– According to CEO Lisa Havilah, the Powerhouse Ultimo will focus on fashion and design but not exclusively. The Steam exhibition will remain but will be integrated into “industrial exhibitions” to be “relevant and contemporary”.
– Peter Collins, President of the Board of Trustees also assured us that “there is no plan to demolish the Harwood Building” although its future use is not clear as there was a general discussion about moving “some” of the collections to Castle Hill to make room for “creative industries”.
– The Parramatta Powerhouse will focus on Science and Technology but there will be no permanent exhibition at all.
– There was a lengthy technical discussion by water experts on flood risks in Parramatta and the wisdom (or lack of) of building a new “world class” institution on a flood-prone river bank, but no meaningful conclusion.
– Suzette Meade, Spokesperson for the North Parramatta Resident Action Group deplored the decision to demolish Willow Grove Mansion and gut St George Terraces while Parramatta Lord Mayor Donna Davis opposed the loss of the building “undercroft” as public space.
North Parramatta Residents Action Group (NPRAG) wrote later:
Their regular email newsletter reported on 17 April on local issues of concern and interest. It included: ‘Powerhouse Museum Inquiry Hearing: On March 17th this year a further hearing was held for the Upper House Inquiry into Powerhouse Museum and other Cultural institutions. This inquiry was very timely as we had just seen again the evidence of water heavy rain does to the project site on Phillip Street. The former minister for arts and heritage Don Harwin is now ironically on the inquiry committee mainly spending his time answering questions instead of asking them. NPRAG secretary Suzette Meade appeared beside Lord Mayor Donna Davis. Suzette focussed her time on the community sadness and anger over the demolition of WillowGrove by the State Government and tabling a set of images from the recent rain events as well as the debris collected around the river front. The Lord Mayor focussed on the lack of evacuation plan from the state government and pointing out that it’s not even required until the project requires final occupation certificates to open, as well as council’s planners still being very unhappy with the undercroft design of the building with flood waters and public safety. The same day the flood expert John Macintosh from the Brisbane Grantham Floods gave his expert testimony beside ARUP the state government engineers who are professionally advising that the Parramatta Powerhouse site is safe.  During questioning the committee got ARUP to admit that they had not been treating riverine and overland flooding as one event in heavy rainfall but two separate events.  This inquiry hearing session is also very good viewing and explains the still inherent danger of building this project on this flood prone site.’ NPRAG April 17

15 March, 2022
Government budget committee includes debate about Powerhouse Museum developments
Portfolio Committee No 1 – Premier and finance, is an inquiry that ‘was established on 23 June 2021 to report on the Budget Estimates and related papers for the financial year 2021-2022 presenting the amounts to be appropriated from the Consolidated Fund.’
The transcript includes considerable discussion about the proposed funding and future of the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, the proposed additional site in Parramatta and the storage facilities at Castle Hill. Present were the former Museums Inquiry member, now Minister of Arts, Ben Franklin, and Executive Officer of the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences, Lisa Havilah.
For an extract of the relevant discussion Read here: 15 March NSW Govt Budget committee
To see members of the committee and read the full transcript go to Here;   and select 15/03/2022 Jubilee Room, Parliament House, Sydney, Transcript, here.

3 March, 2022
‘Fears Lismore art gallery’s entire collection lost in NSW floods’
In a report that draws attention to the dangers for all museums and galleries on flood-prone sites (including the proposed relocation of the Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta), Royce Kurmelovs records in the Guardian that: ‘There are fears the entire collection at the Lismore Regional Gallery may have been lost during the catastrophic floods in northern New South Wales. The gallery director, Ashleigh Ralph, said that while no one had been able to get access to the building to confirm the situation, flood waters had risen 2.5 metres higher than expected, which meant the top floor of the gallery had been inundated. “The collection we stored up there, it’s got all our major exhibitions on the second floor in case of flooding. Most of them would have been flooded,” Ralph said. “That includes hundreds and hundreds of works from the collection.”
The gallery houses several collections from local artists and the Afghan war rugs collection being toured by the Australian National University Drill Hall Gallery… “It’s a huge blow to the community,” Ralph said. “There’s so much history in our collection. Historical works, from artists in the region, that tell our story. And also the gallery is a place where everyone comes together and shares cultural experiences.” … The gallery also houses the Hannah Cabinet, a stunningly intricate cabinet built by master craftsman Geoff Hannah over six years. It is the product of 5,000 hours of work, contains 34 types of timber and veneers, 17 types of stone, four species of shell and 23-carat gold leaf. Hannah, whose home, workshop and woodworking machines were flooded, said he was braced to learn the fate of the cabinet… Hannah, whose home, workshop and woodworking machines were flooded, said he was braced to learn the fate of the cabinet.’ Read more: or Guardian 2 March Lismore floods

2 March, 2022
‘Brisbane floods: pondering the wisdom of placing our major galleries, libraries and theatres on the banks of a flood-prone river’
The Conversation also published  identified dangers to public cultural institutions in Brisbane, and recalled floods over recent years. Read more. 

1 March, 2022
‘Flood disaster for arts sector’
Richard Watts records in ArtsHub, that: ‘Artists and organisations in northern NSW and south-east Qld have been badly impacted by the latest extreme weather events. A ‘rain bomb’ across northern NSW and south-east Queensland has severely impacted arts organisations in two states.The damage is especially bad in the Northern Rivers region of NSW, where two people are confirmed to have died and central Lismore was inundated. At its height, the Wilson River peaked at 14.4 metres, causing the worst flooding in history and rising so high that Lismore Regional Gallery was inundated. Read more 

24 February 2022
‘Flash floods threaten to sink Powerhouse Museum in Sydney’
Joanne Tran writes in The Australian: ‘The future of Sydney’s new Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta has been questioned after the construction site flooded in wild weather, despite assurances it was in a “one-in-1000 year” flood zone. More than 100mm of rain has been recorded in some areas of Sydney’s west, with severe thunderstorm warnings for Sydney and heavy rainfall forecast for the next week. With the museum construction site partially submerged on Wednesday, critics have again attacked the suitability of the riverside location.
Multiple experts at the initial planning stages had questioned the NSW government’s decision to move the existing Powerhouse museum to a high risk flood zone, next to the Parramatta River, former trustee of the museum Kylie Winkworth told The Australian. “It tells you how much they understand about museums” she said.’ In contrast, ‘Former arts minister Don Harwin had claimed new site was in a “one-in-1000-year flood zone”. But frequent flash flooding happened every year in Parramatta, according to local environment consultant Steven Molino, who has spent more than 20 years advising various groups and governments on flood risks.“Rare floods would enter the building and through the museum” Mr Molino said.Mr Molino said the state government “has not done a proper risk assessment”. Read more: Australian 24 Feb Parra

24 February, 2022
‘Calls for Perrottet to Pull the Handbrake on Harwin’s Pleasure Palace in Parramatta’
In a Media release, Suzette Meade from the North Parramatta Residents Action Group, wrote: ‘This week a minor deluge over only 70mm rain saw the banks of Parramatta River inundate the proposed Powerhouse Parramatta construction site. It’s a well-known local sight annually to see a downpour of rain double this amount that would fill the former David Jones carpark site. Social media pages were overflowing with comments from locals asking why is the government not listening to us – this is the wrong site. North Parramatta Residents Action Group have been advocating since 2016 for a Museum Of NSW to be funded in the state government owned 26ha Cumberland Hospital Precinct just 950m north of the flood prone site – that would celebrate the Dharug and migratory narratives of Parramatta. NPRAG call on the Premier to minimise the build plans on the Parramatta River site before the build starts to just one tower on street level to house the conference centre and kitchen auditorium facilities announced this month. Then open up the riverbank to a much need public park for civic events as City of Parramatta council had always planned as part of their Civic Link. “Premier Perrotett could put a stop to Harwins’ pleasure palace in Parramatta – he just needs to pull the hand brake” said Ms Meade Secretary of NPRAG. “There is very little community support for this project, if Domenic Perrotett wanted to really show his government is listening to the community of Parramatta, he would make a visionary call to redirect the museum funding to deliver a cultural precinct that the community actually want beside the female convict site – that doesn’t flood.” Meade added. Read more:  NPRAG Perrotett pull the hand brake

 23 February, 2022
‘Parramatta Powerhouse: NSW arts minister dismisses claims $915m museum is being built on a flood zone’
The Guardian reports that: “As the banks of the Parramatta River steadily rose and engulfed the Powerhouse Parramatta museum construction site on Tuesday afternoon, the state’s politicians in Macquarie Street were arguing about what constituted a one-in-100-year flood. Labor member of the legislative council, Walt Secord, grilled the new New South Wales arts minister, Ben Franklin, during question time. He attempted to table images and video from his phone to prove that the government’s controversial choice of site for the museum – one that will house many of the state’s most valuable and irreplaceable objects from 2025 onward – was misguided and foolhardy. Franklin, in response, said it was “patently absurd”, “far-fetched and utterly unreasonable” to suggest that the new museum, still in the very early stages of construction, would fail the City of Parramatta Council’s requirement to withstand a one in 100 year flood level, and that even in the case of a one-in-1,000 year flood, the ground floor of the museum would still remain half a metre above the flood waters…. Local resident and freelance writer Alan Mascarenhas, who lives less than 500 metres from the museum site and captured images and video of the waterlogged site on Tuesday, said locals knew how prone the area was to regular flooding. “It only takes a couple of hours of sustained rain and the whole place is waterlogged,” he told Guardian Australia. “By yesterday afternoon the walkway down there was obliterated on all sides.”
In February 2019, the NSW State Emergency Service’s senior manager for risk reduction and avoidance, George Jeoffreys, warned that Parramatta CBD residents could have as little as nine minutes warning of flash flooding from the river. Even in a best-case scenario, he said, the best warning the SES could give the public would be only two hours out from an event, making evacuation “difficult, if not impossible”. The $915m Powerhouse Parramatta project’s location on the banks of the flood-prone river has been an ongoing bone of contention between the state government, the opposition and a large group of local residents who are not opposed to a new major museum in the area, but are opposed to its current location.
A month before the Parramatta River broke its banks and flooded the construction site in March last year, independent Parramatta-based flood management consultant Steven Molino told a state government inquiry the museum’s proposed one-in-1,000 year scenario meant that in the building’s predicted 100-year lifespan, there was a 10% chance that water was going to get into the building. “If it was an office building with just office furniture and carpets and everything, it wouldn’t matter … “But the information we have at present suggests that the electrical power supply will go out [during flooding] and the generators won’t operate the air conditioning system. So you’ll have a spike in humidity … and if you’ve got items in the collection made from paper, textiles, and even wood and some metals, [the museum’s] collection will deteriorate, be possibly irreparably damaged or even lost. “Now the decision might be made that the probability of this occurring is an acceptable risk, but no one has gone through that process.” Read more: Guardian 23 Feb 2022

17 February, 2022
‘Western Sydney Rich Lister makes big donation to new Parramatta museum’
Michael Bailey, Rich List co-editor in The Financial Review, reports that: ‘The Powerhouse Parramatta project has revealed another Financial Review Rich Lister donor – property developer Arnold Vitocco has followed Lang Walker in supporting the building of NSW’s largest museum in Sydney’s west.’ They ‘will invest $5 million across two programs that will be run by Powerhouse Parramatta when the $915 million museum opens on the Parramatta River in 2025. The Vitocco Family Kitchen promises to bring together chefs with producers from across Australia, and showcase food technology and education in a 200-seat presentation space equipped with a large demonstration kitchen… The Kitchen will integrate with the Powerhouse’s existing Australian Culinary Archive, which is collecting histories and recipes from leading chefs and producers. Meanwhile, the Vitocco Legacy Project will fund a full-time curator to research, collect and share stories of innovations and entrepreneurial spirit that have sprung from western Sydney.’ Read more: 17 Feb FinRev Culinary donation
[Note: many comments from readers include noting that ‘It’s not a museum, it’s a function and expo centre’; asking ‘whether this leads to a glorified food hall’, as ‘Masterchef or Museum’, and asking when they will announce the Casino; and noting that ‘yet another Development construction firm is donating to put its own business in the milk crate. It’s a perfect match.’]

 11 February, 2022
‘Powerhouse Ultimo Renewal’
‘On behalf of Create NSW (the proponent)’, Curio Projects (heritage consultants) placed an advertisement in the Sydney Morning Herald, seeking ‘registration from local Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders community members with respect to a proposed development. The project site is Powerhouse Ultimo…within the City of Sydney LGA….The purpose of community consultation … is to assist …in the preparation of an Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report (ACHAR) to support a submission of a State Significant Development Application (SSDA) and to assist the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Development in their consideration and determination of the SSDA.’ Read more: 11 February SMH PHM Renewal

11 January, 2022
‘Labor takes the reins at Parramatta Council after Liberals’ retreat’
Following recent Council elections, Megan Gorrey reports in the Sydney Morning Herald about major changes in Parramatta, [that could have an impact on the development of the Parramatta Powerhouse Museum and other historic sites.] She wrote: ‘Labor has seized control of Sydney’s fastest-growing CBD for the first time in more than a decade, after the Liberal Party deserted a string of councils in the local government elections. Councillor Donna Davis was elected unopposed as the new lord mayor of the City of Parramatta, in Sydney’s west…Cr Davis is the council’s first Labor mayor since 2008, and the third woman to hold the job in the city’s 160-year history. She has worked for state and federal MPs and held various roles in the public service…The decision could create a series of political headaches for Dominic Perrottet’s government, which faces the prospect of ramped up opposition to Coalition policies from Labor-dominated councils at a meeting on Monday night.’
“With a Labor mayor and a progressive council … we will be advocating for our community, which is something I feel has been lacking in recent years because there’s been a lot more advocating for state government projects,” she said… She named her priorities as improving community consultation, preserving green space as the city’s population balloons from 257,000 to an estimated 455,000 in the next 15 years, and more affordable housing.’
…Cr Davis’ election comes at a critical juncture for the City of Parramatta, which is overseeing an unprecedented wave of public and private investment. Developer Lang Walker is transforming the centre of the CBD with his $2.7 billion Parramatta Square project. The council is also pushing ahead with its $100 million revamp of the Riverside Theatre, and the $88.6 million Parramatta pool. The state government has earmarked the area for substantial investment, including the light rail line linking Westmead with central Parramatta, and a new metro rail line.
In addition, the state government is building the $533 million Parramatta Powerhouse. Cr Davis has been a vocal opponent of the plan to relocate the historic villa Willow Grove to make way for the museum – a position she said she would not resile from. “I’ve always said I support state government investment in arts and culture in Parramatta,” Cr Davis said. Read more   or  SMH Donna Davis 11 Jan 2022

 18-23 December
Reports of changes in NSW Government ministry, including resignation of Arts Minister Don Harwin, and appointment of Ben Franklin.
(Note:  Harwin was appointed to the Select Committee for Museums, meeting on 17 March 2022, and then on 18 March finally announced forthcoming resignation: see  Resignation:  or Harwin SMH 18 March 2022  )

22 December, 2021
‘Harwin’s exit is a blow to the arts’
Music specialist Annie Whealy writes in the Sydney Morning Herald about her view of retiring arts minister Don Harwin’s popularity in the performing arts world, as experienced by applause for him at two recent Sydney concerts …’Why? Simply because, for these audiences and their performers, Harwin — largely unknown outside the sphere of government — was rightly seen as the saviour of the arts in NSW. ‘
‘What was even more startling was this: by last Saturday it was clear that Harwin was no longer to be a minister in the NSW government. Of course, the new Premier has every right to pick and choose his ministry. That is not in doubt. However, we have to ask this question: what political or other imperative led to the departure of a man, widely regarded as the most successful arts minister in Australia? It is unlikely that we shall ever know or understand the answer to this question.
First, he generally admired and respected all manifestations of the arts. He was not one of those politicians who belittle the so-called “elitism” of classical music, theatre and dance. He did not, like some, regard the arts as the fodder of the privileged middle class. He rightly saw the sector as a civilising aspect of our community life. Second, Harwin was always available to give advice and encouragement. He nurtured and supported smaller ensembles. …
Harwin was not everybody’s cup of tea. No doubt he trod on a few toes. He may have been seen by some to have preferenced the smaller ensembles over and above larger organisations, already wellsupported. His closeness to Gladys Berejiklian may not have stood him in good stead after Dominic Perrottet’s ascension. Whatever his faults, he will be long admired among the arts community. As an erstwhile performer myself, I am conscious that many young performers will be deeply saddened by his departure. The applause at the recent concerts was heartfelt.
So, what is the future for the arts in NSW? There is hope that new Arts Minister Ben Franklin of the Nationals, who has served as parliamentary secretary for the arts, will carry on the vision of Don Harwin, especially in his avowed support for the provision of cultural life and artistic development in the regions. In a recent speech to Parliament, Franklin acknowledged his government’s support for the sector. “The government has supported the industry, individuals and organisations in a way they desperately needed … the government takes this very seriously,” he said.’   Read more:  or  22 Dec SMH Harwin
[See earlier news reports and papers on this website: Harwin was not ‘widely regarded as the most successful arts minister.’ Powerhouse Museum Alliance reminds readers that Harwin advocated for years that the Powerhouse Museum’s Ultimo site could become a Lyric Theatre, and that he also supported the demolition of the historic Willow Grove building in Parramatta to make way for a questionable ‘Powerhouse Parramatta’.] 

20 December, 2021
‘Major reshuffle as new blood enter Perrottet’s cabinet’
Alexandra Smith writes in The Sydney Morning Herald that: ‘Premier Dominic Perrottet has put his stamp on the NSW government ahead of the 2023 election, increasing the number of Liberal women in his new cabinet by one and elevating nine first-time ministers in a major reshuffle. As the state battles the highest number of COVID-19 cases of the pandemic, Mr Perrottet said his new cabinet was “the best team to lead NSW out of the” situation and “take it to the next level”.
There are nine first-time ministers in the new cabinet: Miranda MP Eleni Petinos, Goulburn MP Wendy Tuckerman, Natasha Maclaren-Jones MLC, Cootamundra Nationals MP Steph Cooke, Manly MP James Griffin, Oatley MP Mark Coure, Dubbo MP Dugald Saunders, Ben Franklin MLC and Sam Farraway MLC.’
The report also includes access to the ‘Full NSW cabinet list’, which shows two new appointments relevant to museums in NSW:
Ben Franklin: Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Regional Youth James Griffin: Minister for Environment and Heritage.
Read more:  or  20 Dec SMH New cabinet

20 December, 2021
‘Review launched into galleries and museums’ services’

Relevant to changes in NSW government ministry of the arts, Linda Morris wrote in the Sydney Morning Herald that: ‘The state government has launched a review of the back of house services of the Sydney Opera House and Art Gallery of NSW and other major cultural institutions. Consultancy firm Deloitte has been engaged to investigate “corporate and common services” across all agencies inside the Department of Premier and Cabinet, except for “integrity agencies” such as the Independent Commission Against Corruption and the Audit Office. The Opera House, Powerhouse Museum, Australian Museum and Art Gallery of NSW, and State Library all sit within the department.’
‘News of the review comes as the leadership of Create NSW, the government’s arts, screen, and infrastructure agency, has come under fire from within. A leaked internal staff survey from October shows fewer than one in five bureaucrats were confident in how grievances, changes, and recruitment are managed within the agency…Department of Premier’s deputy secretary Kate Foy told a recent budget estimates hearing that a two-year restructure of Create NSW had not concluded.’
‘“Sadly, Create NSW has become an organisation rife with division, uncertainty, politicisation, and political interference,” Labor’s Walt Secord said.… Meanwhile, the Create NSW spokesman said Deloitte’s survey was intended to “identify opportunities, learnings, and best practice processes”.’  Read more:  or  20 Dec SMH Cultural review

18 December, 2021
‘Theatre plans up in the air as “legendary” Harwin exits arts portfolio’
Linda Morris wrote in the Sydney Morning Herald that ‘Weeks before former NSW arts minister Don Harwin announced his resignation from the NSW cabinet on Saturday, he finalised a strategy to increase the number of theatres and film studios in Sydney. That strategy will be presented to the expenditure review committee next year in his absence after he announced his departure from the ministry on Saturday and, at the end of this parliamentary term, his exit from politics. Harwin had many detractors but none would begrudge the energy the lover of music, visual arts, and dance brought to his portfolio … Under former premier Gladys Berejiklian, arts had a seat at the centre table of government. As a Berejiklian loyalist, Harwin delivered record capital works spending for the Australian Museum ($50.5 million), Powerhouse at Ultimo ($480-$500 million), Sydney Modern ($240 million) and Walsh Bay Arts Precinct ($370 million). In the Perrottet cabinet, however, Harwin was an outsider who had lost some influence as a numbers man to Treasurer Matt Kean. His proximity to power was diminished. He chose to resign but in reality, he had no choice but to make way for the changing of the guard … About his resignation, Powerhouse Museum CEO Lisa Havilah said: “He had that strategic and expansive thinking that has come from a deep and personal passion joined by an extraordinary expertise to get outcomes in government…”. But Morris notes that: ‘He lost political skin when he was discovered to have interfered in the awarding of arts funding grants in 2018 … He misjudged the truculent opposition to his government’s decision to relocate the Powerhouse Museum from Ultimo to Parramatta. That decision was overturned by Berejiklian and the now-Premier at the 11th hour in July 2020.… The protests go on with Suzette Meade – representing those who opposed the demolition of the historic property of Willow Grove to be rebuilt elsewhere – calling on the Premier to use Harwin’s departure to immediately review the Parramatta Powerhouse project. She said it lacked community support or even the “promise to deliver an actual museum”.’ Read more    or  18 Dec SMH Harwin

8/19 December, 2021
‘Melinda Pavey dropped from cabinet ahead of long-anticipated reshuffle; Harwin steps down’
Megan Gorrey, Amelia McGuire and Linda Morris wrote in the Sydney Morning Herald that among changes announced in appointments of ministers: ‘Long-serving Nationals MP Melinda Pavey has been dumped as a NSW minister ahead of a widely tipped reshuffle this weekend by Premier Dominic Perrottet,’ and that ‘Upper House MP Don Harwin – Special Minister of State, and Minister for the Public Service and Employee Relations, Aboriginal Affairs, and the Arts — and Local Government Minister Shelley Hancock also resigned from cabinet on Saturday and said they were not seeking a role in the new ministry’  … ‘Mr Harwin said he had been considering in recent weeks whether he would be able to commit to another eight-year term beyond the election. …Labor’s spokesman for the arts and heritage Walt Secord said no-one could dispute Mr Harwin’s genuine love of the arts. “While I used to needle him that he was not in the league of former arts ministers Peter Collins, George Souris and Bob Debus – he was,” he said.   Read more:   or  19 Dec SMH Harwin resigns

2 December, 2021
Save the Powerhouse group reported on their Facebook page, that ‘Publication last week of the NSW Government’s “Pyrmont Peninsula sub-precinct master plans” https://www.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/pyrmont-master-plans is refuelling doubts about the uncertain future of the Harwood Building in Ultimo, which has long been central to the Powerhouse Museum’s operations and storage of the collections.
These new plans list the Powerhouse Museum as a site “capable of change” (ie rezoning) and state that any “change” would be “City of Sydney Council led” which could easily mean that, as feared earlier, the Harwood Building might be demolished to make way for taller structures.
This hypothesis is supported by approval last April of the proposed Castle Hill Discovery Centre expansion “Building J” and comments by the Planning Minister Rob Stokes that “the entire 500,000-piece Powerhouse collection will be housed and cared for on one site when not on display at Parramatta or Ultimo…It will be capable of housing aircraft, historic trains, and helicopters.”
The rezoning possibility once again raises the question of what is to become of the Harwood Building, and flatly contradicts reassurances received in May from the Department of Planning) by Powerhouse Museum Alliance representative Kylie Winkworth regarding the expansion, DPIE Spokesperson Candace Pon repeatedly asserted that “the Applicant (Create NSW) has advised that the proposal DOES NOT SEEK TO REPLACE EXISTING OPERATIONAL OR FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS OF THE POWERHOUSE.”
Yet, despite repeated fruitless challenges to Pon to produce the “advice that the Applicant provided to the DPIE”, Winkworth acknowledges that “I could not find this advice in any of the EIS reports. On the contrary, the EIS development objectives include: provide storage for all of the MAAS collection objects (Milestone Consulting EIS September 2020, 3.3 p.11). She comments finally “In the absence of documentary evidence it seems that the conclusion of the Assessment report that the proposal does not seek to replace existing operational or functional components of the Powerhouse is factually wrong. It is actually one of the project’s stated objectives…”
It is not clear (yet) where this leaves the extremely vulnerable Harwood Building. It seems unlikely that the Planning Minister himself would make a mistake – or even seek to mislead – about the true purpose of the Castle Hill expansion, yet how can DPIE’s statements (his own department!) be explained? What is obvious, is that the irreplaceable Harwood Building is under increased threat, which must inspire many thousands of PHM supporters to fight on to “Save the Powerhouse”! And what’s more, we have just learnt http://tiny.cc/z54muz that the derelict Newtown Tram Depot may be restored. This building is locally heritage-listed but the City of Sydney has so far declined to similarly list the Harwood Building which has a much more distinguished history and is well preserved.’
If you want to know more before making a submission about these plans, you can attend an information session:
– Online: http://tiny.cc/g34muz (general community)
– Online http://tiny.cc/j34muz (business focused)
– Pyrmont Community Centre: http://tiny.cc/m34muz
– Pyrmont Community Centre: http://tiny.cc/n34muz
– Online: http://tiny.cc/q34muz (general community)
and lodge your submission at https://www.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/pyrmont-master-plans before 04 Feb 2022.

1 December, 2021 (in print 2 Dec)
‘It was once home to thousands of prisoners, now it’s set to be Sydney’s next museum’
Sydney Morning Herald:
Following a media event by Arts Minister Don Harwin on December 1, Linda Morris reported that ‘Parramatta’s Female Factory – where thousands of convict women were held on arrival in the NSW colony – is to be converted into a history museum. Arts minister Don Harwin also pledged to work towards achieving World Heritage Listing for the historic landmark. Almost $54 million was announced Tuesday by the NSW government to “secure, restore and preserve the culture, heritage and future use” of the three-hectare heritage precinct by the Parramatta River… Gay Hendriksen, the president of the Parramatta Female Factory Friends, welcomed the government’s museum commitment… The bulk of the funding – $43.7 million – will go towards the conservation and upgrade of the historic buildings and the opening of a tech-startup hub and cafe. Keller House, part of the Parramatta Girls Home, will be repaired and maintained as a Keeping Place for members of Australia’s Stolen Generation. A further $3 million has been allocated to prepare a business case for the factory museum that would tell the story of the building’s history and significance. Another $3 million has been set aside to identify cultural uses inside the precinct. Listed on the national heritage register in 2017, the Female Factory was built by Governor Lachlan Macquarie to house female convicts in the colony.’ Read more   or   2 Dec SMH Parra FF   

Parra News:
‘$54 million cash splash for future of Parramatta Female Factory precinct’
Staff writers also report Harwin’s announcement, including: ‘Minister for Water, Property and Housing Melinda Pavey said the area is a place of compelling stories and history with enormous cultural significance to the Traditional Owners.  “We are also working in collaboration with Deerubbin Local Aboriginal Land Council (LALC) on future uses for sites within the precinct,” she said. “The Western Sydney Startup Hub and café will be the first major activation of the site in 2022 which will be a vibrant place for the community to meet, collaborate and exchange skills and ideas. “With fundingecured for additional heritage upgrades, we can now plan for future tenancy and activation of the buildings and open spaces bringing more jobs and opportunities to the area.”’ Read more   or  2 Dec Parra News

Facebook comments:
North Parramatta Residents Action Group (NPRAG), one of the local groups that has beencampaigning for many years for the preservation of the Parramatta Female Factory precinct, expresses great concern that much of the site will be passed over for high-rise development. They say: ‘$53.8 for women’s history museum at Female Factory as long as it prostitutes half of the national heritage site for a business hub for Stuart Ayres and hands over 20ha to Sydney Uni to build 1000s of units in its backyard … thousands of units in buildings up to 31 stories high is not sympathetic to one of our most historic sites at Fleet Street Heritage Precinct.  If this high density development goes ahead there will be no world heritage listing.’

Fleet Street Heritage Precinct asks: ‘Fascinating but what’s the catch?! Finally Minister Don Harwin aims for adding Parramatta Female Factory & Institutions ‘Heritage Core’ (7ha), to the UNESCO World Heritage Australian Convict Sites with arts & cultural uses – whilst Geoff Lee – MP, Seat of Parramatta is non-specific what “championing for the site since first elected” means – when not referring to the unsolicited Sydney Uni plans to infill unconstrained accommodation developer interests (potentially 1000s units) as indicated by Department of Planning, Industry and Environment ‘Place Strategy’ (draft march 2021) and essentially destroy the Botanic Gardens Openspace cultural landscape, more heritage buildings (eg, Jacaranda House for a proposed bridge, and road grid utterly disregarding decades of State Heritage Conservation Management Plans for the (20ha) Cumberland Hospital State Heritage site balance. Interestingly Geoff Lee MP is opposed to 193 units as out of character in Oatlands.’

5 November, 2021 (in print 6 November)
‘Parramatta Powerhouse costs surge as opening looks set for 2024’
In the Sydney Morning Herald, Linda Morris follows up a budget hearing on 29 October in NSW Parliament on the ‘Examination of proposed expenditure for the portfolio area, Special Minister of State, public Service and Employee Relations, Aboriginal Affairs and the Arts.’ Re Powerhouse Parramatta See pages 29-31, 34-35, 38. Transcript – PC 1 – 29 October 2021 – Special Minister of State (Harwin)
Morris reports that: ‘The building costs of the NSW government’s flagship Parramatta Powerhouse have surged beyond half a billion dollars, the signed contract shows. Lendlease has been contracted to deliver the museum’s western Sydney headquarters for $553 million, inclusive of GST. This exceeds the $400 million base build costs originally identified in the stage 1 brief to the project’s 2019 design competition. The summary of the contract signed between Infrastructure NSW and the winning contractor was due to have been released to the public late Friday in line with statutory requirements. Construction begins January 24, 2022, with the museum to be completed by May 2024, suggesting an opening date later that year.
An Infrastructure NSW spokesperson said the contract sum was within the budget originally set for the museum project. The $400 million construction cost target was nominated for the design competition to guide the design teams in the preparation of their concept design and design fee proposals. The Lendlease contract value of $502.8 million, less GST, reflected the delivery by mid-2024 of the approved design and includes cost escalation, design fees and some fit-out scope. …But Greens MP David Shoebridge, deputy chairman of the long-running inquiry into the Powerhouse, said the project was $150 million over budget before the first sod had been turned. “…With the escalated cost of construction, if the project is to be delivered on budget, there will need to be a significant compromise in the fit-out and function.”
Powerhouse management has been set a target of $75 million to raise from private philanthropists and corporations to meet the capital cost of the museum, including its fit-out. Board member and developer Lang Walker made a sizeable $20 million philanthropic donation towards the funding of a live-in residential campus and in-school programs from 2022 for schools in the Blacktown, Campbelltown, Liverpool, Bankstown, Penrith and Parramatta LGAs. Western Sydney University has contributed $10 million to become the museum’s foundation partner. Of the $30 million committed in total, $23 million will go towards the building’s costs, the rest in programs.’ And while there is no evidence of other donations, Arts Minister Don Harwin claimed: ’“I think you should assume that we will do well and maybe even exceed both targets at the Powerhouse.” Read more.  or:  5 Nov PP Costs surge SMH Morris
[However, Powerhouse Museum Alliance and others have observed in previous reports (see 22 October below), that donors Lang Walker and Western Sydney University are already project partners and could be following their own preferences rather than that of a state museum.]

26 October, 2021
At last: Powerhouse Museum opens again!
On October 10, 2021, as the CoVid Lockdown eased, the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo was at last able to open its doors to allow visitors to see five new exhibitions (see below). As renovations proceed on the Ultimo site, more exhibitions will open soon. See more details here.   Also check Facebook references to all.
‘Clay Dynasty’: Celebrates studio ceramics in Australia as shaped by three generations of makers: from the 1960s pioneers who transformed the functional pottery tradition to contemporary ceramic artists who continue to push the medium … it features more than 400 objects from the Powerhouse’s significant ceramics collection.
‘Eucalyptusdom’: reckons with our cultural history and ever-changing relationship with the gum tree, presenting over 400 objects from the Powerhouse Collection alongside 17 newly commissioned works by creative practitioners working across the fields of design, architecture, film, applied arts and performance.
‘Graphic Identities’: highlights eight ground-breaking Australian design archives from the Powerhouse Collection. Featuring work from celebrated 20th Century designers including Douglas Annand, Frances Burke, Gordon Andrews and Arthur Leydin, the exhibition explores the role of visual communication in shaping contemporary Australian culture.
‘Robert Rosen Glitterati’:  Over four decades [Rober Rosen has] attended parties, concerts, fashion events and nightclubs across London, Europe and Australia, capturing the rich, famous and fabulous for the social pages of a slew of local and international newspapers and magazines.
‘Electric keys’: At the end of 2020 the Powerhouse acquired an important private collection of keyboards from the middle of the 20th century,…These electronic keyboards complement the existing collection of mechanical instruments  [and] Together they create a unique opportunity to explore modern keyboard development and its contribution to the genres of jazz, pop, rock, soul and prog-rock.

22 October 2021
Media release: ‘Historic $30 million commitment to Powerhouse Parramatta’ – and critical comments
Geoff Lee, Member for Parramatta and Minister for Skills and Tertiary Education announced in a media release that ‘The NSW Government today announced a combined $30 million dollar investment in Powerhouse Parramatta – one of the largest donations ever to an arts and cultural institution in Australia. A $20 million donation from the Walker Family Foundation – the second-largest donation to any Western Sydney institution in history – will deliver the Lang Walker Family Academy, a ground-breaking program to deliver world-class immersive science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) education experiences for over 10,000 high school students from Western Sydney and regional NSW every year – including overnight stays at the museum for many of these students. Western Sydney University has committed $10 million to Powerhouse Parramatta confirming its place as the museum’s Foundation University Partner. This significant investment reinforces the University’s ongoing commitment to developing the next generation of Australian innovators, scientists and entrepreneurs.’ Read more here   or here:  22 Oct Media Release re donation
This was also announced on the MAAS website as: ’Powerhouse Parramatta: our Foundation partners. The Powerhouse is pleased to announce an extraordinary $30 million investment in the future of Powerhouse Parramatta by The Walker Family Foundation and Western Sydney University (WSU) … As part of this significant partnership, WSU will embed researchers in the Museum to create joint research opportunities with Powerhouse curators, there will be an annual WSU Scholar-in-Residence at the Museum, as well as international exchange programs for WSU students. WSU will be Supporting Partner of the Lang Walker Family Academy and will be naming rights partner of the Powerhouse Research Library as well as one of the seven ground-breaking exhibition spaces.’ Read more here.
However, Kelly Burke writes in The Guardian, of billionaire property developer Lang Walker’s ‘hefty $20m donation’ to the ‘controversial Powerhouse Parramatta project’,  that ‘Property developer Walker joined the board of trustees for the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences, better known as Ultimo’s Powerhouse museum, in November 2020…Announced on Friday, the $30m will go a considerable way towards reaching the $75m in philanthropic donations Powerhouse Parramatta must raise if the project is to go ahead.’ And after commenting on research into other philanthropic  offers, she says ‘The Guardian understands no other funds have so far been secured.’ Read more here, or   Lang Walker Guardian 22 Oct 2021
Furthermore, it is significant that a partnership had already existed between the two donors. On 17 December 2019 ‘Western Sydney University and the Lang Walker founded Walker Group are pleased to announce a strategic partnership that will deliver the highest quality new educational and medical research facilities for south-western Sydney, including a world-class medical research centre for the rapidly-growing Macarthur region.’ Read more here.  
[Powerhouse Museum Alliance asks if both institutions are simply using the new ‘Museum’ space for their own benefit, without understanding or caring about the history and purpose of the museum itself. This donation appears to be not about the $70m the PHM is required to raise for its own museum development and programs – it is about ‘education programs’  linked to WSU sites and programs, and using the new ‘museum’ site as a convenient location. MP Geoff Lee says in his media release: “Powerhouse Parramatta will be so much more than a museum and the STEM programs and opportunities delivered by the Lang Walker Family Academy will prepare our children for the future and develop and inspire the scientists, engineers, and innovative thinkers the future needs – right here in Western Sydney.”’
But PMA asks ‘why should it be “more than a museum” Geoff Lee? However badly conceived, it was always meant to be an informative and engaging museum based on its diverse collection, and not superseded by preferences of other institutions.]

24 August, 2021
‘Weep for Willow Grove’: Union lifts green ban, removal to go ahead

Linda Morris reported in the Sydney Morning Herald that: ‘A green ban has been lifted on the historic villa Willow Grove, ending a four-year public campaign and lengthy union stand-off to keep it on site. The NSW branch of the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union announced on Tuesday it had reached an agreement with the state government, a day after contractors began tearing down the building’s modern extensions. The dramatic reversal amounts to an admission that, due to COVID-19 led public health restrictions, the union was unable to enforce the green ban that until now had stalled Willow Grove’s dismantling and relocation to a new Parramatta site. It paves the way for the construction of the second Powerhouse Museum on the bank of the Parramatta River, a project expected to generate thousands of direct and indirect jobs and take until 2024 to finish. In a statement, the NSW CFMEU said it had received commitments from the government to establish a committee to oversee the dismantling, relocation, rebuild and reuse of the villa and its ongoing maintenance.’ and  ‘Union branch secretary Darren Greenfield said the campaign to save Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace would remain an important part of the heritage and story of Parramatta that would be “enjoyed by generations to come”.’ Morris also documented concerns from local groups including North Parramatta Residents Action Group, where spokesperson Suzette Meade said, ‘ “Residents could only weep for Willow Grove…The people of Parramatta will not forgive or forget. Democracy is dead when our government ignores all experts’ advice and community opinion.” But ‘Powerhouse trust president Peter Collins the decision was the right one for the many communities of western Sydney and the NSW economy’ and ‘Powerhouse chief executive Lisa Havilah said it was time to move forward with its communities and partners to deliver the new flagship museum in the heart of Parramatta.’ Read more.. or here: 24 August SMH LM Green Bans lifted

24 August, 2021
‘Weep For Willow Grove’
In a media release, North Parramatta Residents Action Group (NPRAG) wrote: ‘In what can only be described as a coward move the Berejiklian government has used the Covid Crisis to start the desecration of the Willow Grove site. While the community is unable to gather to defend and protect Willow Grove as Parramatta is under strict lockdown and a Covid Curfew. NPRAG has spent 4 years battling to save Parramatta’s much-loved heritage to be incorporated into a much-deserved museum. The CFMEUs principled stand to place a Greenban supporting the huge community groundswell has forced the government to save the 1880s St George Terraces and redesign the Powerhouse Parramatta project to incorporate this last remaining example of this architecture in our CBD streetscape. It is, however, incomprehensible that the government has refused to redesign the project to also retain the heritage listed Victorian Italianate Villa, Willow Grove. This will set a dangerous precedent for the future of heritage all over NSW.
Suzette Meade NPRAG Spokesperson said “We do not support Willow Groves relocation as a win for heritage and firmly believe it will lose all heritage significance when its removed from where it was built over a century ago.”…“To the people all over NSW that donated money to the Willow Grove court case, tied a heart on the fence, made signs and marched beside us – we thank you for your strong stand to demand better for our country’s heritage…NPRAG thanks the CFMEU and their members for their support and actions, bringing the May Day March to Parramatta demonstrated the union movements commitment to community and our heritage.’  Read more: WEEP FOR WILLOWGROVE NPRAG 24082021
On ABC early morning radio on 25 August NPRAG Secretary Suzette Meade was interviewed by Wendy Harmer and Robbie Buck (in the last 10 minutes) Here.
And on 27 August, NPRAG also published a media release,Willow Grove & St Georges Terrace Greenban Speech to CFMEU DELEGATES’. This was the speech given via Zoom to CFMEU delegates on 27 August, and started: ‘On behalf of NPRAG Executive committee and thousands of community members we would like to thank the CFMEU and its members for its principled stand to support the community over the past 18 months in our battle to stop the NSW Government from demolishing Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace. Your unwavering strength has given our community the willpower to stand up to the government and demand better for Parramatta’s heritage. Moving the May Day march from its traditional CBD route to Parramatta this year to support the Willow Grove Greenban was a proud day for everyone.’ Read more Here: NPRAG Thanks CFMEU Delegates 27 August 2021

16 August, 2021
‘Flawed court decisions betraying NSW’s heritage’
Save the Powerhouse Facebook group draws attention to Elizabeth Farrelly’s critique in the Sydney Morning Herald of the NSW planning system and its destruction of heritage buildings, including ‘the “irrational (court) judgment” in the case of Parramatta’s Willow Grove mansion.’
They say: ‘In a hard hitting “OPINION” column (SMH) on August 14, distinguished arts commentator Elizabeth Farrelly takes a swipe at NSW’s courts whose decisions are “failing (our) heritage” …“We should query the courts’ destructive role in planning democracy”, she says. “In theory, the courts…merely apply law-as-made…So bad court decisions should sheet home to bad law…Indeed, in NSW planning, bad law is almost the only sort we have. But there are also bad court decisions, irrational judgments and huge unintended consequences, which include skewing the results further towards the ultra-rich.” She cites several recent examples of such flawed legal decisions including the Arnott Mansion in Vaucluse, Bidura in Glebe or the bad court ruling to facilitate destruction of Burwood’s 1, Railway Parade to make space for an “irredeemably hideous apartment building”, before moving – naturally –  to  the “irrational (court) judgment” in the case of Parramatta’s Willow Grove mansion. “In February” she says “to enable the Powerhouse relocation to Parramatta, the government approved its own proposal to demolish and, at huge expense, “relocate” this building of crumbly 19th century brick.” …“Parramatta locals appealed for judicial review on the grounds that no alternative site or design to keep Willow Grove had been considered. Yet the judge found this legal requirement did not apply because “there is no feasible alternative which would permit retention of Willow Grove. THIS IS WRONG IN FACT”.“The National Trust petitioned Arts Minister Don Harwin to consider alternatives but he has not found time to meet…” ‘
Read here for the full article ‘Courting disaster and a conga line of bulldozers’, on line as ‘The swathe of demolition that proves courts are failing heritage’, or  Here,  or SMH Farrelly 14-15 August

14 August, 2021
‘Green ban’ defied as removal work begins on Willow Grove
Linda Morris reports in the Sydney Morning Herald that ‘Work on the $915 million Parramatta Powerhouse is set to begin with the construction contract to be signed within weeks of the historic home Willow Grove being brought down. Contractor Haus Building Services Pty Ltd moved on site Wednesday to start removal of the Italianate villa, the last surviving example of a riverside mansion in the Parramatta CBD… Work on the heritage site had been halted by a green ban imposed by NSW Branch of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime and Mining Union in June 2020 [with the backing of many other organisations].. COVID-related public health restrictions permit construction workers on building sites at 50 per cent capacity but bar public pickets and protests that might have enforced the green ban, a device used to protect The Rocks from redevelopment. The Berejiklian government has pledged that Willow Grove will be rebuilt on a new site…But formal public consultation to develop a shortlist of sites cannot start while the COVID-19 outbreak is not under control. “Currently with no public reports existing on how Willow Grove can even be relocated, or where or when it will ever see the light of day, it’s completely outrageous that any works commence on this site at all,” Suzette Meade, of the North Parramatta Residents’ Action group said. Labor’s spokesman for Arts and Heritage Walt Secord said the Heritage Council of NSW testified at a parliamentary inquiry yesterday that it did not provide an assessment of the heritage value of Willow Grove…“How can the Heritage Council of NSW not have an opinion on the heritage value when Willow Grove and the Powerhouse Museum were the second most debated arts issue, after COVID support to struggling artists?”… Infrastructure NSW confirmed work had resumed on the Powerhouse Parramatta site in line with the NSW Public Health Order, NSW Government COVID guidelines and the approved development application. “While Willow Grove cannot be retained on site, we remain committed to relocating [it], to return it to the community and make it available for future generations,” a spokesperson said.’ Read more here, or  here SMH 14 August Willow Grove demolition

14 August, 2021
‘Contractor Concerns at Willow Grove’
Save Willow Grove Facebook page draws attention to a report by Lachlan Kennedy on 10 News First, how ‘Work begins deconstructing the heritage listed Willow Grove villa at Parramatta, as Covid-19 health orders stop protests at the site.’ Save Willow Grove says: ‘Watch this great investigative piece … exposing the unknown builders hired by the government to demolish Willow Grove. Non-unionised Haus Building Services have no website and their registered business address is a sandwich shop called Sir Reuben  in Brighton Le Sands.  Make no mistake, this is a demo job by the Heritage minister to destroy Parramatta’s much loved Willow Grove. Thanks to National Trust Australia (NSW) for being part of this story and for their attempt to show an alternative design that retains Willow Grove where it belongs on Phillip Street.  Thanks to North Parramatta Residents Action Group – NPRAG for continuing to expose the government for their woeful treatment of community and heritage.’ A following post adds: ‘We have heard all the trees will be put through the wood chipper on the weekend. The community is unable to defend and protect its 140 year old heritage due to strict covid health orders. Our hands are tied.  No other country in the world treats its heritage with such disrespect and this all by the hand of the NSW Heritage Minister, Don Harwin.’ See 10 News here  And SWG Facebook here.

17 July, 2021
‘Parramatta Powerhouse Museum: Residents lose battle to save Willow Grove’
Joanne Vella follows up in the Parramatta Advertiser with further details about how ‘Demolition on a heritage-listed Parramatta villa is imminent to make way for the $915 million Powerhouse Museum after a community group’s legal battle was lost but they are defiant a green ban will halt the works’ and how ‘After years of trying to save heritage-listed Willow Grove, its relocation is imminent after a residents group lost an appeal against the government in the NSW Court of Appeal.’ She cites North Parramatta Residents’ Action Group (NPRAG) spokesperson Suzette Meade  as saying ‘”Plan A [Green Ban and protests] has always been the passion and the power of the community and unions working together” …”In the spirit of Jack Mundey, a CFMEU green ban will save this site and Willow Grove will remain on Phillip St forever. The legal proceedings were always our Plan B.” ‘And ‘Parramatta Labor councillor Donna Davis said the battle should never have ended in court. “My community is at a loss to understand why and how it has come to this,” she said.”The government has given a green light to the demolition of Willow Grove to be placed in storage indefinitely. How is that, on any level, acceptable and respectful?” However, Vella also notes that ‘the Western Sydney Powerhouse Community Alliance labelled NPRAG sore losers and said the court’s decision was “a victory for the families of Western Sydney”. “The original approval decision by the Department of Planning and the ruling of the Land & Environment Court have been upheld by the Supreme Court,” alliance chairman Christopher Brown said. “This is now strike three for the opponents of the Powerhouse Parramatta and it’s time for them to get out of the way.”’
Vella reminds us that: ‘In the Land and Environment Court in May, barrister Tim Hale told the hearing that Willow Grove, built in the 1870s, was regarded as a rare example as one of the earliest notable Victorian-style houses in the Parramatta region. Mr Hale said that out of 1303 submissions into Powerhouse feedback, 85.5 per cent opposed destroying Willow Grove and neighbouring St George’s Terrace, which is a row of two-storey terraces built in 1881. He said Infrastructure NSW’s EIS failed to inform the public of alternative sites for Powerhouse that would not jeopardise heritage buildings… While the government agreed to dismantle Willow Grove brick-by-brick, Mr Hale told the court 95.3 per cent of submissions opposed the “relocation”… But Infrastructure NSW’s barrister Richard Lancaster said the EIS “comfortably” and “substantially” complied with the topics of alternative sites and designs that incorporated Willow Grove the topics of alternative sites and designs that incorporated Willow Grove… He said alternative sites were not feasible — a submission which promoted scoffs from the pro-Willow Grove group in the public gallery.’ Read more  or here:  17 July, Parra Adv J Vella

17 July, 2021
‘Demolition and relocation of historic Willow Grove given green light’
(in print 17 July as: ‘Willow Grove could be gone in days after court rejects appeal’)
Linda Morris writes in the Sydney Morning Herald, ‘The NSW government is free to demolish and relocate the historic villa of Willow Grove to make way for the $915 million Parramatta Powerhouse after opponents exhausted all legal avenues to halt its construction. The NSW Court of Appeal on Friday upheld the judgment of the Land and Environment Court that the government’s environmental assessment for the museum project was sufficient. North Parramatta Residents Action Group had unsuccessfully argued that Infrastructure NSW failed to meet its obligations for a state significant project when it did not properly consider alternative sites or designs incorporating the sole surviving example of a riverside mansion in the Parramatta CBD. The group immediately called for a moratorium on all demolition works while the pandemic-led lockdown was in place. NSW health restrictions on public gatherings effectively prevent protests and pickets to enforce a union green ban, raising the prospect that the Italianate villa will be gone from the site within days.’
And despite David Borger, executive director of the Business Western Sydney, describing  the judgment as a victory for “western Sydney families”, ‘Residents’ spokesperson Suzette Meade said the legal loss would not deter the group. “We will not lose Willow Grove,” she said. “The people of Parramatta shouldn’t have to choose our heritage or cultural funding – we deserve to have both, and the community will continue to fight for this.” Parramatta City Councillor Donna Davis said her community was at a loss to under how the government had come to be given the green light to the demolition of Willow Grove to be placed in storage indefinitely. “How is that, on any level, acceptable and respectful? Heritage interpretation is a pathetic excuse for protection of our heritage places.” Read more.  or here: 17 July SMH Willow Grove LM

16 July, 2020
‘Judgement day: Willow Grove campaigners lose appeal in NSW Supreme Court’
Nicola Barton reports in the Parra News, that ‘The North Parramatta Residents Action Group (NPRAG) lost their appeal in the NSW Supreme Court this morning, devastating the dedicated community members who are fighting hard to preserve historic home Willow Grove.
Chief Justice Tom Bathurst, Justice John Basten and Justice Mark Leeming spent two weeks reviewing the judgment, previously made by Justice Moore in the Land and Environment, who ruled in his judgment that the Environmental impact statement (EIS) for the controversial Powerhouse Parramatta was sufficient.
NPRAG was represented by Senior Counsel Tim Hale who prosecuted the case that Infrastructure NSW had failed to adhere to the Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs) and consider any alternative sites or designs that would incorporate heritage for the Powerhouse Parramatta. Prior to the final ruling, NPRAG sought an injunction to halt any demolition works on Willow Grove, which is set to be relocated to make way for the Powerhouse Parramatta development. Community members picketed the property in a bid to protect it from destruction before the injunction was successfully granted… A consultant’s report for Infrastructure NSW has indicated the dismantled Willow Grove could remain in storage for years…
The Western Sydney Powerhouse Community Alliance applauded the court decision. “This is now strike three for the opponents of the Powerhouse Parramatta and it’s time for them to get out of the way,” Chair of the Western Sydney Powerhouse Community Alliance (WSPCA), Christopher Brown, said.’ Read more here. See also media protest from NPRAG16 July NPRAG ; CFMEU green ban  16 July CFMEU Green ban; and court support from WSPCA: 16 July WSPCA

9 July, 2021
‘The Powerhouse Museum: a year since the reprieve’
In Bulletin 66, Tom Lockley’s regular information update provides a summary of much that has occurred during the year since it was announced on 4 July, 2020, that the Powerhouse Museum would be saved, and stay in Ultimo; and from 16 June 2021 when funding was announced for its renewal. He documents links to the current exhibition program of the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, while expressing concerns about the future content and program, the powerful role of government in making such decisions and the considerable secrecy that has surrounded that process. As well, he records issues associated with the proposed museum site in Parramatta including protests and court cases about the removal of the heritage Willow Grove building, and the further development of the storage centre at Castle Hill. In conclusion Lockley supplies a timeline of events that have taken place during this year-long period.
Read more here:  9 July Bulletin 66 Tom Lockley

2 July, 2021
‘Chief Justice of NSW Supreme Court hears Willow Grove appeal’
A media release from the North Parramatta Residents Action Group (NPRAG) announces that their appeal against Infrastructure NSW will be heard at the NSW Supreme Court in Sydney this morning. ‘His Excellency the Honourable Chief Justice Tom Bathurst, Justice John Basten and Justice Leeming who will review the judgment previously made by Justice Moore in the Land and Environment who ruled in his judgment that the EIS for the controversial Powerhouse Parramatta was sufficient. Tim Hale SC, representing NPRAG, will continue to argue the case for the community that Infrastructure NSW failed to consider any alternative site in the Environment Impact Statement for the Parramatta Powerhouse. Meanwhile an injunction halting any works taking place on heritage listed Willow Grove will continue until the final judgment is received from the Supreme Court. The community remain a 24/7 vigil on the entrances to the Victorian Italianate villa’s grounds, in fear of any works being carried out regardless of court orders. Read more: CHIEF JUSTICE OF NSW SUPREME COURT HEARS WILLOW GROVE APPEAL

25 June, 2021 (in print 26/6)
‘Willow Grove could end up in storage for years after deconstruction’
Linda Morris, in the Sydney Morning Herald, follows up news that: ‘Infrastructure NSW lost its battle in court on Friday to overturn an injunction halting preliminary works on Willow Grove while the appeal was being heard. Willow Grove is subject to a union green ban and the first community picket was called on Tuesday when workmen were seen entering the building with tools and ladders. Opponents fear demolition will take place under the cover of a pandemic lockdown.’ She writes: ‘Plans are underway to deconstruct historic villa Willow Grove and pack preserved parts on timber pallets inside waterproof containers for indefinite storage, while the search for a new site begins. A consultant’s report for Infrastructure NSW outlines the process for dismantling the villa, the sole surviving example of a riverside mansion in the Parramatta CBD, and demolishing its rear extensions. But the Advisian report, dated June 8, says wide consultation on a shortlist of new sites would begin within six months of construction beginning on the Parramatta Powerhouse. Subject to structural engineering, heritage reports and development approvals, it raises the prospect that the dismantled pieces will be lying in storage for at least a year, if not longer…
Parramatta Councillor Donna Davis said the situation is “as bad as predicted”. “Willow Grove will be put in a storage container and will never see the light of day again. This all points to a flawed, rushed process that gives me flashbacks to the Royal Oak demolition debacle,” she said, referring to the iconic hotel that made way for the Parramatta Light Rail. “Our understanding is that those with ethics in the construction industry have run a mile from this ‘demolition and deconstruct’ job. “If the government was serious about rebuilding Willow Grove and respectful of the concerns raised in the record 1500-plus project submissions they would have completed the consultation process prior to these works commencing.”
… The National Trust of NSW’s director of conservation David Burdon said the methodology of deconstruction and relocation was “woefully inadequate”. ‘ [and] ‘The heritage-listed ornate driveway gates of Willow Grove were sawn off on Monday, residents’ spokesperson Suzette Meade said. “We don’t trust them as far as we could kick them,” she said of the government.’ Read more:  or  25 June SMH Willow Grove – L Morris

23 June, 2021
‘Injunction granted, work on Willow Grove halted after community picket’
Linda Morris reports in the Sydney Morning Herald on the outcome of a picket held around the Willow Grove building in Parramatta, at 6am on Tuesday 22 June.
‘An injunction has been granted to halt work to remove the historic villa Willow Grove, which is to make way for the Parramatta Powerhouse Museum. A community picket was called in defence of Willow Grove on Tuesday morning, just days after the Land and Environment Court ruled against the North Parramatta Residents Action Group’s attempt to challenge planning approval. The action is said to have been sparked by contractors entering the 19th-century mansion with ladders and tools to begin pulling down the villa. Late on Tuesday, the NSW Court of Appeal restrained all work in relation to Willow Grove, pending an appeal hearing set down for July 2……Residents and members of the NSW branch of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, whose members work on construction sites in the Parramatta CBD, gathered at the picket from 6am on Tuesday, blocking all entrances. A careful watch will be maintained over the site, the residents’ spokesperson said. The union can forbid members from touching the locally heritage-listed building but it remains unclear how they can enforce a green ban among non-member contractors.’ Read more:  or  23 June SMH Picket defends Willow Grove

19 June, 2021
‘Powerhouse project reeks of empty immensity’
In print as ‘A need for intense, eccentric local muchness, not size’
Elizabeth Farrelly writes in the Sydney Morning Herald: ‘Empty immensity. Every part of the Powerhouse project reeks of empty immensity – from Mike Baird’s initial thought bubble (I know, let’s move it!) to the design brief lite, from the retrospectively recreated 2018 “business case summary” (there being no actual business case) to the big empty milk crate now set to be built on Parramatta’s flood-prone riverbank.’
‘This week’s two big pieces of Powerhouse news are no exception. The first is Wednesday’s Land and Environment Court decision on Willow Grove , in which Justice Tim Moore (a former Liberal minister) found against a group of Parramatta residents who oppose the government’s effective demolition of Willow Grove, a heritage-listed villa, to make way for the new Powerhouse museum. The case hinged on whether the government ever considered keeping the villa… Empty promises, empty arguments, immense expenditure.’
‘‘The same holds for the half-a-billion-dollar Powerhouse Ultimo dollop, announced on Tuesday by Arts Minister Don Harwin. Some consider it a big community win. Perhaps it is, although a fashion museum in the Powerhouse’s Wran building was always envisaged. Now, instead of having to flog its workshop building to survive, the museum will be funded. But there’s no guarantee to keep the Harwood building in the longer term. Indeed, no information generally. Just a 400-word media puff. Yet another politically-inflated thought bubble, this is less a plan than a press release.’
‘This newly announced Ultimo frock museum brings the whole misconceived Powerhouse project, including the new museum at Parramatta, to almost $1.5 billion. That’s six times the spend on Sydney Modern. Yet there’s no detail. Barely even a description. It’s a design and fashion museum with subsidised workspaces, an “academy” and, oh yes, student accommodation…’ ‘Harwin, grasping at content, likened the frock-shop to the Smithsonian and the V&A. But those museums combine stupendous collections, centuries of scholarship, curatorial genius and profound driving ideas. You couldn’t capture them in 400 pages, much less 400 weasel words. Powerhouse Ultimo, by contrast, leaves an eviscerated collection in a building designed for steam engines, while exiling the steam objects to “celebrate” Parramatta by demolishing that city’s heritage. How does that work again?Read more  or  19 June SMH Farrelly

19 June, 2021
’Bold gum trees in all their glory’
on line as: ‘In praise of mighty eucalyptus: from Mawson’s sled to a new perfume’
Saying ‘From Mawson’s sled to a futuristic fragrance, the Powerhouse’s new exhibit hails the mighty eucalypt,’  Susan Skelly previews in the Sydney Morning Herald, the exhibition  Eucalyptusdom  which is to open at the Powerhouse Museum (July 1 2021-May 7 2022).  The exhibition brings together a wide range of objects in the museum’s collection that relate to the eucalyptus tree, as well as some commissioned contemporary interpretations.
Eucalyptusdom is a kind of parallel universe. On the one hand it is a curation of objects built on the colonial economics of botany – timber, oils, bark, kino. On the other hand are things not so easily framed and captioned: interconnections, culture, myths, ancestral stories, the country that grew the trees… It was the research of the Powerhouse’s embedded artist Agatha Gothe-Snape that planted the exhibition seed. She was fascinated by such books as A Research on the Eucalypts and Their Essential Oils by Richard T. Baker and Henry G. Smith (1920); The Hardwoods of Australia and Their Economics by Richard T. Baker (1919); and A Gallery of Gum Trees by A.W. D’Ombrain (1938).The foreword to the latter, written by E.H.F. Swain, NSW commissioner for forests 1935-48 and an early conservationist, gave the exhibition its name. Swain wrote: “We have subconscious glimpses of inner qualities in these trees, and they lay a momentary spell upon us, but there remains yet to come an acceptance of the full glory of the Eucalyptusdom which is the especial heritage of this stranger land.” …. ‘Says Gothe-Snape: “In the forewords to these books you sense authors falling in love with a place they don’t understand. It’s hard for them to use their Western scientific models to understand the complexity of this genus they’ve never encountered. How do you fall in love with something when you can’t name it, when it keeps escaping your methods of categorisation, of knowledge? For me, this exhibition is about that love.”’..‘Gothe-Snape searched the Powerhouse collection of more than 500,000 objects for everything eucalypt … There was a whittling down to 600 objects, which include countless timber specimens, botanical illustrations, a Beale piano with a eucalyptus lid and the spottedgum sledge Douglas Mawson took to Antarctica in 1911.’ Quotes from a number of the artists commissioned to make work explain their interest in the project.
Read more  or  SMH 19 June Bold gum trees    See also Museum exhibition  info here which says: ‘Eucalyptusdom is a new exhibition that reckons with our cultural history and ever-changing relationship with the gum tree, presenting over 400 objects from the Powerhouse Collection alongside 17 newly commissioned works by creative practitioners working across the fields of design, architecture, film, applied arts and performance.’
[This exhibition may well demonstrate that such integration of design, art, crafts, science, technology and industry, based on the collection and its history,  is more than ‘fashion’!]

16 June, 2021
‘Powerhouse Parramatta: heritage activists lose legal battle but pin hopes on green ban’
Kelly Burke writes in The Guardian how: ‘One day after the announcement of a $500m reinvention of the Ultimo site of Sydney’s Powerhouse Museum, the New South Wales government has jumped a legal hurdle in the second phase of its Powerhouse plan: an expansion to Parramatta.… On Wednesday, the NSW land and environment court dismissed action taken by a Parramatta residents’ action group, who have challenged the validity of Infrastructure NSW’s environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Powerhouse Parramatta project. The action group argued that heritage considerations had not been adequately accounted for in the selection of the site and the design of the museum, which will necessitate the removal of the 140-year-old mansion Willow Grove, currently protected by a green ban… In his ruling, Justice Tim Moore said there was no obligation imposed on the government to investigate alternative sites for Powerhouse Parramatta, and even if this decision was debatable, there appeared to be no feasible alternative site. Consequently, the removal of Willow Grove was unavoidable, he ruled. He also found that the government’s EIS had complied with all relevant requirements.’
‘But with two of the state’s largest unions renewing a green ban to protect a vital area of the proposed site, the state government’s troubles are far from over. … Any government attempt to break the ban could potentially lead to widespread industrial action from unions across the state, the NSW secretary of the CFMEU, Darren Greenfield, warned on Wednesday, with 24-hour surveillance of the site continuing to ensure construction does not proceed. “[Today’s decision] doesn’t change our position,” he said. “We will use whatever political means we can. Our green ban and our members will save Willow Grove.” …’ Outside the court on Wednesday, spokeswoman for the North Parramatta Residents Action Group, Suzette Meade, said an appeal of the decision had not been ruled out, but the NSW government had indicated it would not proceed with any construction on the site until 21 June… But “The people of Parramatta shouldn’t have to choose our heritage or cultural funding – we deserve to have both, and the community will continue to fight for this.” ‘ Read more  or 16 June The Guardian

 16 June, 2021
‘Court gives green light for removal of historic villa to make way for Powerhouse’
Linda Morris and Megan Gorrey record in the Sydney Morning Herald that ‘Residents and unions have placed Willow Grove under 24-hour watch and say they will do whatever it takes to protect the historic villa after losing their legal bid to halt work on the Parramatta Powerhouse. The Land and Environment Court ruled against the North Parramatta Residents Action Group on Wednesday paving the way for Willow Grove’s relocation to a new site to make way for the museum at a cost of more than $10 million. Willow Grove’s garden and curtilage have already been swept away as part of early site works, with the Parramatta Powerhouse’s major construction contractor expected to be named in the coming weeks.’ However, they report: ‘The NSW branch of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union will continue to enforce a green ban on the removal of Willow Grove despite the court’s findings.
The resident action group’s spokesperson Suzette Meade said the legal proceedings were always “plan B”.  “Our plan A has always been and will continue to be the power and the passion of the community with the unions working together,” Ms Meade said.’. …’Arts Minister Don Harwin said the government would wait to read the court judgment and see whether the residents’ group would launch an appeal before making any moves at the site. The court ruling comes two days after the government pledged half a billion dollars to transform the Powerhouse Museum at Ultimo, with the budget commitment bringing to $1.4 billion the cost of keeping the Powerhouse at Ultimo, building flagship headquarters at Parramatta and expanding the institution’s Castle Hill Discovery Centre. Mr Harwin said he was “not at all concerned” Willow Grove’s heritage values would be damaged by moving the building.’ Read more  or  16 June SMH W Grove

16 June, 2021
‘Sydney gives their verdict on the Powerhouse Museum’s $500m transformation’
Sasha Foot writes in City Hub about the NSW Government’s announcement on 15 June of  ‘… a $500m conversion of the Powerhouse Museum to a fashion and design institution. The decision comes after many years of uncertainty surrounding the Powerhouse Museum’s future in Ultimo.’ They cite support from many people, including how ‘Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore applauded local community groups and expressed full support for the shift in concentration to fashion and design. Moore considered this a necessary revival for the museum space to ensure it prevails in the future’, Foot also documents concerns about the future program of the Ultimo site.’
However, ‘Museum specialist and Powerhouse Museum Alliance spokesperson Kylie Winkworth expressed disappointment at the planned transformation. “[The investment is] destructive of the museum’s heritage values,” Winkworth told City Hub. The science and technology exhibits will be moved to the planned $840 million Parramatta Flagship headquarters. The upgrades have drawn criticism centred upon the site’s distinct separation from its intended purpose. “To narrow the museum’s focus to just fashion and design is a betrayal of the museum’s 140 years of collecting practice,” Winkworth said. “The Government promised last July when the Powerhouse was announced to stay in Ultimo that it would retain its focus on technology, engineering and design”…’  … ‘The Powerhouse Museum exhibits an array of collections that includes the arts, sciences, technology and design. Former Senior Curator of Decorative Art and Design, and Powerhouse Museum Alliance activist Grace Cochrane acknowledged the troubling nature of the museum’s identification. “Fashion is not a primarily separate field – it is part of the whole,” Cochrane said. “[The transformation] is potentially exciting – but not at the expense of collection-based exhibitions across all fields of design.” Read more  or  16 June City Hub

16 June, 2021
‘NSW government allowed to relocate Willow Grove villa to make way for Parramatta Powerhouse’
Regarding the North Parramatta Residents Action Groups campaign to save Willow Grove from demolition to make way for the ‘Powerhouse Parramatta’ building, Rani Hayman and Antonette Collins posted for  ABC News, that in The Land and Environment Court today, the Court ruled the ‘Willow Grove villa, built in the 1870s, could be moved’; that ‘an action group failed in its bid to halt the relocation of the Willow Grove villa after challenging planning approval’, and that ‘Residents have vowed to continue their campaign and say a green ban will stay in place.’
‘The North Parramatta Residents Action Group (NPRAG) has failed in its bid to halt the relocation of the Willow Grove villa after challenging planning approval on the basis the environmental assessment does not meet requirements for a state significant project. The group launched legal action in the Land and Environment court in March to halt work on the $915 million dollar museum project, but Justice Timothy Moore has dismissed the case.’
‘Greens MP David Shoebridge said the fight to keep Willow Grove would continue.  “Regardless of today’s decision Willow Grove is still standing, the green ban is still in place and the community campaign to save Willow Grove is only growing,” he said. “What we do know from this decision is that there wasn’t a review of the merits and there’s never been a genuine review of the merits of Willow Grove.”…’ Suzette Meade from NPRAG said she is now concerned about when the government will start work on the site. “Willow Grove now stands like and oasis in this demolition site … and we’ve got people watching despite the hoarding, despite the scaffolding up high from all over Parramatta,” she said. “We are concerned. The government gave us an undertaking prior to this case that they would not touch Willow Grove until June 21st. That’s Monday.” It is not yet clear whether the group will appeal the decision or try and get a further injunction, but Ms Meade said the current green ban means no work can be done to demolish the 19th-century Italianate villa on Phillip Street.’  Read more  or  16 June ABC court report

16 June, 2021
‘Waratah rising from the fires’: Powerhouse funds get mixed reviews
(in print as ‘Avalanche of cash for Powerhouse restyling gets mixed reviews’)
Linda Morris reports in the Sydney Morning Herald about the event at the Powerhouse Museum where the announcement for funding was made on 15 June. ‘An emotional Jenny Kee has welcomed plans for a $500 million overhaul of Ultimo’s Powerhouse Museum at a fashion event held on Tuesday to mark the government investment….“We were always on tenterhooks thinking this extraordinary institution might die, and be moved,” Kee, a designer who helped define a national fashion identity decades ago, said on Tuesday… Fashion and design will be at the forefront of the refurbished museum, with its sister museum at Parramatta to focus on science and technology. Runway models paraded garments from the Powerhouse’s fashion collection for the official launch, joined on stage by Kee and designer Camilla Franks.
The renewal plans include subsidised studios and work spaces for Australian designers, some commercial premises and a teaching hub with residential accommodation for regional students and remote learners, similar to that planned for the Parramatta Powerhouse. It’s envisaged the Ultimo museum will shut for renovations once plans are approved, with the project taking five or six years to complete.’’’
But museum consultant and former trustee Kylie Winkworth said the government had broken its promise that the Ultimo Powerhouse Museum would retain its broad remit across technology, science, engineering and design. “The government said the Powerhouse Museum was saved. Instead, the mission and facilities of the Powerhouse are being downsized without consultation, explanation or even a veneer of museum planning,” Winkworth said. “No thought has been given to the impact of turning the Powerhouse Museum into a fashion and design museum when it’s traditionally attracted family and education audiences. The real waste is that we will have a hollowed-out Powerhouse, without the power and transport collections for which the museum was purpose-designed…”
The Opposition gave the government its in-principle support, saying full credit should go to the community that had saved the museum. “It also shows how a costly thought bubble by a former premier can have multi-billion dollar consequences,” Labor’s arts and heritage spokesperson Walt Secord said. “We are now creeping towards a cost of $2 billion; that would have built a teaching hospital the size of Royal North Shore Hospital.“Had the State Government sat down and properly done their sums from the very beginning, they would have gotten a better and fairer arrangement for Ultimo and western Sydney.” Read more:  or SMH 16 June LMorris

16 June, 2021
‘Fashion a worthy focus for revitalised Powerhouse’
Kellie Hush, a Powerhouse Museum trustee and former editor-in-chief of Harper’s Bazaar, writes  in the Sydney Morning Herald in support of the proposed emphasis on fashion in the changes being made to the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo. ‘As a museum of applied arts and sciences the Powerhouse is a living memory of our material heritage. How appropriate then that our nation’s fashion industry should take a lead role in reframing the museum’s future. The industry I love and have dedicated my career to, pumped $27.2 billion into the Australian economy last year and employed nearly half a million people – 77 per cent of whom are women. And that’s just the economic story. The pleasure that fashion brings into so many lives every single day is immeasurable because it is often so personal.….As a trustee of the Powerhouse, I have been fortunate to have spent many hours viewing the fashion pieces and the revered collection of more than 500,000 objects that tells the stories of where we’ve been and where we want to go as a society. But why I love fashion so much is because it is a business born of reinvention. Every single season it reinvents itself! Ultimo and the precincts that surround it have changed a lot since 1988 when the Power House first stirred into its new life as a museum. This renewal will see the birth of a creative industries precinct – a home for designers, creators, the makers and the innovators. And what an incredible opportunity for generations to come, to have the museum to gather and share ideas and creativity…For young designers of today, and tomorrow, Ultimo will be a place to collaborate, source inspiration from the incredible collection, and see the world’s best international exhibitions right here in Sydney – this is a truly remarkable gift to creative industries in Australia.’ Read more, or  SMH 16 June K Hush

15 June, 2021
It is announced that: ‘The Powerhouse Museum has today welcomed the NSW Government’s $480-$500m transformative investment into one of Australia’s most revered and loved museums, Powerhouse Ultimo. The renewal will see Powerhouse Ultimo focus on design and fashion, presenting exhibitions that feature the museum’s significant collections, international exclusive exhibitions and programs that support the design and fashion industries.
The expansion will deliver renewed and expanded exhibition and public space, connecting the Powerhouse Museum to the City by reorienting the Museum to the Goods Line and connecting to adjacent precincts. ..More than 5,000 regional and remote students from across NSW will further their design and fashion education through immersive experiences at The Academy, which will provide residential accommodation within the museum precinct.
Museum Trust President, Peter Collins AM QC said: “…This renewal will pave the way for generations to come to experience even more of our 500,000 strong Collection through Australia’s leading museum of design and fashion in Ultimo and the new home of science and technology at our flagship, Powerhouse Parramatta.” Powerhouse Chief Executive Lisa Havilah said: “The renewal of our institution will deliver two world-class museums – with a design and fashion focus at Powerhouse Ultimo and our flagship museum focused on science and technology museum, Powerhouse Parramatta. “This visionary investment will see the expansion of our exhibition spaces as well as renewal of our historic exhibition spaces. We will create a vibrant public square beside the Goods Line, and creative industries workspaces that will become home for Australian designers.”
Planning for a design competition led by Create Infrastructure and the Powerhouse Museum will now commence. The Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo remains open.’
Read more: Powerhouse Media Release – 15 June 2021

15 June, 2021
‘Ultimo’s Powerhouse Museum set for $500 million makeover’ (in print as ‘$500m to complete museum backflip’)
Linda Morris reports in the Sydney Morning Herald that: ‘The Powerhouse Museum at Ultimo will become the heart of a new cultural precinct, with the Berejiklian government pledging half a billion dollars to transform the institution almost a year after reversing the decision to shut its doors.
Treasurer Dominic Perrottet will announce the $500 million funding – the first major government investment in the museum since it was founded – on Tuesday as a cornerstone commitment of the NSW budget. A design competition will be held this year to find an architectural team to reorient the museum’s entrance and to create a public square at its rear that will connect visitors to the future Tech Central, Pyrmont Peninsula and metro station development, Darling Harbour and Chinatown… The budget commitment brings to $1.4 billion the cost of keeping the Powerhouse at Ultimo, building flagship headquarters at Parramatta ($840 million) and expanding the institution’s Castle Hill Discovery Centre ($60 million)… Public protest spurred the Berejiklian government to abandon plans to sell the Ultimo site and it will now operate the museum across the two sites with Parramatta focusing on science and technology. Arts Minister Don Harwin confirmed the iconic Powerhouse Museum pieces, including the Boulton and Watt Engine, Locomotive No.1, and the Catalina Flying Boat, would remain at Ultimo. “The Powerhouse Museum’s collection has incredible breadth, telling the great stories of design from the industrial age to the great design achievements at the beginning of this century,” he said [and then identifies a focus on fashion examples, which continue to appear to be his personal preference]..
Trust president Peter Collins and chief executive Lisa Havilah had pitched several funding options to NSW Treasury from a base case of critical maintenance to the once-in-a-generation refurbishment. Mr Collins said exhibition spaces would be expanded. [Note: from here on, not included in print copy]“We will create a vibrant public square beside the Goods Line, and creative industries workspaces that will become home for Australian designers,” he said…The planned project works do not include the nearby Harwood building, which was to have been sold off under the original relocation plan. For the foreseeable future, the Harwood building will continue to carry out its role in museum operations as home to the workshop, library and offices for staff.’ Read more:  or:  SMH 15 June L Morris $500m to complete

15 June, 2021
‘Was the Powerhouse worth the angst, Mike Baird?’(in print 15 June, as ‘Welcome to the parallel universe Mr Baird could not have imagined’)
In the Sydney Morning Herald, Linda Morris reminds us that: ‘It was in 2018 that Mike Baird, then pursuing a career in banking, was summoned to a parliamentary inquiry to defend his inflammatory decision as NSW premier to relocate the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta. He didn’t take a backward step. ..Four years earlier, the Powerhouse board signed off on a strategic plan that included a claim for $350 million in government funding for the regeneration of the museum’s 30-year-old buildings, offset by the sale of adjoining land and development and air rights above its collection store…This touched off what critics later derided as Baird’s pre-election “thought bubble”: selling up the Powerhouse in Ultimo to give western Sydney an iconic museum it deserved.
The state government’s commitment to spend $500 million to renovate the Ultimo Powerhouse brings taxpayers almost full circle… All up, the government’s budget commitment will bring the capital cost of the two museums and Castle Hill expansion close to the $1.5 billion that an Upper House Inquiry and the Powerhouse’s founding director Lindsay Sharp warned would be the real cost to taxpayers of the relocation plan. To put that figure into perspective, the Sydney Opera House refit is costing the government $235 million, Sydney Modern $244 million, the regional cultural fund $100 million, Walsh Bay arts precinct $347 million and the Australian Museum refit cost $50 million.
Mr Baird was right that western Sydney deserves a world-class cultural institution, the arts and cultural funding gap disadvantaging a region that one in 10 Australians call home. Had his government committed to the Powerhouse’s renewal five years ago, however, it would have been one year from completion. It could have had its Parramatta Powerhouse or decided to share its largesse with the Campbelltown Arts Centre, Casula Powerhouse, Joan Sutherland Theatre, and other regional galleries.The Berejiklian government would have avoided the headlines, the inquiries, and the public backlash over the planned closure of Ultimo, necessitating the decision’s sudden reversal 12 months ago.
Union green bans remain in force to block the demolition of the historic home of Willow Grove at Parramatta, which is to be dismantled and rebuilt elsewhere. The Land and Environment Court hands down its judgment on Wednesday about the validity of the planning process for the Parramatta Powerhouse. Whatever the outcome, it will go to appeal. Fans of the Powerhouse Ultimo will be grateful the museum got its lifeline in the end. But was the last five years worth all the angst, Mr Baird?’  Read more: or  SMH 15 June Linda M – Baird

 15 June, 2021
‘Powerhouse Ultimo is here to stay as design museum with $480M investment’
Gina Fairley writes in ArtsHub, of a joint media call this morning from NSW Arts Minister Don Harwin, with MAAS (Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences) CEO Lisa Havilah, to announce ‘a new investment of $480-500 million to transform Powerhouse Ultimo into a dedicated museum to design and fashion.’ ‘Powerhouse Parramatta will focus on the intersections and histories of science, technology and creative industries. The investment – along with $1.1 billion already committed to Powerhouse Parramatta – makes it the largest cultural investment NSW has made since the building of Sydney Opera House. Minister Harwin said: “This year’s budget will cover the cost of a design competition and approval processes and the government expects when the museum is finished, that operational expenditure will have increased with 100 new jobs in the creative industries funded at the museum.”…
’Just over a year ago, the Ultimo site was slated to be sold to property developers to assist with the funding of the new Parramatta museum. The sale was expected to generate some $195 million. But the plan has long been the subject of protests, consistent lobbying by the Powerhouse Museum Alliance, a Parliamentary Inquiry, and good old fashioned ‘people power’, which has seen that decision reversed.…Havilah said the catalyst was really the government’s announcement on 4 July that committed to two world class museums, that was the trigger point, “so our job as the museum was to work through the business case process – what does that actually mean, and how to think about the renewal of the museum in terms of defining how much investment it requires, that brings us to today.” …she continued: “What I am most excited about is that we are not only going to create these incredible exhibition spaces, but also create spaces that will support industry, that will keep creatives and designers in this precinct, while working to integrate the industry into our broader practices as an museum.”
Read more: or  Arts Hub 15 June

15 June, 2021
Powerhouse win: MP Facebook entries
Following the announcement above, Members of Parliament who have been active in support of the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, wrote on their Facebook pages. See also shared posts on the PowerhouseMuseumAlliance Facebook page. 

Jamie Parker, MP
‘Just a year after they tried to demolish it, the NSW Government has committed half a billion dollars to revamp the Powerhouse Museum.  This funding, in addition to the money going to the new museum in Parramatta, represents the biggest investment in a single cultural institution in the state since the Sydney Opera House. Wins like this don’t happen by accident. Thank you to the thousands of people who signed our petition, to all the residents who have joined me to meet with the Minister over the years, and to all the community groups who have played a leading role to save this precious site including Powerhouse Museum Alliance and Pyrmont Locals and Save the Powerhouse.
There is still more to do especially defending Willow Grove in Parramatta and making it clear that the arts and culture are more important that real estate deals.’

David Shoebridge, MP
‘We’ve always said that we shouldn’t have to choose between world class museums in Sydney’s city and Parramatta- we need both.  Finally the NSW Government has listened: half a billion dollars to transform the Powerhouse Museum! This brings to $1.4 billion the total commitment to keep the museum at Ultimo, build flagship headquarters at Parramatta ($840 million) and expand the institution’s Castle Hill Discovery Centre ($60 million). Community campaigning works! Thank you to the thousands of people who signed the petition and to the tireless campaigners including Powerhouse Museum Alliance, Pyrmont Locals and Save the Powerhouse.’

Alex Greenwich, MP:
‘I welcome today’s announcement that the government will allocate $500 million for a revitalised Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, with media reports saying this includes a new public square at the rear to reorient the museum and a strong focus on fashion and design. I joined the Lord Mayor Clover Moore – a strong advocate for the Powerhouse – and the local and museum community to oppose the initial plan to close the museum and sell off the site. I have continued to ask questions in Parliament and am pleased the museum’s values and potential have been recognised. My May 2021 questions in Parliament: > HERE.’

29 May, 2021
‘Sunless and soulless or the Paris of the west: Three events will determine Parramatta’s future’
Elizabeth Farrelly reports in both the Sydney Morning Herald and the Brisbane Times on three issues being dealt with in Parramatta: The future of Willow Grove and the Powerhouse Museum; the Greater Sydney Parklands White Paper proposing a single trust for all Sydney’s great parks; and the impact of expanding ‘tower-zones’ in Parramatta’s CBD planning proposal.
Regarding Willow Grove, following the presentations made on 25 and 26 May in the Land and Environment Court case in Parramatta, she says: ‘The judge peered over his spectacles. “I think the applicant is saying, you can’t build a house on sand.” The wording is approximate. The transcript is pending. But you get the gist. Justice Tim Moore, former environment minister and now a Land and Environment Court judge, was addressing the respondent – the NSW government – on day one of the Willow Grove court case this week.
The comment followed an hour or so of the government’s flustered attempts to sandbag the non-compliant documentation that could yet render the Powerhouse museum approval null and void. Embarrassing. It was an apt metaphor. As the audience recognised, “building on sand” also suggested the whole attempt to “relocate” the Powerhouse from Ultimo to a flood-prone alluvial sandbank and former Dharug fishing spot on the Parramatta River. It could equally suggest the current, whole-of-Parramatta struggle to escape its daggy old cocoon and become a proper city.’
After discussing the city tower development, Farrelly adds: ‘Which brings us to Willow Grove, itself in a 211-metre zone. The court case is brought by the North Parramatta Residents’ Action Group [which] argues that the Environmental Impact Statement for the Parramatta Powerhouse, approved in February, breached the legislative requirement to analyse feasible alternatives. No such alternatives, on the same site or elsewhere, appeared. Indeed, there’s no evidence, there, in the competition brief or in the 2018 Business Case Summary, that the possibility of keeping Willow Grove was ever seriously entertained.
The respondents (Infrastructure NSW and the minister) had nowhere to go. Sounding a lot like developers on building heights, they blustered that it was too late to change, too much money spent. They said Willow Grove makes site access too difficult. But the community has been fighting five years for this, and the building occupies scarcely a tenth of the site frontage. There’s also a CFMEU green ban on the site, with support from the National Maritime Union, the Nurses and Midwives Association, the Teachers’ Federation, the Public Service Association and the Dharug and allies.
The judge has reserved judgment. Meantime the government, having already let the demolition contract and scaffolded Willow Grove, has promised to cease work. Perhaps, as we speak, it’s frantically dredging up some alternatives to look like they’d been considered. It’d be easier, though, and cheaper – a fraction of the $10 million relocation cost – to keep Willow Grove, work with it. Like the wise man said, you can’t build a house on sand.’ Read more SMH and BTimes, or in print here  29 May Farrelly -Brisbane Times and SMH   or  29 May Farrelly in print

25 May, 2021
‘Power Battle’
on line as ‘Parramatta River banks the only site for Powerhouse: Barrister’
Joanne Vella reports in the Daily Telegraph, that ‘As demolition works loom over a heritage-listed Parramatta house to make way for the $915 million Powerhouse Museum, a community action group’s legal battle with the State Government begins.’
‘North Parramatta Residents’ Action Group (NPRAG) is beginning legal action against the State Government and its approach to planning the $915 million Powerhouse Museum, in the Land and Environment Court on Monday. The group claims Infrastructure NSW failed to undertake the proper planning approval because the environmental assessment failed to meet requirements for a state significant project. The residents’ group is desperately trying to halt construction work in an effort to save 140-year-old Italianate villa Willow Grove.’ … ‘NPRAG spokeswoman Suzette Meade said the planning also failed to avoid impact on heritage properties. “We have been left with no other option other than to commence this action,” she said. “The Powerhouse can be redesigned but Willow Grove, once it is lost, can never be restored.” Among other issues, including strong local opposition, barrister Tim Hale told the hearing before Judge Timothy Moore that ‘Infrastructure NSW’s EIS failed to inform the public of alternative sites for Powerhouse that would not jeopardise heritage buildings.’  Infrastructure NSW’s barrister Richard Lancaster made counter arguments, but ‘Justice Moore told Mr Lancaster he had to demonstrate why there were no “rational” options for alternative sites for the Powerhouse Parramatta. … The hearing continues…’ Read more here, or here 25 May DT Power battle

14 May, 2021
‘Tearing up the carpet, burning down the house’
In his regular arts news email, and with reference to Kylie Winkworth’s research, art critic John McDonald writes: ‘Even though I almost dread to raise the subject again the Powerhouse Museum is back in the news for the usual wrong reasons. It was July last year when the Don and Dom show descended on the museum to announce that the building would be remaining in Ultimo. This seemed at the time like a big turnaround and a major victory for the forces of common sense that had been trying to prevent the systematic dismantling of the PHM. But there was so little detail given that it would have been premature to break out the champagne.
Ten months on from the grand backdown and we can see it was no backdown at all, merely a smokescreen intended to buy time while the next devious scheme was put in place. Almost nothing has changed in the government’s approach to the Powerhouse and Parramatta. They are still intent of building a mega-entertainment centre in Parramatta even though the site was flooded in the recent downpours. They are still intending to demolish or “move” the historic Willow Grove. They are still constructing a gigantic storage depot in Castle Hill, and even sending out press releases to tell us what a great thing this is. They are taking apart the existing museum piece by piece, condemning major exhibits to an uncertain future. The idea is quite simple: fudge, fib and dodge for long enough until public anger dies down and complacency sets in. Gladys’s gangsters have simply decided they can outlast the vigorous campaign conducted by the Powerhouse Museum Alliance and other critics of what is probably the worst ever piece of cultural vandalism undertaken in this country.’ Read more: 14 May John McDonald

13 May, 2021
‘Breaking up the Powerhouse Museum: 10 Years of the LNP at Work’
In CityHub, Kylie Winkworth documents how: ‘The NSW Government has hacked away at the Powerhouse Museum for the last ten years, relentlessly cutting its budget, gutting the museum of expertise, competent leadership and good governance, undermining public trust, and making museum policy on impulse round the campfire.’
‘In 2011 when the LNP came to power MAAS had 284 staff, 20 conservators and 49 in the curatorial team. It ran an award winning Migration Heritage Centre and a highly regarded regional program, both since abolished. As at the last annual report in 2019-20, and not counting the team packing up the collection, the museum has just 178 staff, a decrease of 37 percent. There are just 18 people in the curatorial team, and only 7 conservators, but 10 SES level directors. There are more artists occupying the Powerhouse than curators and conservators. That is the scale of their axe attack to dismember the Powerhouse.’ ‘Philanthropist Gene Sherman has proposed splitting the museum’s collections and turning the Powerhouse into a fashion and design hub. Does the Government want crowd pleasing fashion exhibitions? We had a museum that did record-breaking fashion exhibitions, and design and decorative arts. They were shown at the once great Powerhouse Museum, before this Government started their hack attack. No one should be surprised at the latest idea for breaking up the Powerhouse because in Sydney this Government doesn’t do museum policy and planning, doesn’t do proper process, or genuine consultation. Instead, the city’s culture is carved up behind closed doors in secret meetings with lobbyists, insiders and influencers. That is how decisions are made in Sydney about how our taxes are spent on cultural projects, museums and public culture.’
Winkworth continues with significant concerns and details about the proposed new museum in Parramatta and the demolition of a heritage building, the move of the collection to Castle Hill, and the splitting of the collection, saying ‘If the fashion and design scheme goes ahead we will likely end up with a white box fashion showcase and party place at Ultimo, more taxpayer-subsidised fashion balls, no museum at Parramatta, and the PHM’s internationally significant power and transport collections exiled to a cluster of big sheds at Castle Hill. The Ultimo plans will be badged as a ‘cultural industries precinct’.  This is not industry or culture. It is a euphemism for cultural erasure and amnesia, fronting a shameless scheme to evict and erase Sydney’s transport and industrial history, just as they have at Carriageworks and the ATP.’
Read more  or  13 May City Hub Winkworth

13 May, 2021
‘Culture beats construction in Covid economic recovery, report finds’
Kelly Burke writes in The Guardian, that: ‘Twice as many jobs could have been created during the Covid crisis if the federal government had invested in culture rather than construction. If the federal government had invested the equivalent amount of money into the arts and entertainment sectors as part of its Covid response as it did in a construction recovery scheme, twice as many jobs would have been created over the past 12 months, a report has found. The analysis, conducted by the Canberra-based thinktank the Australia Institute and based on Australian Bureau of Statistics data, suggests the country’s cultural sector was vastly underestimated when it came to the national economy, the report’s senior researcher, Bill Browne, said. “There’s a wide recognition that the arts and entertainment sector has an important cultural impact but the contribution the sector makes economically is still largely neglected,” he told Guardian Australia. “There’s a very natural focus on [the cultural sector’s] importance in how we think and feel and how we interact with the world and how we make sense of ourselves. But in this focus, some of the attention to its economic impact is being lost.” According to ABS data, the arts and entertainment sector employs four times as many Australians as coalmining, and the same number of Australians as the entire finance sector.…“This week’s budget was a timely opportunity for the government to support the Australian economy, create jobs for women and recognise the importance of the arts and entertainment industry,” the Australia Institute executive director, Ben Oquist, said. “Unfortunately, the male-dominated and jobs-poor sectors of construction and mining continue to receive the majority of government attention and support.” Read more  or  Guardian 13 May

9 May, 2021
‘Power and the fashion: Pitch to turn Powerhouse Ultimo into design hub’
In print as ‘Power and the fashion: an Ultimo pitch’
Linda Morris reports in the Sun Herald that ‘Sydney philanthropist Gene Sherman has called for the Powerhouse Museum at Ultimo to become the state’s first cultural institution dedicated to the display of design, decorative arts, and fashion… A former Powerhouse trustee [with a particular personal interest in fashion], Dr Sherman wants the Ultimo museum to focus on crowd-pleasing exhibitions of costume and designer fashion, ceramics, jewellery, furniture, and architecture, and leave the new Parramatta museum to focus on science and technology. Dr Sherman recently presented a two-site model to Mr Collins and Arts Minister Don Harwin. She has proposed two separate foundations and, possibly over time, two separate directors enabling more effective fundraising from private philanthropists and corporate sponsors. If considered appropriate, she has offered to chair the foundation at Ultimo, seeding it with a considerable donation from her own family.’
…‘However the president of the Powerhouse trust, Peter Collins, said he did not support splitting the museum’s collection… Mr Collins said he wants to showcase the entirety of the Powerhouse collection across the three sites including the soon-to-be expanded Museum Discovery Centre in Castle Hill rather than siloing the museums. “The Shermans have made a fantastic contribution to the Sydney arts scene in Sydney over 30 years for the institutions in which they have served, and in Gene’s case they are perfectly entitled to want to leave a legacy for their particular passions but I do not support the proposed splitting of exhibitions with fashion and design exclusive to Ultimo and science and technology to Parramatta,” Mr Collins said. “We want to see a blend of our collections across the three sites when fully operational.” He expected the idea of splitting administrations and establishing micro museums would also have limited appeal to Treasury as COVID-19 stimulus money dried up. ‘
‘The future of the Ultimo museum is at a crossroads after the Berejiklian government decided last July to keep it open. The site requires critical maintenance and NSW Treasurer Dominic Perrottet is expected to outline funding for its renewal in the June budget.’
Read more  or  9 May Sun Herald – Sherman

6 May, 2021
Powerhouse Ultimo Business Plan?
On 6 May, Independent member for Sydney, Alex Greenwich, asked the questions we all want answers for, ‘to the Premier representing the Special Minister of State, and Minister for the Public Service and Employee Relations, Aboriginal Affairs, and the Arts’. The parliament website shows that the Question was asked on 6 May 2021 (session 57-1) and that the Answer is due on 10 June 2021. Read here  Thank you Alex Greenwich! Here are the questions:
(1) When will the Government release the business plan for the Ultimo Powerhouse Museum site, originally announced for late 2019?
(2) To what extent will the museum remain focussed on science and technology, decorative arts and design and social history?
(3) Will the Government retain existing buildings for museum use?
(4) What further plans does the Government have to revitalise the Powerhouse Museum following years of uncertainty?

3 May, 2021
‘Majority of Western Sydney voters haven’t heard about Willow Grove: Poll’
later as ‘Majority of Western Sydney voters back new Powerhouse’ on line; and in print as:
‘Power of the People: Residents back Parra museum’
James O’Doherty writes in the Daily Telegraph about a ‘YouGov poll commissioned on behalf of the Western Sydney Powerhouse Community Alliance,’ [a business-oriented organisatio]. He says: ‘The Powerhouse Museum’s move to Parramatta has been given an emphatic tick of approval by Western Sydney, with more than half of residents vowing to attend the new attraction and nearly three quarters adamant the area needs more cultural institutions. The results of a new survey come as it is revealed a whopping two-thirds of Western Sydney voters have not even heard of the historic Willow Grove building at Parramatta — which is due to be relocated to make way for the new museum — and only 14 per cent have ever visited the site. That is despite residents’ groups staunch opposition to a State Government plan to move the 19th Century villa…Opponents of the current location argue the site is prone to flooding, although the government has stressed measures have been put in place to ensure there is no risk to the museum. Only a third of people surveyed in the poll were “aware” of Willow Grove.
The state government continues to face vocal opposition against its plan to relocate Willow Grove for the new museum. Unions have placed a so-called “green ban” on the site, effectively preventing its demolition. However Western Sydney Powerhouse Community Alliance Chair Chris Brown said the YouGov polling showed “the numbers are in” for the Powerhouse to go ahead at the Willow Grove site.’ Read more  or 3 May, 2021 DT

1-4 May, 2021
Reports: May Day rally in Parramatta
About 3000 people attended the traditional May Day rally in Parramatta, marching through the city centre to the (boarded-up) street-front of the historic building, Willow Grove. Members of the Powerhouse Museum Alliance supported colleagues in their campaign to save this building.
See also FACEBOOK reports from around 1-3 May, 2021 from these groups:
Powerhouse Museum Alliance:  HERE
North Parramatta Residents Action Group (NPRAG): HERE
Save Willow Grove: HERE
CFMEU NSW Construction Union: HERE
Maritime Workers Union : HERE
Save the Powerhouse: HERE

 3 May, 2021
‘Thousands rally to Save Willow Grove’
Mirage News writes:  ‘Thousands of people took to the streets of Parramatta on the weekend in a powerful show of strength of the community support to save historic Willow Grove from Gladys Berejiklian’s wrecking ball. “The May Day rally on Saturday should serve as a warning to the government of the type of mobilisation they can expect if they attempt to defy the wishes of the people of Parramatta and move to destroy Willow Grove,” said Darren Greenfield, CMFEU NSW Secretary …“There is no need to destroy Willow Grove to make way for the government’s proposed museum and shopping complex. It is bizarre to suggest the only way the people of Sydney’s west can have a new cultural institution is by tearing down and paving over irreplaceable heritage sites.The government can run as much push-polling as it likes, but at the end of the day the people of Parramatta and their supporters across the trade union movement have shown they can put the boots on the ground to stop the destruction of Willow Grove. The Green Ban on the destruction of Willow Grove remains in force. It’s time for the Berejiklian Government to sit down with the community to find a way to build the Powerhouse without destroying this important heritage site.”  Read more 

 3 May, 2021
Thousands Rally To Save Parramatta’s Historic ‘Willow Grove’ 
Jenna Benson, for WSFM radio, writes of the rally as: ‘…a powerful show of strength of the community support to save historic Willow Grove from Gladys Berejiklian’s wrecking ball.’ She refers to a Facebook post by the Save Willow Grove group on 24 April 2021, who said: ‘ “There is no need to destroy Willow Grove to make way for the government’s proposed museum and shopping complex. It is bizarre to suggest the only way the people of Sydney’s west can have a new cultural institution is by tearing down and paving over irreplaceable heritage sites. The government can run as much push-polling as it likes, but at the end of the day the people of Parramatta and their supporters across the trade union movement have shown they can put the boots on the ground to stop the destruction of Willow Grove.
Read more  or  3 May, WSFM 101 radio 

1 May, 2021
‘A May Day to Remember: March in Support of Willow Grove Green Ban’

Oliver Pether, in Honi Soit, reported that: ‘A coalition of trade unionists, activist groups and students have used this year’s May Day to protest against the dismantling of Willow Grove, an 19th century heritage building in Parramatta. Willow Grove is set to be relocated in favour of the construction of a second Powerhouse museum.  May Day, or International Workers Day, is a rally held annually to support workers and express solidarity to the labour movement. Though the event normally takes place in the city, this year it was held in Parramatta for the first time in its history. The move, proposed by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU), aimed to express support for a green ban on Willow Grove. A green ban is a form of strike action where members of a trade-union refuse to work on a project because of environmental or heritage concerns…Prominent union figure and State Secretary of the construction division of the CFMEU Darren Greenfield paid homage to the late activist Jack Mundey and vowed to protect Willow Grove till the end. Other speakers included representatives of the Maritime Union of Australia, the Electrical Trades Union, the Public Service Association (PSA) and Indigenous youth organisation Gamilaraay Next Generation.
One of the final speeches was made by local activist Suzette Meade and Parramatta City councillor Donna Davis, two women at the forefront of the Save Willow Grove campaign. Meade expressed confidence in her campaign’s ability to stop Willow Grove’s removal, and declared: “the Government wants to destroy our history, we’re not going to let them do that.” Suzette Meade and the North Parramatta Residents Action Group have recently taken the State Government to the Land and Environment Court. They are arguing that the Government’s planning processes failed to properly analyse alternate sites for the new museum. The Government has indicated it has no intention of backing down.’ Read more  or 1 May Honi Soit

April 2021: Powerhouse Museum Alliance summarises recent issues
The Powerhouse Museum: what has happened in the last few weeks?
1. Ultimo, Sydney CBD:
Business plan:
Despite the welcome July 2020 announcement that the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo is ‘saved’, the NSW Government continues to pursue its plans for a Parramatta ‘jewel in the crown’ relocation, and the future of the Ultimo site is still unclear. While it was announced that a business plan for Ultimo would be selected in early 2021 by Arts Minister Don Harwin from options prepared by Create NSW/MAAS, this has not yet been made public (if the decision has been made). The MAAS website says: ‘Together with Create NSW the Powerhouse Museum is working on a final business case to determine the future of Ultimo and conducted community consultation as part of this work.’ Read here 
Current exhibition plan:
The Powerhouse Museum has started work on a 2021 program of temporary exhibitions and events, complementing some remaining permanent exhibition/exhibits. Read here. 
Despite many redundancies and reduction of numbers of staff with knowledge of specific collection areas over recent years, many staff appointments have been made to digitise the collection and work on the transfer of collection objects to Castle Hill storage.
Relationship to collection:
But many are worried that the ‘saving’ of the museum is a token gesture. Ultimo is still without a forward plan within a contextual reference for content and collection: it should still cross science and technology, decorative arts and design and social history. But will it still be narrowed down to suit the Minister’s personal preferences? What about its relationship to the heritage of the site? And the spaces that are well-suited to the large objects? A ‘design precinct’ or ‘creative industries precinct’ has been mentioned. But what does that mean? It is still intended to move the management to Parramatta.
Heritage: And along with award-winning buildings from 1988, as yet not included on heritage listing, the future of the adjacent Harwood building (first and only remaining Sydney tramshed), for 30 years providing  accessible workshops and offices for staff including curators, conservators, registrars, IT and exhibition designers, publications and library – and accessible collection storage –  is still unannounced (previously cited as arts minister’s preference for a lyric theatre! Apartments?).
2. Parramatta:
Heritage:  controversy continues about loss of heritage buildings.
Rally 1st May: A May Day international workers union march of an estimated 3-5000 people will start in Parramatta at 11.30am at Prince Alfred square and then march to WillowGrove. It will support a Green Ban placed on the demolition of Willow Grove to make way for the proposed Parramatta Powerhouse Museum. See details here. 
Floods: extensive flooding of the Parramatta river – and other centres in NSW, confirmed for all except the government and developers, the risks of building a new museum on a flood-prone site – see our news reports 20-23 March.
Museum or retail? And commenting on the retail strategy for the site, with canteens, cafes, small bars and 56 apartments planned, “It’s just an exercise in setting up a commercial precinct with a so-called museum tacked on the side”. (See news page, April 13).
Castle Hill storage: questions are still being asked about moving a state collection into distant storage (not a museum), beyond Parramatta, where it is far from the exhibition spaces and cumbersome for staff to access while putting objects at risk during transport, and when the funds could better support investment in the Ultimo site, and regional museums including one specifically relating to Parramatta.
3. Recent announcements:
Budget forecast: Millions cut from cultural institutions
(See news page: April, and various reports on April 14). In the context of many years of reductions in recurrent funding, documents from a government inquiry committee for ‘Budget Estimates 2020-2021’, include further serious proposed funding reductions to major arts institutions.
– Art Gallery of NSW (AGNSW) will reportedly lose $9 million a year;  Australian Museum (AM) will lose $13 million; Sydney Living Museums (SLM) will lose $5 million.
– Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences (MAAS) will lose $10 million.
Gina Fairley (in Arts Hub, April 14) records that  the Public Service Association (PSA) said: “The NSW Government’s plan to slash more than $37 million in funding from the state’s cultural institutions will see huge staff cuts, cripple their ability to deliver world class exhibitions, and leave them empty, the union is warning.”  Stewart Little, the PSA’s general secretary said: “The Berejiklian government is all about splashing cash on development, but never about investing in delivery.”  Fairley also provides details of some of the implications of such cuts in operating budgets, and provides further figures for recent and current building development.
However, the government and MAAS point out that: ‘The forward planning figures referenced in today’s media are not the final budget numbers … Funding decisions will be made as part of the normal budget process with the 2021-22 Budget to be handed down in June.’ See the Budget forecast committee page here. In Other Documents, in Answers to Supplementary Questions on 23/3/21, go to Question 90, where the figures are provided. See: March 2021 Budget forecasts What will the final figures be?
 Heritage review:
Many submissions have been made in recent years to support heritage nominations and to submit concerns about Environmental Impacts of proposed plans. In April (see PMA news page) Heritage NSW announced a ‘NSW Heritage Act Review’, where the NSW Government is inviting community discussion and submissions ‘on how heritage can be better managed and protected in NSW.‘ See its  Discussion paper here. 
4. Powerhouse Museum Alliance
congratulates and thanks the many, many individuals and groups  – professional museum people, politicians, cultural and educational colleagues, museum volunteers – and members of the committed general public across NSW, Australia and other countries –  who continue to maintain the argument for properly supporting the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, and providing Parramatta with a gallery/museum of its own, for its own diverse communities (like other regional centres).

29 April, 2021
‘Planning Minister approves Powerhouse storage centre in Castle Hill’
After long-standing controversy about access, costs and safety for the collection, and submissions about Environmental Impact Statements, Linda Morris reports in the Sydney Morning Herald, that: ‘A huge storage house for the priceless collection of the Powerhouse Museum has been approved for Sydney’s north-west. The Powerhouse’s Museums Discovery Centre at Castle Hill is to double in size with the construction of the 8135sqm centre. It will be capable of housing aircraft, historic trains, and helicopters.  Building J, as it is known, is to be built on TAFE land and the site of the museum’s eucalypt plantation established post-war to scientifically help with the commercial harvest of essential oils.
Planning Minister Rob Stokes approved the new facility on Thursday and said it would increase the museum’s accessible storage space by 30 per cent, allowing for better community access to artefacts from the collections…But the expansion raises questions about what the government intends to do with the former Ultimo Tram Depot, known as The Harwood Building, which is the current collections’ store for the Ultimo Powerhouse. The Harwood Building’s future use, including potential conversion to a lyric theatre, is currently subject to an undisclosed $5 million government business case.
In its objection to the expansion, the Powerhouse Museum Alliance’s Jennifer Sanders said funding for the new store would have been better spent updating Ultimo. No budget has been revealed for the Castle Hill project but early plans for a much smaller building were costed in 2017 at $32 million. “The real purpose of this extravagant and unnecessary project is to evict the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences collection from its purpose-designed conservation, research and collection store at the Powerhouse Museum so the museum can be redeveloped,” Ms Sanders said in the submission.
The Berejiklian government reversed its decision to close the Ultimo Powerhouse last July. The government’s expenditure review committee has been asked to fund a renewal of Ultimo…Architect of the 1988 Ultimo Powerhouse redevelopment, Lionel Glendenning, was also among those to object to the Castle Hill expansion. “It is not best practice to replace the functioning Ultimo support facility, with a distant store 38 km away in dense traffic,” he said. “Collection handling – the safety and security of objects – is compromised and risks are increased. Critical staff access is disrupted to the point of dysfunction.”
Former museum curator of transport and engineering Andrew Grant warned that the loss of engineering workshops would affect the museum’s capacity to carry out any major conservation or restoration work on the very large objects in its collections.’ However: ‘The Department of Planning, however, concluded Building J was in the public interest, providing “significant public benefits by enhancing the [Museums Discovery Centre] as a cultural institution in north-western Sydney, increasing community access to the Powerhouse collection and supporting the Powerhouse Parramatta”.’ Read more, or here  29 April SMH Castle Hill

26 April, 2021
NPRAG says: ‘Hands Off Our Heritage’
The North Parramatta Residents Action Group (NPRAG) provides a summary of its activities and concerns, regarding the future of Parramatta’s historic sites, in particular the proposed demolition/relocation of the Willow Grove building to make way for the ‘Powerhouse Parramatta’. Their information includes:
1: ‘On Friday 23rd April NPRAGs barrister Tim Hale SC met with the judge and government lawyers to set the date for the court case objecting to the Powerhouse Parramatta DAs approval.’
2: This May Day (Saturday May 1st)  for the first time ever the unions have moved the march from its traditional route in Sydney CBD to be held in the streets of Parramatta all to support the CFMEU Greenban on Willow Grove.  See details in attachment here.
3: Fabulous to announce the Teachers Federation Union have now announced their support of the CFMEU Greenban on Willow Grove. The motion was raised at the Parramatta Branch of the Teachers Federation and then supported at the State Conference a few weeks ago.
4. We are very excited and honoured to announce that NPRAG’s Save Willow Grove campaign has been shortlisted on the National Trust of Australia (NSW) annual awards list for best heritage advocacy.’ Read more here  26 April NPRAG summary : and watch video about the May Day March here.

26 April, 2021
‘The memory of the nation is at risk’ with National Archives desperate for funds

Reflecting with concerns about funding to state cultural institutions by the NSW state government, similar issues are also apparent with national institutions such as the National Archives. Katina Curtis and Shane Wright, in the Sydney Morning Herald, write that: ‘Years of funding and staff cuts have caught up with the archives, which is struggling to prevent the disintegration of unique pieces of Australian history, including the personnel files of RAAF non-commissioned officers from World War II and papers for suffragettes Adela Pankhurst and Celia John.’ They note that ‘Recordings of wartime speeches given by John Curtin, tapes of the Stolen Generation royal commission and even the records of the Bounty mutineers could disappear forever without an injection of cash into the National Archives. ..Even surveillance films taken by ASIO, video of the 1998 Constitutional Convention and original films of early Australian Antarctic research expeditions are at risk as the Archives struggles to protect 384 kilometres of records that are growing rapidly every year.}
Nicola Laurent, president of the Australian Society of Archivists, of which the National Archives is an institutional member, says it’s highly concerning it has come to the point where such important records are at risk. “It would be a devastating loss to the nation’s memory and to the history of the country. It is really critical that these materials are saved,” she said. “We shouldn’t be in this position that we’re now desperately trying to save materials.” ‘
They point out that ‘The Archives, like many smaller government institutions, has suffered from constant reductions in real funding levels. It has fewer employees today compared to 2013-14. …Constitutional law expert Anne Twomey says the Archives is at risk of not fulfilling its fundamental role as “the memory of the nation”…Assistant Minister to the Attorney-General Amanda Stoker said the government would respond to the Tune review this year but it would not be rushed… In New Zealand the government last year allocated $35.7 million (AU$33 million) to convert its 271km of records to digital files.’ Read more  or 26 April SMH Archives

14 April, 2021
‘Berejiklian splurges on pet projects but stints on the basic upkeep of the arts’
on line as ‘Harwin: a Jekyll and Hyde Minister’
In an Opinion piece for the Sydney Morning Herald, John McDonald asks: ‘Should we be surprised the Berejiklian government is contemplating a sneaky cut to the operating budgets of major cultural institutions? By now we’re accustomed to those familiar patterns of secrecy, lack of transparency, and the reckless disregard for both public and expert opinion. The rule is: “We know best, so suck it up.” For a government that has squandered billions on mismanaged extravaganzas such Sydney’s light rail it’s a soft option to pull vital funds from museums.’ Of the Art Gallery of NSW’s Sydney Modern project, he says: ‘When it finally does open we’ll be faced with an effective doubling of the AGNSW’s operating costs and no plan to bring in extra money beyond the “magical thinking” that twice as much gallery space equals twice as many visitors. It’s more likely the builders will strike gold while digging the foundations.
And, of course, there’s the ongoing saga of the Powerhouse, which has been run into the ground while the government pursues a lunatic, utterly unnecessary scheme of “moving” the museum – or at least part of the museum – to an entertainment complex in Parramatta. The proposed budget for this is $840 million but that’s a fraction of what would need to be spent if the relocation were realistically costed. In the meantime, having destroyed the Powerhouse’s capacity to raise funds and receive bequests, Premier Gladys Berejiklian’s team is happy to trim another $10 million off an inadequate annual budget.’
Saying ‘As Minister for the Arts, Don Harwin has been a Jekyll and Hyde figure…’, and noting that ‘Among the biggest casualties have been the regional arts organisations, which have been starved of funds ,’ McDonald concludes: ‘The merest glance at these figures shows the huge disparity between the sums that are wasted on pet projects with the most dubious of business plans and the basic upkeep of the state’s cultural institutions.’
Read more  or  14 April John McD Harwin Jekyll and Hyde

14 April, 2021
‘NSW Budget estimates warn of cuts to come’
In Arts Hub, Gina Fairley reports that: ‘The 2020-2021 NSW Budget Estimates hearings have been ongoing during February and March, with Minister for the Arts Don Harwin sitting before the panel in late February. What was revealed in his answers to Supplementary Questions tabled on 23 March and now more widely disseminated painted a bleak forward forecast for certain NSW cultural institutions. While the Berejiklian government has generously funded record spending on capital works for many Sydney and regional venues – a figure placed at $1,817.4 million in the Supplementary budget answers – moving forward, operational funding has been cut significantly. As tabled last week by Arts Minister Don Harwin:’
– Art Gallery of NSW (AGNSW) will reportedly lose $9 million a year
– Australian Museum (AM) will lose $13 million.
– Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences (MAAS) will lose $10 million.
– Sydney Living Museums (SLM) will lose $5 million.
Fairley records that a statement from the Public Service Association (PSA) said: “The NSW Government’s plan to slash more than $37 million in funding from the state’s cultural institutions will see huge staff cuts, cripple their ability to deliver world class exhibitions, and leave them empty, the union is warning”. Stewart Little, the PSA’s general secretary said: “The Berejiklian government is all about splashing cash on development, but never about investing in delivery.” ’
Fairley also provides details of some of the implications of such cuts in operating budgets, and provides further figures for recent and current building development.
Read more
  or  14 April Arts Hub Gina Fairley NSW budget

14 April, 2021
‘Millions on the line: Sydney’s museums and galleries plea for funding’
(extended version of print copy:  ‘Arts sector pleads for funds as cuts flagged)
Following her earlier report, Linda Morris writes: ‘The state’s galleries and museums have pitched for greater funding from NSW Treasury and privately warned the cumulative effect of year-on-year cuts is stripping them of vital resources. The additional funding bids have been made ahead of the NSW budget to be handed down on June 8, with the state government flagging multimillion-dollar cuts for the Art Gallery of NSW, the Australian Museum, the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences and Sydney Living Museums in budget forecasts… Struggling to recover from the impacts of COVID-19, they have also called attention to the impact of annual efficiency dividends that apply to all government departments in order to generate budget savings.’
‘The Public Service Association, which represents staff at those the institutions in line for cuts, said its members were worried there already were not enough skilled people to deliver exhibitions, particularly in Sydney Modern. The union said it remained concerned about the growing reliance on temporary and casual staff among these institutions, a factor that added to employment uncertainty in the broader arts sector. Many members had been classed as temporary workers despite working for four years or more, it said. “The Berejiklian government is all about splashing cash on development, but never about investing in delivery,” PSA head Stewart Little said. “The Berejiklian government is effectively turning these galleries and museums into empty and expensive mausoleums. NSW has just invested a huge amount of money in overdue upgrades to these cultural institutions, but now the building works are over the government is cutting them off at the knees, making it impossible to deliver on the potential of these new spaces.” ’
‘The minister’s spokesperson said the forecast figures were not the final budget numbers and did not represent the outcomes of the budget process.’
Read more  or  14 April SMH Linda M arts sector pleads

12 April, 2021
‘Multimillion-dollar funding cuts flagged for major Sydney cultural institutions’
(In print 13 April as ‘Major cuts flagged for museums, galleries’)
Linda Morris reports in the Sydney Morning Herald, about forecasts of severe budget cuts to major cultural institutions, in budget estimates to be announced in June. She explains: ‘The forward estimates act as a guide to Treasury thinking and are projected by two or three years so that galleries and museums can plan future exhibitions, staff budgets and programs with certainty.’
Proposed cuts include: ‘The Art Gallery of NSW is facing a multimillion-dollar funding cut that would hit its programs, staff and shows as it prepares to open the doors of its new home for contemporary art, Sydney Modern… The cut would be a major blow to the gallery’s daily operations and could affect planning for exhibitions, staff budgets and programs at the same time as it almost doubles its exhibition space with the construction of Sydney Modern due to finish in 2022.’… the Australian Museum would take an even deeper cut of $13 million just months after opening its $57 million renovated galleries. Total government funding is projected to fall from $45.6 million to $32.5 million from June due to a deep cut to the museum’s operating budget.
The Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences would have to find savings of almost $10 million annually with total government funding to fall from $39 million to $29.7 million over the next 12 months. It has also asked the government to fund renovations to the Ultimo Powerhouse this budget. Sydney Living Museums faces losing $5 million annually, a combination of recurrent and capital money. State Library will be protected this coming financial year but will lose $9 million in 2022-23 as a result of a tail-off in capital works funding. Sydney Opera House expects similar and stable levels of government funding.’
Morris also points out that: ‘Under Arts Minister Don Harwin, the state’s cultural institutions have benefited from record spending on capital works. The Berejiklian government has funded $244 million of the $344 million for Sydney Modern, with the rest coming from private donations. Walsh Bay Arts Precinct is costing $347.7 million, Sydney Opera House Concert Hall $236 million and the Parramatta Powerhouse $840 million. But the size of the operating budget is what determines the quality of art, exhibitions and performances inside the renovated and expanded spaces.’ Read more  or  12 April SMH Linda M – Multimillion cuts

April, 2021
‘Cuts to cultural institutions: NSW Government Budget Estimates 2020-2021’
Documents from a  government inquiry committee for ‘Budget Estimates 2020-2021’, which includes proposed funding reductions to major arts institutions, have prompted a great many protests and expressions of concern in public media and arts communities. The committee reports: ‘This inquiry was established on 18 November 2020 to report on the Budget Estimates and related papers for the financial year 2020-2021 presenting the amounts to be appropriated from the Consolidated Fund.’
To see the current figures cited for operating major cultural institutions, see the committee page here. In Other Documents, in Answers to Supplementary Questions on 23/3/21, go to Question 90, where the figures are provided for the Art Gallery of NSW, the Australian Museum, the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences, Sydney Opera House, State Library, Historic[al] Houses Trust, and State Archives Records Authority.  See: March 2021 Budget forecasts

This information provoked considerable informed protests in subsequent news reports (above), social media and Letters to the Editor, from this date on, about the need for recurrent and operational funding, despite an (unsourced) government statement which insists:  ‘The NSW Government has provided record funding to the arts sector, including cultural institutions in recent years. Under this Government, the state’s cultural institutions have benefited from record spending on capital works and will continue to receive the necessary financial support to ensure they can operate effectively, and continue playing a vital role in attracting tourism, generating jobs and driving the social and cultural fabric of our society. The forward planning figures referenced in today’s media are not the final budget numbers and as such do not represent the outcomes of the budget process. Funding decisions will be made as part of the normal budget process with the 2021-22 Budget to be handed down in June.’

13 April, 2021
‘Retail, pub, apartments planned for Parramatta Powerhouse Museum’
Joanne Vella, in the Parramatta Advertiser, writes that ‘critics have labelled the retail plans for the Powerhouse Parramatta project a “Westfields on water’’’, saying  ‘North Parramatta Residents’ Action Group obtained the retail vision and strategy for the museum, which outlines plans for “large format buzzing canteens, cafes, small bars and operators that combine food production with retail”.  “Food and beverage will be the primary retail category for Powerhouse Parramatta, a key driver of social interaction and a means of making the precinct relevant in daily social life,” the strategy states. “The proposed retail mix of food and beverage, lifestyle, culture, wellbeing and convenience for Powerhouse Parramatta is uniquely complex for a cultural facility, but essential to successfully establishing the project as a precinct rather than a museum.” ‘
‘The comments have sparked outrage from the action group. “The people of NSW are being duped,” action group spokeswoman Suzette Meade said. “Parramatta Powerhouse is just a Westfields on water to hold large business conventions, rolling exhibitions topped with apartments and a pub. We are not getting a museum — it’s there in black and white.”… ‘Shooters and Fishers Party leader Robert Borsak echoed the comments and said “It’s just an exercise in setting up a commercial precinct with a so-called museum tacked on the side”.  Infrastructure NSW has earmarked 56 apartments for the museum, a taxpayer-footed plan that triggered outrage because the landmark will be surrounded by hotels and apartments, including the neighbouring  Meriton tower.’ A spokesperson for the Powerhouse Museum, and  Business Western Sydney executive director, David Borger, defended the plans. Read more  or  13 April Parra Advertiser

April, 2021
‘NSW Heritage Act Review’
Of interest to those concerned about acknowledging and preserving the heritage aspects of the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, and the historic house, Willow Grove in Parramatta (as well as other sites), it is of significance that ‘Heritage NSW announces: The NSW Government is inviting community discussion on how heritage can be better managed and protected in NSW. ‘
– Heritage NSW has produced a Discussion paper: 
– And asks for written enquiries to be sent to them here: Policy2@environment.nsw.gov.au
Heritage NSW notes: ‘The NSW Heritage Act 1977 was first introduced over forty years ago. The Act has not been reviewed since 2007 and there have been no major reforms since 1999.
In April this year the government asked the NSW Legislative Council’s Social Issues Standing Committee to conduct a review of the Act. The review will look at the effectiveness of the Heritage Act and the NSW heritage regulatory system, along with heritage aspects of the Environmental Protection and Assessment Act 1979.
The purpose of the review is to see how we can deliver more effective, relevant, and best-practice ways of recognising, conserving, re-using and celebrating the important heritage of NSW. The findings of the review will contribute to the evidence base for a Government White Paper and a subsequent Heritage Bill.’ …‘To assist with their public consultation, the discussion paper has been referred to the Social Issues Standing Committee. ..The Committee will call for submissions from the public on the review and we encourage all stakeholders and interested members of the community to take the opportunity to have your say.’

3 April, 2021
Don’t be fooled, the ‘Westmead Place Strategy’ puts lipstick on a pig
‘Ours is a government of many plans’ writes Elizabeth Farrelly in the Sydney Morning Herald. ‘Indeed, such is the profusion of plans, so vast is their coverage and so thick and fast their arrival one almost suspects deliberate obfuscation… In all this multiplicity, though, all this rampant “building Sydney’s future”, there’s just one discernible idea. Innovation. Tech-hubs have deluged inner Sydney, designating everything from Eveleigh through Central to White Bay an “innovation corridor”. But if western Sydney was feeling any FOMO in the innovation department, it shouldn’t worry. Pretty soon, if the plans are to be believed, and just upriver from the new flood-prone Powerhouse-to-be, Parramatta will have its own 250-hectare “health and innovation district”.’
Farrelly elaborates further: ‘It’s all set out in the 81-page draft Westmead Place Strategy. The name makes it sound harmless, a collection of landscape fixes for that woebegone hospital campus. Be not fooled. It’s not about place, it’s not strategic and it’s certainly not harmless, less concerned to fix the hospital than expand it to 10 times its already considerable size. It’s not even innovative. Far from it. This is grubby old business as usual. What it really is, this Place Strategy, is a cloak for stuffing as much development as possible into the fragile, treasured Cumberland Hospital precinct, part of which is proposed for world heritage-listing.’ Then she provides more details: Read more:  or  3 April SMH Farrelly

28 March, 2021
‘Quote of the Week’: Peter FitzSimons
Listed in Quote of the Week, in his Opinion column in the Sydney Morning Herald, columnist Peter FitzSimons includes:
“The flooding we saw on the weekend wouldn’t have come within 4 metres of the museum entrance. Powerhouse Parramatta will be a very safe building for people to visit and for the collection to be exhibited.” – Peter Collins, president of the Powerhouse Trust, saying nothing to see here, folks, after a flood warning was issued last weekend for the ground floor of the four-level car park that’s to be demolished to make way for the museum, sparking renewed criticism around the contentious development.
“The lower parts of the Parramatta Powerhouse will go underwater … that’s just the nature of the riverside location that has been chosen. Now it’s up to the state government to decide whether the risk is worth it – and that risk assessment has not been done.” – Independent Parramatta-based flood management consultant Steven Molino.
Read more: 
or  28 March SMH Fitz 

26 March, 2021
‘Legal action launched to stop work on Parramatta Powerhouse’
Despite the insistence of local business and development groups, supported by the Daily Telegraph, that the controversial plans for the Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta should proceed, significant local opposition is also strongly maintained.
Linda Morris reports in the Sydney Morning Herald that ‘Residents have launched legal action to halt work on the $915 million Parramatta Powerhouse, just weeks after the Berejiklian government gave the museum project the green light. A residents action group has sought an injunction to halt any works taking place on the historic 140-year-old Victorian Italianate Villa, Willow Grove, that stands in the way of the proposed museum pending a full hearing of claims before the Land and Environment Court… The North Parramatta Residents Action Group is challenging planning approval on the basis that the environmental assessment did not meet requirements for a state significant project. Summons for a judicial review was filed on Thursday. “We have been left with no option other than to commence this action,” its spokesperson Suzette Meade said. “The Powerhouse development can be redesigned but Willow Grove’s heritage significance is inseparable from its location.” The claim states that the environmental assessment failed to assess any feasible alternatives to development including other sites. Further, the environment assessments did not demonstrate, as required, attempts to avoid or mitigate the impact of heritage significance or cultural heritage values of the site and surrounding heritage items. The Land and Environment Court has been asked to rule that consent by the Minister of Planning or their delegate is invalid.’
Read more:  or  26 March SMH Legal

26 March, 2021
‘Best of the West: Ten major projects to shape region’s future’
In the Daily Telegraph it is noted: ‘The west is forging ahead at great pace with infrastructure projects abounding but there is plenty more to do to ensure the future dynamism and success of this vast region, local leaders said. The Powerhouse’s move to Parramatta is a great start but should be just the beginning of cultural migration west. Here are seven projects that western Sydney needs’. (These are listed) Read more, or  26 March DailyT Best West

23 March, 2021
Statement: ‘There are Serious Flood Risks at the Powerhouse Parramatta Site’
Museum experts Kylie Winkworth and Jennifer Sanders, members of the Powerhouse Museum Alliance, provide a statement about the serious risks to the proposed new museum of flooding in Parramatta. They say: ‘While NSW is in the grip of a flood emergency, bringing widespread misery and destruction, the Powerhouse Museum Alliance is grateful the proposed Powerhouse Parramatta site has only flooded to the level of the undercroft. This is the space the Powerhouse intended to use for exhibitions, public programs, a café and other activities, until it was ruled out by the DPIE’s peer review water expert, and the Department of Planning’s conditions of consent. Both demonstrated a better grasp of the flood risks on the site than MAAS.  Still the NSW Government has approved the only museum in the world designed to allow high velocity floodwaters 2-3m deep to flow underneath the museum.’ They provide details by Steven Molino, Sydney’s foremost expert on flood risks in the Parramatta River, identifying areas at risk to the collections, exhibitions and visitors, and say about earlier reports: ‘It is incorrect for the MAAS CEO to assert that the engineering work undertaken by internationally renowned engineers ARUP will ensure that the ground level of the museum will never be impacted by a flood event. The President of the MAAS Trust, Peter Collins was poorly advised to mistakenly claim that the weekend flood demonstrates that our new Museum… is positioned well above even the rarest of flood events….[and conclude] The discretionary siting of a major new museum in a high risk flood zone is contrary to prudent museum planning and sensible infrastructure investment. A flood in the museum poses risks to visitors, the collection, museum programming and to the museum’s reputation. Every flood event means higher recurrent costs and risks.’
Read more: 23 March PMA Serious Flood Risks

23 March, 2021
‘Flood proves Powerhouse Museum is safe’
Robert Moran reports in the Sydney Morning Herald that ‘Powerhouse Parramatta bosses have defended the museum’s site following weekend flooding, saying water levels “would not have come within four metres” of the future building’s entrance. A flood warning was issued on Saturday for the ground floor of the four-level car park to be demolished to make way for the museum, sparking renewed criticism around the contentious development. But Peter Collins, president of the Powerhouse Trust, said the weekend’s flooding proved that the new museum was “positioned well above even the rarest of flood events” and Powerhouse chief executive Lisa Havilah said the museum’s design and engineering teams had ensured “every element of Powerhouse Parramatta puts safety first”. Read more: 23 March SMH Flood proves museum is safe

23 March, 2021
Museum to create ‘great city’ in the west
Lachlan Leeming writes In the Daily Telegraph: ‘Not just a tourist drawcard and a cultural landmark, the new Parramatta Powerhouse Museum has the potential to change history, no less. Despite opposition to moving the museum from inner-city Ultimo, the state government last month finally received approval to deliver the new facility to the west. And Premier Gladys Berejiklian was buoyed by its prospects, saying it can “change the course of history”.
And, while detractors continue to argue over its design and location, politicians and thought-leaders of the west have heaped praise upon the project they say will help Parramatta’s transformation into a “great city”.’ Leeming cites words of approval from Arts Minister Don Harwin, Premier Gladys Berejiklian, Powerhouse Museum chief executive Lisa Havilah and Chris Brown, founding chair of think-tank the Western Sydney Leadership Dialogue.’
 Read more, or 23 March, Daily T Museum to create ‘great city’ in west

23 March, 2021
‘Flooding no cause for worry’
Josh Hanrahan and Angira Bharadwaj write In the Daily Telegraph: ‘The basement carpark at the site flooded at the weekend but supporters of the museum’s move said concerns about its viability were not necessary. Museum chief executive Lisa Havilah said construction of the museum would ensure the west’s new major tourist drawcard would never be affected by flood. “Flood mitigation is core to the design of Powerhouse Parramatta. “The weekend’s flood event, as it stands today, would have come nowhere near the museum ground level,” Ms Havilah said.  Read more: 23 March Daily T Flooding no cause for worry

23 March, 2021
Hub set to make ‘New History’ in Parramatta
James O’Doherty writes In the Daily Telegraph: ‘A historic part of Parramatta will be restored and reinvigorated to create a hub for the jobs of the future, with a plan to create a “Startup Hub” in the Parramatta North Heritage Core now approved. Emerging entrepreneurs and the local community are set to benefit from the revamp of three heritage buildings that form part of the circa 1876 Hospital Spinal Range Building and circa 1892 Kitchen Block in Parramatta.’ 
Read more: 23 March Daily T Hub set – New History

22 March, 2021
‘Sydney floods reignite Powerhouse museum controversy as Parramatta River bursts its banks’
Elizabeth Fortescue writes in The Art Newspaper that ‘Torrential downpours across New South Wales in Australia this weekend rekindled anxieties that the future second outpost of the Powerhouse Museum on the banks of the Parramatta River in Sydney is under threat of severe flooding. [This] prompted … a statement today in which Peter Collins, the president of the Powerhouse Trust, said that the water would not have come within four metres of the entrance to the future Powerhouse Parramatta… But David Shoebridge a Greens member of the New South Wales parliament and part of the Upper House committee inquiring into the Powerhouse’s plans, says the weekend incident was “nowhere near a one-in-a-hundred-year flood event, which would be about five to ten metres above where we are seeing this water already. The people of Parramatta deserve a world class museum that will be safe to go to when it rains,” Shoebridge said. A spokeswoman for the North Parramatta Residents Action Group says the new museum should be built 900 metres along the river on a 26-hectare riparian site which is not flood prone and whose numerous colonial-era buildings would lend themselves to use as artists’ studios and the like.’
Fortescue recalls: ‘In 2018, the NSW state government unveiled a controversial plan to relocate the Powerhouse Museum—part of the Museum of Applied Arts & Sciences—from central Sydney to the western suburb of Parramatta, despite widespread criticism and a parliamentary inquiry. At a cost of A$1.2bn ($890m), the relocation was set to be the most expensive and complex museum move anywhere in the world. It would have meant demolishing the museum, which opened in 1988 in Ultimo, central Sydney, and seven historic buildings in Parramatta, 23km to the west, to make way for a new museum due to open in 2023. Last year…the government cancelled the relocation, opting instead to keep open the museum in central Ultimo and build a second, new “world-class” facility to in Parramatta.’ 
Read more, or 22 March E Fortescue Art newspaper

22 March, 2021
‘After a decade of lost opportunity to fix NSW’s planning mess, here’s a model for success’ In print as ‘How to fix NSW’s planning debacle’
In his critique in The Sydney Morning Herald, about how ‘After a decade of lost opportunities, NSW needs a genuinely independent planning commission, free of ministerial intrusion and vested interests,’ James Weirick includes a reference to the Powerhouse relocation proposal . He points out that:  ‘The Liberal-National Coalition came to power a decade ago promising reform of a NSW planning system besmirched under Labor by allegations of undue developer influence, overdevelopment at Barangaroo and the misuse of ministerial discretion in planning decisions. The O’Farrell government could have been a model of probity in these matters. It overstepped the mark, however, with a planning bill that proposed to weaken the already weak environmental measures of the state planning legislation and to open significant categories of property development to fast-track approval under “exempt and complying” provisions.’
Among many issues, Weirick notes: ‘The sale of public assets – electricity infrastructure, the ports, 20,000 government properties and so on – has been justified on the basis of capital recycling to fund new infrastructure, most notably transport projects across metropolitan Sydney aimed at overcoming the woeful lack transport investment in the Labor years.  Alas, the funds have been spent on the wrong transport projects…These are part of a long list of undertakings – the stadiums, the Powerhouse Museum, the Millers Point social housing sell-off, redevelopment of the Waterloo Estate, sale of the Bridge Street heritage buildings, sale of the Land Titles Registry, the Aerotropolis land deals, treeless suburbs in western Sydney – that have one thing in common. They are all mistakes. Or more accurately, they are the ruinous outcomes of persistence in folly, as all have had wise counsel ranged against them – to no effect. In the next 10 years we can expect more of the same unless there is fundamental change to the way our city is planned.’ Read more:  or  22 March SMH Weirick

21 March, 2021
‘Parramatta River’s floodwaters renew fight on Powerhouse Museum move’
Joshua Hanrahan writes in the Daily Telegraph that  ‘The flooding of a construction site where the $915 million Powerhouse Museum is set to be built has added fuel to the fire already burning over its controversial move to Parramatta. Three days of heavy rain led to flooding on the future site of the museum, which is still yet to make its controversial move from its inner city location…Furious locals who have long argued against building the museum on the site say they have been vindicated by its flooding. They believe an alternative site at the old Cumberland Hospital, 900 metres away and 10 metres above river level, is more appropriate.’
Read more  or  21 March Daily T Parra floods

20 March, 2021
Spokespeople Jennifer Sanders and Kylie Winkworth from the Powerhouse Museum Alliance, and Suzette Meade from the North Parramatta Residents Action Group, distributed a media release for a press conference on  SUNDAY 21st MARCH 2021 – 10.30am , 34 Phillip Street, Parramatta @ WILLOW GROVE , Joined by David Shoebridge – Greens and Darren Greenfield – CFMEU. They wrote:  ‘For the second time in 13 months the Powerhouse Parramatta site is inundated with fast flowing flood waters, breaching the riverbank and symbolically washing away the Powerhouse Parramatta site construction banners, sending them swirling downstream…The torrent of floodwaters across the museum site highlights the reckless stupidity of the Government pushing ahead with the museum project that will put treasures of NSW at risk. Museum and flood experts have long warned of the obvious and unacceptable risk to museum visitors and irreplaceable collections. Community groups including the North Parramatta Residents Action Group have lobbied for the 26ha Cumberland Hospital precinct 900metres away for a Museum of NSW, supported by the Powerhouse Museum Alliance.
An ill-conceived thought bubble is destroying Parramatta’s heritage and putting the Powerhouse Museum collection at risk when there is a better site. Willow Grove is on death row, awaiting demolition, despite community resistance and union solidarity to save it.
“… After spending millions on consultants, the Government still can’t demonstrate that the development will safe for visitors or the museum’s collections.” Kylie Winkworth – PMA
“… This is an outrageous waste of public money when communities across NSW are reeling from fire, flood, drought, mice plagues, and stark inequalities in health, education and cultural funding.” Jennifer Sanders, PMA
“The river levels flooding the Powerhouse site today mirror the height of the State governments stubbornness to concede this is the wrong site for Parramatta’s long awaited museum – on many levels” Suzette Meade, Spokesperson NPRAG  Read more: Parramatta Floods Powerhouse Site Press Conference

 20 March, 2021
‘Parramatta River breaks its banks, flooding Powerhouse Museum site’
Following devastating reports of floods across eastern NSW, Linda Morris and Andrew Taylor write in the Sydney Morning Herald that ‘Floodwaters have breached the site of the new $915 million Parramatta Powerhouse a year after a one-in-20-year flood. Hit by three days of heavy rain, the swollen Parramatta River burst its banks on Saturday, creeping up to the construction fence line. A flood warning has been made for the ground floor of a four-level car park that is earmarked for demolition to make way for the museum. Images shared on social media showed water from the river flooding streets and bike paths, while a video posted by Parramatta Labor councillor Donna Davis depict the museum site inundated with floodwaters. Cr Davis on Facebook said it was “old news” that the site on the river floods every time there is heavy rain. “That’s why we know this is not the best place for a squillion $ museum,” she said. “A Powerhouse Museum that has been redesigned to permanently close the ground floor ‘undercroft’ because it’s not safe from flooding…”‘. ‘The Berejiklian government has been criticised for its selection of the flood-prone site for the Parramatta Powerhouse, approved with 188 conditions last month. .. Shadow Arts Minister Walt Secord said the government had been repeatedly warned this would happen. “This is the second time in two years the Powerhouse Parramatta site has been inundated by flooding. The Berejiklian government … maintained it was a one-in-1000-year chance of happening and it has happened twice in two years. This is a complete debacle.” ‘   Steven Molino, ‘an environmental and natural hazards consultant with long experience in the Parramatta area, said ‘the risks to collections displayed on the museum’s ground floor were not properly considered in the environment impact statement, the basis of which the museum was conditionally approved.’
Meanwhile, against obvious evidence, ‘Arts minister Don Harwin told a recent parliamentary inquiry that the museum collection would not be at risk. “Let us make it quite clear: The ground floor of the new museum, which is at the level that has been approved above the one-in-1000-year flood level, is one of the highest ground floors, arguably, of any building in Parramatta.’ Read more:  or  20 March SMH Parra river flood

11 March, 2021
(on-line 10 March)
‘Sydney remains in his debt’: City mourns loss of ‘visionary’ Jack Mundey
Tim Barlass reports in the Sydney Morning Herald on ‘Jack Mundey State Memorial Service in honour of the “visionary” leader who saved the face of Sydney’  where many people spoke about his legacy and influence. ‘In the 1970s as leader of the Builders Labourers Federation he instituted some 40 green bans where union members refused to work on certain projects earmarked for demolition and high-rise development. He saved many of Sydney’s inner heritage areas including The Rocks, Woolloomooloo, parts of Centennial Park, The Botanic Gardens, Aboriginal housing in Redfern and more. MC Bob Carr said Mundey galvanised public opinion and laid the basis of heritage protection. “He was taking on the developers who under premier Askin were levelling Sydney block by block. Developer power was all that mattered in Sydney until Jack spoke out,” Mr Carr said.’ And: ‘National secretary of the CFMEU David Noonan said historic buildings were still under threat today, citing the example of Willow Grove in Parramatta. “[It] is a beautiful historic building scheduled for destruction and I am so proud to say it is the CFMEU and the building unions that stand with the community. That’s the spirit of the green bans, that’s the spirit of the NSW BLF – and that’s the spirit of Jack Mundey.”’ Read more:  or 11 March SMH Mundey
‘Guardian of Sydney’s heritage was a man ahead of his time’
The Editorial Opinion piece in the Sydney Morning Herald confirms: It was fitting that NSW held a state funeral on Wednesday for Jack Mundey, the trade unionist and environmentalist who deserves much of the credit for what Sydney looks like today. Mr Mundey, who died last year, led the so-called “green bans” movement in the 1970s, which prevented the destruction of priceless heritage architecture by property developers.…While Mr Mundey was a global figure in the 1970s, the issues he brought to the fore back then are still very current. Building unions have recently slapped a new green ban on Willow Grove, the unique 19th century stately home that the NSW government wants to demolish, move and rebuild nearby as part of the construction of the proposed new Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta.’ Read more   or  11 March SMH Opinion editorial

9 March, 2021
‘Berejiklian government ditches plans for Powerhouse river bridge’
Brief in print 11 March, as ‘Brake on costs scuppers art bridge plans’
Linda Morris, in the Sydney Morning Herald announces that: ‘The government has abandoned plans for a $10 million art bridge over the Parramatta River, a central plank in the $140 million Parramatta Powerhouse land deal lauded by NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian four years ago. The disclosure comes as the Maritime Union of Australia announced it would enforce a green ban imposed by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union’s NSW branch to prevent any demolition of the Italianate villa Willow Grove on museum land. The historic home, a key site of women’s history for Parramatta, is to be relocated to make way for the new $915 million museum. Originally the new museum was to anchor a vibrant arts and cultural precinct in Parramatta, which was to include a revamped Riverside Theatres connected to the museum by a new footlink across the river… Greens MP David Shoebridge said the whole rationale for the original land deal seemed to have fallen through. “Basically, the state government has walked away from the land deal,” Mr Shoebridge said. “The revamped Riverside and cultural precinct can’t be delivered with the funds the council has. The whole concept has unravelled, largely because of the costs blowout and delays for the Powerhouse – such a tragic missed opportunity for Parramatta.” ‘ Read more  or  9 March SMH Govt ditches river bridge

8 March, 2021
‘Heritage Debate was always heated’
Di Bartok, in Issue 8 of the Parramatta Times, writes: ‘With International Women’s Day for this year just passed, defenders of Parramatta’s dwindling heritage buildings are reflecting on the sustained attack on female history in Sydney’s burgeoning second CBD.’ She describes issues associated with development at Parramatta’s Female Factory and the ‘relocation’ of Willow Grove, and interviews Suzette Meade from the North Parramatta Residents Action Group, who ‘finds it ironic that the wiping or disregard for the history of female pioneers in Parramatta is happening under the State’s first elected female Premier, Gladys Berejiklian.’ Bartok  further discusses views from  local lobbyists for heritage, including local Councillor Donna Davis and two of the state’s largest unions, as well as the continuing defence for demolition in the name of progress and employment. Read more  or  Parramatta Times Issue 8

8 March, 2021
‘Campaign to save Parramatta’s Willow Grove intensifies’
Alec Smart writes In the Sydney Sentinel: ‘Campaigners lobbying to keep the heritage-listed Willow Grove villa in Parramatta have increased their efforts to oppose its “relocation” to another site by Infrastructure NSW, the NSW Government’s public works agency. ..Despite the announcement in 2015 by then-NSW Premier Mike Baird that the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo was to be demolished and a significantly smaller ‘replacement’ built in Parramatta, it wasn’t until June 2018 that the public was made aware that the heritage-listed Willow Grove and historic 1881-built St George’s Terrace were also earmarked for destruction.
The information was only shared by the NSW Government after an executive order from the NSW Upper House demanded they release their business plan for the Powerhouse Museum relocation – NSW although the subsequent documents were severely redacted. On 1 July, 2020, the NSW Government rescinded the destruction order on the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo. However, the ‘new’ Powerhouse construction in Parramatta, projected to cost $840million, is still proceeding and will involve removal of Willow Grove… However, a report by Anglo-Dutch auditing giant KPMG proposed that Willow Grove be reassembled beside the old Parramatta Correctional Centre. …On Thursday, 11 February, 2021, final Planning Approval was granted by Planning Minister Rob Stokes for Infrastructure NSW to construct the $840 million new Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta, still scheduled to open in 2024. … The week after the announcement, Powerhouse Trust chairman Peter Collins invited North Parramatta Residents’ Action Group (NPRAG) president Suzette Meade to a cafe meeting to enquire what was her preferred selection for relocation of Willow Grove, to which she replied there was “no Plan B – leave it where it is”. Ms Meade said Mr Stokes had made “a flawed decision on a flawed (environmental impact statement)”… “The community are ready to fight and will chain ourselves to the fence with the CFMEU to protect Willow Grove.”…Darren Greenfield, CFMEU NSW Construction Secretary, strongly urges the retention of Willow Grove in its historical site. In October 2020, whilst reiterating his union’s retention of their 30 June green ban, he added, “…There is no sensible reason why Willow Grove cannot also be preserved in its current location and incorporated into the new Powerhouse Museum …The people of Parramatta and Western Sydney deserve a museum that celebrates their heritage, rather than destroy an irreplaceable historic building to make way for the museum gift shop.”
Read more  or  8 March Sydney Sentinel

8 March, 2021
‘On IWD we urge Premier Berejiklian to stop the destruction of women’s heritage’
In a joint media release for International Women’s Day the North Parramatta Residents Action Group (NPRAG) and the Powerhouse Museum Alliance (PMA) write: ‘Women were the unsung builders and creators of culture in Parramatta. From the remarkable Dharug leader Maria Locke, to the heroines of labour in the Female Factory, it is women have made Parramatta a heritage hot spot. Now, two centuries of women’s history and heritage is under direct threat from the NSW Government. In NSW the heritage Minister Don Harwin is determined to obliterate places of deep importance in women’s history in Parramatta….The minister for western Sydney and Tourism Stuart Ayres is leasing out Australia’s most intact female convict site… for office space. While Rob Stokes the Planning and Public Spaces Minister has a monstrous proposal to fill the botanic heritage estate this sacred women’s site is nestled in… with 1000s of residential units.’ Spokespeople elaborate:
“On IWD we urge everyone to stop the heritage vandalism in Parramatta. Stop the reckless demolition of Annie Gallagher’s Willow Grove. Stop the NSW Government erasing women’s heritage places and stories in North Parramatta Female Factory precinct. We must listen to women, hear their voices, and protect their places for the future.” – Kylie Winkworth (PMA)
“The Powerhouse Museum must not be complicit in the destruction of our women’s heritage – Willowgrove must be saved and cherished. How can women, children and men from across our community understand our history – women’s history –  to build our shared future if we destroy women’s heritage? We must Cherish Willowgrove and the Female Factory and shout loudly to the world about women’s contribution to Australia.” – Jennifer Sanders (PMA)
“Instead of being revered the status and memories of our women’s history in Parramatta is being erased demolished for development, or having serviced offices plonked inside. How can our daughters aspire to greatness when our leaders are not showing respect for the stories of the strong, determined and resilient women that came before them? “ Suzette Meade – NPRAG Read more: NPRAG + PMA media release on IWD 2021

6-7 March, 2021
‘Energy in Motion’
Christopher Allen, in the Weekend Australian, reviews the Steam Revolution exhibition at the Powerhouse Museum, documenting how ‘steam power captured artists and transformed everything from mining to manufacturing’.  He discusses the history of steam power from the time of its discovery in Greece in the first century AD and development during the Industrial Revolution, especially as it is represented in the Museum’s exhibition through machines such as the Boulton and Watt machine, Locomotive No 1 and others. He considers these also in the context of the work of Impressionist artists such as Turner, Manet, Monet and Australian, Arthur Streeton. Allen’s review is a welcome reminder of the significance of the Powerhouse Museum and its collection, in Ultimo.
Read more: 6-7 March C Allen Weekend Aust Steam Revolution Exh review

4 March, 2021
‘After 22 years  Macgregor to end her successful reign’
Linda Morris, in the Sydney Morning Herald, reports that Liz Ann Macgregor, director of the Museum of Contemporary Art  from 1999, ‘has called time on her role as director… The Scottish-born Macgregor announced on Wednesday afternoon that she would leave the institution in October to allow for a new director to lead the post-COVID-19 recovery. Initially, she intends to return home to visit family in Scotland, including her elderly mother, who is aged 86, and hasn’t ruled out penning a book about her life and work in Sydney.’
However, despite Macgregor’s achievements in the MCA, Morris also mentions her extremely controversial advice to then Premier Mike Baird about relocating the Powerhouse Museum: ‘During her reign, Macgregor implemented free admission, attracted millions in philanthropic donations, oversaw a major redevelopment, championed Indigenous art – including overseeing a world-class survey of bark painter John Mawurndjul in 2018 – and lobbied the government to invest in the arts in western Sydney, controversially becoming then Premier Mike Baird’s ambassador for western Sydney and backing the relocation of the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta. Read more,   or  4 March SMH Liz Ann M

And Read Here for an announcement ‘Fair Go for the West: Arts ambassador calls for Museums to move to Parramatta’ in the Daily Telegraph on 24 February, 2015: where: ‘PREMIER Mike Baird’s Western Sydney arts ambassador Elizabeth Ann Macgregor has thrown her support behind a controversial proposal to shift the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta. Ms Macgregor, director of the Museum of Contemporary Art Australia, believes the Powerhouse is the “obvious” candidate for a shift to Sydney’s population heart. The Powerhouse had ambitious plans to be better connected to the rest of the city. But Ms Macgregor said the State Government would be better off spending the money on a brand new home for the museum in Parramatta. Read also under 24 February 2015 on PMA web here.

March 2021
5th hearing for Second Inquiry into Powerhouse Museum: Transcript and videos :
Now accessible, are the videos and transcripts of the 5th hearing on Monday 15th February, of the NSW Upper House select committee examining the Government’s proposal for the Powerhouse Museum.
Speakers included: Hon Don Harwin MLC; Ms Kate Foy: Dept of Premier and Cabinet; Mr Simon Draper: CEO Infrastructure NSW; Ms Lisa Havilah: Chief Executive, MAAS; Hon Peter Collins AM QC: President, Board of Trustees, MAAS; Mr Christopher Brown AM: Chair, WS Powerhouse Museum Community Alliance; Mr Darren Greenfield Secretary, CFMEUnion, NSW ; Mr Steven Molino: Principal, Molino Stewart; Mr Tom Lockley: Private citizen and PHM volunteer; Clr Donna Davis: City of Parramatta Council.
Much discussion focussed on plans, costs and consultation for the new Powerhouse museum in Parramatta, with particular attention to issues of the floodprone site, and the controversies associated with relocating the historic WillowGrove building. Also mentioned was the remaining lack of clarity about the specific future role of the Powerhouse Museum at its significant Ultimo site, where a decision from ‘options’ has still to be made.
Main committee page and link to video recordings  HERE: 
Transcript for 5th hearing  HERE.

26 February 2021
‘The Government’s proposed expansion of Castle Hill Discovery Centre … is completely unnecessary’
As part of the government’s  Powerhouse Parramatta/Ultimo proposals, most of the Powerhouse Museum’s collection is being controversially relocated to distant stores in Castle Hill.
In their email and Facebook entries, the Save the Powerhouse group summarises the issues:
‘It has been said many times before, but it’s still worth repeating. The Government’s proposed expansion of its uninspiring Castle Hill Discovery Centre, over 20km from Sydney and Parramatta in the middle of nowhere, is COMPLETELY UNNECESSARY. The Powerhouse already has all the essential facilities required for smooth future functioning including collection storage, curation, exhibition preparation and backroom operations, in the custom-designed Harwood Building. … With efficient planning of the so-called “Ultimo Renewal” there would be ample room for a large part of the current collection, and the rest, including new additions could be accommodated at Castle Hill with minor modifications. By NOT building the expansion, the Government could save (estimate) $50M for spending on other projects more beneficial to the NSW community…
Experts warn that storing collections far away from the relevant museums (at Ultimo and/or Parramatta) would put them at great risk as many of these fragile objects would need to be transported frequently (whenever temporary exhibitions changed)…Museum specialists further advise that future exhibition preparation from a remote location is inefficient and impractical. It would again generate a lot of road traffic, with a waste of qualified staff time spent on the road, while Curators are also better located at the museum where the exhibition is actually mounted …From the public’s perspective, Castle Hill is remote and difficult to access by public transport. It also has limited car parking space. Visitors, especially international tourists with tight itineraries, will be reluctant to brave the time-consuming journey to Castle Hill… when the acclaimed Ultimo Powerhouse is conveniently located at the heart of Sydney. Read more: 26 Feb Save the Powerhouse re Castle Hill

21 February, 2021
‘A state determined to demolish memories’; on line as ‘I had my first pash at Parramatta’s Roxy: The fight to save the memory-making buildings of Sydney’s second city’
Helen Pitt, in the Sydney Morning Herald, writes about ‘Parramatta’s picture palace, the Roxy Cinema. I can’t remember the film but I do remember the frisson of excitement I felt every time I walked up the elegant stairs of this Spanish Mission-style theatre and beneath its ornate archway… Generations of suburban Sydneysiders feel the same about this heritage-listed cinema. Built in 1929, the same year as central Sydney’s opulent State Theatre, also scene of one of the great conservation battles/victories for 1970s Sydneysiders, this George Street glory was flagged to be on the Parramatta civic walk from the train station down to the Parramatta River. A tourist attraction, like nearby Willow Grove, a short distance away on Phillip Street.
On Friday, February 12, at 5.45pm, Planning Minister Rob Stokes announced, without much fanfare, this Victorian Italianate two-storey villa, was now slated to be dismantled and relocated to make way for the “New Parramatta Powerhouse project.” Like the experts I refuse to call it a museum.
If you didn’t already know it from the NSW Parliamentary upper house inquiry, there’s a lot of love for Willow Grove in this community…The people of Parramatta – past and present – have spoken – loudly in both the case of the Roxy and Willow Grove. They want their heritage buildings respected, retained and revived. They will chain themselves to the buildings to stop the vandals if necessary, just as Jack did. Now is the time to shout it from the old red-tiled rooftop of the white-stuccoed hacienda-style Roxy, just like the immortal refrain by anchorman Howard Beale in the 1976 film Network: “I am as mad as hell and I am not going to take it any more.”’  Read more, or  21 Feb, 2021 SMH  or  21 Feb SMH print

20 February, 2021
‘Heritage is meaningless in NSW if we let Willow Grove go’
 Elizabeth Farrelly, in the Sydney Morning Herald, writes: ‘When Powerhouse Trust chairman Peter Collins summoned North Parramatta Residents’ Action Group president Suzette Meade to his office this week to ask for her Plan B, he should have had his own up his sleeve. At one level, Meade v Collins was a tiny skirmish in a five-year battle. In one corner was Collins, charged with removing the sweet Italianate villa Willow Grove from the billion-dollar path of the Powerhouse juggernaut, aka the milk crate. Facing him was Meade, tireless defender of Parramatta’s rapidly dwindling heritage, including Willow Grove. Behind that, though, lies the whole question of why heritage matters. We need to decide. Is it OK for governments to duck and weave like the shoddiest of developers? Or should they show best practice and moral leadership? Meade told Collins she had no Plan B. He regrouped. What was her preferred site for Willow Grove’s knock-down rebuild? … Meade stood firm. Leave it where it is: Phillip Street.’
Farrelly documents the history of Willow Grove, and the recent much-criticised state government approval to ‘relocate it’ to make room for the new Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta. She recounts: ‘Late the preceding Friday, the state had approved its own indefensible Powerhouse project. On Sunday, Valentine’s Day, Meade was out with … scores of others, channelling floods of community love into a thicket of blood-red hearts strung along Willow Grove’s pretty cast-iron fence. By 7am Monday the grotesquely misnamed Create NSW had removed the hearts, as it had countless times before … Then it erected an even bigger fence to prevent any recurrence.’
…’Back in 2017, Willow Grove was owned by the council. In a mechanism designed to protect heritage, its air rights had been sold to a neighbouring development and a covenant placed on its title. Willow Grove had been fully restored. Then the state offered to buy it for $140 million – on one condition. The covenant had to go. … That was 2019. Simultaneously, the state launched its international Powerhouse design competition.’…The winners, Paris-based Moreau Kusunoki and Australia’s Genton, simply pretended Willow Grove didn’t exist…This, in December 2019, caused huge public outcry.’
‘Earlier that year, an upper house inquiry had already found the government’s business case for the Powerhouse relocation “did not comply” with Treasury’s own guidelines. It recommended the project “not proceed”. It was just common sense. Governments don’t demolish museums. They build them. … The inquiry recommended restoring the existing Powerhouse and giving Parramatta its own, grown-up museum, not some hand-me-down entertainment space. It was ignored. Six months later, in response to public grief over Willow Grove, the CFMEU issued its first green ban of the century. The Premier, it said, “should be under no illusion … people will be prepared to put their bodies in front of machinery”. This was a serious blow. Then, via KPMG, the solution. Relocate – not only the Powerhouse, but poor little Willow Grove…The union remained defiant, but KPMG got a partner, Mark Hassell, on the Powerhouse board. Nice.
Except for Willow Grove. Relocating heritage is an act of deepest disrespect. It contravenes the Burra Charter, Australia’s heritage bible – which says “a building should remain … in its historical location” – and breaches every tenet of best practice. …For all Australians, heritage connects us to our stories, our land, and our sense of the sacred. You can’t just shove it around. If Willow Grove goes – if government not only allows but connives at the demolition of a listed, title-restricted public building – heritage is meaningless in NSW. Nothing is safe. So the fight for Willow Grove could get very big indeed.’ Read more, or 20 Feb SMH

19 February, 2021
5th Hearing: 7 Videos now available
The NSW government web page for the ’Hearing Schedule for the Inquiry into the government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects in NSW”, shows that 7 videos are now on line – and transcripts of the interviews are expected soon.
Speakers included: Hon Don Harwin MLC; Ms Kate Foy: Dept of Premier and Cabinet; Mr Simon Draper: CEO Infrastructure NSW; Ms Lisa Havilah: Chief Executive, MAAS; Hon Peter Collins AM QC: President, Board of Trustees, MAAS; Mr Christopher Brown AM: Chair, WS Powerhouse Museum Community Alliance; Mr Darren Greenfield Secretary, CFMEUnion, NSW ; Mr Steven Molino: Principal, Molino Stewart; Mr Tom Lockley: Private citizen; Clr Donna Davis: City of Parramatta Council.
For introductory information about the committee, previous hearings, and the schedule for this and earlier hearings, go to: HERE
For the schedule of speakers for 15 February, 2021, go to: HERE
For the 7 Videos now available, go to: HERE

18th February, 2021
Is this house losing power? Someone somewhere is going to ask “why have we got two Powerhouses?”
Urban policy and strategy specialist, Mike Brown, writes in The Fifth Estate: ‘Here’s a cynical take on recent announcements concerning the Parramatta Powerhouse. It’s getting sillier… Just as advertising has become the product – rather than the thing promoted – we recently learned that the newly approved Powerhouse is set to become Australia’s very own Smithsonian, as though this potential equates to its delivery. This is magical thinking; plain political conceit. The obvious riposte is, why didn’t we make it so at Ultimo some time back?
Breathtaking cluelessness: No one objects to the idea of building a new nationally significant museum in Parramatta. Originally, objections were against its relocation from Ultimo in what looked like a sleazy property play to free up some inner-city land for developers.
Now that the Ultimo Powerhouse has been “saved” (refer following discussion) objections are against the destruction of existing cultural heritage – Willow Grove and St George Terraces – to build the competition winning scheme…The triteness of the “Smithsonian” idea can be grasped from a simple 10-second search here; “the Smithsonian Institution is the world’s largest museum, education and research complex” comprising 19 world class museums, galleries and a zoo. Twenty seconds later the breadth of its educational resources is displayed. Its research activity, for which the institution is so well-known, is summarised a further 20 seconds after that.’
Brown considers a number of significant museums and compares them to the Powerhouse Museum collection, program, and perceived future. Citing ‘Inexcusable obduracy’, he concludes: ‘If there is nothing to prevent the re-casting of the project to require retention of existing valued buildings and house alternative collections, why not do it? Is the refusal to retain existing valued buildings nothing more than obduracy; a sharklike insistence on always moving forward? It would appear to be nothing other than administrative obduracy; a sharklike insistence on always moving forward. Yet, the need to adapt the project has already been imposed by at least one of the 188 planning conditions attached to its recent planning consent. Though part of a feature originally admired by the jury  –  “an exceptional open space for Parramatta, incorporating a clear continuation of the civic link and connecting the city and the river” – all public access has been banned to the screened under-croft facing the river in order ensure public safety in the event of inevitable flooding.’
‘So, what’s the game then?’ he asks: ‘This author’s take on this trajectory (backed by no more than a cynical hunch) is that the original strategy to decant the Powerhouse from Ultimo still informs the current scheme. Long after this government has gone, as community memory fades, and as the attendances of two Powerhouses inevitably decline – let’s face it, attendances are not going to double when the new facility opens – someone somewhere will ask “why have we got two Powerhouses?” This will prompt an earnest beard-stroking review by a select committee of toadies and hacks, which will reluctantly conclude that, yes, we are over-endowed with Powerhouses. And that as the most recent investment was located in Parramatta and now resembles the Smithsonian (if one squints hard in the gift shop), it now makes good sense to recover taxpayers’ funds by a total or partial sale of the Ultimo site. Bidders anyone? BUT… this can only occur if the Powerhouse is reproduced at Parramatta, rather than housing an alternative collection.’
Read more:  or 18 Feb 2021 The Fifth Estate

18 February, 2021
‘Powerhouse museum still in dark about funding’
Judy Skatssoon, in the independent online publication Government News, reports: ‘There is no budget and no opening date for the new Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta, a parliamentary committee has heard. The museum is also yet to receive one dollar of the $75 million in targeted philanthropic donations it announced it was seeking more than two years ago. The NSW select committee on the government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum heard evidence about the troubled project this week, two days after the government announced planning consent for the new museum which was first mooted more than five years ago. The government first trumpeted plans to relocate the existing Ultimo Powerhouse Museum to a new site, with the sale of the old building to partly fund the new facility, in 2015. MAAS trustees board president Peter Collins Board told the committee this week that the Powerhouse Museum had been through a turbulent time and that “I see my job as trying to get everybody on the same page and to move this forward”. ..‘MAAS Chief executive Lisa Havilah admitted the museum had not yet received any of the required $75 million in donations in more than two years… But she said a campaign committee had been appointed and she was confident of raising the sum, including by giving donors naming rights for museum wings. Ms Havilah also confirmed there was no operating budget to run the new museum or an opening date for the Parramatta site. Ms Havilah said “a very robust business case” was currently being considered but the museum would attempt to supplement government funding with its own revenue streams. Mr Shoebridge suggested that “unless you get a substantial increase in ongoing government funding you’re not going to be able to get the lights on are you?” Ms Havilah agreed that government investment was needed but said the museum would also generation revenue via commercial programs, events, retail and expanded hours…’
‘Announcing the government’s planning consent for new Parramatta Powerhouse over the weekend, Arts Minister Don Harwin said Sydney was getting “the biggest and best museum in NSW”. ..“With a focus on science and technology, Powerhouse Parramatta will be the museum’s flagship site and hold the revered Powerhouse collection it is renowned for,” he said. Mr Collins …admitted the “missing part of the jigsaw” was the absence of a funding decision for renovating the Ultimo site, which the government announced last July would remain despite the construction of the new Powerhouse Museum at Parramatta. “We don’t know our budget yet, he said have a detailed submission and have provided the government with various options. We’re waiting to see which of those it will be.” He said he expected to know by the end of April.’ Read more, or  18 Feb 2021 The Fifth Estate

18 February, 2021
‘Powerhouse Museum pulls pin on Goulburn Maudslay move’
Following strong support for major industrial items to remain in the Ultimo site of the Powerhouse Museum, Louise Thrower, in the Goulburn Post,  writes about the Maudslay steam engine that was brought from England to power the Old Goulburn Brewery in 1837 and was moved to the Sydney’s Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences in the 1920s, that: ‘Hopes that a historic beam engine would be relocated from Sydney’s Powerhouse Museum to Goulburn have been dashed, at least for now. Council general manager Warwick Bennett said the proposed transfer of the 1837 Maudslay Sons and Field steam engine had been caught up in the Powerhouse’s “politics” and controversy surrounding an additional facility at Parramatta. A state Upper House inquiry into the government’s plan for the museum resumed on Monday. The Maudslay move rated a mention…”We have been informed by the Powerhouse management that they are now basically deferring this (relocation and loan) decision while they sort out the internal politics, the consultation needs of those involved with the museum and I am hoping, (with) the Goulburn community,” he told Tuesday night’s council meeting….We’ll wait until the matter re-emerges and any offer that comes to us for that engine. It’s extremely disappointing because it’s a Goulburn asset and it would be great to have it back at The Waterworks Museum.”‘ Read more  or  18 Feb Maudslay engine Goulburn

16 February, 2021
5th hearing for Second Inquiry into Powerhouse Museum: Reports
On Monday 15th February, the NSW Upper House committee examining the Government’s proposal for the Powerhouse Museum held its 5th hearing.
Speakers included: Hon Don Harwin MLC; Ms Kate Foy: Dept of Premier and Cabinet; Mr Simon Draper: CEO Infrastructure NSW; Ms Lisa Havilah: Chief Executive, MAAS; Hon Peter Collins AM QC: President, Board of Trustees, MAAS; Mr Christopher Brown AM: Chair, WS Powerhouse Museum Community Alliance; Mr Darren Greenfield Secretary, CFMEUnion, NSW ; Mr Steven Molino: Principal, Molino Stewart; Mr Tom Lockley: Private citizen and PHM volunteer; Clr Donna Davis: City of Parramatta Council.
Much discussion focussed on plans, costs and consultation for the new Powerhouse museum in Parramatta, with particular attention to issues of the floodprone site, and the controversies associated with relocating the historic WillowGrove building. Also mentioned was the remaining lack of clarity about the specific future role of the Powerhouse Museum at its significant Ultimo site, where a decision from ‘options’ has still to be made.
Transcripts and webinair recordings will be available within a few days HERE.  (Now see above, 19 Feb)

Among many issues raised, media reports include:

‘NSW arts minister defends Powerhouse Parramatta museum days after giving it the green light’
Kelly Burke, in The Guardian, (15 Feb) writes: ‘New South Wales’ largest cultural capital works project since the Sydney Opera House will go ahead at a cost of at least $950m, with the state government finally approving the Powerhouse Parramatta museum after a five-year controversy. But the project is contingent upon the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences – better known as the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo – raising $75m of the total cost from philanthropic donations…Greens MP, David Shoebridge, asked Harwin how much of the $75m had so far been secured after a year and a half of fundraising. “None of it’s in the bank yet but they’re making excellent progress,” Harwin said. Shoebridge replied: “You have to get $75 million. You haven’t got one single cent, how can you say that’s going well?”
The secretary of the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union NSW, Darren Greenfield, told the inquiry that as long as the NSW government adhered to its plans to demolish Willow Grove, the union’s green ban would remain, effectively preventing any construction on the new museum… Havilah told the inquiry work on the museum site began at 7.30am on Monday. Protest signs and memorabilia, including photographs of babies born at Willow Grove during its time as a maternity hospital in the 20th century, were removed from the site in recent days.… Giving evidence … natural hazards consultant, Steven Molino, said while modifications to the Moreau Kusunoki and Genton design had largely mitigated the risk of loss of life in the event of flooding, there was still a 12% chance of the museum’s priceless collection being damaged by flood water in the presumed 100-year lifespan of the building.
Read more 
or  15 Feb 2021 Guardian

‘Powerhouse project hasn’t received a single donation yet, inquiry hears’
Linda Morris reports on-line (15 Feb) in the Sydney Morning Herald that: ‘Planning Minister Rob Stokes gave the $840 million Powerhouse project the green light over the weekend, heralding the imminent dismantling of the historic villa and a start to construction of the science and technology museum by year’s end. Greens member of the NSW Legislative Council David Shoebridge pointed out that the 188 conditions of consent approved by the Department of Planning did not explicitly guarantee the rebuilding of Willow Grove.
But Mr Harwin promised the rebuild, saying, “That’s the approval I’ve got, it’s going to be done.” The rebuilt Willow Grove would be “faithfully reassembled and it will be in better condition than it is now and will be available for the people of Parramatta to use,” Mr Harwin said. “We will consult them on where they want it and how they want to use it – and that will be a damn sight better than the way it was given to us by Parramatta council, which didn’t seem to care at the time.”
Darren Greenfield, secretary of the NSW branch of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, which has imposed a green ban on the site, estimated the dismantling of Willow Grove would cost $25 million and take eight to 12 months to complete if it was a “proper job”… Powerhouse’s president Peter Collins said he didn’t attach particular significance to the historic building’s role as a former maternity hospital, but acknowledged there was a legitimate emotional attachment that had primarily emerged since the project was first publicised. Willow Grove had been scarred by its location next to a car park and unsympathetic additions, he said… Meanwhile, the final business case for renovations of the Ultimo museum was complete and was to be presented to State Cabinet shortly with an announcement expected in a couple of months, Collins said. Read more.

‘I am Don with this old place’
James O’Doherty writes in the Daily Telegraph (16 Feb)  that ‘A nineteenth century villa in Parramatta which is to be dismantled and rebuilt by the state government to make way for the new Powerhouse Museum is “not particularly significant,” Arts Minister Dona Harwin says’…’ But the Construction union is refusing to work on the demolition and rebuilding of Willow Grove, which is complicating the government’s plans for the Powerhouse site.
Read more  or  16 Feb Daily Tele

‘Greenlit Powerhouse project signals dismantling of historic Willow Grove’
Michael McLaren is joined on 2GB Radio (16 Feb) ‘by Suzette Meade, President of the North Parramatta Residents Action Group, regarding Planning Minister Rob Stokes’ recent announcement that the $840 million Parramatta Powerhouse project has been given the green light.. which will in turn signal the dismantling of the historic Willow Grove. Ms Meade says the minister’s decision was based on a flawed development application process and amounts to a declaration of war against the Parramatta community. Ms Meade says, “The community is ready to fight for our heritage, and we’ll chain ourselves to the fence beside the CFMEU to protect Willow Grove from the wrecking ball.”  Download podcast here.

15 February, 2021
‘Parramatta Powerhouse approval drives renewed backlash, threats’
Linda Morris reports in the Sydney Morning Herald on the Valentine’s Day public protest about relocating the significant Willow Grove building in Parramatta: ‘Final planning approval was announced on Friday, green lighting the $840 million project with Parramatta City Council lord mayor and the Powerhouse’s board of trustees welcoming the decision as a once in a lifetime opportunity for western Sydney. The Department of Planning concluded that retaining Willow Grove would “severely compromise” the development of the site and delivery of public benefits.’
But she also notes that:  ‘The Berejiklian government has been warned against a “dead of night” demolition of the historic villa that is to make way for the new Parramatta Powerhouse. The NSW branch of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) vowed to bring in affiliated workers from nearby construction sites in Parramatta to enforce a green ban to protect the 19th-century riverside mansion known as Willow Grove.’ …And ’While the existing design was striking and the museum needed, Sydney architect Shaun Carter said a superior and cheaper outcome, even at this stage of the planning process, would be for the architects to redesign the museum around the existing building while incorporating the site’s Indigenous history going back 60,000 years.’ North Parramatta Residents Action Group said: ‘In some strange unworldly logic this government seeks to knock down heritage to build a museum to house stories of Parramatta’s proud past.’ National Trust’s David Burdon said … ‘This project has taken heritage tokenism to a new level because the revised design does not respond to St Georges Terrace and we would argue it is a detrimental outcome for both buildings on the site.’
Powerhouse chief executive Lisa Havilah said the internationally significant museum would connect young people and communities with its collections to tell stories of ingenuity and innovation and reflect the diversity of western Sydney. “Powerhouse Parramatta will deliver dynamic exhibition, education and community programs that will bring cultural and scientific leaders from around the world and across Australia into Parramatta. “In an Australian-first the Powerhouse will provide opportunities for 10,000 regional NSW students each year to stay at the Museum and immersive themselves in science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) programs.”’ Read more, or  SMH 15 Feb

14 February, 2021
‘Public protest in Parramatta’
On Valentine’s Day, supporters who argue to keep the heritage building, Willow Grove, in its original location in Parramatta, met to sign and tie hearts to the gates, in protest about moving the heritage building to make way for the new ‘Powerhouse Parramatta’. Labor Opposition leader Jodi McKay, Parramatta Councillor Donna Davis, Julia Finn MP, Darren Greenfield from the CFMEUnion and Suzette Meade of the North Parramatta Residents Action Group, speak here at a rally save Willow Grove and other Parramatta heritage buildings from demolition by the Berejiklian Government.  View here.

14 February, 2021
7 News comments on Powerhouse Parramatta ‘Green Light’ announcement
Following the public protest in Parramatta, a Youtube video of 7 News addresses a number of comments: ‘Plans for a new Powerhouse at Parramatta have been given the green light but 7NEWS can reveal the state government has serious concerns about the building’s potential to flood and that means part of the museum will remain empty.’  See video here 

14 February, 2021
‘Campaign to Save the Powerhouse’
Educator, aviation enthusiast and Powerhouse Museum volunteer, Tom Lockley, draws attention in his regular Bulletin, No 59, to the upcoming 5th hearing of the Select Committee into Museums and Galleries, identifying speakers (including himself). In a general summary, he says: ‘There are two aspects of the ongoing struggle. One is to ensure that PHM [in Ultimo] remains the key site for the museum, fully equipped with a functioning workshop in the Harwood building and the second is to get for Parramatta the facilities on the site that they want, and not just have the current monstrosity plonked upon them. We go flat out on both projects, separately, in the process supporting anything positive that comes out of PHM and giving it all the support we can.’ Among the positives he mentions: ‘A program of new displays is being issued…They are locally created, largely by museum staff, who of recent years have often taken second place to imported programs of varying quality. Four years ago we were faced with the Government’s intention to bulldoze the whole area and put up high rise, but now we are told that the existing buildings will be retained. Covid has wreaked havoc on the normal operations of the museum, but gradually things are improving.’ He also documents the difficulty in ‘the reluctance of the Government to abide by the spirit of the latest call for release of documents… Yet another case of the Government’s policy of disinformation and no information. It is getting very tiresome. But things are coming to a climax, and this is no time to give up.’ Read more: 14 Feb Tom Lockley

13 February, 2021
‘Australia’s very own Smithsonian’: Powerhouse gets green light
Linda Morris writes (on-line) in the Sydney Morning Herald that: ‘The $840 million Parramatta Powerhouse project has been given the green light, heralding the imminent dismantling of a historic villa and a start to construction of the science and technology museum by year’s end. Planning Minister Rob Stokes made the announcement late Friday naming 188 conditions of planning consent. The North Parramatta Residents Action Group president Suzette Meade said the minister’s decision was based on a flawed development application process and amounted to a declaration of war against the Parramatta community. “The community is ready to fight for our heritage, and we’ll chain ourselves to the fence beside the CFMEU to protect Willow Grove from the wrecking ball,” Ms Meade said.
Key conditions relate to the government’s plans to dismantle the 19th-century mansion known as Willow Grove and relocate it elsewhere in Parramatta – about which community opposition has galvanised. The riverside villa sits on land the museum is to occupy… Planning consent requires photographic archival recording and conservation management of both heritage buildings. The Department of Planning has also barred all public access to the screened undercroft that is to collect floodwaters and which infrastructure NSW says will mitigate any risk of flooding on the riverside site…
Earlier yesterday, Parramatta councillor Donna Davis predicted “the devil will be in the detail, in those conditions of consent”. “If the government fails to retain Willow Grove and St Georges Terrace on Phillip St then it shows just how truly out of touch they are with what the people of Parramatta value,” she said. “Parramatta needs a vibrant arts and cultural precinct but not at the expense of Willow Grove … Now the community and the CFMEU has no choice but to enact green bans to its full force.” ‘
Morris also notes that the announcement comes just before the 5th hearing for the Select Committee of Inquiry, and cites positive comments by Arts Minister Don Harwin and new  Powerhouse president of board of trustees Peter Collins, who will be speaking there.
Read more or  13 Feb LM in SMH Powerhouse gets green light

13 February, 2021
‘The Parramatta Powerhouse won’t be a Museum’
Save the Powerhouse community group writes on Facebook and in email:
‘Planning Minister Rob Stokes’  late-Friday announcement that the contested “Parramatta Powerhouse” project has been approved http://tiny.cc/o09jtz surprised no-one. It was a foregone conclusion… The Government’s 2015 plan to “move” Ultimo’s world-famous Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta was initially greeted with hoots of derision…until the NSW community realized that the NSW Government was serious!  For the six years since then, this tortured project has muddled along, via backflips, U-turns, threatened cancellations, three MAAS directors, several business cases, a two-year (ongoing) Parliamentary Inquiry and $ millions in consultancy.’
Save the Powerhouse identifies issues raised by themselves and critics including John McDonald and Kylie Winkworth to do with the allocation of exhibition space in what appears to be an entertainment centre, the inadequacy of facilities necessary for managing a state museum, the risks of flooding, the relocation of historic WillowGrove – and more. Save the Powerhouse argues that ‘ whatever the people of Parramatta have been promised, or are hoping for, IT WON’T BE A MUSEUM!  … Worse than a bad joke, it is an insult to the people of Parramatta, and to all those innocent future tourists the Government hopes to lure to Parramatta with the promise of a rich new “cultural experience.” ‘ Read more: 13 February Save the P comments

13 February, 2021
‘Powerhouse: five years later and the Berejiklian Government approves project late on Friday afternoon. Labor calls for financial update on controversial project’
In a media release, ‘NSW Labor today called on the Berejiklian Government to break its silence on the Powerhouse Museum and reveal its true cost – after the controversial project was given the official “green light” late yesterday (February 12) afternoon. The news comes ahead of embattled Arts Minister Don Harwin being called before a parliamentary inquiry into the debacle on Monday.  NSW Labor Leader Jodi McKay has called on the Berejiklian Government to release a financial update on the controversial project – showing the real cost of the project. “This project has lurched from crisis to crisis and is shrouded in secrecy,” Ms McKay said. “We now discover that after five years, it has been given official approval late on a Friday afternoon. This whole process stinks.”
NSW Shadow Treasurer and Shadow Minister for the Arts Walt Secord said the Berejiklian Government slipped out the announcement late Friday afternoon because the project is “riddled with problems”… As documents tabled in the NSW Parliament in June 2020 revealed, $46 million has been spent on consultants at the Powerhouse Museum.’
Read more: 13 Feb 2021 McKay and Secord

13 February, 2021
‘Parramatta Powerhouse plans given green light’
Don Harwin, Minister for the Arts and Rob Stokes, Minister for Planning and Public Spaces, announced through the Department of Planning, Industry and Development, that: ‘Plans for the new Powerhouse Museum at Parramatta have been approved by the NSW Government, ensuring the city’s future as the jobs and cultural powerhouse of Western Sydney. Minister for the Arts Don Harwin said the final decision to move ahead with the plans for the Powerhouse on the banks of the Parramatta River followed extensive community feedback.
“Now that planning consent has been secured, I am delighted as Arts Minister that Western Sydney will now have the biggest and best museum in NSW and first major cultural institution,” said Mr Harwin. “With a focus on science and technology, Powerhouse Parramatta will be the museum’s flagship site and hold the revered Powerhouse collection it is renowned for.” Member for Parramatta Geoff Lee said the new museum will play a pivotal role in propelling the local economy during the pandemic while putting Parramatta on the global culture map. “This new museum will create 4,000 new jobs while also injecting hundreds of millions of dollars into the economy during construction to help the State power through the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic,” Mr Lee said.’ Read here, or  13 Feb 2021 Govt announcement

However, local residents disagree. Suzette Meade, spokesperson for the North Parramatta Residents Action Group says, in advance of a media event at Willow Grove on Valentines Day: ‘Rob Stokes has made a flawed decision on a flawed EIS.  By approving the unnecessary demolition of historic WillowGrove overnight he has called war on people of Parramatta. the community are ready to fight and will chain ourselves to the fence with CFMEU to protect WillowGrove from the wrecking ball of Berejiklian .’

And Powerhouse Museum architect Lionel Glendenning writes for the Powerhouse Museum Alliance: ‘What started 6 years ago as a BAIRD ‘thought bubble’ – move the Powerhouse Museum 23 kms to a flood prone riverbank in Parramatta and sell the Museum’s historic Ultimo site to developers for $250m to pay for it – has now become a $1.5billion Berejikian/Harwin/Stokes flood prone, heritage destroying, community-ignoring BOONDOGGLE – an edifice to political hubris and the wanton waste of public monies.’

10 February, 2021
5th Hearing of NSW Govt Select Committee:  15 February
For access to submissions, the schedule of speakers (and later, transcripts) go to the Select Committee’s website here.  The hearing will start at 9.15am and will be broadcast live via web stream; check Live, Legislative Council on the committee page.
Their media release says: ‘The NSW Upper House committee examining the Government’s proposal for the Powerhouse Museum – as well as funding issues for the State’s museums and cultural projects more broadly – is set to kick off its next round of hearings in 2021 on Monday 15 February. The Committee Chair, the Hon Robert Borsak MLC, stated: “This costly project continues to evolve, with the Government pressing ahead with the Powerhouse Parramatta proposal despite what can only be considered almost unanimous community opposition. As highlighted by submissions to the statutory planning process, there are still serious concerns about the impacts of this State significant project “… The future of Willow Grove – a property of substantial social, cultural, historic and aesthetic significance – also remains unresolved, with the Government announcing late last year that it will be relocated to a site in North Parramatta… “This hearing will be a very timely opportunity to get to the nuts and bolts of what’s being  proposed,” Mr Borsak added.’ See media release here: Media release – Fifth public hearing
Speakers include: Hon Don Harwin MLC; Ms Kate Foy: Dept of Premier and Cabinet; Mr Simon Draper: CEO Infrastructure NSW; Ms Lisa Havilah: Chief Executive, MAAS; Hon Peter Collins AM QC: President, Board of Trustees, MAAS; Mr Christopher Brown AM: Chair, WS Powerhouse Museum Community Alliance; Mr Darren Greenfield Secretary, CFMEUnion, NSW ; Mr Steven Molino: Principal, Molino Stewart; Mr Tom Lockley: Private citizen; Clr Donna Davis: City of Parramatta Council.

10 February, 2020
‘Parramatta Powerhouse Museum apartments planned cops backlash’
In the Parramatta Advertiser, Joanne Vella writes: ‘More than 50 apartments are planned for the $767 million Powerhouse Museum in Western Sydney, but opponents have lashed out at the plan to have taxpayers foot the bill for the dwellings when the landmark will be surrounded by hotels and apartments. .. In April, details emerged about how the Powerhouse’s relocation from Ultimo to Parramatta meant the Phillip St site would include retail and function venue spaces, with apartments and a 60-bed dormitory for visiting students and scientists, retail and food hall and some exhibition space. However Infrastructure NSW’s accommodation facilities now include plans for 56 apartments, to be called the Powerlab Residencies and the Academy, for visiting researchers and school students respectively.’ The report continues with comments from a range of organisations – for and against the move. Read more: 10 Feb Parra Ad

8 -9 February, 2021
Powerhouse Museum: 2021 exhibition program announced
Following the well-received July 2020 announcement that the Powerhouse Museum would continue to operate in Ultimo, Sydney, and despite Create NSW still not publicising the business case options it was committed to present to government for the future role and scope of the site, the Museum’s CEO, Lisa Havilah, announced an exhibition program for 2021, supplementing some exhibitions and projects already in place. At the same time, the government is determined to proceed with development of the ‘Powerhouse Parramatta’ as a museum focussed on science and technology, while local public and professional communities dispute the demolition and transfer of historic buildings, and the proposed site and program.
The Museum’s webpage lists the 2021 program HERE, and here: PHM 2021 Program Final
Note: opening dates later changed:
Read new dates here. A range of media outlets also describe the proposed exhibitions for 2021, while commenting variously on the difficulties associated with developing a program within the insecurity of the future of the Ultimo and Parramatta sites, and the moving of the collection to Castle Hill. The 2021 program is announced without yet any clear thematic clarification from Create NSW about the role of the Ultimo-based Powerhouse Museum.
9 Feb: Kelly Burke, in The Guardian, writes in: ‘Everything had been on hold’: Powerhouse Museum announces program after rocky few years’,‘ The Powerhouse Museum’s chief executive Lisa Havilah has endured a rocky ride since her appointment, with an insecure future facing the Ultimo site, a Covid-19 enforced lockdown, and a deluge of controversy surrounding the museum’s expansion to Parramatta.’ Read here, or  9 Feb Guardian
9 Feb: Australian Arts Review writes  in: ‘Powerhouse Museum announces 2021 exhibition program’ that  ‘The program includes 12 new exhibitions celebrating the Museum’s world-class collection of more than 500,000 objects, as well as international collaborations, Australian exclusives, new commissions and never before seen objects.’
Read here, or  9 Feb 2021 Aust Art Review
9 Feb: Dee Jefferson, in ABC Arts, writes in: ‘Powerhouse Museum bounces back from COVID-19 with exhibitions celebrating Buddhist sculpture, eucalyptus’:  ‘The schedule announcement, made on Tuesday, kicks off what Havilah hopes will be a year unmarred by COVID-19 setbacks, following the hits to programming and visitation when the museum was forced to close from mid-March to June last year.’ Read here, or  9 Feb 2021 ABC
8 Feb: Linda Morris, in Sydney Morning Herald, writes in ‘From Goggomobils to Islamic art: Powerhouse’s eclectic 2021 program’: ‘The year-long exhibition program is the first since the government’s decision last July to keep the Ultimo Powerhouse open alongside a new Parramatta Powerhouse. Read here, or  SMH 8 Feb 2021 PHM program

6-7 February, 2021
‘Art in the Year of the Plague’
In a perceptive summary of the past year in the visual arts, John McDonald writes in the Sydney Morning Herald: ‘There were many struggles, joys and unexpected twists in this year of hibernation.’ Among many observations of how galleries and museums have dealt with changes brought about by COVID 19, he says:
‘The retreat into Fortress Australia turned 2020 into a strange and unpredictable year for the visual arts. It made for a year in which public institutions struggled and private galleries enjoyed surprisingly healthy sales. While commercial galleries only require a handful of willing clients, the big institutions are vitally dependent on visitation to bring in revenue, and even to acquit their obligations with governments that use an “efficiency dividend” as a blunt instrument to penalise a museum that doesn’t pull its weight.
Some museums had even greater problems with the politicians. The great blight – and false dawn – of the year was the continuing wrangle over the future of the Powerhouse Museum. In July it was announced with a fanfare that the Berejiklian government would abandon plans to destroy the award-winning building in Ultimo in response to concerted public opposition. It now seems this was no more than sleight-of-hand on behalf of a regime that still wants to sell off part of the site to developers and divide the institution into three separate components: fashion and design at Ultimo; science and technology in Parramatta; and all the rest, including collection storage, in Castle Hill. This is colossally wasteful and unnecessary. It will destroy the historical uniqueness of the museum, subject the collection to much avoidable stress and strain, create vast new ongoing expenses, and produce an unsatisfactory outcome for both the city and Parramatta. Why is this lunatic project still on the table? When we have a Premier who sees nothing inherently wrong with pork barrelling favoured electorates or overseeing an office that destroys documents that were legally required to be preserved, we should never expect a straight answer. The entire disgraceful business has been wreathed in secrecy ever since it was announced by former premier Mike Baird, and the duplicity seems set to continue into 2021.’ Read more, or  SMH McDonald 6 Feb 2021

6-7 February, 2021
 ‘Artists want seat at Macquarie St  game of musical chairs’
On line as: ‘Once-in-a-generation opportunity’ for new symphony centre in Sydney’
Linda Morris, in the Sydney Morning Herald, follows up on possibilities for Macquarie Street (See 4 February, below): ‘A former repository of NSW’s public records is to be considered as Sydney’s first dedicated centre for orchestras, music ensembles, choirs and freelance musicians. Facing a dearth of affordable space to play and rehearse, musicians have urged the Arts Minister Don Harwin to turn the Registrar-General’s Building near Macquarie St into a symphony centre bringing rehearsal, recording studios, performance and instrument storage spaces under the one roof. In a report by former prime minister Paul Keating and former Sydney lord mayor Lucy Turnbull, released this week, it was recommended that the sandstone building, which sits next to St Mary’s Cathedral, become a cultural institution – possibly a design museum – bookending a revamped cultural precinct akin to New York’s Museum Mile. “Sydney is clearly Australia’s leading city with an enormous depth in our orchestras and ensembles,” Mr Harwin said. They’ve brought this idea to me over the last few years and it’s a concept worth exploring further.” Read more, or  SMH L Morris 6-7 Feb Macquarie St
[PMA notes that Harwin is also on record as seeking to use the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo as a site for a ‘Lyric Theatre’.] 

4 February, 2021
‘Plan to make Macquarie St a global destination’
State political editor for the Sydney Morning Herald, Alexandra Smith, provides insights into a report prepared for the NSW government on a report just released by ‘former prime minister Paul Keating and Lucy Turnbull, a former Sydney lord mayor, who were commissioned by the NSW government in 2018 to review how the area known as Macquarie Street East could be returned to its former glory.’
‘Their report …says the area – home to NSW Parliament House as well as major cultural institutions including the Sydney Opera House, the State Library and the Art Gallery of NSW – should rival the London’s Exhibition Road or Museum Mile in New York. It also includes the Mint, Hyde Park Barracks, the Registrar-General’s Building and St James Church. The report’s authors commend the area as “an important and unique intersection of Aboriginal, colonial and 20th century NSW history” noting it has been home to the Gadigal people of the Eora nation for tens of thousands of years.’
Among other suggestions: ‘The report recommends identifying spaces to showcase and celebrate Sydney’s 60,000-year history, through public art and monuments. It says the Registrar-General’s Building, most recently the Land Titles Office, should be “an anchor cultural institution” focused on the decorative and applied arts and the Chief Secretary’s Building should be returned to its original purpose as the Department of Premier and Cabinet.’ Read more, or  SMH 4 Feb 2021 A Smith
[PMA asks: could this proposal for the Land Titles Office extend the decorative and applied arts and social history scope of the Powerhouse Museum, in a location so appropriate to a state collection?]

5 February, 2021
‘Bye bye Premier Gladys – it’s time to go’
Alex Mitchell writes in his weekly Come the Revolution column, that ‘Premier Gladys Berejiklian has had enough. She plans to leave the premiership in March hoping that her political legacy is in reasonable nick despite her personal reputation being in tatters.’
He traces her successful  transition from Transport Minister to NSW Premier, noting ‘Berejiklian was the hardest working Minister in the Coalition Government. There was not a skerrick of scandal attached to her name. She represented a monumental change from the corruption-riddled days of NSW Labor. Her timing was exceptionally favourable. It coincided with the arrival of President Donald Trump and a tsunami of ridicule and hatred generated by MeToo, Respect and other chat lines fostered by the US Democratic Party.’
But he also documents her worsening relationships with women politicians, while surrounding ‘herself with Liberal hacks who covered her in flattery’; ‘She loved the “bubble” they created around her and she became increasingly intolerant of Ministers, civil servants or contractors who stood in her way, whispered the corridors of power’, while ‘Her shenanigans with former Liberal minister Daryl Maguire are a tale of colossal misjudgement, secrecy and apparent large-scale corruption, her opponents claim… Any similarity between Cassius and her deputy, Dominic Perrottet, is purely Shakespearean. In reality there is a large field of candidates who want to be CEO of NSW Inc. However, the NSW Libs are a hollowed-out version of their former selves. Their gene pool of talent is shallow. Most are in politics for what it can give them, not what they can give the people of NSW. Gladys is a product of this culture; it has infected NSW Labor and the Nationals as well.’  Read more.

3 February, 2021
‘Arts, cultural job cuts on the horizon to net million-dollar savings’
In the Sydney Morning Herald, Linda Morris reports:  ‘Dozens of jobs are set to be lost among agencies supporting arts, heritage, Indigenous communities, and some of the state’s biggest cultural projects as the NSW Premier’s department searches for multi-million dollar savings. Tim Reardon, head of the state’s public service, is seeking voluntary redundancies across the Department of Premier and Cabinet as part of post-budget “necessary efficiency savings”. The redundancy drive has prompted the Public Service Association to complain to the department about a lack of consultation.
Heritage Council of NSW, Create NSW – the government’s arts agency – and Aboriginal Affairs NSW fall within the department, along with positions responsible for the development and delivery of government strategy and legislation, major projects and state events. The number of positions to be lost will depend on take-up but savings of up to $8 million – when the redundancies are combined with other cost-saving measures – have been spoken about inside government, according to a source familiar with the process who spoke on the condition of anonymity. This figure was not challenged by the government. In November, the COVID-19-impacted NSW budget reported a $16 billion deficit, the first in almost a decade.
Major cultural institutions including the Sydney Opera House, Australian Museum and the Art Gallery of NSW are understood to be exempt from the redundancy program. But the arts sector is anxious the redundancies might herald a restructure of Create NSW, and even fewer resources to administer grants in the midst of pandemic disruptions. Earlier this week peak arts bodies rebuked the government for the adequacy, integrity and lack of transparency of its arts grants process, often aggravated by internal restructures and abrupt changes to personnel. Public engagement with the sector was poor, they said. “Make no mistake, these job cuts will make it worse,” Shadow arts minister Walt Secord said on news of the redundancy round.’ Read more.  or 3 February SMH Linda M – Arts, cultural job cuts

30 January, 2021
‘Govt to approve “revised’ Parra Project but major risks remain’
Save the Powerhouse community campaign group advises:  ‘It is now reliably rumoured that approval of the revised Environmental Impact Statement for the controversial Parramatta Powerhouse will be announced by the Government by mid-February. This would clear the way for full implementation of the contested Riverbank project, including construction of the widely-ridiculed “milk-crate” building and “moving” Parramatta’s heritage-rich Willow Grove mansion from the site by dismantling it brick by brick and restoring it elsewhere.
In late 2020 the Government revealed that over 1,300 public submissions to the initial EIS had been received, most raising serious concerns about the proposed ‘museum’s design, especially its vulnerability to flooding (over 20% of objections). Of particular note was the submission from water specialists Molino Stewart, which expertly identified and described the design’s numerous fatal flaws, and showed that the flood risks presented “A GRAVE THREAT TO HUMAN LIFE.”
There is general agreement that the Government has brushed aside critical questions including…
– How the undercroft screens (in the event of flooding) will be operated reliably?
– Whether the provision of emergency power to lifts will cover both buildings and the undercroft
– How often the building is likely to flood?
– The standard of climate control planned for, and whether it is adequate to protect the collections?
– Whether the emergency generator and/or other building design features will be able to maintain climate control standards during extreme floods?
– The impact of flood events on museum operations?…amid fears that, if project approval is announced very soon as predicted, they will never be answered.
Read more. 30 Jan Save the Powerhouse

 24 January 2021 ‘Gladys set to revamp team’ on line as ‘Winners and losers: Gladys prepares for reshuffle’
Linda Simalis, in The Daily Telegraph, announces ‘BETS are under way on who will be dumped — and promoted — when Premier Gladys Berejiklian finally conducts her long-awaited Cabinet reshuffle to create the team to take the Coalition to the next State election. However, ministers are still divided on whether the Premier herself will be leading the team come 2023 while there is also speculation if veteran Liberal minister Brad Hazzard will close the door on an impressive 30-year state political career. While one Macquarie Street source claimed the reshuffle was “imminent”, the majority of ministers believe the end of March made the most sense given it would be after Budget Estimates.
One minister is putting money on the days after March 26, the 10-year anniversary of the NSW Coalition’s election victory.’ After considering a number of possible changes, she also notes that: Among those that may be moved include Local Government Minister Shelley Hancock and Arts Minister Don Harwin and Lower House Speaker Jonathan O’Dea…Ms Berejiklian has so far declared she intends to stay. But then former long-serving Labor leader Bob Carr told reporters repeatedly he wouldn’t be quitting — until the day he did. ‘
Read more: or  24 Jan, 2021 DT, Gladys reshuffle
[PMA asks; who would we get as Arts Minister if Harwin moves, and what would their position be regarding the Powerhouse Museum?]

 January 2021
National Trust newsletter, January-March 2021
Daniel Burdon, conservation director at the National Trust writes about the importance of preserving and maintaining heritage buildings in Parramatta, including Willow Grove, controversially identified to be relocated  to make way for the new Powerhouse Museum. Read more: National Trust Jan-March 2021

29 December, 2020
‘Powerhouse makes profit after year of few visitors’
in print as ‘Powerhouse Museum back in the black after cash squeeze’
Linda Morris comments in the Sydney Morning Herald on information provided in annual reports by major Sydney arts institutions, saying: ‘The Powerhouse Museum is one of the state’s few cultural institutions to survive COVID-19 in the black despite months earlier running out of cash, newly released financial figures show. The financial squeeze facing NSW cultural institutions has been documented in their annual reports, which were tabled in State Parliament before Christmas.’ Alongside the AGNSW, Opera House and others, she observes: ‘In March this year, the Powerhouse Museum at Ultimo joined all cultural institutions in shutting its doors. Visitor numbers fell 31 per cent as a result. But COVID-19 proved an unexpected bonus, with the museum emerging from lockdown with a net profit of more than $4 million. It made significant savings by shutting exhibitions, hibernating programs and redirecting staff to a project to digitise its collections, which is separately funded. It was a reversal of fortunes for the museum, whose budgeted net loss of $3 million had doubled to $6.2 million in the 2018-19 financial year and which ran out of cash in June 2019. The financial statements show the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences received from the Department of Premier and Cabinet a $5.32 million grant as a “funding adjustment” to “address the museum’s cash position”, according to the audited accounts. It’s not common for government agencies to use a “bank overdraft”, and sometimes involved a timing issue with agencies while they waited on the next recurrent grant payment, the NSW Audit Office said…
The NSW opposition said the government had serious questions to answer about the cash flow issues at the Powerhouse Museum. Shadow Treasurer Walt Secord said the 2018-19 financial statement clearly showed that the Powerhouse Museum was left owing the bank $3.1 million by June 30, 2019 with no cash on hand. “If the Berejiklian government can’t manage the budget of the current site, how will they be able to manage the billion-dollar project in Parramatta?” he said.’  Read more or  29 Dec PHM budget SMH or  29 Dec SMH PHM budget

25 (in print 28 )December, 2020
‘The moments that defined Australian art in 2020’
Art critic John McDonald ‘paints a portrait of the year that was in Australian art’, in the Sydney Morning Herald. ‘From record-setting auctions to a history-defining Archibald Prize …This year will be remembered as the one the runaway globalisation of art hit the wall. In a world in which artists, dealers, collectors, curators – and even critics – had become accustomed to flitting from one international event to another, flitting was suddenly out of the question. It was hard enough to get to Canberra, let alone New York, Beijing or Paris. As museums went into lockdown major shows were cancelled or postponed and staff were laid off. International loans became impossible to negotiate while private and corporate patronage dried up.’
McDonald discusses Art fairs, Biennales, the Australian art market, and also documents and comments on exhibitions and developments in museums and galleries, including the Art Gallery of NSW, Museum of Contemporary Art, National Museum of Australia, National Gallery of Australia, Australian War Memorial, Australian Museum in  Sydney, White Rabbit Gallery and the new Chau Chak Wing at Sydney University. Then he concludes:
This brings me, finally, to the story that remains the cultural flashpoint of the year: the Berejiklian government’s heavy-handed attempts to destroy the unique Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo and impose an unwanted, badly-planned commercial development, masquerading as a museum, on the people of Parramatta – at a cost somewhere between $1-2 billion. A concerted campaign by friends and supporters of the PHM brought about an apparent backdown by the government at the end of June. Yet even amid the celebrations it looked like a smoke and mirrors trick, and with each passing month it becomes clearer that destructive intentions remain intact. It’s dismal to think that in 2021 we may escape from a deadly pandemic only to find ourselves fighting the same old battles with a secretive, duplicitous government prepared to advance the interests of their mates over the state’s cultural heritage.’ Read more   or  J McD SMH 28 Dec 2020
[PMA comments: It seems John McDonald is on the money about the PHM. There’s been a lot of talk and encouragement for us to work with the government, the PHM and Create Infrastructure, which we’ve tried to do in good faith. But from their side there is no evident concrete change of direction at Ultimo or Parramatta. Everything that was in train before the July 4 announcement is still going ahead.
The Parramatta development has not been recalibrated. Willow Grove is at risk of demolition/fake removal. The Harwood building is being emptied of its collections. And the expansion of the Museums Discovery Centre at Castle Hill is still going ahead. For a while it looked like the development was paused. Now the site says submissions are being collated.  This is only needed if the Harwood building is going to be redeveloped. Yes there have been encouraging noises about the PHM hanging onto the Harwood building. But they are just placatory assurances at this point.
The masterplan and business case for the PHM Ultimo Creative Industries precinct was set in train before the July 4 announcement. It is still underway. There is no way of knowing if the brief was amended to reflect the spirit of the July 4 announcement…The plans for Parramatta still include transport and space which suggests these exhibitions will be vulnerable to removal from the PHM.]

22 December, 2020
‘CFMEU clout at stake in Powerhouse tussle’
On-line as ‘CFMEU faces historic challenge as builders refuse to buckle’
David Marin-Guzman, workplace correspondent for the Australian Financial Review, documents current issues in the construction industry, asking, ‘Can builders in NSW break the union’s grip?’
He writes: ‘It is the contest that could pit the biggest non-union builder in NSW against the CFMEU and fundamentally alter the industry. Second-tier builder Richard Crookes, which has defied the militant construction union to secure a landmark non-union agreement, was selected last week to face off against top-tier union builders, Lendlease and Multiplex, in a shortlist for the new Powerhouse Museum project in Parramatta budgeted at $840 million. The industry hasn’t seen the likes of it for decades. Employers believe what is happening in the NSW construction sector could be the start of a long-term split in the industry and a challenge to the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union’s dominance.’
After tracing a number of examples of such challenges and potential implications, including competitive costs through paying lower wages, Marin-Guzman says: ‘The broader ramifications of the split remain to be seen. The CFMEU is putting up a fight and the final outcome of industry bargaining is uncertain. [NSW Union Secretary Darren Greenfield] ‘…says “once all agreements are finalised, more than 99 per cent of workers in the construction industry will be covered by union agreements.” But the Powerhouse Museum could be the first test of a new dynamic. In the end, competitive forces may prove too hard to resist.’ Read more  or  Fin Review 23-28 Dec 2020
[Powerhouse Museum Alliance notes possibilities of the government over-riding the Green Ban on Willow Grove, or crashing through and giving the tender to a cheaper non-union second tier builder who has nothing to fear from the CFMEU. And concerned Parramatta residents say ‘What they seem to have ignored is that the unionised labour will be not only refusing to work but also barricading the site with us.’]

21 December, 2020
‘Six Ribbons to save Willow Grove’
Save Willow Grove Parramatta Facebook page, posts: ‘Mario Millo, Australian musician & composer, tells why we must save Willow Grove. Mario co-wrote Six Ribbons with Jon English for the popular acclaimed TV mini series Against The Wind. Mario also composed music for Brides of Christ, The Lighthorsemen, GP and Changi. ‘ View and hear.
Kylie Winkworth comments elsewhere that: ‘Of note Create NSW asked Parramatta Council to remove all the love hearts on the Willow Grove fence and signs of crafty activism, making a remarkable strike against women’s creativity. This is all of a piece with their intention to demolish Willow Grove which is an important site of women’s history, at the same time as they are turning the Female Factory into offices surrounded by 25-storey flats.  Only in Parramatta could they so shamelessly trash what in any other state would be a World Heritage site, and a museum about itself. The Libs are making war on women’s history and heritage.’

16 December, 2020
‘First look inside the Parramatta Powerhouse’s galactical spaces’
In print as ‘Plenty of space for space in Parramatta’s Powerhouse’
Linda Morris reports in the Sydney Morning Herald  about plans for the Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta, associated with ‘the launch of a new shop front at Parramatta Square to share the museum’s ambitions with the local community.’
‘The public has been given its first glimpse inside the Parramatta Powerhouse, with new plans revealing large column-free exhibition spaces and a 360-degree immersive tour of the galaxy. Three major construction firms – Multiplex, Lendlease and the builders of the Art Gallery of NSW’s extension Sydney Modern, Richard Crookes – have been shortlisted for the contract to build the western Sydney headquarters of the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences…
The year-long formal planning process for the new museum is almost complete with protests continuing to beset the NSW government’s plan to dismantle and relocate the historic home Willow Grove to North Parramatta to make way for the new museum. A union green ban remains in place on the riverside site that will be home to the Parramatta Powerhouse. The Department of Planning is expected to give final planning approval in early 2021. An Infrastructure NSW spokesperson said subject to approval, the first works will start early next year with the main works contract to be awarded later in 2021…’
Museum chief executive, Lisa Havilah, spoke about how collecting and exhibitions will focus on the rise of space programs in the Asia-Pacific region, as well as the history of market gardens in western Sydney. ‘”At any given time there will be six different exhibitions happening at the museum so you will be able to come and have six different experiences whether they are international shows or local history shows, science or immersive screen.” ‘
Read more  or  17 Dec SMH Space in Parra Powerhouse
[Comments from PMA:
– How does the content relate to the diverse audiences at Parramatta and western Sydney? Agriculture? Is that by popular demand? Chefs and cooking, transport and space.
– The content ideas seemed remarkably scant, considering the project has been in the pipeline for six years.
– The museum still lacks a coherent rationale, a unique selling point.
– MAAS Parramatta has a problem with permission to interpret Dharug history and culture.
– MAAS has not addressed the duplication of themes that are already an integral part of the design and brand of the PHM: transport and space. The design and content plans have not been recalibrated after the July 4 announcement that the PHM would be kept. Will the PHM’s transport and space exhibition be removed to supply Parramatta? Possibly.
– The statement that Arup has assured the CEO that the building will be climatically suitable for international loans and travelling exhibitions is not consistent with what is in the EIS/RTS, namely a clear statement that no part of the building will have international museum standard climate controls.
– The ground floor P1 space has no access to the loading dock. It is not clear if large objects can be moved into the building. INSW refused to answer my questions about the size of the access way from Wilde Ave.
– The building is hopelessly non-functional as a museum. Not a single space is dedicated to the collection or designed specifically for museum exhibitions. Perhaps that explains the needed secrecy.
– No museum anywhere in the world has ever been designed on the basis that all the spaces are available for hire and for use for performances. No museum that I know of is developed in secrecy without the community having a meaningful say in what it is about and where it is located.
– This week we read about the opening of Walsh Bay, nearly 200% over budget. Will the same be true of Parramatta?]

11 December, 2020
Parramatta councillor Donna Davis interviewed by Ray Hadley
On his radio Morning Show, Ray Hadley interviews Parramatta councillor Donna Davis about the controversy regarding demolishing and moving the significant Willow Grove building to an as yet unidentified location in north Parramatta. While Council has agreed that the St Georges Terrace buildings will remain, and possibly be integrated into the proposed new Powerhouse Parramatta site, it did not agree to leave Willow Grove in its original location. Both Davis and Hadley agree that it is ridiculous to tear down an old building with strong associations with the city centre, and replace it with a new building that will be showing old objects.  Listen here.

7 December, 2020
‘Parramatta Powerhouse project faces delays as concerns unappeased’
Linda Morris summarises in the Sydney Morning Herald, how ‘Design changes and a state government offer to relocate a historic building have failed to placate key public concerns as the Parramatta Powerhouse project faces delays. The National Trust said the former maternity hospital Willow Grove could not be “simply picked up and moved wholesale” to make way for the new powerhouse on the banks of the Parramatta River as much of its fabric – cement, brick, and plaster – would be destroyed in the process. NSW conservation director David Burdon said moving the house to a new site in North Parramatta would have “severe negative effects” on the historic building’s place and values… As well, Heritage NSW, an agency under the purview of the NSW Premier, said Infrastructure NSW, the project’s proponents, had not met requirements to consult with Indigenous leaders to document the site’s cultural heritage values during all stages of the project …
In its submission to the Department of Planning, Parramatta City Council said Willow Grove’s relocation to a new site was preferable to its demolition. There was, however, insufficient information about the relocation method, the historic building’s exact place of relocation and the impact of the rebuild on its heritage values…Despite its overall support for the museum project and redesign of the undercroft, Parramatta Council remained dissatisfied with the engineering solution proposed to manage quick flowing floodwaters… Flood modelling undertaken on behalf of the Powerhouse Museum Alliance by flood management engineers Molino Stewart estimates that there was greater than a 12 per cent chance, or a one in 800 in any given year, of flood water entering the ground floor of the museum during its 100-year design life.
Museum consultant Kylie Winkworth said using the council’s standards, which assume a total blockage of underground pipes that carry overflow floodwaters, the museum could flood in a one-in-20-year event. “If it is intended to operate as a museum for the next 100 years the project is taking reckless and unnecessary risks with the $1 billion infrastructure investment, and in locating the collection in a flood-prone building,” Ms Winkworth said. Urban Ethos, the firm acting on behalf of Infrastructure NSW, said there was no alternative to the undercroft while maintaining the architectural design of the museum and it was not considered habitable space. Urban Ethos maintained the design and operation of the undercroft and the museum itself was an appropriate flood response and safe for the public.’ Read more or  7 Dec SMH Parra project delayed

26 November, 2020
Anniversary of announcement: ‘Fact sheet as at 26 November 2020’
On the 6th anniversary of former Premier Mike Baird’s announcement  that ‘The Powerhouse Museum will move from Ultimo to Parramatta (Parramatta Advertiser, November 26, 2014), researcher and museum volunteer, Tom Lockley, summarises six years of the sequence of events in seeking the rationale, business plans and related documents associated with the proposed move, and concludes: ‘Further, the only satisfactory resolution to the current situation is outlined in the following agreed statement: 1. Parramatta must get a magnificent new museum and/or other cultural facilities on a site that is democratically approved and of a type that is properly researched and democratically selected;  2. Australia’s only museum of applied arts and sciences must remain where it is: in the most accessible site for the city the state, the country and the world. It must retain its iconic traditional exhibits, in its unique heritage building, with appropriate facilities and funding; All Powerhouse Museum buildings, including the Harwood building, must be preserved, integral to the museum.’
Read more: 26 Nov Tom Lockley 6th anniversary Fact sheet

26 November, 2020
‘Analysis of documents released under SO52 order of 13 May 2020’
After months of painstaking research, Tom Lockley documents his comments on and analysis of the papers released under government Standing Order 52 about the planning process behind the move of the Powerhouse Museum.
‘Six years ago today, the Premier of the time announced that the Powerhouse Museum would be moved from Ultimo. Even at the time of the announcement the Government refused to provide evidence that any alternatives had been examined for improving the cultural facilities at the centre of population, and ever since, the Government has been very reluctant to give information about its plans. However on 13 May 2020 the Legislative Council, with the support of all parties, sought the release of information about the project, with a list of topics relating to the project, beginning with ‘any 2019 revised business case or cost benefit analysis’.
The publicly supplied documents were received 10-14 June 2020. Physically, they consisted of 17 document boxes, containing an estimated 20,000 sheets of paper, including copies of a catalogue list of 197 pages and other smaller lists of document titles. With massive help from a small group of people an objective assessment of the documents has been prepared… The documents received were so disappointing that it is hard to believe that this was a serious attempt to inform the public. Let us, for the sake of this exercise, assume that this is indeed a legitimate attempt meet the Legislative Council order.  Many questions arise, as listed below. The Government is invited to reply to these questions, and explain why these circumstances apply.’ Read more26 Nov Tom L – analysis of released documents

25 November, 2020
‘Sydney Lord Mayor still evasive on support for the Harwood Building’
Save the Powerhouse community campaign writes: ‘Traditionally the Powerhouse Museum was always one of the cultural highlights of the City of Sydney’s LGA, and an anchor point on the “Cultural Ribbon” … and – initially – strongly supported by the City. When Mike Baird’s infamous “move” project was announced in 2015, Lord Mayor Clover Moore and her independent team volubly opposed it. In late 2016, Councillor Jess Miller, representing Moore at a “Save” rally, asserted “…as a City we see this Ultimo (institution) as an integral part of our Cultural Ribbon…”. But this policy was abruptly “ripped to shreds” a few days later, when the Council voted “to endorse a harbour walk that follows the foreshore from Darling Harbour to Woolloomooloo”…’
‘We wrote to her in September outlining our concerns about current strong rumours that the Harwood Building is to be destroyed, or converted to a lyric theatre  (Arts Minister Harwin’s preference) or cultural industries centre (the MASS CEO’s choice).’ … ‘In her carefully crafted response (received ten weeks later) she nimbly skirted around the question, reminding us that ‘”the Heritage Council of NSW (has) concluded that the Harwood building is not of state heritage significance” but that “the City of Sydney will consider the significance of the Harwood building against the relevant criteria and whether it should be listed as a heritage item…” She concludes noncommittally “I am pleased that the NSW Government has now recognised that retaining the museum in Ultimo is the best cultural use. Keeping the Powerhouse Museum is an opportunity to rethink and renew it … and for it to be more fully integrated into the (Government’s?) planning of this important precinct.”  Whatever that really means, we clearly cannot rely on the Lord Mayor’s/ the City’s/ unqualified support for keeping the entire Powerhouse, restored to its “former glory”, in Ultimo. Read more: 25 Nov Save the P re Lord Mayor

[Bearing in mind the future of the Powerhouse Museum buildings, and Perrottet’s ‘saving the museum’, as well as issues of heritage buildings in Parramatta…] 
25 November, 2020
‘Ten iconic buildings I’d bulldoze’
Following criticism of his earlier expressed preference to demolish the White Bay Power Station, Treasurer Dominic Perrottet acknowledges in the Sydney Morning Herald  that having visited the site with the Premier and Planning Minister Rob Stokes, that  ‘Perhaps I was too hasty’. However he argues that ‘Sydney’s beauty is marred by some horrible architecture that could only be improved by the wrecking ball,’ and lists ten buildings he suggests for ‘bulldozing’. Read more.
‘Perrottet warms to White Bay but savages other architectural landmarks’ In print as ‘Perrottet warms to White Bay but has hit list’
Also the Sydney Morning Herald, Tom Rabe and Julie Power provide information about Perrottet’s ‘hit list’, and include comments such as that of ‘Glen Harper, a member of the Australian Institute of Architects NSW Heritage Committee, said the “ treasurer’s lampooning of the appearance of many culturally significant late-modern buildings is certainly not in the public interest especially in a city where the government is paying lip-service to built heritage generally’. Read more.
‘Why the White Bay power station should become a museum of climate change’ in print as ‘White Bay can still do a power of good’
Caitlin Fitzsimmons makes reference to the Powerhouse Museum buildings, when  writing in the Sydney Morning Herald: ‘Planning Minister Rob Stokes has said he hopes the White Bay power station will be the centrepiece of plans to revive the Bays Precinct. I hope so too. Specifically, I think it should become a museum of climate change…The transformation of the Bankside Power Station into Tate Modern in London or the Brisbane Powerhouse shows the possibilities for reusing these old industrial structures for artistic purposes. Even better if there’s a connection between the original building and the repurposed cultural use – as there is with the Powerhouse Museum in Sydney and its exhibits on science and technology… Read more.

21 November, 2010
‘Excellent Treasurer, appalling architect’: Stokes rejects Perrottet’s bid to bulldoze power station
Following ‘Treasurer Dominic Perrottet’s remarks in Parliament last week…’, Caitlin Fitzsimmons writes in the Sydney Morning Herald that: ‘NSW Planning Minister Rob Stokes has hosed down fears that the old White Bay power station at Rozelle will be bulldozed, saying he hopes it will be the centrepiece of the precinct’s revival. ..Mr Stokes said of his fellow Liberal frontbencher, “Dominic Perrottet makes an excellent Treasurer but would make an appalling architect.”…’Their comments stirred huge public debate. Inner West mayor Darcy Byrne received about 400 comments’ …saying ‘the community was angry because it was the latest incident in a “pattern of disrespectful conduct” to the inner west. ‘ Read more.
See also:
26 November, 2020
Brutal but beautiful: Stokes’ list of Sydney’s architectural gems
Julie Power records  in the Sydney Morning Herald, the NSW Planning Minister’s response to the Treasurer’s comments on significant buildings in Sydney:  ‘Far from agreeing that the Brutalist style Sirius building should be slated for the wrecking ball as Treasurer Dominic Perrottet suggested this week, NSW Planning Minister Rob Stokes has put the love-it or hate-it apartment block on his competing list of 10 hidden architectural gems in Sydney. Explaining his list, Mr Stokes said, “One of the beautiful things about Sydney is that it isn’t consistent and there’s a contradiction of styles.”… He said the idea of knocking everything down was as repugnant as the idea of saving everything. “We need to consider whether buildings are useful and beautiful and can be adapted to a new use.” Read more, or  26 Nov Stokes

19 November, 2020
‘It should be knocked down’: Metro development jeopardises heritage listed power station’ and in print as ‘Black day for White Bay if Perrottet get his way’
In the Sydney Morning Herald, Tom Rabel reports about the potential demolition of another power station, saying: ‘Construction of a new metro station and development at White Bay has cast doubt over the future of the nearby heritage listed power station, with the state’s Treasurer suggesting it should be knocked down….The longest-serving power station in Sydney, it was built between 1912-17 to supply power to the railway and tramway system. It shut down in 1984.’ Read more.  or: 19 Nov Black day for White Bay

20 November, 2020
Powerhouse boss digs deep in pursuit of the ‘wow effect’, on line as ‘New MAAS president Peter Collins wants ‘a wow effect’ at Powerhouse Museum’
Linda Morris, in the Sydney Morning Herald, provides information about the new president of trustees of the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences,  former  Liberal minister Peter Collins.  ‘Formerly the NSW arts and health minister, … it was he who first saw the potential in a young university student by the name of Gladys Berejiklian. Current Arts Minister Don Harwin and police minister David Elliott are former staffers.’
After references to his personal collecting interests, Morris says: ‘What is clear is Collins, the new president of the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences, is going to be more hands-on than his predecessor, Western Sydney University vice-chancellor Barney Glover. “We’ve barely scratched the surface of the Powerhouse collection,” Collins said. “I want to go through the backlots and see what we’ve got.”
‘Collins was appointed to the museum board at the same time as billionaire property developer Lang Walker – whom Infrastructure NSW confirms is not bidding to build the Parramatta Powerhouse – and says Walker is the type of business leader he wants to see investing in the institution. MAAS needs to raise $75 million in private donations…NSW budget shows there is no money for full-scale construction at Parramatta until the 2021-22 financial year. A tender call for early site demolition works has raised fears of a rushed and rough relocation of Willow Grove. Collins assures the relocated villa would be no replica. “I have a deep commitment to built heritage,” he says, likening criticism around the Parramatta Powerhouse to that which dogged the Sydney Opera House. As to the fate of the Harwood Building, the central storage facility next door to the Ultimo museum, he’d like it to stay in government hands but can see its purpose changing…”My understanding is the government wants to retain Harwood Building as part of the arts precinct in Ultimo. Whether or not it is the Harwood Building doing exactly what it does now or Harwood transformed to perform a different function for the Powerhouse itself … I would think those things remain open.” Read more,  or 20 Nov Peter Collins

17 November, 2020
‘NSW Budget: Powerhouse Museum, Sydney Modern in funding boost’
Jake McCallum reports in the Parramatta Advertiser, that: ‘The controversial Powerhouse Museum development has received a major funding boost in the NSW State Budget along with several other major arts projects including the Sydney Modern. A massive $269 million in funding has been injected into the controversial plans for the new Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta as part of this year’s NSW State Budget. Treasurer Dominic Perrottet’s 2020-21 budget also announced the allocation of hundreds of millions of dollars in funding to both the Parramatta and Castle Hill Discovery Centre. Arts Minister Don Harwin said cultural sectors across the state were set for a major boost in this year’s budget …The cash injection for the long-debated arts project is part of hundreds of millions of dollars in funding for arts and culture across the state, including $199.6 million for the Sydney Modern Project and $129 million for the Walsh Bay Arts Precinct.’ Read more.17 Nov Budget for Parra Powerhouse
(But PMA notes that no funding for necessary work on the Ultimo museum site is allocated.)

 17 November, 2020
‘Insignificant’ building threatens to scuttle $800m Powerhouse Parramatta
Kelly Burke reports in The Guardian that ‘The row over Willow Grove continues with two unions imposing a green ban on the heritage relocation and a protest taking place. A “not particularly significant or unique” two-storey building in Parramatta could scuttle one of the NSW government’s most ambitious projects, the $800m Powerhouse Parramatta.
On Tuesday, Parramatta’s main thoroughfare will close temporarily from midday, to make way for a protest march to save Willow Grove, an 1890s villa that sits at the centre of the site selected by the state government to house one of the country’s largest museums… The issue has also caused bitter division among the City of Parramatta’s councillors, with last week’s meeting deteriorating into a shouting match during debate over whether council should support a motion in favour of the NSW government’s response to the EIS’s submissions, which recommends the building’s removal from its existing site. The council ultimately voted to support it. In a report prepared by a major accountancy firm at the behest of the state government to convince the unions to lift the green ban, the relocation site for the historic building is revealed. In the confidential report seen by Guardian Australia, it’s confirmed Willow Grove will be dismantled brick by brick and rebuilt directly opposite old Parramatta Gaol. Representatives from the Dharug community, recognised by the state government as the traditional owners of the area, who have strong historical ties to both the house and the land it sits upon, have also condemned the relocation site.  .. Last Monday’s council meeting heard that the heritage issues surrounding Parramatta Powerhouse had become so controversial that the government had received more submissions to Infrastructure NSW’s Environmental Impact Statement on the project than those combined for the similarly polarising Westconnex and Sydney Metro West. More than 90 percent of the more than 1,300 submissions raised “loss of heritage” concerns over the demolition of St George’s Terrace – a row of 1880s residences and shops – and/or the dismantling and relocation of Willow Grove a couple of kilometres north, to make way for the new museum. Read more, or Guardian 17 Nov Council and Willow Grove

17 November, 2020
‘Protest march in Parramatta to save Willow Grove’
7 News also records the protest, reporting:  ‘A major union yesterday joined a protest against plans to relocate Parramatta’s historic Willow Grove. The 19th century villa is set to be moved to make way for the new Power House Museum, The CFMEU has slapped a green ban on the house when it was slated for demolition. The union doesn’t want the house moved to North Parramatta.’  Read more,  or Read more. 

14 November, 2020
‘Problematic Castle Hill expansion project in exhibition’
Save the Powerhouse community campaign group circulated these comments by email and Facebook: ‘The NSW Government has published details of its planned Expansion of the Museums Discovery Centre project at https://www.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/major-projects/project/35916. They include “…removal of vegetation, earthworks and site preparation, and the construction and operation of a new building for the storage, conservation, research and display of the Powerhouse collection”. Public comment is invited by December 1. The announcement is not good news, not least because the project is presented as a “State Significant Development”. A “State Significant” (SDD) designation is one of the NSW Government’s preferred ways of taking complete control of new Sydney developments, while silencing any community objections…
Second, as everyone knows – except the Government, apparently – the lifeblood of all museums is their collection(s). This is especially true of the Powerhouse in Ultimo, the unique custodian of the area’s rich industrial history, where the collections are stored, studied and cared for in the specially-designed Harwood Building. Yet one of the project’s key objectives is “construction and operation of a new building for the storage, conservation, research and display of the Powerhouse collection”. This supports numerous earlier indications that the new Castle Hill facility will replace Harwood, and it’s further described at http://tiny.cc/7mn4tz  … Expanding Castle Hill as a collection facility makes the two other “Powerhouse” project sites virtually redundant, calling into question the Government’s hollow mantra that Sydney will have TWO future world-class “Powerhouse Museums” – in Ultimo and in Parramatta – and the vast amounts of public money that have already been lavished (wasted?) on this concept.’
They conclude with: ‘In summary, the Expansion of the Museums Discovery Centre is just further confirmation that the Government has resolved to charge blindly ahead with this project, despite well-documented community opposition to many aspects including
– Location, especially the long, inconvenient journey to Caste Hill for locals and visitors with tight vacation schedules, whereas the central Ultimo site is  easily accessed.
– Universal recognition of the Ultimo Powerhouse (compared with “Where’s Castle Hill?”).
– Trashing Parramatta’s heritage buildings to make way for “Powerhouse 2”.
– Destruction of the essential oil research plantation  in Castle Hill.
Meanwhile the Government is seekin  expressions of interest  for the “Powerhouse Parramatta” early works and selected architect Lahznimmo to design the Castle Hill extension . Read more: 14 Nov Save the Powerhouse – Castle Hill issues

11 November, 2020
Legislative Council: ‘Order for papers, Powerhouse and Parramatta’
In the Legislative Council Minutes No. 67—Wednesday 11 November 2020, Mr Robert Borsak, Chair of the Select Committee of Inquiry, ‘… moved, according to notice, as by leave amended: That, under standing order 52, there be laid upon the table of the House within 30 days of the date of passing of this resolution the following documents in the possession, custody or control of the Minister for the Public Service and Employee Relations, Aboriginal Affairs, and the Arts, the Premier, the Department of Premier and Cabinet, the Trustees of the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences, Infrastructure NSW or the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, relating to the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences and Powerhouse Parramatta.’
The question, which was put and passed, included requests for a number of documents (a-r) to be tabled within 30 days. Read more, or 11 Nov LC minutes

10 November, 2020
‘Greenban March to Save Willow Grove’
North Parramatta Residents Action Group announces that a Greenban March is being held in Parramatta on 17 November, saying: ‘Jack Mundey saved The Rocks with the GreenBan marches of the 70s – now it is time to march on Parramatta to save our heritage in the heart of Parramatta. Despite the NSW Government announcing they have ‘saved’ Willow Grove by proposing to move it from its garden setting, effectively demolishing it and building a replica in an unidentified location in Parramatta, the community along with heritage experts and the CFMEU do not accept this as saving our heritage. The CFMEU GreenBan is still in place. Willow Grove must remain at the place it was built 140 years ago at 34 Phillip Street, Parramatta.’ They provide a schedule starting with an Assembly from 11:15 am at the George Street gates Parramatta Park (Pavillion Park), and concluding with speeches at 34 Phillip Street (WillowGrove) – also advising that marchers must register on line for CoVID-safe reasons. Read more: GreenBan March 17 Nov

8 November, 2020
‘MAAS Trustee appointments confirm Government’s business bias’
Save the Powerhouse group comments on its Facebook page:  ‘Back in 2018 we asked “How Far Can We Trust the MAAS Trustees? Under the Museums Act (1945), the Premier is responsible to Parliament for the operations of the Museum, which is managed “…by nine Trustees, appointed by the Governor on the recommendation of the Minister for the Arts.” The only selection guidelines the Act offers for Trustees is that there should be “representation across a range of…categories on public sector Boards and Trusts”, of whom at least one (JUST ONE?) should be “…experienced in the arts or sciences”. The primary responsibility of the MAAS Board is stated as “ministering to the needs and demands of the community in…applied science and art and industry development” on behalf of Australia’s internationally-acclaimed Arts and Sciences Museum. As far as we know the MAAS Board of Trustees has no recent history of consultation with the general public, nor of responding to the wider community’s “needs and demands”. On the contrary, it has a troubled track record of welcoming to its ranks political, big business, and property development magnates who have the ear of the Arts Minister and the NSW government. The three new appointees are no exception. The Minister’s press release enthuses “We are extremely fortunate to have these recognised business leaders on board to guide the Museum”, adding that Peter Collins’ current focus is “finance.” while “Investing in Greater Western Sydney” is a priority for Lang and the Walker Group, and Mark Hassell is “skilled in strategic partnerships”. No mention of relevant knowledge and experience in Museum operations and management in. the Arts and Culture Sector, or in associated fields.
The new appointments to the MAAS Board have infuriated – but not greatly surprised – NSW museum specialists.  As one outraged museums consultant commented “What (these new Trustees) do NOT bring is independence from the NSW Government…Is the government serious about having an independent MAAS Trust with an appropriate set of skills? It says something about (their) position on the challenges facing MAAS…that they have selected a former Liberal politician as chair, a leading developer, and another partner from one of the big four accountancy…practices.”… At a moment when the Powerhouse as we know it is fighting for its very existence, more heavy-handed right-wing control from Big Business appointees who join fanatical “Powerhouse move” supporter David Borger on the Board, is the last thing it needs! Read more or  8 Nov Save the PHM – Trustees
Also see: 17 November, 2020
Parra News reports that ‘Action group disappointed with Powerhouse Appointments’, page 12
Read more. 

8 November, 2020
Save Willow Grove lobbyists question new Board members
The Save Willow Grove group writes in its Facebook page (supported by the North Parramatta Residents Action Group):  ‘The announcement of 3 new Powerhouse Museum Board members raises even more questions about  Gladys Berejiklian’s commitment to build a “world class museum” or a “world expo” centre on the rubble of Willow Grove.  Just to rub salt into the wound one director is from the same KPMG engaged to prepare the report to knock down Willow Grove and rebuild a replica beside the Gaol!!! The 2nd appointment is Lang Walker, magnate of Walker Group, a tier 1 developer – builder & owner of Parramatta Square. And last but by no means least, the new Chair is a former leader of the NSW Liberal party… With these fresh new appointments this is the perfect time to dig out their email addresses and tell them why Willow Grove must be saved.’ Read more.

7 November, 2020
‘Billionaire developer joins board of Powerhouse’
Reporting on what are immediately proving to be very controversial appointments, Megan Gorrey writes in the Sydney Morning Herald that: ‘One of the state’s leading developers has been appointed to the board of the Powerhouse Museum, as the NSW government pushes ahead with plans for a new building at Parramatta and an overhaul of its Ultimo site. Billionaire property developer Lang Walker will join former NSW Liberal leader Peter Collins and Mark Hassell, a partner at consulting giant KPMG, as trustees on a new-look Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences board at a time of significant upheaval for the Sydney arts institution. The government is forging ahead with its $840 million ambition to construct the new Parramatta Powerhouse, while it eyes the possible redevelopment of part of the existing museum site in inner-city Ultimo.’
‘Announcing the appointments yesterday, Arts Minister Don Harwin said the three “recognised business leaders would bring “significant experience and strategic expertise to the board”. [But] Museum consultant Kylie Winkworth criticised the lack of diversity and experience in museum management and collections among the trustees. “I fear with these appointments we might be going into another round of ‘Save the Powerhouse’. Museums and our cultural institutions are not small operations; they are managing huge and highly valuable assets,” she said. “What are the skills the government thinks the museum board needs? It seems to be property development, political nous and heading up a company.”
The appointments coincide with the departure of Western Sydney University vice-chancellor Barney Glover, who stepped down from the board yesterday. Mr Collins will replace Professor Glover as the board’s president.’ Read more  or  7 Nov SMH – Trustees

1 November, 2020
‘Redesigned Parramatta Powerhouse smaller, cheaper, more refined’
Sun-Herald (on-line longer version)
Following many enquiries, submissions, objections, reports and public responses, and an announcement in July that at least some part of the Powerhouse Museum would remain in Ultimo, Linda Morris writes that: ‘The Parramatta Powerhouse has been redesigned smaller, potentially saving the Berejiklian government tens of millions of dollars. Presentation spaces on all but one level of the new museum have shrunk according to the latest architectural plans prepared by Moreau Kusunoki and Genton. Architects and planners consulted by the Herald estimate the reduced floor space would slash construction costs by between $20 and $60 million. With other changes, the savings could exceed $90 million. The Government did not challenge the assessments, saying detailed construction costs would be confirmed during the tender process. Parliamentary papers show museum planners have been striving for savings to keep the new museum within its $840 million budget.’ As well, ‘The government announced earlier this month its plans to demolish the former maternity hospital Willow Grove and rebuild it in North Parramatta. Some of the mature trees within the villa’s curtilage are to be retained in the revised plans…The design changes have been made to improve museum operations and visitor experience in response to feedback to the Environment Impact Statement. The construction contract for Parramatta Powerhouse has already gone out to tender. The contract to clear the riverside site is separate, a move that could potentially sidestep the green ban imposed by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining, and Energy Union (CFMEU) on any demolition of Willow Grove. Barring a legal objection, the project now awaits the expected green light from planning minister Rob Stokes.’ Read more, or: SunHerald 1 Nov 2020

31 October, 2020
Indigenous group ‘sickened’ by Powerhouse Museum expansion: ‘It treats our land as terra nullius’
Kelly Burke writes in The Guardian, that ‘An Indigenous group has been left “sickened” and feels “utter dismay” over the controversial proposed Powerhouse Parramatta museum in Sydney, saying it was effectively cut out of consultation. The organisation that represents Dharug people in Western Sydney said it felt it was only included in planning talks about the multimillion dollar development in order to “tick boxes”. And the group said part of the plan – which involves demolishing and relocating a 130-year-old homestead, Willow Grove – may unearth ancient Indigenous artefacts and the bodies of their ancestors, in a move which “reaffirms the colonial reality that we did not – and still don’t – matter”… On 8 October, Powerhouse trustee David Borger told an ongoing parliamentary inquiry into NSW museums that the Parramatta project – including the removal of Willow Grove – had the full support of the “traditional Aboriginal owners”. But Borger was referring to the statutory body the Deerubbin Local Aboriginal Land Council, not the Dharug people, who are recognised by the NSW government as traditional owners of the land but have been refused entry to the land council in a decades-long and bitter dispute. The Dharug Strategic Management Group (DSMG) is a local non-profit organisation that represents Dharug people in the area, and which is acting as one of the consultants to the Powerhouse Parramatta project.
The DSMG’s response to the EIS was one of 1,268 public submissions, the overwhelming majority of which objected to the project and raised the issue of loss of heritage. In their submission, the DSMG said the Dharug people of Parramatta were “sickened” and “dismayed at the complete lack of respect” and the “unacceptable” and “ignorant” implications that the proposed site was “empty of anything of value prior to its occupation by the Powerhouse”. “This erasure parallels the colonial insistence that our nura was empty and that we did not exist. It reaffirms the colonial reality that we did not – and still don’t – matter,” the submission said. …DSMG’s finance officer Richie Howitt told Guardian Australia that the fact that the site isn’t known for its historical significance is precisely what makes Willow Grove valuable: “It’s possibly the only [historical] building in Parramatta that doesn’t have a history of colonial violence.”… “To think that heritage can be preserved by dismantling [Willow Grove] and rebuilding it somewhere between the old Parramatta Gaol and the Female Factory – both sites that contain terrible stories for the Dharug people – is a fundamental misunderstanding of what heritage is,” Howitt said. “It’s not just adding insult to injury … it’s quite simply offensive.” There is also the issue of what may lie beneath Willow Grove: the inquiry heard it could be sitting on a treasure trove of ancient Indigenous artefacts.’ Read more or  30 Oct Guardian

30? October, 2020
‘Powerhouse: we’ll block bulldozers’
The Parramatta Times reports that: ‘The architects designing the $780M Powerhouse Parramatta has presented to Infrastructure NSW an improved design to include rooftop spaces which images revealed a sweeping view of the city and its river… With the reduction of the estimated 18,000sqm exhibition spaces for thousands of prized artefacts within the museum, “a rooftop pavilion” in the eastern side of the building will be used as a “multi-functional indoor-outdoor space for education, community and event activities,” the report said… This latest development on the museum has been welcomed by Powerhouse chief executive Lisa Havilah saying, “I am excited by the progress being made on this extraordinary design.” Ms Havilah also said they welcomed the NSW Government’s recent decision to relocate Willow Grove to North Parramatta because it will mean “improved access to this much-loved building but also deliver it in a much better setting.” However, critics of the move include the National Trust, who all say that Willow Grove cannot be moved without significant damage…. While tenders have gone out for the building work, the North Parramatta Residents Action Group president Suzette Meade said there needed to be a reassessment of the whole project, given the changes to the original approved design. ‘’They are not minor tweaks we’ve had along the way, with the closing of the undercroft for non-exhibition times, changes to the setback and now the rooftop terrace, so it needs to go back to the community,’’ Mrs Meade told the Times. NPRAG remains opposed to the current site of the Powerhouse and the demolition or re-siting of Willow Grove. A green ban from the construction union, the CMFEU remains on the Willow Grove site, with members vowing to ‘’stand in front of the bulldozers’’ if necessary.’ Read more or  30 Oct Parra Times  or 30 Oct Parra 2

29 October, 2020
‘Tenders called: Powerhouse Museums Discovery Centre Castle Hill’
The NSW Government’s e-Tendering website proceeds with the proposal to construct a new collection storage building at Castle Hill for the Powerhouse Museum’s collection – currently being digitised and packed for removal from its long-term Ultimo site. As well as providing contact information, the Tender Details include: ‘ Seeking Expression of Interest for the Construction of Building J and associated works at Powerhouse Museum, Castle Hill. Powerhouse Museums Discovery Centre Castle Hill – RFT-10033261. Published 29-Oct-2020; Closes 19-Nov-2020 9:30am … Expression of Interest For Pre-Qualification – An invitation for Expression of Interest (EOI) for pre-registration of prospective tenderers for a type of work or service. Applicants are initially evaluated against published selection criteria. RFT may then be invited from a panel of providers (as Selective, or Invited).’  Read more, or  Castle Hill Tender

22 October, 2020
‘Premier’s staff called to appear at hearing (before grants inquiry)’
Report below updated in print, detailing issues to do with ICAC inquiry into corruption in funding council projects through the Community Grants program. Read more.

20/21 October, 2020
‘NSW government dealt embarrassing blow as leader kicked out of upper house’ (on-line)
Following earlier news reports of NSW government rorts during the last week, Alexandra Smith writes in the Sydney Morning Herald that ‘The Berejiklian government has been dealt a humiliating blow with its most senior minister of the upper house suspended from Parliament in a rare move last used more than 20 years ago. In an extraordinary development, the leader of the government in the upper house Don Harwin was removed from the chamber late on Tuesday by the Usher of the Black Rod… Mr Harwin was suspended for the remainder of the day after the Berejiklian government failed to produce documents showing signed paperwork relating to more than $250 million in council grants. Premier Gladys Berejiklian directly approved more than $100 million in the grants, but the only records of the approvals are in the form of emails from policy advisers. The grants, which Labor’s MP John Graham told the house were worth “two-and-a-half times the federal sports rorts” scandal, were distributed almost exclusively to councils in Coalition-held seats.’ Comments are recorded from Upper House members including Labor leader Adam Searle, Greens MP David Shoebridge and One Nation leader Mark Latham. Read more or  SMH Harwin out 21 Oct 

 19 October, 2020
‘Coalition faces bruising week…’
As well as making reference to recent documentation of government corruption that could involve the NSW Premier, Alexandra Smith writes in the Sydney Morning Herald, that: ‘The Berejiklian government handed out more than $250 million in council grants, almost all in Coalition-held seats, in the months before last year’s election without any signed paperwork…Ms Berejiklian also faces the embarrassing spectacle of the leader of the government in the upper house being suspended from the chamber over the “failure to table documents … relating to the tied grants round of the Stronger Communities Fund”. If successful, the leader of the government Don Harwin will be suspended from the chamber for two sitting days. .. Meanwhile, Labor MLC John Graham has moved a motion in the upper house, which is awaiting a ruling from the president John Ajaka, calling on Mr Harwin, as the most senior government member in the chamber, to be suspended for being in “contempt of the house”. Mr Graham said it “beggars belief” that 249 grants to councils could be approved without signed paperwork, telling the upper house: “Was this done on a whiteboard or a Post-it note?”… Labor has repeatedly maintained that 95 per cent of the total funding went to Coalition seats, with only five of the funded projects in Labor seats.’ Read more  or:  SMH Oct 20

19 October, 2020
‘Artists take a stand against Parramatta Powerhouse’
Antonia Mangos writes in City Hub: ‘Although the Powerhouse’s Ultimo location has been saved, the NSW Government’s decision to press ahead with the construction of a second Powerhouse museum in western Sydney has sparked a public outcry. After months of deliberation from the government, a second Powerhouse museum is set to make its mark in Parramatta on the site of existing historic buildings. The decision has left local artists and members of the community scratching their heads.’ Mangos documents protests by local art groups including Guerilla Gallery and the The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU),most recently after ‘Arts Minister Don Harwin announced on October 8 that there are plans for the Willow Grove building to be dismantled piece by piece and relocated to North Parramatta whilst St George’s terraces will be preserved.’ Read more or  City Hub 19 Oct

 19 October, 2020
‘Update on the planning process’
Infrastructure NSW distributed a postcard Update on the planning process’ in Parramatta, in October, advising that ‘Infrastructure NSW has now reviewed all the submissions and a Response to Submissions Report has been prepared ( See here.)The report addresses the matters raised in the submissions and also outlines changes made to the project as a result of the feedback received’. See:   Postcard in Parramatta
This information was also circulated through email by INSW as: INSW update 21 Oct
However, many individuals and organisations are asking for opportunities for further comments, saying not all the concerns are being met.
Save the Powerhouse writes in Facebook on 19 October:
‘We are advised that the public can still make submissions and we encourage you to send your thoughts to Marcus.jennejohn@planning.nsw.gov.au
Your objections could include:
– A project which received over 1300 submissions of which 95% were opposed, should not be considered for approval.
– The modifications made to the design are purely cosmetic and do not change the fundamentals
(a) The flood dangers on the site have not been addressed. Even if the undercroft is now closed people could still drown when trying to escape land flood.
(b) The proposed removal and rebuilding of Willow Grove on another site has been universally derided by experts as “farcical.”
(c) All other problems – size, lack of museum curatorial space, etc… and immense costs – remain. Read more. Save the P 19 Oct

17 October, 2020
‘Controversial project to avoid scrutiny’
Greater Sydney Community’s Facebook
page reports that: ‘Despite 1,303 submissions in response to the controversial Powerhouse Parramatta project, the Department of Planning has confirmed the project won’t be subject to independent scrutiny by the Independent Planning Commission.  Instead, given the government is the proponent, the project will be assessed by the Department with the process now underway in consultation with the local council and other agencies. This follows receipt of the RtS (Response to Submissions report) from the proponent, which responds to submissions and makes a number of changes to the project.’ (To view the RTS and associated reports & drawings (24 files) see here.)
However, because there are now a number of controversial changes to the proposal, including: ‘Significantly, the amended plans include ‘moving’ Willow Grove to an undisclosed site, which has drawn extensive criticism from experts and the community alike’, they and others are seeking further opportunity to submit comments. They have found that: ‘Given the assessment process is underway, if you wish to comment, please provide your feedback ASAP by emailing the Planner, ie Marcus.jennejohn@planning.nsw.gov.au . IMPORTANT: All submissions are published on the Department’s website.  If you don’t want your personal information published, please make sure to note this in your email/submission.’

16 October, 2020
‘Powerhouse Parramatta Project Expression of Interest – Powerhouse EOI’
Despite many unresolved publicly expressed issues about the proposal, the NSW government announces: ‘Infrastructure NSW (INSW) intends to commence a two-stage procurement process for a design development, documentation and construction contract for the Powerhouse Parramatta Project (the Project).’
The attached document provides the Tender Details  or  INSW Exp Interest Parra PH 16 Oct

15 October, 2020
‘Ben Fordham goes head-to-head with Don Harwin over ‘dud’ Powerhouse plan’
Radio 2GB interviews Arts Minister Don Harwin , who ‘is defending the plan to spend less than $10 million to relocate a historical building to make way for a Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta’ … ‘Willow Grove House will be relocated to North Parramatta and the brick facade of St George’s Terrace will also be preserved. “I think you know Don, this is a dud of an idea,” Ben Fordham said. But Mr Harwin is rejecting that idea. “It’s been done before. I really think that the community wants to keep this, this is a good compromise.”
Don Harwin has revealed it will cost less than $10 million to dismantle and re-erect the 19th-century building. “You’re gonna spend $10 million moving an unusable building!?” Ben exclaimed.’ The interview documents Harwin’s comments that he inherited the project, and that he has been doing his best and that this would be a ‘great outcome’. But Ben Fordham raises many concerns from many objectors. Read and hear more.

13 October, 2020
‘The battle to save Willow Grove’
Susan Price in Green Left interviews ‘Suzette Meade, from the North Parramatta Residents Action Group … about the campaign to save heritage sites and for an alternative location and design for a new museum in Parramatta.’  They discussed the Green Ban placed by the CFMEU on the demolition or removal of Willow Grove, while ‘ the NSW Nurses and Midwives Association came on board, pledging to “stand in front of the machines with us”.’ As well,  ‘The site is located on the land of the Burramattagal people of the Darug nation — from where the name Parramatta is derived. The Darug Strategic Management Group strongly objected to the new museum.’ ‘Meade said the alternative would be to locate a Museum of NSW at the Cumberland Hospital heritage precinct “with low-level intertwined serpentine buildings between landscape” and “set within a botanical estate”. “It would cost less, deliver more culturally and would bring so much tourism to Parramatta”. Read more  or  Green Left 13 Oct

10 October, 2020
‘Erasing our women of history in Parramatta, stone by stone, and brick by brick’
Following the announcement that the NSW Government had approved the relocation of the significant Willow Grove building to make way for the ‘Powerhouse Parramatta’, Elizabeth Farrelly writes in the Sydney Morning Herald: ‘The seven stone sisters of Parramatta: Willow Grove, the Female Factory, the Female Orphan School, Experiment Farm, the Dairy Cottage, Hambledon and the Parramatta Girls Industrial School. These seven rare and heritage-listed buildings, exemplars of a remarkable female-driven narrative in early colonial Parramatta, form a veritable female phalanx. Yet two of the seven are currently under threat – not from ratbag developers but from our own supposedly conservative, supposedly heritage-conscious, supposedly female-led government… Our disdain of heritage is itself a form of misogyny. Not only because so many of its defenders are women but because heritage is seen as the “girl” of contemporary politics. Inherently weak and, however lovable, unable to fight its corner or pay its way, heritage is a soft target in the bovver-boy world of neoliberalism, ripe for trampling. The government’s current proposal to squeeze a tech hub into the Parramatta Female Factory is one example. Its underhand determination to demolish the pretty Italianate villa Willow Grove, or shove it from its glorious garden for the Powerhouse, is another. With a mite of common sense, both could be avoided.’ After documenting the significant histories of a number of Parramatta buildings associated with women, and the historic Fleet Street precinct, she concludes: ‘In any case there’s a more rational, less invasive alternative: keep the Powerhouse in Ultimo, customise a genuine Parramatta museum within these old and lovely Fleet Street buildings and retain Willow Grove in its lofty garden as a tribute to the women who, for decades, created and ran it.’ Read more, or  10 Oct SMH Farrelly

9/10 October, 2020
‘Utter lunacy’: Plan to shift Willow Grove for Parramatta Powerhouse sparks outcry (on-line, 9/10);  ‘Union commits to boycott over villa’s relocation’ (in print, 10/10)
Megan Gorrey reports in the Sydney Morning Herald that: ‘The construction union will not back down from a boycott on demolition work that could damage a heritage building the Berejiklian government wants to relocate to make way for the Powerhouse in Parramatta… The decision to shift the building removes a significant obstacle in the government’s $840 million plan for the Powerhouse in Parramatta – months after backing down from plans to remove the institution from Ultimo. ..But CFMEU NSW secretary Darren Greenfield said the green ban remained in place and the union was “asking all our contractors and builders to not touch this building”.”The plan to move Willow Grove is nonsensical and will result in the loss of the building’s heritage value. Willow Grove is over 150 years old, made of 150-year-old bricks and 150-year-old timbers. “The dismantling of the building will inevitably result in the destruction of much, if not all, of the original materials. What will be rebuilt on a completely different location will not be Willow Grove – it will be a copy.” ‘
Gorrey includes comments from Parramatta MP Geoff Lee, Labor leader Jodi McKay and North Parramatta Residents Action Group spokeswoman Suzette Mead, who said: ‘demolishing the property and “rebuilding some faux replica beside the sandstone, convict-built Parramatta Gaol” was “utter lunacy”. “The streetscape of Parramatta will lose its last-remaining connection with its past – erased by a museum.”
She adds: ‘The decision comes in the midst of an Upper House inquiry into the Powerhouse and a last-minute push from a new coalition of western Sydney business, arts, education and health groups for Willow Grove to be relocated. The demolition of Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace was assumed as part of business cases prepared for the Parramatta Powerhouse. But the government later said it would try to keep those buildings. According to a response to submissions, prepared by Infrastructure NSW and released this week, part of the museum’s setback would be widened to retain St George’s Terrace as part of the Phillip Street frontage.’ Read more, or 10 Oct SMH Gorrey

9 October  2020
‘Historic Parramatta building will be moved to make way for Powerhouse museum’
ABC Radio 702’s On Breakfast
with Wendy Harmer and Robbie Buck, investigated responses to the announcement that: ‘An historic building set to be demolished to make way for a new museum in Sydney’s west will be saved. The state government announced Willow Grove house will be relocated and restored in North Parramatta. The removal of the building will make way for the new Powerhouse Museum building. It comes after community outcry to save the 19th century building. There’s been a mixed reaction to the decision though.’ Wendy Harmer and Robbie Buck spoke to Parramatta MP Geoff Lee, Suzette Meade from the North Parramatta Residents Action Group and heritage consultant Tony Brassil to get their reaction.

9 October, 2020
‘Willow Grove Parramatta to be relocated for Powerhouse Museum’
In the Parramatta Advertiser, Joanne Vella reports that: ‘Relocating the heritage-listed Willow Grove to North Parramatta so it can make way for the Powerhouse has been labelled a “bogan brain fart” by “flabbergasted” MP Julia Finn. The State Government yesterday announced plans to relocate the 140-year-old heritage listed Willow Grove at Phillip St Parramatta, to North Parramatta to make way for the $767 million museum after years of the community fighting to save the former maternity hospital.’ She notes supportive comments for the move from arts minister Don Harwin, Parramatta state Liberal MP Geoff Lee and Parramatta Lord Mayor Bob Dwyer. ‘But Granville state Labor MP Ms Finn slammed the relocation, saying it was not a compromise. “I think it’s ridiculously tacky,’’ she said. “It’s pretty much a bogan brain fart. It’s not preserving the building, it’s preserving the building’s materials. “It flies in the face of heritage guidelines. It doesn’t add to the history, it erases it. Even if they do it brick by brick this isn’t preserving the building. “It’s not a compromise, it’s just vandalism.’’ ‘
‘North Parramatta Residents’ Action Group spokeswoman Suzette Meade the relocation was lunacy. “Demolishing this 140-year-old privately built Victorian Italianate villa and rebuilding some faux replica beside the sandstone convict-built Parramatta Gaol is utter lunacy,’’ she said.“The streetscape of Parramatta will lose its last remaining connection with our past – erased by a museum. “Instead of spending tens of millions moving a cherished piece of Parramatta’s heritage that’s been a part of the social fabric of Phillip St in its garden setting for 140 years, it makes far better sense to move the project that hasn’t even left the drawing board instead.’’ ‘ Read more, or   9 Oct Parra Advertiser 

9 October, 2020
‘Willow Grove Green Ban Stands’
In a media release, Darren Greenfield, CFMEU NSW Construction Secretary [who spoke very convincingly in the government Inquiry hearing on 8 October], says of the sudden government  announcement that Willow Grove would be moved, that: “The CFMEU’s green ban on the destruction of Willow Grove stands. “It is long past time for the government to listen to the people of Parramatta, to heritage experts, and to the whole NSW community and finally commit to preserving the heritage building in its current location. The ‘plan’ to move Willow Grove is nonsensical and will result in the loss of the building’s heritage value. Willow Grove is over 150 years old, made of 150-year-old bricks and 150-year-old timbers. The dismantling of the building will inevitably result in the destruction of much if not all of the original materials.” “What will be rebuilt on a completely different location will not be Willow Grove – it will be a copy. And given the low-ball figures we’ve heard bandied about on the cost of the project, it will be a poor copy at that…”The people of Parramatta and Western Sydney deserve a museum that celebrates their heritage, rather than destroy an irreplaceable historic building to make way for the museum gift shop.” Read more: Willow Grove green ban stands

9 October, 2020
‘It’s moving house time’
On line 8 Oct as ‘Powerhouse Museum at Parramatta gets NSW government construction approval’
Matthew Benns writes in the Daily Telegraph, that ‘Arts Minister Don Harwin confirmed heritage listed Willow Grove house would be taken down brick by brick and rebuilt in North Parramatta. The Government will also retain the original heritage portion of nearby St George’s Terrace.’  Read more here, as well as a statement from local MP Geoff Lee, and an editorial, both clearly influenced by business interest rather than heritage and culture. Read more:  or:  DT 9 Oct
This announcement follows longterm community lobbying to save the buildings where they are, supported by a Green Ban by the CFMEU. Strong protests were expressed – alongside support – in news such as: Channel  9 News.
Also check Facebook responses from Save Willow Grove, North Parramatta Resident Action Group, and Save the Powerhouse,.as well as Powerhouse Museum Alliance.

9 October, 2020
‘The Western Sydney Powerhouse Community Alliance Launches’
Museums & Galleries of NSW also reported that: ‘On Thursday 8 October, an Alliance of influential Western Sydney organisations and individuals announced their combined support of the Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta. The announcement was made by Christopher Brown, Chairman of the Western Sydney Leadership Dialogue, who stated “For too long, people from Eastern Sydney and a small minority of local opponents have been allowed to be the voice of Western Sydney on this issue. That ends today.” The Alliance has written to the NSW Premier, Gladys Berejiklian, to endorse the new Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta, and to argue for the relocation of the heritage building Willow Grove (which is currently on the proposed site of the new museum).
Earlier today (Friday 9 October), it was announced that Willow Grove will indeed be relocated and restored at a site in North Parramatta.’ Read more.  
(Note: this Alliance is not associated with the Powerhouse Museum Alliance of this web page). 

8 October, 2020 (on line)
‘Saving Willow Grove: The plan to shift historic building to North Parramatta’
Megan Gorrey writes in the Sydney Morning Herald, ‘A historic Italianate villa that was earmarked for demolition to make way for the new Powerhouse museum in western Sydney will be shifted to North Parramatta, following a lengthy community battle to preserve it on-site.
Arts Minister Don Harwin said the 19th century Willow Grove, which sits on the Parramatta site of the museum, would be dismantled and re-erected nearby in response to feedback from residents during the planning process. Mr Harwin said late on Thursday that the original heritage portion of nearby St George’s Terrace, including its brick facade, would be retained and refurbished. The Berejiklian government is pressing ahead with its $840 million ambition to build a second Powerhouse on the banks of the Parramatta River, months after backing down from plans to shift the institution from Ultimo.
The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) had placed a green ban on Willow Grove and the terraces in response to calls to have them preserved and incorporated into the museum’s design – a move that threatened to stall the project. It previously rejected Infrastructure NSW’s idea to relocate the villa, arguing the union would not support any proposal that did not preserve the property in its entirety in its existing location.
Parramatta Labor councillor Donna Davis said the announcement was premature given the environmental impact statement process for the project had not yet been completed [now published; see below]. “Surely any removal of a local heritage item, either by demolition or relocation, still requires you to follow proper planning processes,” she said. “Willow Grove’s heritage significance is it’s connection to its place as a 19th century Italianate villa in the Parramatta CBD, not North Parramatta.”
The buildings’ fate came under the spotlight during a NSW parliamentary inquiry on Thursday. Western Sydney Business Chamber executive director David Borger, who is on the museum’s board of trustees, said Willow Grove sat at the centre of the museum site and keeping it would require significant design changes. Powerhouse museum chief executive Lisa Havilah told the inquiry what happened to Willow Grove’s was “a matter for Infrastructure NSW”. ‘ 
Read more:
  or SMH October 8

8 October, 2020
‘Gladys, prove your power’
Matthew Benns writes in the Daily Telegraph about how: ‘A powerful group of Western Sydney business leaders has joined forces to lobby the NSW government to deliver on its promise to build the $767 million wing of the Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta.’ Although the demolition  of adjacent heritage buildings has been blocked by a green ban, ‘… the Western Sydney Community Powerhouse Alliance [absolutely no links to the Powerhouse Museum Alliance of this website] has today written to Premier Gladys Berejiklian asking her to move the Italianate villa in Phillip St brick by brick and make way for the museum. Read here.

8 October, 2020
Report: ‘Powerhouse Parramatta: Response to Submissions’
[Refer to invitation to make submissions, ‘You can help shape the future of the new museum’, 22 June, 2020]
Following consideration of many submissions made to the Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed ‘Powerhouse Parramatta’ project, a report by Ethos Urban, ‘Response to Submissions and Amended Proposal Report, Powerhouse Parramatta’ was submitted to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment on behalf of Infrastructure NSW on 8 October 2020.
In 57 pages, it documents an analysis of submissions identifying concerns including design integrity, location, heritage, flooding, parking, programming and closure of the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo and other issues, and provides responses with suggestions.
Some responses remain of concern, including:
– ‘The subject site is the most suitable location for the Powerhouse Parramatta as outlined in the EIS, including the site’s iconic location within the CBD of Sydney’s Central City, positioned on the Parramatta River foreshore at the terminus of the future Civic Link.
– In recognition of the comments regarding the preservation of heritage in Parramatta it is proposed to deconstruct and relocate Willow Grove to another location within the Parramatta area.
– Design amendment has also further enabled the retention of St George’s Terrace as part of the Phillip Street frontage of Powerhouse Parramatta. This will comprise works to integrate the terrace with the renewed site and to adaptively reuse the building to support Powerhouse Parramatta programming.
– The Premier of NSW announced on 4 July 2020 that Powerhouse Ultimo would be retained. The decision ensures Sydney benefits from two world-class facilities, providing a significant boost for the arts, tourism, and employment sectors. However, this issue is separate from and not a relevant matter for consideration as part of this SSD DA.
– The proposed development has been the subject of significant study and assessment by Arup, identifying the flood risk of the site and associated management strategies.
– The Powerhouse collection and processes of conservation, storage, restoration and exhibition is not an environmental planning issue….
– The potential transfer of collection and exhibition items between sites is not an environmental planning issue.’ For full Report read here.  or here: Response to Submissions Report

8 October, 2020
Second Inquiry: 4th Hearing,
The 4th hearing of the ‘Select Committee into government’s management of Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects’ took place, with proceedings available live on air.
For the Committee web page: See Here.
Schedule of speakers: See Here
For Transcript:  See Here

On-line recording: See Here

5 October, 2020
‘Campaign to Save the Powerhouse: Bulletin 57’
In one of his regular Bulletins, long-term volunteer and aeronautical expert, Tom Lockley, summarises current concerns about the future of the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo:
‘The battle for the Powerhouse continues, but there is one bit of unmitigated good news. At Ultimo, the trend for objects to be removed is to be reversed, in one very significant object. The Sputnik replica satellite, which had been removed to Castle Hill after the demolition of the Apollo 11 temporary exhibition, is, we are informed, to be reinstalled in its usual space during October.’ And ‘At Parramatta there was excellent publicity regarding the visit of the Legislative Council committee to the area.’ ‘The short summary is that the present processes are still being controlled by the few Government people who have seized control. While making vague statements have been made that the Ultimo Powerhouse will remain, the degradation of Ultimo proceeds. At Parramatta the ‘Government’ still is proceeding with their unresearched, autocratic ‘move’ process, undeterred by the opposition.’
He then provides a number of particular points including concerns for adequate display and workshop spaces, the future of significant Harwood Building Tram Shed, which was omitted from the Heritage Listing, and the decision-making process leading towards the Final Business Plan for Ultimo. Read here: 5 Oct Bulletin 51

4 October, 2020
‘More signs that Harwood and the Ultimo site may be doomed?’
In reporting on the MAAS and Create NSW joint submission for the Pyrmont Precinct [See news report on 11 September], Save the Powerhouse group writes: ‘In their document, the entire site will become the “Ultimo Creative Industries Precinct (UCIP)’” (no mention of a Museum!) which will be “embedded within the Pyrmont Peninsula as a key cultural anchor.” They point out that any recommendations they put forward will be subject to yet another Final Business Case, to be completed by end 2020, that will “…test options for a new 1,500 seat lyric theatre and creative industries spaces”. This picks up a recurrent theme, that the unique Harwood Building will be turned into a “music-hall’ theatre and commercial centre, and so will inevitably be gutted, as feared…They conclude that UCIP will…”be a place that provides rich cultural experiences, facilitates collaboration and partnership with industry and supports Sydney’s diverse creative industries community.” ‘
‘But’, asks Save the Powerhouse, ‘where does that leave the internationally-recognised Powerhouse Museum, that has graced the Ultimo site since 1988? First (see the attached plan), obviously, the Harwood Building would disappear, to make way for the “lyric theatre and creative industries space”. A second potential victim to the wreckers would be the distinguished Wran Building “to reveal the unique fabric of the Power House and Post Office buildings”.  The “Ultimo Powerhouse”, however, (Switch House, Boiler House, Turbine Hall and Office Building) would remain as “The Powerhouse Museum Ultimo”, and the Old Ultimo Post Office, which is State Heritage protected, would be spared, too. If it all sounds too depressing, let’s remember that this document is merely a submission from Government servants, however influential they may be, and, more important, NOTHING can happen until the Final Business Case is published, which will give us all time to return to the attack!’ Read more: 4 October Save the Powerhouse

25-26 September, 2020
‘Willow Grove heritage protections removed prior to Powerhouse site purchase’
In print as ‘Villa’s protections lifted before site bought for museum’
Linda Morris reports in the Sydney Morning Herald on the visit to the Willow Grove heritage building in Parramatta, by members of the Upper House inquiry into the museum project which is set to demolish it and the adjacent Orange Grove buildings. Media were not allowed entry, but ‘Greens MP David Shoebridge emerged to say the villa was in surprisingly good condition given it had been left vacant.’
However,  it was revealed co-incidentally that ‘Protections preventing redevelopment of historic Willow Grove were quietly removed last year paving the way for the building to be demolished for the Parramatta Powerhouse. Former Sydney lord mayor Jeremy Bingham, a lawyer specialising in local government law, described the removal of the restrictive covenant on the land in April 2019, which left the historic building and its grounds unprotected, as immoral and an act of “sheer bastardry”. … Land title documents show that Parramatta City Council officers applied through the Office of the Registrar General in January 2019 to lift restrictions that blocked development of the garden forecourt of the Italianate villa. The council had imposed the safeguards 30 years before. The council said it made the request to meet a pre-condition set by the state government two years earlier for the $140 million sale of the riverside site.’
‘Campaigners seeking to save Willow Grove say the government’s condition contradicts the Premier’s assurances that she wanted to preserve local heritage where possible. Parramatta Labor councillor Donna Davis said it showed the government never had any intention to save Willow Grove or to incorporate it into the Parramatta Powerhouse design… Infrastructure NSW, the agency driving the museum project, is poised to recommend that Planning Minister Rob Stokes green-light the Parramatta Powerhouse project, with some amendments. But the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) has slapped a green ban on the two locally heritage-listed sites amid growing public calls to have them saved and incorporated into the museum’s design. Read more,  or here: SMH 26 Sept

See also: 24 September, 2020
‘Locked Out of Willow Grove & St. George’s Terrace Parramatta’
Alex Hart, on 7 News,
documents comments from the visit, and the controversy over the potential demolition of the buildings, where ‘Committee Chair, the Hon Robert Borsak MLC, stated “This visit is an opportunity for the committee to get an in depth understanding of Willow Grove’s significance including its contribution to the surviving heritage fabric of Parramatta.”
‘‘They knew all along!’: Ray Hadley fires up over Willow Grove scandal’
On Radio 2GB,
Ray Hadley protests: ‘ “This becomes more and more bizarre as life goes on.The state government knew all along they wanted to knock it base over apex! It’s incredible; it’s disgraceful.” City of Parramatta Councillor Donna Davis told Ray Premier Gladys Berejiklian’s claims she wanted to protect the heritage buildings don’t stack up. “It shows that there was always an intention to protect Willow Grove and its garden, and the state government completely disregarded that. “Even if the Premier did not know at that particular point in time … the fact is that the Premier knows now.”
October, 2020 ‘United front in saving Willow Grove’
Elizabeth Frias also reports in the Parramatta Times for October 2020, about strong local concerns for the future of Willow Grove, and on the visit by the Select Committee of Inquiry, as well as comments from local residents including Darug elders, community groups and union representatives. Read more.

17 September, 2020
‘Boyish hobby that became an $18 million collection of Australian history’
Julie Power writes in the Sydney Morning Herald about the news of a major acquisition by the National Museum of Australia, of an outstanding collection of Australian decorative arts, from well-known collector, Trevor Kennedy.
‘Like most boys born in 1942, former journalist, media executive and businessman Trevor Kennedy collected stamps, matchbox lids and other things. That boyish hobby became a passion for Australian history and resulted in a collection of 5000 treasures dating back to the First Fleet, valued at between $15 to $18 million, that will today find a permanent home at the National Museum of Australia in Canberra. In an unusual arrangement that follows a decade of negotiations, the museum will pay more than $8 million for a large part of Kennedy’s collection with payments in six instalments ending in 2023. And in a donation, on an unprecedented scale, Mr Kennedy has given the museum other items of historical significance – valued at between $7 and $10 million – to retain the collection’s integrity and character. Kennedy said he hoped the collection would give Australians the opportunity to “explore and better understand our nation’s remarkable history”. As well as engraved eggs, clocks, ceramics, taxidermy, artwork and historic furniture of historical significance, it includes: Thomas Watling’s miniature portrait of John White, principal surgeon on the First Fleet; a silver collar made for a dog, Tiger, who killed 20 rats in 2 minutes and two seconds in 1834; jewellery decorated with Australian flora and fauna during the gold rush; invitations and press passes to the opening of the first parliament of the Commonwealth in 1901; a plane-shaped diamond and platinum brooch given by Charles Kingsford Smith to his wife to commemorate his flight across the Pacific… Kennedy started as a cadet reporter in Albany, WA, and had a meteoric rise in journalism including as editor of The National Times newspaper [and] editor-in-chief of Packer’s Consolidated Press and later managing director until 1991.’  Read more  or  SMH 17 Sept Trevor K
[Kennedy was also an active early Trustee of the Powerhouse Museum, prompting comments on the Herald’s Comments page.]

17 September, 2020
‘Tweak in Powerhouse design for safety: Despite disagreements, council supports the riverbank site’
In the Parramatta Times, Di Bartok  writes (page 6) that: ‘The NSW Government appears to have heeded Parramatta Council’s call for a redesign to reduce the dangerous flood risk of the controversial riverside Powerhouse. … However, a last-ditch plea in council’s submission for the government to try for a redesign that would save the heritage properties of Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace has again been ignored…‘At an earlier council meeting deputy Lord Mayor Michelle Garrard said that, following the announcement to keep the Ultimo building, there was hope that the government “may change its mind over the demolition “of the heritage buildings. Despite some disagreements, council supports siting the Powerhouse on the riverbank and is excited with the investment in Parramatta.’ Lord Mayor, Bob Dwyer said “I thank the NSW Government for committing to this game-changing project.”
‘Preserving heritage a win-win for our city’
Councillor Donna Davis (page 7) writes that ‘Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace enhance Parramatta and are of high social significance. The must remain central to any reimagining of our city to ensure we incorporate the past in the present.’ After discussing how the Parramatta community has campaigned for over three years to save the buildings, she recommends better alternatives, including : ‘A return to the Council’s River Strategy provides an opportunity to save the heritage while creating a 24/7 arts and cultural precinct delivering [an art gallery] to complement Riverside Theatres… [and] even better is the opportunity to realise a museum in the Cumberland Heritage Precinct that incorporates the Parramatta Female Factory.’ However, in ‘Focus on the Facts and forget the fluff’ Councillor Bill Tyrrell argues for the current plans for the Powerhouse Parramatta to proceed, citing economic benefits.
‘St George’s Terrace love-bombed’
Di Bartok writes (p. 11): ‘A rare splash of colour lit up Parramatta when artists came to town to protest against the NSW Government’s plan to demolish heritage properties [St George’s Terrace and Willow Grove] to make way for the new Powerhouse Museum. The Western Sydney artists “love-bombed” St George’s Terrace through their “guerrilla gallery” of paintings, drawings and colourful yarns…North Parramatta Residents Action Group president Suzette Meade said the day was a great success with many passers-by vowing to “stand in front of the bulldozers” if necessary to support the CFMEU green ban on demolition of those properties.’
Read full stories here: pp 6,7, 11. Or here: Parramatta Times Sept 2020 p6-7 and  Parramatta Times Sept 2020 p11

13 September, 2020
‘Pyrmont Peninsula Place Strategy’
Between 31 July and 13 September, the City Of Sydney has sought feedback on their development plans for Pyrmont (and Ultimo), saying:  ‘We welcome your feedback on the draft Pyrmont Peninsula Place Strategy. The draft strategy has been developed to enable a transformation that unlocks innovation and investment to create the jobs of the future, while celebrating the rich heritage and charm of the peninsula. The draft strategy is on exhibition to midnight, Sunday 13 September, 2020. Feedback from the community, visitors, business groups, government agencies and stakeholders during public exhibition will be used to refine the Place Strategy which will guide transformation of Pyrmont Peninsula over the years to 2041. For more information on the project and consultation, visit the website. You can also read the exhibition documents here.’ https://www.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/Pyrmont
Local groups such as Friends of Ultimo, Save the Powerhouse and Ultimo Community Centre, as well as MPs including Jamie Parker and Alex Greenwich, have questioned the effects of over-development on local history and heritage.
In their submission, Friends of Ultimo point out: ‘Whereas Pyrmont’s former historic buildings, symbolising its industrial past, were virtually obliterated to make way for an oversized casino and high rise apartment buildings, Ultimo has kept its own, well-defined, identity. It retains many elements of its industrial past including wool stores, rows of Victorian terraced houses and secluded small parks, such as Quarry Green, with its church and local pub. Ultimo is further distinguished as the home of the time-honoured Powerhouse Museum since 1988 and, currently, the ABC, UTS and TAFE as well as many high-tech and creative startups…
On the plus side: the Strategy appears to make some sound recommendations to guide and
improve development of the Pyrmont Peninsula over the next two decades, drawn mainly from public’s reaction to the “10 directions” published earlier. These guiding principles explore five “BIG MOVES”. ‘
Negative points: ‘When digging deeper into the Strategy and reach the Framework to Key Sites, however, problems become clearly visible. Many of the positive actions listed above are in fact only general theories and/or have no timeframe. Hence they mask specific, ad hoc building densities and height relaxations, which allow, for example: …A South Ultimo “Taller Building Cluster”, “consistent with City of Sydney’s approach to solar access in the draft Central Sydney Planning Strategy” (ie up to 110m tall – 30 storey buildings) including both the Powerhouse Museum Harwood Building and the ABC headquarters!’ Read more here: 200912 FoU Submission ; 200912 SPH Submission ; 200911 Ultimo CC Newsletter18

11 September, 2020
Create NSW and Powerhouse Museum submission: Pyrmont Peninsula Place Strategy
Annette Pitman (Head of Create Infrastructure, Create NSW) and Lisa Havilah, (Chief Executive MAAS) presented a ‘Submission to the Department of Planning, Industry and the Environment regarding the draft Pyrmont Peninsula Place and Economic Development Strategy.’
This occurred as a Final Business Case for the Ultimo museum site was being prepared, and as community consultations were taking place. Their submission (No 92; one of 135) reinforced the importance of the Museum’s presence in Ultimo (although all the collection will be stored at Castle Hill and a new museum site is still planned for Parramatta). Comments include the changing culture of Darling Harbour; access to the Museum; continuing education links; and possible focus for exhibition and audience engagement. However, some concerns are being expressed by long-term museum supporters about the decisions still to be made about the future of the Wran Building and the Harwood building, and reference, still, to a ‘direction’ to include a lyric theatre, a favourite of the Minister for the arts.
‘…Create NSW and the Powerhouse Museum (Powerhouse) support the draft Strategy, and as part of the NSW Government are committed to working with the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment to embed the Ultimo Creative Industries Precinct within the Pyrmont Peninsula as a key cultural anchor. A Final Business Case (FBC) is being prepared to consider options for the Ultimo Creative Industries Precinct – a renewal of the Powerhouse site at Ultimo. Development of the FBC is guided by the NSW Government’s commitment to a world class museum anchoring the precinct, and direction to test options for a new 1,500 seat lyric theatre and creative industries spaces. Create NSW is leading the development of the FBC in partnership with the Powerhouse. It is expected to be completed by the end of 2020.’
‘A precinct masterplan is being prepared as part of the FBC, responding to the site’s strategic location at the junction of Darling Harbour and the Goods Line, and as an entry to Pyrmont from Ultimo. … Powerhouse Ultimo is Australia’s leading museum of science, design and innovation. Its home in the Ultimo Power Station will provide the context to tell the stories of the age of industrialisation and its ongoing impacts which continue to shape our world through its vast collection…. The unique fabric of the Power House and Post Office buildings and history of the site will be revealed and showcased…The renewal of Powerhouse Ultimo will reflect the changing needs of the city and the communities that it serves. While carrying forward its legacy, Powerhouse Ultimo will continue to grow its collection while supporting new generations of designers and creative thinkers and continuing to connect audiences with Australian and international design innovation… The structure of the Powerhouse site, including original buildings and more modern additions, responds to a context that no longer exists. Darling Harbour Live, a wholistic [sic] redevelopment of the Darling Harbour Precinct, has introduced significant new public spaces and placed emphasis on different connection points… As in 1988, a wholistic approach to renewal is required to make sense of the site in its current context.’
Apart from suggestions regarding access, some Key Comments include:
‘Create NSW and the Powerhouse support Direction 6 of the structure plan, celebrating the creative, cultural and historical character of place. The Harwood building, identified in the strategy as education uses (figure 2.6.1), is part of the Ultimo Creative Industries Precinct and is owned and managed by the Powerhouse with future use to be resolved in the FBC. Expanding late night trading to include cultural and creative institutions is an important part of diversifying the offer of our city into the evening and achieving a strong 24-hour economy. A core element of the vision for the renewed Powerhouse Ultimo is bringing the precinct to life through the evening. The creation of theatre, performance, production and rehearsal space aligns with the strategic need for increased theatre space in Sydney in order to attract first run shows. Compared to other major cities, Sydney is underserved for theatre venues, particularly those with larger capacities.’ Read more or here:  (92) Create NSW andPHM
Responses to submissions:
In response to the Draft Pyrmont Peninsula Place Strategy, and the submission made by MAAS and Create NSW, Powerhouse Museum Alliance representatives say:
Jennifer Sanders: ‘Attached is my submission on behalf of the PMA to the Draft Pyrmont Peninsula Place Strategy in which I object to the inclusion of the Harwood Building in the ‘taller buildings cluster’ as this presages development on the HB site and the loss of it as an integral part of the Powerhouse Museum – without HB the Museum is dysfunctional and part of its key heritage suite of buildings will be destroyed. We must keep calling for the Powerhouse Museum to be renewed in all its magnificence.’ Read here: PHM Pyrmont Peninsula Place Strategy Sub JS 2020-09-13
Kylie Winkworth: ‘….there still seems to be no recognition of the PHM’s significance as a heritage museum, and a major tourism destination, to say nothing of the industrial history of Darling Harbour and the Goods Line. Why should the people in charge of the Powerhouse Museum be offering up one of its major buildings, one which is central to the history and operations of the site, as if it is already vacant, when the loss of the Harwood building will substantially diminish the significance and operational capacity of the museum, and require other major interventions in the PHM at ridiculous cost?  To say nothing of the fact that any diversion of resources into cultural industries on the part of MAAS is not consistent with the MAAS Act. This just underlines why the PHM must have a CMP before they start locking in wasteful and possibly destructive design ideas. Add the likely $100m cost of the new J Store at Castle Hill plus extravagant building works to the PHM. and this will not look good in the lead up to the next election.’

11 September, 2020
‘The Harwood Building is the Powerhouse Museum:  its demolition is reckless, wasteful, destructive, unnecessary, and an assault on Sydney’s heritage’
To contribute to the invitation for public consultation about the future of the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, and in response to the recent Heritage Listing which was selective of only some of the museum buildings, museum expert, Kylie Winkworth,  says: ‘Nothing has changed in the Government’s plans to shred the Powerhouse Museum’s status and operations as Sydney’s major heritage museum, evict its collections, demolish its heritage buildings, and destroy its state-of-the-art collection facilities.  The process of packing up the collections at the PHM continues. This is because the Government plans to demolish the museum’s historic Harwood building which is an integral part of the Powerhouse Museum’s history, design conception and operations. The Arts Minister and senior bureaucrats told the Legislative Council Museum Inquiry that the Harwood building may be developed as a lyric theatre. This is likely to include a high rise tower above the theatre. MAAS is working on yet another business case and masterplan, which has been in train since last year. The brief would see the museum downsized and reduced to a cultural industries facility with a fashion and design showcase. Some details may have changed but the intent is the same.’   Winkworth expands her argument with a summary of the heritage significance of the Harwood building, the further relocation of the collection to Castle Hill, and the imminent danger of the Government seeing ‘…  the Powerhouse Museum and its heritage buildings as just an underused development site.’
Read more: Winkworth The Harwood Building is the PHM Sept 2020

8 September, 2020
‘Powerhouse Ultimo Business case ‘
Alex Greenwich, Independent MP for Sydney, writes in his newsletter ‘Alex’s Update Issue 373’, about questions he recently asked in Parliament about the status of the business case for the Ultimo site of the Powerhouse Museum. (The question was asked on 28 July 2020 (session 57-1) and printed in Questions & Answers Paper No. 70; Answer received on 31 August 2020 and to be printed in Questions & Answers Paper No. 76.) The Hansard record reads:
Greenwich, Alex to the Premier representing the Leader of the Government in the Legislative Council, Special Minister of State, Minister for the Public Service and Employee Relations, Aboriginal Affairs, and the Arts, Vice-President of the Executive Council.
– When will the Government release the business plan for the Ultimo Powerhouse Museum site, which was due to be released in late 2019?
– What options will be considered for the future of this site?’
‘The Government announced on 4 July 2020 that the Powerhouse Museum will remain open at Ultimo, in addition to building a new Powerhouse Museum for Parramatta. This will deliver two world-class facilities that will provide a significant boost for the arts, sciences, tourism and employment sectors with the establishment of a flagship Powerhouse museum in Parramatta for the Central River City and a world class Powerhouse museum retained for the Eastern Harbour City. It will also provide infrastructure stimulus for the State and provide a significant number of construction jobs.
This decision will allow us to provide an outstanding visitor experience in the areas of technology, science, engineering and design at two major locations. It will increase access to the Powerhouse Museum’s extraordinary collections and create vibrant centres to inspire learning in the fields of sciences and applied arts for the next generation. Both Powerhouse museum sites (Parramatta and Ultimo) will be working precincts, linking the Powerhouse collection, the community and industry. The Business Case for the retained and redeveloped Powerhouse Museum at Ultimo will also consider a broader creative industries precinct and is being finalised.’

7 September, 2020
A better museum option: the Fleet Street Heritage Precinct
Opposition leader Jodi McKay visited the Fleet Street Heritage Precinct in Parramatta, with fellow MPs Kate Washington and Walt Secord, saying ‘I am often asked where the Parramatta Powerhouse Museum would be built if not on the rubble of heritage icon Willow Grove. One option is here, in the surrounds of the Parramatta Female Factory.’ In a recorded video Facebook post, she talks to NPRAG (North Parramatta Residents Action Group) spokesperson Suzette Meade, about this as a preferred site, which would save important city heritage buildings from demolition. Listen to the discussion here.
‘Fleet Street Heritage Precinct’ concept paper
As background to the visit, and in opposition to the ‘Powerhouse Parramatta’ proposal in the flood-prone city centre, on 3 June, 2020 members of NPRAG (North Parramatta Residents Action Group) and advisors had published a Fleet Street Heritage Precinct ‘concept paper for discussion and development’ as an engaging and credible alternative. It introduces the well-described and illustrated document, saying:
‘This proposal to restore and redevelop Parramatta’s Fleet Street Heritage Precinct (FSHP) as part of a 30-hectare botanic and heritage public engagement site takes substantial 50,000-year human investment in this precinct and leverages its unique cultural authenticity into a world class cultural experience. Restoring and recycling the significant Heritage Buildings, First Nations’ archaeological and living sites and, the enormous public landscape spatial scope of the Park – can be achieved for much less of the real cost of the ‘Parramatta Powerhouse’ project.
This proposal also provides Government with many individual ‘shovel ready’ projects which provide a series of ‘good news’ announcements and local employment leading into 2024; mitigating adverse media and public outcry from the current unpopular model which will destroy heritage like Willow Grove, St Georges Terrace, and the Powerhouse at Ultimo and, spending over $1.5 billion on a ‘museum’ the people of Parramatta didn’t ask for.’ Among other points, it identifies that:
‘Two main stages between 2020 and 2023-24 will see the completion and opening of the Fleet Street Heritage Precincts renaissance to include the existing heritage buildings renovated and conserved and complementing the sites already extraordinary existing arcadian land scape qualities.’
* This will be combined with the new innovative uses and activities associate with multiple venues including the unique signature Museum of NSW integrated and distributed across the site, attracting visitors across NSW and internationally to the Fleet Street Heritage Precinct.
* Complementing this cultural initiative will be extensions loans of exhibitions and events from all the States major cultural institutions – Art Gallery of NSW, Powerhouse Museum at Ultimo, State Library of NSW, Australian Museum, Sydney Opera house, Sydney Living Museums.’ Read document here: Fleet Street Heritage Precinct Proposal

7 September, 2020
‘Death trap’ warning prompts redesign’: Parramatta Powerhouse
Linda Morris, in the Sydney Morning Herald, reports that: ‘The Parramatta Powerhouse is undergoing a significant redesign to remove a publicly accessible undercroft deemed a death trap during downpours and floods. The undercroft lifts the museum and its collection above the 1-in-100-year flood level, collecting rising floodwaters. In dry weather, it was to have been open to the public with sports courts and art displays suggested for the space. The redesign is to be detailed in the government’s formal response, which will argue for the development despite most of the 1300-plus public submissions opposing the demolition of two historic buildings. Parramatta Council first sounded the alarm to the risk with flood management engineers while also warning that visitors risked drowning while sheltering or being evacuated from the museum during flash floods… Without a redesign, Maurice Blackburn lawyers said government authorities would risk legal action if visitors suffered injury or death and the government had not heeded warnings of local authorities and field experts. ’  Morris continues: ‘The danger would come, a parliamentary inquiry heard, during extreme rain events when visitors, being evacuated from a rising Parramatta River, would be confronted by high-velocity run-off converging on Phillip Street and running to the river.“It would be like trying to walk up a creek which has got a fair amount of flow in it,” Steven Molino, environment and water hazards management consultant told an Upper House inquiry. “It is going to be shin to knee-deep or even higher with the sorts of velocities that could knock you off your feet.”  Molino Stewart was commissioned by the Powerhouse Museum Alliance, which campaigned to keep the Powerhouse Museum at Ultimo, to independently review the Environment Impact Statement. The company is familiar with the site, having prepared most of the major flood policies and plans for Parramatta Council… The Premier’s Deputy Secretary Community Engagement, Kate Foy, says the construction contract will likely go to tender by Christmas. This is despite CFMEU green bans on the two historic buildings – Willowgrove and St George’s Terrace – that will make way for the Moreau Kusonuki Genton designed museum.’ Read more: or  Death trap’ – SMH 7 Sept 2020

7 September, 2020: Also hear  Robbie Buck interviewing report writer Steven Molino, and museum expert Kylie Winkworth about this news, on Radio 702.

5 September, 2020
‘Powerhouse Ultimo: Community Consultation’
A media release from The Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences announces that ‘The Powerhouse Museum is calling on the community to have its voice heard in planning for the renewal of Powerhouse Ultimo. On 4 July the NSW Government announced the expansion of the Powerhouse to four sites including the retention and reimagining of Powerhouse Ultimo. Together with Create NSW the Powerhouse is developing a final business case to determine the future of Ultimo as a world class Museum.’ Read here for media release.
And for information of how to submit suggestions, go to the Powerhouse Renewal site here.
These suggestions are provided:
Please complete this survey to have your say.
Community webinar: We would like to invite you to join a webinar to discuss what opportunities there are for the renewal of the Museum and the Ultimo precinct. The webinars will be held via Zoom on:
Monday 14 September, 6pm–8pm
Tuesday 15 September, 11am–12.30pm
Saturday 19 September, 10am–11.30am
Please click here to register for a webinar on your preferred date.
Questions and feedback should be sent to project@maas.museum or 1800 979 761.
Powerhouse Museum Alliance asks: ‘Is this a genuine and much appreciated contribution to the future of the Powerhouse Museum at the Ultimo site, or is Create NSW co-opting museum staff to tick boxes for them?”

5 September, 2020
‘Powerhouse seeks inspiration from the community’
During the first three hearings of the Select Committee’s Inquiry into the management of the Powerhouse Museum, and following the July 4 announcement that the Powerhouse Museum will stay in Ultimo, many doubts are being expressed about what exactly will stay, and what will go to Parramatta – and where. A business case is reported to be under way for Ultimo, but many are concerned about the future of this key site, and what will be included. In the Sydney Morning Herald, Linda Morris follows up a media release from the Museum and Create NSW,  reporting: ‘Two months after rallying to save it from shut down, Sydneysiders have been invited to contribute ideas for the Powerhouse Museum’s renewal at Ultimo. The museum’s chief executive Lisa Havilah is asking for the public’s perspective on a reimagined museum experience, including their thoughts on what might turn the museum into a lively cultural hub, drawing workers, tourists and students to the museum day and night… Consultations will take place with the community, staff, volunteers, City of Sydney council, and other stakeholders throughout September, via surveys and webinars. Those consultations will run concurrently with a government business case that is costing options for the Harris Street museum and its collection storage building, known as the Harwood Building. The museum has suffered for its years in limbo, needing significant capital and operational investment for it to resume the mantle as a world-class destination, and to ensure the collection is properly managed…Ms Havilah said the community’s vision for a worldclass museum would feed into the new business case and assist with long-term planning. She was keen to hear from all age groups, as well as loyal museum visitors and those who are not.’ Read more: or here: 5 Sept SMH L Morris Powerhouse seeks inspiration from community

4 September, 2020
Recent Ministerial decisions on State Heritage Register Nominations’
Heritage NSW announced a list of decisions on ‘items’ around NSW, recently nominated for state heritage listing. Earlier, many people and organisations had submitted comments on the nomination for the entire Powerhouse Museum site, and its collection. For details of heritage nomination see PMA website History and Heritage.
And read here the for the Heritage Council’s final version of the nomination.
The decision, made by Arts Minister Don Harwin, reads (see full document): 
‘Ultimo Power House – 500 Harris Street, Ultimo; SHR No. 02045
1. Ultimo Power House is of state significance as an outstanding example of a large state-owned electricity generating station and a landmark group of buildings which relate closely to the visual and architectural industrial context of the area. It is of museological and architectural significance as a landmark early example of the adaptive reuse of a large-scale industrial heritage site, which was then a radical new approach to museum making for NSW. Its fabric, form and uses is held in demonstrable public esteem by engineers, architects, museum associates and the wider public.
2. Listing will provide for the identification and registration of this item of state heritage significance.
3. Listing will promote an understanding of the state’s heritage.
4. Listing will encourage the conservation of this item of the state’s heritage.’
However, it is clear that the ‘landmark group of buildings’ does not include the award-winning 1988 Wran building or the significant Harwood tram-depot building, or the museum’s collections; and whether ‘Powerhouse Ultimo’ can actually be understood as the ‘Powerhouse Museum’ or just a site for something else. Save the Powerhouse Facebook group comments:    ‘The whole listing seems to have been constructed as vaguely as possible to allow Government to preserve or discard whatever parts of the Powerhouse Museum it chooses, and is totally inadequate. Powerhouse Museum Founding Director Lindsay Sharp comments “this so-called ‘heritage listing’ of Ultimo Powerhouse Museum (UPHM) is trying to pretend that the buildings have only partly been, do not continue to be and cannot be again completely reinvigorated and reinterpreted as a museum (visited by over 22 million people). The wording is deliberately vague…This is almost criminal in its lack of professionalism and partiality…The fact that its future reinvigoration is by far the most cost effective and exciting solution for the UPHM precinct is wilfully avoided. This description permits the Government to “white-box” the huge main spaces and destroy the Tram Depot/Harwood Building at will…As for the Wran Building and Galleria – who knows?’ Many people are pursuing these questions, and wonder what impact there will be on the current business plan development. Read more.

2 September, 2020
‘Third hearing: select committee on the Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects in NSW’
This hearing was held in the Macquarie Room, Parliament House, Sydney, and was available to audiences on line. For details of the day, see:
Schedule of interviews:  Transcript of discussions, and Webcast of proceedings.

See also PMA link to the Second Inquiry here.

29 August, 2020
‘Was the Powerhouse backflip a pseudo-somersault?’
Elizabeth Farrelly, in the Sydney Morning Herald, identifies many of the questions that now follow the announcement that the Powerhouse Museum will stay in Ultimo, and which the government’s Inquiry is pursuing.
‘Saturday July 4 was Independence Day, and while America’s jettisoning of George III may not seem a cause for celebration just now, Sydney found another reason to get giddy. For July 4 was also the day of the famous Powerhouse “backflip”. But was it actually a backflip? Or was it a pseudo-somersault-with-designer-smokescreen? Everyone was over the moon. The word “backflip” leapt from every banner and tumbled from every lip. Activist groups welcomed this huge victory after five years of strenuous lobbying… Weeks later this spirit of trusting triumphalism persisted, even among those for whom scepticism is essential PPE. Greens MP Jamie Parker put out a flyer headed “Powerhouse Museum win: together we saved it.” But was this whole thing simply an exercise in misdirection?… The Premier’s July 4 media release contained just one pertinent fact. “Sydney’s Powerhouse Museum at Ultimo … will remain open.” That was it, the backflip. By the next day, it was understood that “open” meant a “fashion and design museum” on the site. But that had always been on the table – a fashion-museum-with-lyric theatre bundle had been discussed for the Ultimo site since 2016 and officially costed in 2018 (at $388 million) as the government’s preferred option. So what had changed, if anything? Curious, I called the minister’s office. The conversation, on July 10, went something like this: ‘So I’m just wondering what, exactly, has changed for the Powerhouse between July 3 and now? Well, well, hmm, so, the government is undertaking a business case study to consider retention of the Ultimo site.’ Farrelly continues with the conversation, which produced very vague answers, and also reports on discussions about comparative costs with former assistant government architect Andrew Andersons.  Read more:  or here: 29 Aug SMH E Farrelly

25 August, 2020
‘Was the PHM “Move”’ cancellation just a hoax?’
Save the Powerhouse, the active Ultimo-based community group, asks these critical questions in an email and Facebook report, following the second hearing of the current Inquiry on 21 August, and the news that the expansion of storage is under way at Castle Hill:
1) CASTLE HILL “POWERHOUSE EXPANSION”  Save the Powerhouse advised of the opportunity for ‘hearing more about the Government’s plans for enlarging collection storage facilities at Castle Hill’, by joining a “Zoom” Webinar meeting. But they say: ‘We believe that the Government intends to build those facilities to replace the Harwood Building in Ultimo.’
“Was the July 4 announcement that the Powerhouse will remain in Ultimo (and that the “relocation” project was presumably cancelled) simply a hoax”? That was probably among the most critical of key questions the Select Committee put to witnesses during last Friday’s 2nd Hearing proceedings…And it’s a question that everyone is now asking…perhaps there were a few sighs of relief, but then reality kicked in as everyone quickly realised that the so-called “announcement” had actually announced…NOTHING AT ALL, and that the Government’s position was exactly as before. Don Harwin, in his first incarnation as Arts Minister, had consistently said that he planned to leave a “cultural presence “ in Ultimo, sometimes described as large,1500-seat “lyric theatre” … in the converted Harwood Building …sometimes as a “fashion centre’ in the same location …Harwin has clearly always intended to “leave the Powerhouse in Ultimo”, even if only as an empty shell to house his “cultural” toys.
So what on earth was that supposedly earth-shattering announcement all about?  …the announcement certainly appears as an attempted cruel hoax – sick joke? – by Government to show that they had ”listened to the community”, but which would, in fact, give them a free hand to continue to do exactly as they like…Fortunately, it was a failed hoax .Both the NSW community and the Select Committee conducting the Inquiry, have seen right through it and will be even more wary in future of a Government pathologically addicted to lies and deception.’ Read more: 25 August – Save the P – a hoax

24 August, 2020
‘New Parramatta museum site at risk of devastating floods’
Ray Hadley interviews Powerhouse Museum Alliance heritage consultant Kylie Winkworth, on his 2GB morning radio show, following her appearance at the second hearing of the Select Committee Inquiry on 21 August. North Parramatta Residents Action Group commented on their Facebook page: “Great to have the well informed heritage and museum consultant Kylie Winkworth speak with Ray Hadley this morning about how important WillowGrove is and the flood report that has shown the devasting loss of life from the museum proposed.’  To hear the broadcast, Listen here.

22 August, 2020
‘Powerhouse Museum still in danger’
Judith White writes about her response to the Select Committee’s hearing in her Culture Heist newsletter: ‘Six weeks ago the museum’s supporters were celebrating Premier Gladys Berejiklian’s backflip decision to retain the museum at Ultimo. But the backflip has turned into a 360-degree somersault. Staff are under instruction to continue packing up the collection at Ultimo, and now a parliamentary inquiry has heard that there are grave risks to the State’s heritage. The government’s about-turn even poses threats to life and limb. It has become apparent that Arts Minister Don Harwin – reinstated to the role just a day before the Premier’s 4 July announcement – is pushing ahead with three of the most contentious aspects of the government’s original plan: dispersal of the collection; demolition of a crucial part of the Ultimo complex; and the construction, on the Parramatta flood plain and over the wreckage of heritage buildings, of an edifice unfit for purpose as a museum. On Friday 21 September an array of expert witnesses, including some of Australia’s most distinguished specialists, lined up to give evidence of the flaws in the plan to an Upper House select committee inquiry. Their considered, meticulously documented testimony was compelling to watch.’ She includes comments from many of the speakers. Read more here: or here:  22 August Judith White

21 August, 2020
Second hearing of Select Committee’s Inquiry into Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum
The second hearing of the Select Committee on ‘the Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects in New South Wales’ took place on 21 August, available for public viewing on air. Those interviewed included former senior staff and trustees of the Powerhouse Museum, a museum director and professionals in related fields associated with museum content and management, and key people from Parramatta, Ultimo and Pyrmont action groups.
Interviews covered concerns for the future of the Ultimo site, as its business case proceeds and discrepancies are discovered in the government’s meaning of ‘saving the Powerhouse in Ultimo’; the future of the Harwood building (NSW’s first tram depot); the extent of collection representation at the Ultimo site with doubts about Harwin’s focus on Fashion and a lyric theatre; and issues of access and safety in transport to and from exhibitions sites if all the collection is transferred to Castle Hill. As well, strong concerns continued to be expressed about the suitability and safety of the Parramatta site, with support for an alternative proposal for the Fleet Street heritage site.
See schedule of speakers here.
The transcript can be read here. 
Webcast recordings of the hearing are publicly available here.

21 August, 2020
‘Proposed Powerhouse Museum could be ‘life-threatening’ during major floods’
Alex Hart reports on Channel 7 News that ‘A scathing new report has found the proposed Powerhouse Museum at Parramatta will pose a serious risk to life during a major flood. Experts say precious exhibits could also be destroyed unless dangerous design flaws are fixed.’ Hart is reporting on one of the issues covered in the Inquiry hearing (see above), notably a report prepared by Molino Stewart Environmental and Natural Hazard Consultants.
View the report here.

20 August, 2020
‘Parramatta Powerhouse: Flood could put lives at risk at new museum’
Joanne Vella writes in the Parramatta Advertiser that ‘People could be trapped and their lives put at risk if a flood hits the Powerhouse Museum, which is earmarked for the “vulnerable’’ banks of the Parramatta River, a shocking report by flood experts has warned. … Flood experts Molino Stewart’s report declared that the proposed design failed to provide evacuation plans if a severe hit flood the Phillip St site, with no access for people with disabilities and no backup power.’
‘The report was a review of the State Government’s Environmental Impact Statement into the Powerhouse Museum and labelled it “incorrect and misleading’’ because it mostly took into account that a flood would happen only once in 100 years. “The rates of rise of flood waters in the streets and in the river are such that it is unlikely to be practical or safe in most circumstances to evacuate the building during a flood,’’ the report’s author Steve Molino said. ”It will also be important that outdoor areas be designed to have continuously rising access routes to Phillip St which avoid overland flow paths so that all people can evacuate away from a rising river flood without getting trapped by floodwaters. The current design does not do that.’’ Using the museum’s undercroft as an evacuation point was also slammed as possibly representing “a serious risk to life’’… The report suggested there was also a failure to protect contents inside the museum, with humidity potentially causing contents to erode.’ Vella also notes that ‘an Infrastructure NSW spokeswoman said the project met Parramatta Council’s flooding development control plan, as well as the NSW Floodplain Development Manual, and was consistent with other buildings developed in the Parramatta CBD. However the Molino report states that the council uses flood modelling from 1987 but was now updating it.. “Infrastructure NSW is considering all matters raised during the exhibition period and will respond in the Response to Submissions Report.”.’ Read more: 20 Aug Parra Advertiser

20 August, 2020
‘Heritage, justice and the future of culture’
In John Menadue’s public policy journal, Pearls and Irritations, Judith White writes about an international issue that has implications for Australia: ‘A crucial debate is taking place over the function of cultural institutions. The concerns of a rising generation about race, gender and historical justice have to be heard. But it’s equally important to defend heritage collections and the cultural achievements of the past.’ Among other issues she says: ‘Now a parallel discussion has resulted in high-profile resignations from the International Council of Museums (ICOM) which represents professionals worldwide. Since its Kyoto conference in September 2019, the organisation has been unable to agree to a proposed new definition of what constitutes a museum. The London-based Art Newspaper reported (13 August) that ICOM’s Turkish president Suay Aksoy and Jette Sandahl, the Danish curator heading the drafting committee, have both resigned. The existing ICOM definition reads: “A museum is a non-profit, permanent institution in the service of society and its development, open to the public, which acquires, conserves, researches, communicates and exhibits the tangible and intangible heritage of humanity and its environment for the purposes of education, study and enjoyment.” It is the definition UNESCO endorsed at its 2015 Paris Conference.’
‘In the proposed alternative, “museums are democratising, inclusive and polyphonic spaces for critical dialogue about the pasts and the futures”. The new text was no doubt an attempt to make way for new voices, particularly from the ex-colonial world, but many seasoned professionals baulked at the change. … However well-intentioned the suggested change, by failing to give central place to collections and education it leaves cultural institutions more vulnerable to pressures from governments that want them to dumb down, corporatise, commercialise their audience appeal and become money-spinning entertainment venues. ‘
‘Those are precisely the kind of pressures at work in Australia under the Coalition Governments of Scott Morrison federally and Gladys Berejiklian in NSW… The Berejiklian Government in NSW has taken disregard for heritage to the extreme in its plans for a new Powerhouse Museum at Parramatta, where the fight to preserve historic buildings and save the collection is far from over despite the recent backflip which leaves the original institution at Ultimo. “Heritage is old-fashioned” tweeted Labor’s David Borger, one of Arts Minister Don Harwin’s appointees to the Powerhouse Trust.’ White continues: ‘Clearly it’s time to be reminded of the four primary functions of museums, spelt out by UNESCO at its 2015 Conference: [Preservation, Research, Communication, Education ] Australian governments and museum boards please take note.’ For full story Read more .  Also read news reports from  The Art Newspaper   and the NY Times.

18 August, 2020
‘State Significant Development: Expansion of the Museums Discovery Centre’
It has been evident for some time on the MAAS website that: ‘The Powerhouse and Create NSW are developing a state significant development application for the construction and operation of the new building for the Museums Discovery Centre. A request for Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs) has been lodged with the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment. The state significant development application including an environmental impact statement and technical reports will be developed by Powerhouse and Create NSW to address the SEARs. Once lodged, this application will be placed on public exhibition which is expected to occur in Quarter 3 2020.’ Read more
With a planning proposal and preliminary architectural drawings submitted on 15 May, the SEARs request was issued on July 4, the day that the NSW government announced the Powerhouse Museum would be retained in Ultimo. However there has been no announcement that the development has been paused, or withdrawn. The State Significant Development site which documents the development of the projects provides access to the planning documents to date: See portal here: Read more and: SEARs Request_ Museum Discovery Centre
Saying ‘Time to draw a line in the sand’, Greater Sydney Community’s Facebook page identifies further concerns about the relentless push to move the Museum to Parramatta, including: ‘Minister Harwin’s unwavering support for the Powerhouse Parramatta on the controversial flood-prone riverbank site, was apparent at the recent Parliamentary Inquiry following his return to Cabinet. Ignoring the Green Ban on the demolition of historic Willow Grove and St Georges Terrace, instead, the Minister boasted plans are proceeding full steam ahead, despite the government’s announcement the Ultimo site will be retained … [while] confusion now reigns after revelations the Discovery Centre at Castle Hill expansion into the adjoining TAFE site is continuing unabated… the Planning Proposal will necessitate the loss of 1940s Cumberland Plains Woodland, with an estimated 377 spotted gums felled to accommodate the Museums expansion.’ Read more  (c16 August)

12-13 August, 2020
‘Nurses and midwives join Powerhouse protest’ (on line)
‘Infrastructure NSW flags relocating historic building for Powerhouse’ (on-line; in print)
In two related reports, Linda Morris writes in the Sydney Morning Herald about the continuing protests in and for Parramatta regarding the demolition – and now proposed relocation – of significant heritage buildings to make way for the proposed new Powerhouse Museum building.
On 12 August, she wrote: ‘The NSW Nurses and Midwives Association (NSWNMA) has backed the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union’s (CFMEU) green ban to halt the demolition of the two historic buildings to make way for the new Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta and say it won’t let it happen “without a fight”. Union members announced on Tuesday they would join the campaign to pressure the Berejiklian Government to save the former maternity home, Willow Grove, and a complete row of seven terraces known as St George’s Terrace… An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) found Willow Grove, and St George’s Terrace were rare heritage items in the Parramatta CBD. …A report prepared on behalf of Infrastructure NSW recommended the development of the new Powerhouse on the banks of the Parramatta River proceed anyway as the public benefits of western Sydney’s first major, world-class cultural institution outweighed heritage concerns and the loss of the local community’s sense of place.’ Read more or: 12 Aug SMH Nurses and Midwives join protest
And on 13 August, Morris added: ‘At a meeting with museum planners, Infrastructure NSW asked the union if it would support the dismantling of Willow Grove and its re-erection in a new location. The union was told that the alternative – a complete building redesign to retain the Italianate villa on-site – would delay the project by one year and ground construction jobs. “We made it clear that the union completely rejects that idea,” the union’s NSW secretary Darren Greenfield said. “It is bizarre to think the government would spend tens of millions of dollars to take the building apart and tens of millions more to put it back together somewhere else. It is perfectly fine right where it is. “The entire property at Willow Grove is important to the people of Parramatta and NSW. The CFMEU will not accept any plan that does not preserve the property in its entirety in its current location.”’ ‘Historian Dr Terry Kass researched the site’s past for the North Parramatta Residents’ Action Group and uncovered a history of ownership by women in millinery, drapery, health and maternity services’….[and] ‘Suzette Meade, a spokesperson for the North Parramatta Action Group, said Willow Grove should be left where it is. “Just move the proposed Parramatta Powerhouse project 900 metres down the road to the enormous 30 hectare Cumberland Hospital Precinct,” Ms Meade said. “This state-owned land is far more suitable for an arts and cultural precinct with the added bonus that it doesn’t flood.” … An Infrastructure NSW spokesperson said the agency was reviewing all public submissions and its response would be outlined in a formal public report.’
Read more  or: 13 Aug SMH Infrastructure NSW flags relocation

6 August, 2020
‘Parramatta, Powerhouse Museum: Australian Unity Fund objection’
Joanne Vella writes in the Parramatta Advertiser that: ‘The neighbours of the would-be Parramatta Powerhouse won’t be rolling out the welcome mat after they entered a 121-page submission objecting to the controversial museum being built next door… The government approached AU [Australian Unity Fund], which is housed in the eight-storey GE Capital Finance building at 32 Phillip St, to acquire the 6759sq lot in February 2018 before withdrawing and ceasing negotiations in May that year. The government purchased the neighbouring site, where heritage-listed Willow Grove and the St George’s Terrace is, for $140 million to build the museum… In its submission to the Planning Department, the company expressed concerns over heritage loss, flooding on the site, blocking car access during Dirrabarri Lane during construction, and adverse noise and wind impacts if the museum, dubbed the milk crate on stilts, is approved… The AUF feedback, prepared by Urbis, stated: “These heritage items contribute to the local character and landscape setting of the riverside precinct and could be integrated into the Parramatta Powerhouse Museum and the public domain and the planned Civic Link.” ‘ Vella also noted that, despite strong submissions such as this one, Parramatta state Liberal MP Geoff Lee complained that only a few of the objections were local, saying “I’m not going to be lectured by people in the eastern suburbs or inner city.” Read more: Aug 6 Parra Adv

5 August, 2020
Inquiry hearing, 29 July, 2020; Transcripts can now be read
Following the first hearing of the Select Committee of the (second) Inquiry into the Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum and other Museums and Cultural projects in New South Wales, the uncorrected transcripts of the interviews have been released.
Session 1: Hon Don Harwin MLC, Minister for the Public Service and Employee Relations, Aboriginal Affairs and the Arts; Mr Simon Draper, Chief Executive Officer, Infrastructure NSW; Ms Kate Foy, Deputy Secretary, Community Engagement, Department of Premier and Cabinet.
Session 2: Cr Clover Moore, Lord Mayor of Sydney, City of Sydney; Ms Monica Barone, Chief Executive, City of Sydney; Mr Brett Newman, Chief Executive Officer, City of Parramatta; Ms Jennifer Concato, Executive Director, City Planning and Design, City of Parramatta.
Session 3: Mr Troy Wright Assistant General Secretary, Public Service Association of NSW; Ms Judith Coombes, President, Australian Museum and Galleries, Association (NSW Division); Ms Alex Marsden (via teleconference) National Director, Australian Museum and Galleries Association.
Session 4: Mr Bruce Dawbin NSW State Representative, International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) Australia; Ms Cherie McNair Secretary, International Council of Museums (ICOM) Australia; Mr David Burdon Chair, Built Heritage Conservation Committee, National Trust of Australia (New South Wales).
Issues discussed included: prior knowledge of government’s decision to keep the Ultimo site for the Powerhouse Museum; the suitability of the proposed new site in Parramatta and EIS findings; concerns about destroying heritage buildings; other options for Parramatta; questions about the proposed business plans for Ultimo – collection and exhibition content, site development, maintenance, costs; location of large objects; plans and policies for museums in regional NSW – and others. Read the transcript on the Committee’s web page here: Read more
As well, Webcast recordings are publicly available here.

5 August, 2020
‘Pressure mounts for museum redesign’
Linda Morris, in the Sydney Morning Herald, reports on the statistics associated with the 1264 [1299 see below, 31 July] community submissions made about an environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared for Infrastructure NSW, for the new Powerhouse Museum site in Parramatta, where 95% of submissions were against the move. ‘The vast majority of community submissions lodged with the NSW government about the project lamented the loss of the 19thcentury Italianate villa Willow Grove, a former maternity hospital, and a row of terraces known as St Georges Terrace… But Parramatta Liberal MP Geoff Lee said only 111 of the 1264 submissions were by Parramatta residents. “The arts and culture budget must have a focus beyond the inner city and eastern suburbs. Parramatta and western Sydney deserve better. Finally, Willow Grove is not national or state heritage-listed and there are hundreds of similar buildings in NSW,” Mr Lee said… But it [Infrastructure NSW] recommended the project proceed as the benefits of moving the cultural institution to the banks of the Parramatta River outweighed heritage concerns and the loss of the community’s sense of place. Building and construction union CFMEU NSW met with Infrastructure NSW yesterday to discuss its green ban on the properties. Union secretary Darren Greenfield said he has told Infrastructure NSW the green ban was based entirely upon preserving the buildings in their current location and this was “what the people of Parramatta have told us they want”.’ Read more  or: 8 August SMH

3 August, 2020
Parramatta Powerhouse museum: Upper House inquiry under way
Joanne Vella, in the (now only online) Parramatta Advertiser, reports on the publication of submissions to the recent EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) for the proposed new Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta. She writes:
‘Shocking figures have revealed the level of objection to the iconic Powerhouse Museum being relocated and constructed in Parramatta. The figures have been revealed as an inquiry into its relocation is under way. An overwhelming 95 per cent of 1299 submissions into the Powerhouse Museum relocation objected to its construction at Parramatta. Submissions to the Environmental Impact Statement, now on display at the Planning Department website, have cited concerns including plans to build the museum on a floodplain and the loss of heritage-listed properties Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace on the Phillip St site.
The submission results — which buoy heritage advocates’ fight to retain the heritage landmarks — emerge in the same week the issues were raised in the Upper House inquiry into the government’s management of the museum. Parramatta Council CEO Brett Newman and the council’s city planning and design executive director Jennifer Concato spoke at the inquiry on Wednesday when they reinforced the council’s concerns over flooding, loss of heritage and its integration with the public domain, called the Civic Link.’
Vella quotes a number of other interviewees, including Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore, who ‘ also spoke at the hearing and applauded the government’s decision to keep the Powerhouse at Ultimo but “not by pitting region against region”. “Western Sydney should have its own iconic cultural facilities but not by destroying a distinct and valued inner city cultural institution,” she said. Read more  or:  3 August, Parra Adv
The transcripts of the Inquiry hearing are expected to be posted on line soon, here: Read more

1 August, 2020
‘If you want to govern us, learn to listen’
Helen Pitt, in the Sydney Morning Herald, raises questions about the ways governments and councils may or may not listen to what people have to say.
‘To govern well requires unblinkered vision and, perhaps more importantly, the ability to listen. Last month Randwick Council announced plans to block Coogee Bay Road to install a pop-up entertainment precinct to counter the COVID-19 economic slump… This week Randwick Council dropped the idea…This is a good example of democracy in action; the people have spoken in opposition and the government listens and changes plan.’
‘Like the NSW government’s Powerhouse pivot. Let’s hope the current upper house inquiry into museums and galleries listens to the people of Parramatta in their bid to save the 1886 Italianate villa Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace slated for demolition despite a green ban being placed upon them by the building and construction union, CFMEU NSW.’ ‘Will the pleas of the people of the Pyrmont peninsula be heard in their call for more social housing rather than have their suburb become a “jobs hub” over shadowed by a $500 million, 51-storey Ritz-Carlton luxury hotel tower at The Star casino as announced by the state government on Friday?’
‘All levels of government need to be nimble now if they want to get re-elected in this fast changing world we find ourselves in thanks to this virus. But more haste, less speed, I would caution… Over-development and under-regulation are a toxic combination in this city. We need to be vigilant. It’s time to voice your protest – like the businesses of Coogee and the people of Parramatta. And fashion your own protest face mask.’ Read more  or: 1 August SMH

31 July, 2020
Summary: Powerhouse Parramatta, submissions to EIS
Save the Powerhouse Facebook group has analysed details of the submissions made to Infrastructure NSW about the proposed museum site in Parramatta: ‘Of the 1,299 submissions received about the E.I.S. on exhibition – an unprecedented total – there were a staggering 1,232 (95%) objections.’
To read more of their findings, including the figures for Supports, Comments and Objects, from Public, Organisations and Public authorities, Read: 31 July EIS submission stats
And to read all the submissions on the project portal, Read more

31 July, 2020
EIS submissions on line!

The Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, has advised those who made submissions to comment on the Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Powerhouse Parramatta project (SSD-10416) on its NSW Planning Portal, that the submissions are now able to be read on line: https://www.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/major-projects/project/26576 
Under the heading: Attachments & Resources, open Submissions.
You will find 1299 submissions, in these categories: Public: 1264; Organisation 29, Public Authority 6. An overwhelming number of all the submissions object strongly to the proposal.

30 July, 2020
‘Ultimo is final stop for the Powerhouse’s famous locomotive’
Following the first hearing of the second inquiry into museums and galleries on 29 July, Linda Morris reports in the Sydney Morning Herald: ‘The NSW government has officially abandoned plans to relocate the Boulton and Watt steam engine, the Locomotive No. 1, and the Catalina flying boat to the new Parramatta Powerhouse… Mr Harwin confirmed the flagship exhibits would remain at Ultimo on the first hearing day of an upper house inquiry into management of the Powerhouse Museum. The Berejiklian government announced earlier this month that Ultimo would be spared from sale for commercial and residential towers. It had been due to close next July…Arts Minister Don Harwin confirmed the significant objects of the industrial age would remain at Ultimo following the government’s decision to retain the museum’s inner Sydney site. The minister could not guarantee that the nearby Harwood building, the primary storage facility for the Powerhouse’s priceless collection, would not be sold or redeveloped…
The Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences will now operate museums at Ultimo and Parramatta with the latter to stand as the institution’s flagship, specialising in science and technology including robotics and artificial intelligence. The CBD museum would retain a focus on the industrial age, the minister said…No money has been allocated to renew the Ultimo site, which was estimated in a 2014 business case to have needed $350 million, funded in part by the sale of the Harwood site for $70 million. A final business case, likely to be completed by the end of the year at the cost of $5 million, would consider the costs of remodelling Ultimo Powerhouse and the future of the Harwood building…. Museum staff remained anxious about the future of Ultimo, the viability of their positions and the lack of new exhibitions in development, the inquiry heard, with museum management yet to formally address them. Read more  or: 29 July – SMH – Linda Morris  or: 29-30 July SMH Ultimo is final stop

30 July, 2020
‘I Don know about plan’
James O’Doherty writes in the Daily Telegraph: ‘REINSTATED Arts Minister Don Harwin insists he was not involved in a decision to keep open the Powerhouse Museum site at Ultimo, despite the fact the major policy U-turn was announced on the day after he was brought back into cabinet. Appearing  before a parliamentary inquiry into the museum move yesterday, Mr Harwin also resisted calls to shift the proposed Parramatta location to avoid destroying two local heritage buildings. Mr Harwin announced the Ultimo Powerhouse would continue to operate alongside a new museum at  Parramatta on July 4, less than a day after he was reinstated as arts minister after a court case for breaching COVID restrictions was abandoned. “I was not involved in any discussions about reopening Ultimo, but I was absolutely thrilled to be told about them when I was sworn back in,” Mr Harwin told the committee.’
And ‘The government is considering “a range of possible outcomes” for the museum, “from continuing to operate in its current form … through to a major redevelopment”, Infrastructure NSW chief executive Simon Draper said. Despite concerns from locals, the government is pushing ahead with the planned Parramatta site, which would involve the demolition of the 19th century Willow Grove building and historic St George’s Terrace buildings.’ Read here: 29 July – Daily T – James O’D

29 July, 2020
‘He is a buffoon!’ Ray Hadley tears into Arts Minister
A summary of his Morning Show on Radio 2GB notes: ’Ray Hadley has torn into Arts Minister Don Harwin over the ongoing Parramatta Powerhouse Museum saga. Ray has been campaigning against the proposed expansion which would see St George’s Terrace, built in 1881, and Willow Grove, built circa 1886, demolished.’ In the on-line discussion ‘NSW Opposition leader Jodi McKay blasted Mr Harwin for “willfully destroying” heritage buildings, telling Ray the Arts Minister is incapable of fulfilling his portfolio. “He’s on the stand this morning in Parliament. “He’s like a buffoon to be honest: he can’t actually tell us what the cost will be.“  The only thing he did say this morning Ray, is that … Ultimo is costing them $5 million just to prepare a business case! “He’s a deeply unpopular minister, and he’s making a deeply unpopular decision.”  McKay reports further on her views of the proposals for Ultimo and Parramatta. The interview can be heard here: Read more

30 July, 2020
‘No justification for Powerhouse movie’
Michael McLaren, on 2GB’s Wake Up Australia, speaks with Robert Borsak, NSW Upper House Member and Chair of the Select Committee on the Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums & cultural projects in New South Wales, to discuss the opening day of the new Powerhouse Museum inquiry.
Mr Borsak says “It does seem from questioning today that the knee-jerk change in direction and backflip on the Ultimo building demolition was made purely for political purposes, and there is no plan yet and certainly no business case to justify what they’ve done.” ‘  He talks further about a range of issues covering costs, heritage, risks and decisions still to be made out the future of both the museum locations, and the suitability of the Arts Minster for his responsibilities.
Read more Download podcast here

29 July, 2020
Second Inquiry: First Hearing
On 29 July, the ‘Select Committee on the Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects in New South Wales’, which was established on 27 February, held the first of four scheduled hearings for the second Legislative Council Inquiry in the NSW Parliament.
Interviews included:
– Minister for the Arts; the CEO of Infrastructure NSW; and a Deputy Secretary from the Department of Premier and Cabinet.
– Representatives from the City of Sydney, and the City of Parramatta
– CEO of Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences, and Chair of Trustees
– Representatives from Australian, NSW and International Museums and Galleries Councils, and the National Trust.
To read details, refer to the committee’s website here:
Cover page for links to Submissions,Hearing Schedules and Transcripts: Read more
The Schedule of speakers for hearing on 29 July: Read more

23 July, 2020
‘Fleet Street Heritage Precinct a better option for proposed Parramatta Powerhouse’

Michael McLaren, on radio 2GB, ‘is joined by Kylie Winkworth, museum and heritage consultant, who says the proposed Parramatta Powerhouse should be moved to a more suitable location to better embrace the city’s culture while protecting heritage sites – the 1870s-era Willow Grove villa and St George’s Terrace, built in 1881 – which are currently destined for demolition. Ms Winkworth says building a museum in the Fleet Street Heritage Precinct at North Parramatta could tap into “deep community pride of place” by celebrating local culture and history. “If the new museum was in the Fleet Street precinct, there is (also) an opportunity to propose adding the 1818 Greenway Female Factory to the World Heritage List of serial convict sites,” she says. Ms Winkworth adds that a World Heritage listing would prove a boost for international tourism.’ Listen here: Read more

22 July, 2020
Weeping over fate of Willow:
Heritage villa to go for ‘jewel-in-the-crown’ museum
James O’Doherty reports in the Daily Telegraph that: ‘The proposed Parramatta Powerhouse should be moved to a more suitable location to better embrace the city’s culture while protecting heritage sites currently up for demolition …The 1870s-era Willow Grove villa and St George’s Terrace, built in 1881, are slated for demolition to make way for the planned museum at an old car park site by the Parramatta River. But museum and heritage consultant Kylie Winkworth yesterday said the museum should be moved to the Fleet Street Heritage Precinct at North Parramatta. Ms Winkworth said building a museum there could tap into “deep community pride of place” by celebrating Parramatta’s culture and history. “If the new museum was in the Fleet Street precinct, there is (also) an opportunity to propose adding the 1818 Greenway Female Factory to the World Heritage List of serial convict sites,” she said.’
O’Doherty adds: ‘A parliamentary inquiry is next week set to probe the Government’s decision to build a second museum in Western Sydney, after it backtracked on an election commitment to move the original Powerhouse from Ultimo to Parramatta. Of the almost 150 submissions to that inquiry, many opposed the Government’s original plans.’ But, ‘The Government is forging ahead with its plan to build a “jewel-in-the-crown” museum on the site. Parramatta state Liberal MP Geoff Lee said the benefits of the Parramatta Powerhouse would outweigh keeping the buildings.’ Read more  or: 22 July Daily T – O’Doherty

17 July, 2020
‘Sydney’s Powerhouse Museum saved from sell-off, but debate rages on’
In The Art Newspaper, London-based Hannah McGivern writes about how the: ‘NSW government scraps controversial billion-dollar relocation plan but faces questions from community groups and parliament.’ She says, ‘A surprise decision by the New South Wales government to cancel a fiercely controversial relocation of Sydney’s 140-year-old Powerhouse Museum has been hailed as a victory for community campaigners. But arts figures and local residents who contested the A$1.1bn ($770m) plan to demolish the museum’s current 1988 building in the city centre and create a new venue in a western suburb say the battle is not over yet.’
McGivern succinctly documents the process of the government’s change of mind, and also summarises the many concerns about what still has to be decided about the future of both sites, in Ultimo and Parramatta. She quotes representatives from Government, the Powerhouse Museum Alliance, Save the Powerhouse, the  North Parramatta Residents’ Action Group and local media reports, saying ‘…campaigners say their core demands for the government remain unanswered, including an overdue funding boost for the museum and a full community consultation over the culture hub proposed for Parramatta,’ and that ‘A parliamentary enquiry due to begin at the end of July is set to bring further scrutiny on the government’s handling of the Powerhouse Museum and other NSW cultural projects. A 2016-19 enquiry urged the state to abandon the relocation project, concluding in a final report that it was “based on poor planning and advice, a flawed business case and insufficient community consultation”.’
Read more  or: 17 July Art Newspaper

9 July, 2020
‘…what a difference a week makes!’
In his regular newsletter, art critic John McDonald writes: ‘Pardon the cliché, but what a difference a week makes! The previous newsletter anticipated a long, bitter fight to keep the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, but on Saturday morning I was amazed to hear that the government had backed down from their “non-negotiable” stance and decided the PHM should stay where it is.
Almost immediately, Treasurer, Dominic Perrottet, and re-instated Arts Minister, Don Harwin, were strolling around the Powerhouse, praising the “passionate” campaigners and museum staff for their efforts in derailing the government’s corrupt, madcap scheme! In this new, alternative universe the government was tremendously happy with the outcome, which would leave greater Sydney with two world-class venues rather than one…’. ‘When the euphoria had died down, those “passionate” campaigners began to scrutinize the lack of detail in what we had just heard. There is, to date, no guarantee that the heritage properties of Willow Grove and St. George’s Terrace will be preserved. Neither is there any suggestion that the proposed double milk crate on a flood plain will be abandoned or altered in any way. There is still no sight of a coherent museum strategy for NSW, let alone Parramatta, and no commitment to consultation with the community or with anybody who has actual experience of the way museums work…The dim outlines of a plan have been announced which reframes Ultimo as a “fashion and design” centre while Parramatta becomes the home of science and technology. This would trash the historical identity and uniqueness of the PHM as a museum of applied arts and sciences. It also leaves the door open to moving the heavy objects – the trains, engines, space vehicles, planes, etc – that should not be moved because of their relevance to the existing site, their fragility, and the outlandish expense involved. Finally if the Ultimo site is to become the home of “fashion and design”, it’s a small step to discover it’s too big for such a task. Then, lo and behold, the idea of selling off part of the site to commercial developers will be revived.’
‘After the victory lap it seems there’s still plenty to be worried about. Ironically the government’s stubbornness, secrecy and downright dishonesty has been directly responsible for the creation of the volunteer group, the Powerhouse Museum Alliance, which was able to mobilise massive public anger against a terrible plan …Some campaigners believe it’s important to thank the Premier for the backflip with triple pike on the PHM, but it’s pretty clear she won’t be swayed by positive reinforcement. Gladys backed down because of pressure, not through a sudden rush of enlightenment. Experience has shown this government doesn’t need to be thanked, it needs to be watched. Read More: John McD 9 July

9 July, 2020
‘…here’s our take on what could, and more importantly what CAN’T happen’
Save the Powerhouse lobby group, in an email and on Facebook, identified some critical issues about the Government’s recent decision to keep the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, and provide another institution in Parramatta, saying: ‘…here’s our take on what could, and more importantly what CAN’T happen.’
‘To recap, the Government’s original project to move the Powerhouse to Parramatta was supported by a (highly dubious) business case. It was withdrawn on 4 July 2020. So whatever new project the Government (and the MAAS team) want to pursue in Parramatta, the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for “Powerhouse Parramatta”, currently on exhibition, is now clearly invalid and inapplicable and should be cancelled immediately, since it describes a project (ie moving the PHM to Parramatta) which the Government has dropped. To be legitimate, they must now start the process all over again, with a new business case that must follow, and be based on, extensive and transparent community consultation.
Equally, any future project in Ultimo, including the creation of Harwin’s rumoured dream – a “fashion centre” – that would involve altering the Turbine and Boiler halls and/or remove large objects from these halls and/or alter the Harwood building’s collection storage and curation facilities CANNOT be pursued without a valid business case including genuine, documented community consultation. Clearly, it is time for the Government to wipe the slate clean, and re-think the whole operation.’
Save the Powerhouse provides points to consider, when reviewing plans for both Ultimo and Parramatta, making reference to both the upcoming Second Inquiry with its first hearing on 29 July, and on submissions to the EIS statement, and say: ‘We do not believe that any of these steps can be carried out under the current management team and Trustee Board.’ Read more  or:  9 July Save the Powerhouse

 8 July, 2020
‘How the Powerhouse was saved’

Judith White writes in her Culture Heist blog,The fight to save the southern hemisphere’s finest museum of applied arts and sciences and its priceless 500,000-object collection has achieved a decisive victory. For more than five years a dedicated group has campaigned against one of the State Government’s barmiest ever projects – the “relocation” of the Powerhouse to Parramatta.’
She traces the origins of the Powerhouse Museum Alliance group, and refers to long Upper House Inquiry of 2016-19, saying: ‘The Inquiry confronted a wall of secrecy from the NSW Government. Its report, delivered last year, recommended that the move should not proceed, but it was brushed aside by Arts Minister Don Harwin. Premier Berejiklian also disregarded expert advice, insisting as late as 31 May 2020 that the plan would go ahead.’
‘By then a second Upper House Inquiry had been called, and again submissions were overwhelmingly for keeping Ultimo and building a new museum for the West. Kylie Winkworth analysed the design brief for Parramatta to reveal that it could not possibly house the jewels of the collection; it would be more an events venue than a museum. With the great turbine and engine halls at Ultimo due to be closed for good on 30 June, and the collection about to be scattered to the winds, the wave of opposition became a tsunami: professional bodies of architects and engineers, international museum organisations and community groups were on board. The offices of Premier Berejiklilan and Treasurer Dominic Perrottet, and of the city’s newspapers, were swamped with outraged letters.
White documents speeches by on 2 July by key people at media gatherings in Ultimo, and also in Parramatta, where a ‘green ban’ was placed on the demolition of historic buildings: ‘Next day, Don Harwin, close ally of Premier Berejiklian, slipped back into Cabinet and into the Arts portfolio following the withdrawal of his COVID restrictions fine; and the day after that came the announcement of the backflip. The U-turn was part of Berejiklian’s deal with Treasurer Perrottet, the premier-in-waiting, to bring back Harwin, her ally and his factional foe. Perrottet had become alarmed at the mounting costs; Harwin was watching mounting opposition to his pet project. Alternative opportunities would have to be found for the developers waiting to pounce on Ultimo.’ White says: ‘There are four principal lessons from the fight for the Powerhouse.
First, arts and cultural policy cannot be made by developers, boards stacked with political cronies, financial consultants and servile planning departments. It requires the input of the kind of professionals who have been instrumental in saving the Powerhouse.
Second, arts and cultural organisations, their boards and directors need a greater degree of independence from ministerial interference in order to flourish.
Third, at a time when public trust in parliaments is at an all-time low, select committees have an important role to play in holding governments to account.
Fourth and most importantly: when communities are mobilised with the involvement of people of knowledge, governments can be rolled back from acting against the public good.
This victory provides a rare opportunity to celebrate.’ Read More: Judith White 8 July 2020

7 July, 2020
‘Saving Powerhouse is welcome but big questions remain’
The Editorial Opinion in the Sydney Morning Herald summarises some of the continuing questions about the government’s welcome announcement, saying: ‘NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian deserves credit for keeping open the Ultimo branch of the Powerhouse, but now that the decision has been made, many questions about the future of the city’s museums remain. Instead of closing the museum and transferring it to a new facility in Parramatta, Ms Berejiklian, her Treasurer Dom Perrottet and newly returned Arts Minister Don Harwin announced on Saturday the Ultimo site would remain open and share its extensive collection between both sites. It certainly took guts for Ms Berejiklian to shelve the plan on which her government has already spent five years and $46 million in consultants’ fees. Some say the decline in the property market in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic was the main reason for the change of heart because it would have been harder to sell the Ultimo site to developers to pay for the new building.
But it’s more likely that Ms Berejiklian has yielded to mounting popular opinion across the political spectrum against closing the much-loved complex, which includes the city’s former powerhouse and tram sheds and was converted to a museum as a Bicentennial project in 1988. That campaign picked up steam in recent weeks as the closure date loomed and problems inherent in the project became more obvious.
As a result of a call for papers by the ALP and the crossbenchers in the upper house of NSW Parliament, the public has learnt how much damage closing the Powerhouse would have caused to Sydney’s cultural landscape. The plan contemplated dispersing the unique science and technology collection – including steam trains, vintage race cars, planes and trams – to various specialist regional museums. It emerged that the new Parramatta site might not be able to accommodate about 15 of the largest and best exhibits. Since the new museum will take at least four years to build, Sydney would have been left without a science museum until 2024.
Last week, building unions placed a green ban on the Parramatta site because the design involves demolishing the heritage-listed Willow Grove and a row of houses at St Georges Terrace. The noise around the project was a continuing distraction for the government. Yet while the Herald fully supports the decision to change course, it is clear the Berejiklian government still has work to do to explain where it is heading. Read more  or: SMH Editorial 7 July

7 July, 2020
‘In Sydney’s west we know all about getting a good haircut, and the Powerhouse backflip fits the bill’
Andy Marks, Assistant vice-chancellor at Western Sydney University, writes critically in the Sydney Morning Herald about the decision not to move the Powerhouse Museum: ‘We’re used to a good haircut in western Sydney. But the one our friends to the east just gave us is an absolute beauty. At the very moment the world is re-thinking its “ownership” of culture, history and artifice, inner Sydney deemed that western Sydney – the country’s fastest-growing and most culturally diverse region – could not be trusted as primary custodians of a bold new Powerhouse.’ [He appears not to acknowledge local opinions about alternatives that might focus on Parramatta!}
Read more  or: Andy Marks SMH 7 July

6 July, 2020
In the face of green bans and protests, Powerhouse Museum rethinks future
Gina Fairley writes in ArtsHub that: ‘Plans for the sale of the Powerhouse Museum’s Ultimo site back-flipped over the weekend, as protests escalated around its imminent closure and green bans were imposed on the new Parramatta site. After six years of protest and various Parliamentary Inquiries since the idea was first introduced by the Baird Government in 2014, the dismantling of the Powerhouse Museum at Ultimo, to accommodate a move west to Parramatta, took a dramatic turn around over the weekend. The surprise announcement by NSW Treasurer Dominic Perrottet and a recently reappointed Minister for the Arts, Don Harwin, on Saturday, 4 July, was welcomed by the sector, especially the Powerhouse Museum Alliance – which has long advocated for the relocation decision to be reversed… Gladys Berejiklian’s government has said it will abandon plans to sell the Ultimo property, and will now use the Parramatta site as a secondary Powerhouse location… In a formal statement over the weekend (4 July), Powerhouse CEO, Lisa Havilah and President of the Museum of Applied Arts and Science (MAAS) Trust, Professor Barney Glover AO said they welcomed the  NSW Government’s announcement that the Powerhouse Ultimo site would be retained, with the new Powerhouse Parramatta to also go ahead… The NSW branch of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) has placed a green ban on the site of the proposed Powerhouse Parramatta on 30 June, adding industrial weight to the grassroots campaign to save two state heritage listed buildings. “If the Berejiklian government wants work on the museum to proceed they need to sit down with the local community, listen to what they say and come up with a plan that preserves these buildings,” Darren Greenfield, the union’s NSW secretary told Architecture Australia.
The Premier, who has been acting in the position of Arts Minister for the last few months, has failed to step up to celebrate and support the value of the arts despite the troubles afflicting the sector. Her abrupt about-face on the Powerhouse’s Ultimo site suggests she remains out of touch with the sector, resorting to an 11th hour escape route with mounting pressure as her government more broadly supports building and development.’
Read more  or: Arts Hub 6 July 2020

5 July, 2020
‘Powerhouse Ultimo wing tipped for fashion, design precinct’
Linda Morris and Caitlin Fitzsimmons report in The Sun-Herald  that: ‘The Berejiklian government has been looking to split the Powerhouse collection and its disciplines between Ultimo and Parramatta as part of a business case for a creative precinct at the museum’s inner-city location… A briefing document obtained by The Sun-Herald shows planning under way for the Powerhouse Fashion and Design Museum within a fashion and design precinct. Returned to their original industrial aesthetic, the renovated heritage halls of the Boiler House, Turbine Hall and Engine House would be used for ticketed and free contemporary exhibitions and public events. Next door, the Harwood Building was to be used as Fashion and Design Creative Industries Hub with offices, studios, workshops, fashion and design markets.’
However, ‘The document predates the government announcement to keep the Powerhouse Museum open at Ultimo. Its idea to isolate the museums into centres of excellence cuts across the idea of a multi-disciplinary collection. It is understood that the document could be the blueprint for a revamped Powerhouse at Ultimo.’
‘An upper house inquiry into the disputed project would not be abandoned despite the welcome announcement, Greens MP David Shoebridge said. “It’s a clear victory for the Powerhouse but there are many unanswered questions,” he said. “This is why the ongoing upper house inquiry continued to be essential.” … Museum consultant and opponent of the relocation Kylie Winkworth welcomed the change of heart but said the energies of campaigners to save the Powerhouse at Ultimo would be redirected if the museum’s very large objects were moved and proper funding was not given for the museum’s renewal. It’s not known if the emblematic objects of the steam age, including Locomotive No.1 will be kept at Powerhouse Ultimo.’
Read more  or: Linda M -Caitlin F – SMH5 July

5 July, 2020
‘Berejiklian’s Powerhouse backflip a crowd-pleaser for east and west’
Linda Morris writes in the Sydney Morning Herald that: ‘The Berejiklian government’s stunning change of heart to keep the Powerhouse Museum at Ultimo is a crowd-pleaser. The museum at Ultimo lives another day to re-emerge as a centre for fashion and design, and so do its curators and conservators. Western Sydney gets its cultural trophy as the museum’s new headquarters and the museum’s chief executive Lisa Havilah is free to put her own signature on a modern museum a plus multi arts and culture venue.’  She adds: ‘Crucially, the decision potentially buys the government easier relations with the upper house crossbench. The Christian Democrats supported the relocation but the Greens, One Nation’s Mark Latham and the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party were opposed. None more so than the Shooters’  Robert Borsak who stalked the case for relocation with all the patience and cunning of a big game hunter. It was the upper house, led by Borsak and Greens MP David Shoebridge and backed by Labor, that ordered the release of sensitive documents revealing plans to disperse the collection, and the blow-out in the construction timetable for the Parramatta Powerhouse.’
As well, ‘There are still worries about the flood design of the Parramatta Powerhouse and the fate of the two heritage buildings earmarked for demolition on the Parramatta riverside…A green ban could potentially drive up the cost of the museum if major construction companies decline to tender to sidestep a row with union workers.’ Read more  or: Linda M SMH 5 July

5 July, 2020
‘For once, the right decision has been made for the future of our wonderful city’
Former trustee of the Powerhouse Museum, Leo Schofield, writes in the Sydney Morning Herald that: ‘Make no mistake, the retention of the Powerhouse in Ultimo is a landmark moment in the cultural history of New South Wales. It is an occasion not for triumphalism but for quiet celebration that sanity and vision have won out over political opportunism. Equally welcome is the parallel decision to give the good people of western Sydney a cultural institution of their very own, one that reflects their remarkable history, their interests and their ambitions. For those of us who opposed the so-called “move” or “relocation”, it was never a question of either one of the other. Museums are about collections, and in the Powerhouse’s astonishing, eclectic holdings there are enough objects to fill two major museums and, in the future, half a dozen specialist satellite institutions.’
He recalls the work behind the project of developing the Powerhouse site in Ultimo: ‘Excitement about the project was universal. When the main museum officially opened in 1988, there followed a rush of donations, funded acquisitions and a tsunami of awestruck visitors… Now is the time for all of us to ensure this beloved 140-year-old institution, with its ineradicable memories, will make a magnificent comeback.’ Read more  or: Leo SMH 4 July
[3 August, 2020
Antiques Radio Show: The significance of the Powerhouse Museum
In a podcast of his radio program on 3 August, Jolyon Warwick James discusses the 4th July announcement that the Powerhouse Museum will remain in Ultimo, and reads from Leo Schofield’s article, ‘For once, the right decision has been made for the future of our wonderful city’, in the Sun Herald on 5 July. A silver historian, consultant and valuer, James runs, as a volunteer, the Antiques Radio Show on Sydney’s radio station 2RPH (Radio for the Print Handicapped of NSW). ]To hear the podcast (approx. 15.30-20.30 minutes in) Listen here.

4-5 July, 2020
‘U-turn on Sydney’s Powerhouse Museum a win for common sense’
Henry Ergas, in the Weekend Australian, says: ‘The decision not to shut Sydney’s Powerhouse Museum is a victory for common sense and for the preservation of Australia’s history. And although no promises have been made, so too is the state government’s announcement that it will examine if the funds that were to be spent on relocating the museum’s priceless artefacts can be used to renovate the Powerhouse’s current premises in Ultimo. An important feature of Sydney’s landscape since 1893, the museum houses one of the world’s finest collections of materials relevant to the applied arts and sciences in an outstanding building that was designed to meet the collection’s exacting needs… The decision to move that collection to Parramatta in Sydney’s west was never based on proper analysis…At no point was the goal being pursued coherently set out; the cost-benefit analysis was riddled with errors; and the successive plans were entirely inconsistent with the promises being made. The only certainties were that costs were consistently underestimated and likely patronage overstated. Far from preserving the collection’s integrity, the transfer would have compromised it, perhaps fatally…
All those who care about Australia’s cultural heritage can therefore breathe a sigh of relief… But more needs to be done. If the Powerhouse is to fulfil its potential, it must have substantially better governance than it has had in recent years. And the museum desperately needs funding to renew the display spaces and to strengthen its education and outreach capabilities.’
Read more  or: H Ergas -Aust 4-5 July

4 July, 2020
‘Premier to power up two museums’

on-line as: ‘Premier backflips over Powerhouse  move ‘
Anna Caldwell writes in the Daily Telegraph:  ‘Gladys Berejiklian has backflipped on an election promise to move the Powerhouse Museum from the CBD to Western Sydney, instead bowing to inner city pressure to fund two museums.’ Caldwell discusses issues of costing , audience access, employment and heritage. Read more  or: Anna C DT 4 July

4 July, 2020
‘Gladys Berejiklian’s monumental backflip on Powerhouse Museum’
Yoni Bashan writes in The Australian, writes: ‘NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian has dumped plans to move Sydney’s Powerhouse Museum to the city’s western suburbs, in a billion-dollar backflip on a key election promise as she scrambles to quell a backbench revolt following Don Harwin’s resurrection as arts minister. Despite years of defending the project as worthy of public spending, Ms Berejiklian will announce on Saturday that the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences will remain at its current site in inner-city Ultimo while a new “state of the art” facility will be planned for western Sydney.’ Bashan adds: ‘Senior members of Ms Berejiklian’s cabinet have been strident in their criticism. They have branded the project as wasteful and argued the funding would be better spent on infrastructure projects in regions that have suffered from drought and bushfires… The construction union joined the chorus of voices against the project this week, saying it would order contractors not to destroy the historic premises.’
‘The building’s design — it was to be raised on a “hyper-platform”, with a latticework design — has not escaped opprobrium either. It has been ridiculed and was described by the state opposition as a “monstrosity on stilts”. Local interest groups in the Parramatta area have also protested against the fact that its construction would have led to the demolition of two heritage-listed properties, Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace.
The move was quickly interpreted by Coalition MPs as a significant capitulation to the NSW Labor opposition and crossbench parties, both of which have consistently attacked the $1.6bn relocation as a waste of money since it was mooted by the Baird government in 2014.’
Read more  or: Yoni B Aust 4 July

4 July, 2020
‘Powerhouse backflip as Ultimo site saved by Berejiklian government’

Alexandra Smith writes in the Sydney Morning Herald that: ‘The Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo has been thrown an extraordinary 11th-hour lifeline and will not close but instead operate across two sites, including one in western Sydney. Five years after the move was first announced by her predecessor, Gladys Berejiklian’s government will abandon plans to sell the Ultimo property and will now use the Parramatta site as a second Powerhouse location…But the government will now explore if some of the funds earmarked for relocation costs can be used on renovating the Ultimo site.
Documents released to NSW upper house showed negotiations have been under way since last year to find temporary homes for some of the museum’s very large objects as Sydney awaits the opening of the new Parramatta site…The government’s $1.17 billion plan to demolish two heritage buildings for the Parramatta museum also hit a setback, with unions threatening to block demolition work that damages the buildings. The Parramatta environment impact statement supported the demolition of the 19th-century Italianate villa Willow Grove, formerly a maternity hospital, and a row of terraces known as St George’s Terrace. But the building and construction union, CFMEU NSW, said green bans meant no work could be done to destroy the sites.’ Read more  or: 4 July A Smith SMH

4 July, 2020
‘Powerhouse museum: NSW Premier dumps plans to close Ultimo site’

The Guardian newspaper reports: ‘The New South Wales government has made a U-turn on its decision to relocate Sydney’s Powerhouse museum, more than five years after the announcement was made… A joint statement from the NSW premier, Gladys Berejiklian, and the state’s treasurer, Dominic Perrottet, on Saturday described the new Powerhouse at Parramatta as the “jewel-in-the-crown” for the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences. The existing museum at Ultimo would complement the new Parramatta centre, Perrottet said… The Parramatta lord mayor, Bob Dwyer, said he was pleased the government confirmed it was “still committed to delivering a world-class museum in Parramatta. The decision to retain the Powerhouse museum at Ultimo should not compromise the investment we were promised for an iconic cultural institution in western Sydney,” Dwyer said. Independent Sydney MP Alex Greenwich said the debate should have “never been about Sydney versus Parramatta”. “The passionate community campaign to save the Powerhouse speaks volumes to its special significance to Sydneysiders,” Greenwich said.’  Read more  or:  Guardian 4 July

4 July, 2020
See PMA Facebook, below: The Powerhouse Museum Alliance celebrates!

Powerhouse Museum Alliance
After rallies in Ultimo on 18 June and 2 July, the announcement to keep the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo was made on 4 July. Upper House Inquiry deputy chair David Shoebridge, and MP Jamie Parker, organised a hasty celebration on 4 July. For photos: see Powerhouse Museum Alliance Facebook page. Also on this site are posts from Parramatta groups who want to consider different options.

4 July: PMA Facebook

Read here: 
 5 July at 15:45 ·
4th of July! Powerhouse version of Independence Day?
A group of very happy people came together to celebrate the just-announced decision to keep the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo. It was understood that much needs to be done to strongly re-establish it in Ultimo, and to make the best decisions for an appropriate cultural institution in Parramatta. But here, everyone – and the hundreds and hundreds of supporters who have been calling in from all over Australia – and the world – are all smiling!

4 July: PMA Facebook:
Read here: 
5 July at 14:42
A rewarding celebration about the just-received news that the Powerhouse Museum would stay in Ultimo, and that Parramatta would have its own institution. Thank you, MPs David Shoebridge (who initiated the celebration) and Jamie Parker – and many supportive MPs – for your involvement in encouraging change.

4 July, 2020
Media release: ‘More Powerhouse for the people – NSW Government to retain Ultimo museum’
In a surprise decision late on July 4th, the NSW government has announced that the Powerhouse Museum will stay in Ultimo! A great result after nearly six years of campaigning on the part of many, many people and organisations. But it is still not clear what will happen in Parramatta.
A media release from NSW Premier, Gladys Berejiklian, and Treasurer, Dominic Perrottet, says: ‘Sydney’s Powerhouse Museum at Ultimo will continue to welcome visitors to its world renowned exhibits, with the NSW Government today announcing it will remain open and operate alongside the new state-of-the-art facility planned for Western Sydney…the decision would ensure Sydney had two world-class facilities and would provide a significant boost for the arts, tourism and employment sectors. “Sydney is a global city of more than five million people and this will allow us to provide an outstanding visitor experience in the areas of technology, science, engineering and design at two major locations,” Ms Berejiklian said.’ Read more  or:  Govt media release 4 July

3 July, 2020
‘Parramatta Powerhouse Museum: Council discusses EIS’
Joanne Vella reports in the Parramatta Advertiser that on 2 July: ‘A divided Parramatta Council chamber debated whether to have “one last showdown’’ with NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian about saving heritage buildings to make way for the Powerhouse Museum while others believed it should “stop poking the bear’’ and welcome the “cultural icon’’. The council met on Thursday night to discuss its submission to the Environmental Impact Statement for the controversial Powerhouse project, which would see it relocate from Ultimo to the flood-prone banks of the Parramatta River.
The council has reaffirmed its support of the museum while retaining the heritage-listed Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace at Phillip St. A motion to delay the submission to the State Government until the council could hold a meeting with Premier Gladys Berejiklian was lost on Lord Mayor Bob Dwyer’s casting vote during an emotion-charged meeting.
“Let’s have one last showdown with the premier to explain why these buildings are so important not just for Parramatta, not just the city, but Australia,’’ Labor councillor Donna Davis said. “It’s one last chance.’’ She reminded her peers they had twice unanimously voted to retain Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace at previous meetings. But Liberal councillor Bill Tyrrell said the project, which is expected to create 3000 jobs, should proceed regardless of saving the historical gems.’… Labor’s Patricia Prociv  ‘slammed the Environmental Impact Statement for failing to address “one iota’’ of Parramatta’s history “and what it means to the people of western Sydney’’. “To get this building we’re going to lose our heritage and income from a parking station (the Riverbank carpark). We are losing more than we are getting. You cannot always put value on heritage.” Read more  or:  J Vella Parra Adv 3 July

3 July, 2020
‘Council warns of Parramatta Powerhouse safety risk’
in print as  ‘Council eyes redesign due to flood risk’
Linda Morris reports in the Sydney Morning Herald, on a meeting held by the City of Parramatta Council, following the continuing controversy about the suitability of the proposed design for the ‘new Powerhouse in Parramatta’, and their draft submission to the Environment Impact Statement for the museum. ‘City of Parramatta Council is proposing major design changes to the new Parramatta Powerhouse, warning of a safety risk to people gathered around the museum and on the riverfront during flash floods. Council officers also canvassed a name change for the museum, questioning its appropriateness given the institution will no longer occupy “a redundant power station in Ultimo” … Last night, Parramatta Council backed construction of the new Parramatta Powerhouse in a knife-edged vote last night that divided its elected councillors.
Lord mayor Bob Dwyer used his casting vote to defeat calls for council to urgently meet with the Premier Gladys Berejiklian to convince her to save two heritage buildings slated for demolition. Across the chamber, councillors agreed that the Italianate villa and former maternity hospital St George’s Terrace deserved protection. But a majority argued the city could ill afford to turn down the government’s $1.17 billion arts and culture investment at a time of economic decline and in the face of funding disparity in western Sydney… While the design had many positive elements, the council wanted the government to collaborate with it more closely. Heritage was not a “fundamental element of the design”, it said.
The EIS prepared for Infrastructure NSW has recommended the Parramatta Powerhouse proceed despite the loss of two heritage buildings, as the benefits of the culturally significant institution outweighed heritage concerns and loss of the community’s sense of place. A spokesperson for Infrastructure NSW said it would consider and respond to all submissions received during the public exhibition period’. Read more   or: Linda Morris 3 July

3 July, 2020
‘Harwin reinstated as Arts Minister after being cleared of $1000 lockdown fine’
Lucy Cormack and Alexandra Smith write in the Sydney Morning Herald: ‘Don Harwin has been reinstated as a NSW minister after being cleared of a $1000 fine for breaching COVID-19 lockdown restrictions earlier this year.Premier Gladys Berejiklian said that, following Friday’s court decision, Mr Harwin would now return to his former positions as minister responsible for the arts and Aboriginal affairs. He was also the special minister of state.  Read more.

1 July, 2020
‘Parramatta eatery earmarked to make way for new Powerhouse’
Following the announcement on 30 June about the Green Ban on Parramatta heritage buildings slated to be demolished for the ‘New Powerhouse’, Linda Morris writes in the Sydney Morning Herald, that: ‘One of western Sydney’s most famous restaurants has been earmarked for potential acquisition, joining two heritage buildings also slated to make way for the new Parramatta Powerhouse.’ ‘The owners of the El-Phoenician restaurant, which is at the heart of Parramatta’s Eat Street, have been advised their business is in line to be compulsorily acquired… The fine-dining Lebanese restaurant, an institution on Church Street for 20 years, would make way for a pedestrian laneway to the new Parramatta Powerhouse.
Ratepayers would be liable for costs of the pedestrian access, with the matter likely to be raised at an extraordinary meeting of Parramatta City Council on Thursday night… Parramatta City Council Labor councillor Donna Davis raised questions about the pedestrian bridge and adequacy of evacuation exits with the Powerhouse’s chief executive officer Lisa Havilah last month. The new museum will be built on a flood-prone site and Church Street is an important exit point in the event of an emergency. “The initial response I received was that consideration was being given to a walkway access along the neighbouring Meriton site,” Cr Davis said. “A week later when I made further inquiries to officers, I was advised that one of the options could be the El-Phoenician as it links directly from the Powerhouse to Church St.” ‘
Read more   or: Linda Morris SMH 2 July

1 July, 2020
‘Slap in the face’: Daughter of legendary aviator warns against Powerhouse move
Tim Barlass writes in the Sydney Morning Herald, that: ‘The daughter of the famous aviator who made an epic flight from Sydney to Chile in a Catalina aircraft hanging in the Powerhouse Museum fears it will be irreparably damaged by the institution’s relocation. Gai Taylor, whose pilot father P. G. Taylor died in 1966, said the Catalina, part of Australia’s aviation history, should be protected. “I think it shows an incredible lack of appreciation, understanding and love of our aviation history,” she said…” The Herald revealed on Monday that many of the very large objects – including Locomotive No.1, race cars and trams – could be dispersed to temporary homes in regional museums when the Powerhouse is relocated to a riverside location in Parramatta. There are increasing concerns about the ability of the new museum to accommodate and protect exhibits… In 1961 Taylor presented the Catalina to the museum and in 1985 it was restored and hoisted 10 metres above the floor of the Boiler Hall to form a breathtaking centrepiece.’… ‘Dick Smith, whose round the world helicopter is in the Powerhouse, said he questioned the thinking behind the relocation. “The whole thing is a bit mysterious to me,” he said… Ian Debenham, former curator of transport at the Powerhouse, who oversaw the installation of the Catalina, said the relocation was “basically killing off the Powerhouse”. “The huge objects are just going to be a very costly logistics exercise in getting everything in and they won’t have any context when they are in there,” he said, and elaborated further on the potential risks.
Barlass also noted that: ‘About 100 people gathered outside the museum in Ultimo on Tuesday to protest against its demolition and relocation. The museum’s former deputy director Jennifer Sanders told the crowd the government needed to realise the Powerhouse belonged to the people of NSW. “We love this museum and it will not be moved. Bring it on.” University of NSW science historian Professor David Miller told the gathering the relocation “defies common sense”. “What is suggested to be done here is just ludicrous,” he said.’ Read more  or: Tim B SMH 1 July

1 July, 2020
‘Bodies in front of machinery’: Parramatta Powerhouse hit by boycott
(in print as) ‘Powerhouse move hit by union boycott’
Linda Morris writes in the Sydney Morning Herald: ‘The Berejiklian government’s $1.17 billion plan to demolish two heritage buildings to make way for the new Parramatta Powerhouse has received a setback with the building and construction union, CFMEU NSW, adding its support to the public campaign to save the properties. The union of Jack Mundey, the crusading leader credited with saving The Rocks from redevelopment during the 1970s, says it will block any demolition work that damages the two historic buildings. But the NSW Premier, Gladys Berejiklian, through a spokesperson said: “Powerhouse Parramatta project will proceed. One-third of NSW’s population is in western Sydney and they deserve to have an iconic cultural institution.”
…The Parramatta Powerhouse’s Environment Impact Statement, now in the final week of public consultation, supported the demolition of the 19th-century Italianate villa Willow Grove, formerly a maternity hospital, and a row of terraces known as St George’s Terrace.The EIS found that in the Parramatta CBD, Willow Grove is “one of its kind” while St George’s Terrace is the only remaining example of a terrace row in its architectural style and their loss would have a significant impact on the community’s connection with heritage. But the report prepared for Infrastructure NSW recommended the Parramatta Powerhouse proceed as the public benefits of western Sydney’s first major, world-class cultural institution outweighed heritage concerns and loss of the local community’s sense of place. The union’s secretary Darren Greenfield said the green bans meant no work could be done to destroy the sites. The North Parramatta Residents Action Group said the CFMEU’s green ban on Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace was a “tremendous win”.
“Parramatta deserves a genuine museum and continued cultural funding from the State Government – but it does not need to be at the expense of more of Australia’s heritage being destroyed,” spokeswoman Suzette Meade said.’ And ‘Graham Quint, the National Trust’s director of conservation, said Parramatta should have its own distinctive museum that was not founded on the loss of one of its beloved historic buildings and one of Sydney’s cherished museums.’ Read more   or: Linda Morris 1 July

1 July, 2020
‘Power up for a fight: Museum hit with green ban’
Joanne Vella writes in the Daily Telegraph: ‘A stoush over knocking down two of Parramatta’s heritage buildings to make way for the new Powerhouse Museum has escalated with the construction union placing a “green ban” on their demolition as activists threated to “put their bodies in front of machinery”. Read more

30 June, 2020
‘Sydney residents, union, vow to save heritage buildings from being bulldozed for Powerhouse Museum’
Michelle Brown writes for the ABC: ‘The construction union has weighed in to the campaign to save two heritage buildings slated for demolition to make way for the new Powerhouse Museum at Parramatta…. Darren Greenfield, Secretary of the CFMEU’s Construction Branch, has called on NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian to save the properties… Suzette Meade from the North Parramatta Resident’s Action Group said people would stand firm with the union. “The Premier should be under no illusion that if a finger is laid on any of these buildings, the community of Parramatta and heritage lovers from all over New South Wales, will put themselves in front of machinery to save them.” Read more  or: ABC 30 June

30 June, 2020
Rally in Ultimo: ‘Media call for Powerhouse Museum’
On what was to be the last day for visiting the ‘heritage core’ of the Powerhouse Museum (now extended to late 2020) the Powerhouse Museum Alliance organised a meeting with news media on the museum’s forecourt.
A strong crowd of supporters, most with a long association with the museum, heard speakers Jennifer Sanders (former deputy director), Professor David Miller (an engineering specialist), Clive Lucas (restoration architect) and Jamie Parker, Member for Balmain.
For all speeches at both rally sites, watch Channel 7 here: Read more
Both rallies were recorded for TV news later in the day by: Channel 10 at 5pm; Channel 7 at 6pm; ABC 2 at 7pm.

30 June, 2020
Rally in Parramatta: ‘Parramatta heritage: Green Bans on demolition of heritage buildings’
At a rally in Parramatta with the North Parramatta Residents Action Group (NPRAG), the CFMEU (Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union) NSW , placed a Green Ban on the demolition of the Willow Grove and St Georges Terraces buildings, ‘earmarked for destruction by the NSW Government as part of their plans for the new Powerhouse Parramatta.’
“These Green Bans mean no work can be done to destroy these historically significant sites,” said Darren Greenfield, CFMEU NSW Secretary. “If the Berejiklian government wants work on the museum to proceed they need to sit down with the local community, listen to what they say and come up with a plan that preserves these buildings…The local community, through the North Parramatta Residents Action Group, has campaigned for years to save these two heritage buildings and they are supported by the National Trust of Australia (NSW) and the Historic Houses Association. The CFMEU is proud to stand with the community in support of this important campaign. This is the first Green Ban the CFMEU has put in place since the recent passing of Jack Mundey who inspired a generation of unionists and community activists to fight for our shared built, cultural, and environmental heritage.”
CFMEU media release: CFMEU media
In the NPRAG media release, Suzette Meade, spokesperson for North Parramatta Residents Action Group, said:  “For four years the community has tried to reason with Premier Berejiklian…Over this time we’ve offered solutions but they have been ignored.  We will not stand by and watch as more local heritage is destroyed.”
NPRAG media release: NPRAG Media Release – Green Ban Willow Grove
For all speeches at both rally sites, watch Channel 7 here: Read more
Both rallies were recorded for TV news later in the day by: Channel 10 at 5pm; Channel 7 at 6pm; ABC 2 at 7pm.

29 June, 2020
‘Powerhouse Museum move to Parramatta makes economic sense’
in print as ‘Sydney’s shifted west, the Powerhouse should too’
In what is a controversial argument to most of those involved in the debate about the relocation of the Powerhouse Museum, Andy Marks, assistant to Chair of Powerhouse Trustees and Vice-Chancellor at the University of Western Sydney, Barney Glover, writes in the Daily Telegraph about how ‘In 1951, the Catalina flew 13,600km from Sydney to Chile in an historic flight. Now, activists are stopping it moving 20km down the road from Ultimo to Parramatta.’… ‘With a nearly 32 metre wingspan, the Catalina is among the Powerhouse Museum’s most imposing exhibits. Aviator PG Taylor chose it for his pioneering 1951 flight from Sydney to Valparaiso, Chile… The Catalina’s next journey will be just 20 kilometres, from Ultimo to Parramatta. But it may as well be to the moon the way some critics have described the museum’s relocation: a “disaster”, “cultural vandalism”, “shameful”. He argues for the relocation of the museum as: ’At Parramatta, it will be an accessible collection for all to share; a collection that reflects greater Sydney’s shifting population,’ while ignoring many issues including responsibilities for a state institution, and the safety of collection items such as the Catalina. Read more  or: Andy Marks 30 June

30 June, 2020
‘Powerhouse Parramatta will be bigger and better than before’
Professor Barney Glover provides an argument for the move of the Powerhouse Museum that defies the findings of over five years of well-researched facts, figures and questions about the rationale for the move, when Parramatta people wanted something else that reflected their own interests and histories, and everyone wants the Powerhouse itself to stay where it is. He appears ignorant of the fact that it should remain accessible as a state museum; the inappropriate spaces of the proposed new museum and the inadequate and non-transparent business cases and cost blowouts; and ignores the heritage issues in both locations. As the president of the Board of Trustees of the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences (which has no museum experts on it), and as Vice-Chancellor of the University of Western Sydney, his Opinion piece appears to reflect his conflicts of interest and responsibility. Read more or: Barney Glover, SMH 30 June

29 June, 2020
‘Temporary reprieve’ for Sydney’s Powerhouse Museum

Alec Smart writes in City Hub, that: ‘Sydney’s Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, which faces demolition and most of its exhibits put into storage for up to five years while NSW Govt build a smaller, milk-crate-shaped alternative in Parramatta, has been granted a temporary reprieve.
Due to close on 30 June, the demand for last-minute tickets has been so high that the two primary exhibition halls in the heritage core – Transport and Steam Revolution – remain open until the end of the year.’ … ‘A Save The Powerhouse spokesperson said, “It is certainly not a victory, but it’s encouraging, and buys valuable time – to allow even more people to put even more pressure on the ‘move’ advocates in Cabinet; to allow further vigorous debate in Parliament; to enable the pending second Parliamentary Inquiry to do its work; and hopefully, to finally uncover the murky, even corrupt dealings that many suspect underpin the ‘move’ folly.” The ‘second Parliamentary Inquiry’ refers to the cross-party Select Committee currently investigating the management of Powerhouse Museum, the financial reasons for its demolition and relocation of its artefacts, and disparities in NSW Govt funding for city and regional galleries and museums.’ Amongst other issues  he notes: ‘The newly released documents reveal that a feasibility study commissioned in March 2020 found at least 15 of the Powerhouse Museum’s largest objects were incapable of fitting in the new (as yet unbuilt) building’s goods lift for transportation up to their respective display spaces.’ Read more  or:  City Hub 29 June
Meanwhile, he cites a  Save The Powerhouse advocate saying: “Remember that the Government does NOT have approved Development Applications to permit demolishing heritage buildings at either Ultimo or at Parramatta, so it is important that we send as many submissions as possible objecting to the current Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the detested Parramatta project. “The closing date is 7 July [later extended to 21 July]. You are advised to start your submission with “I object to the Parramatta project…” so that it cannot be considered as just a ‘comment’.” The address for lodging a submission is: https://www.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/major-projects/project/26576

29 June, 2020
‘Powerhouse collection to be ‘scattered’ across NSW, plans reveal’

Linda Morris and Carrie Fellner write in the Sydney Morning Herald, that  ‘Management of the Powerhouse Museum is proposing to lend steam trains, vintage race cars, planes and trams to regional museums across the state when its Ultimo site closes. Documents released by order of the NSW upper house show negotiations have been underway since last year to find temporary homes for some of the museum’s very large objects as Sydney awaits the opening of the new Parramatta Powerhouse.’
‘Locomotive No.1 could be moved to the NSW Rail Museum, in Thirlmere, from July 2021, according to an email sent last September by Julie Banks, the museum’s director of Curatorial, Collections and Exhibitions. The Sydney Tramway Museum at Loftus could take Sydney’s only known surviving horse-drawn trams and a Toastrack O-class tram, the most famous of all Sydney’s electric trams.’
‘[CEO] Ms Havilah said the Powerhouse regional program was about giving communities access to its incredible collection during what was an exciting phase for the institution. A final plan is expected to be announced by the end of the year.’
‘But the dispersal of the collection has prompted concern around standards for storage, display and management of these objects in regional museums and the risk of damage in transit. Among the critics of the new Powerhouse was former NSW Premier Bob Carr … “I can’t believe that there would be any other city in the world where a government would be dissolving a major museum collection built up and nurtured by its people over generations, to scatter and disperse its contents for all time,” he said. The museum’s former deputy director of collections, Jennifer Sanders, said the museum’s artefacts spoke of global industrial heritage. “These stories will be ripped apart by dispersing the museum’s Very Large Objects, imposing artefacts of our industrial heritage which embody people’s inventiveness, innovation, and creativity,” she said.
Ms Havilah said: “I can’t understand how anybody would criticise sharing our collection with our regional museums and galleries. The safety of the objects is always our top priority and any suggestion the program would disrupt the collection is an insult to the professionalism of our amazing staff….” Premier Gladys Berejiklian, in her capacity as NSW Arts Minister, and Ms Havilah did not respond to questions about the adequacy of the Parramatta facility on Sunday. They declined to address suggestions the plans appear to cater to entertainment, cafes and events over exhibitions.’ Read more or: SMH 29 June

28 June, 2020
‘Our history will be put in a storeroom’
Recording in the Daily Telegraph that ‘critics claim new Powerhouse can’t fit iconic exhibits,’ Elizabeth Fortescue identifies some of those important items, and asks where and how they can be shown safely, if at all, in the new building in Parramatta. The 1944 Catalina Flying Boat, a horse-drawn taxi-cab, and Steam Locomotive no1 are among many of concern. She sites chair of NSW Upper House inquiries, Robert Borsak, as saying: ‘…the Powerhouse at Parramatta will open with no permanent collection on display, and no on-site permanent storage. Powerhouse Parramatta will be a “fun palace” with a “strong tinge of commerciality”.’ And former deputy director of the Powerhouse, Jennifer Sanders says: ‘large exhibits that won’t fit in the Powerhouse Parramatta will be “farmed off”.’ Fortescue concludes: ‘Like many, Mr Borsak believes the move is “all about a grab for inner-city real estate” cash by the government”.’
Read More: Daily T Fortescue 28 June
Fortescue also announces, that according to Powerhouse CEO Lisa Havilah, instead of closing this coming Tuesday (June 30), as originally announced, the Museum’s Steam Revolution and Transport Halls will remain open until the end of this year: To book tickets: Read more

26-28 June, 2020
‘The Murder of the Powerhouse Museum’  (blog 26/6)
‘Silence won’t save the Powerhouse; speak up now’ (SMH 27-28/6)
Art critic John McDonald writes informatively and critically in the Sydney Morning Herald, and in a longer version in his personal blog, about the proposed relocation of the Powerhouse Museum. He writes:
‘It’s not a museum. This is not a matter of opinion, it’s not a slander being spread by critics of the project. The proposed building in Parramatta the NSW government would like us to see as the home of a ‘relocated’ Powerhouse Museum will be nothing more than an entertainment venue stuffed with cafes and reception areas. The simplest on-line definition of a museum is: “a building in which objects of historical, scientific, artistic or cultural interest are stored and exhibited.” There is no storage facility in the plans for the new building, and no thought given to a permanent collection which is the very heart of the institution.’ Despite well-researched reasons for not moving the museum ‘None of this has struck a chord with Premier, Gladys Berejiklian, who has declared the “move” of the Powerhouse Museum “non-negotiable”.’ He records how: ‘The entire project has been veiled in a cloak of secrecy. Volumes of expert reports have been ignored. The findings of comprehensive inquiries have been treated with disdain,’ and ‘The reasoning behind the projected “2 million” attendance is confirmation that the new Powerhouse is not intended to be a museum…The museum component has been reduced to a bare minimum, with savings made at the expense of facilities such as climate control which will severely limit loans and display options.’
McDonald then discusses some key objects and collections that may never be safely displayed again, if at all. Meanwhile: ‘Parramatta wanted an arts complex but the government, until recently, was committed to giving them a science museum. Now even that idea has been watered down into something closer to a recreation centre. The price Parramatta will pay for an unwanted, overgrown double milk crate, will be the destruction of the Victorian heritage buildings of Willow Grove and St. George’s Terrace. Instead of a building that enriches the cultural life of the city, residents will see the last remaining fragments of local heritage trashed – completing the task so spectacularly begun by the concrete behemoth of Westfield Shopping Centre.’ SMH report: Read more  or:  John McD 27-28 June ; for McDonald’s blogRead more

26 June, 2020
‘’The proposed relocation … has become like a rotting carcass around the Coalition’s neck.’

(unpublished, so far…)
Robert Borsak, Chair of the Select Committee on the Government’s management of museums  in New South Wales, writes of his long experience in arguing in Parliament against the move of the Powerhouse Museum, his rationale for better spending of the money, and his hope for ‘a compact with NSW to reprioritise infrastructure investment to drive economic recovery across the whole state’. He says:
‘The proposed relocation of the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta has become like a rotting carcass around the Coalition’s neck.  A thought bubble for Western Sydney championed by former Arts Minister Don Harwin of Pearl Beach fame and now further decomposing in the hands of the new Arts Minister, the Premier. It has become emblematic of how this government does business – fake consultation backed by a dodgy business case that lines the pockets of their developer mates.  It simply doesn’t stack up, particularly in this dire economic climate…’
‘When I travel around NSW, I see communities struggling in the face of years of drought, the recent devastating bushfires and finally COVID 19… That’s why the Shooters Fishers and Farmers party met with the Government last month to propose a new way – a compact with NSW to reprioritise infrastructure investment to drive economic recovery across the whole state, not just Sydney.
The first step was to cancel wasteful projects like the Powerhouse Museum relocation and ANZ stadium upgrade and postpone the $15 billion Western Harbour Tunnel and Beaches Link in favour of fast tracking regional infrastructure projects…’
‘Our compact and the dreams of many in regional NSW were flatly rejected in a frankly disappointing 15 minute audience.  The Premier and Deputy Premier refused point blank to budge – preferring the extravagant largesse of the Powerhouse to the real economic future of regional NSW…Our door remains open if the Government wants to work with us.  It’s time regional NSW received its fair share backed by a vision and long term commitment to drive growth and prosperity into the future.’  Read more: Robert Borsak 26 June  (see also: radio interview below)

21-25 June, 2020
Radio interviews: Radio 2GB

Over the last week, 2GB radio journalists Michael McLaren (Overnight: 12.00-4am; Wake Up: 4.00-5.30am Mon-Fri), and Ben Fordham  (Breakfast show, 5.30-9.00 Mon-Fri), have conducted a number of well-informed interviews with significant people, critical of the proposed move of the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta. Topics have covered the destruction of a significant state museum; inadequacy of the new design and program; danger to the collection; relative inaccessibility to audiences for a state museum; lack of concern for heritage buildings; and lack of considered alternatives for Parramatta, as well as the need to properly support and invest in the Ultimo site.
Apart from the interviews, many people were able to phone in with questions and comments.
29/6 McLaren, with John McDonald (art critic and columnist) all 15 minutes
25/6: Fordham, with Ray Hadley
25/6: McLaren, with Suzette Meade (North Parramatta Residents Action Group) https://www.2gb.com/podcast/alternative-powerhouse-museum-location-ignored/
25/6: Fordham, ‘head to head’ with Geoff Lee (NSW Minister for Skills and Tertiary Education, Acting Minister for Sport, Multiculturalism, Seniors & Veterans, and the member for Parramatta)
24/6: McLaren, with Professor David Flint (legal academic):  PHM from 5.30 – 12.50 minutes  https://omny.fm/shows/overnight-with-michael-mclaren/professor-david-flint-92
24/6: McLaren, with Kylie Winkworth (museum specialist): 12-19 minutes, and phone-in comments https://www.2gb.com/podcast/wake-up-australia-24th-june/
23/6: McLaren, with Robert Borsak (chair of the Govt Inquiry into Museums and Galleries)
22/6: McLaren, with Leo Schofield (former trustee, Powerhouse Museum)

22 June, 2020
Referring to the EIS submissions, discussed below (‘You can help shape the future…’), the North Parramatta Residents Action Group (NPRAG) circulated to their wide constituency, information and recommendations for how to make their objections heard. They ‘have been strongly campaigning for the past four years for the Museum of NSW to be created in the Fleet Street Heritage Precinct instead of closing the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo.’ In their document they  provide their rationale about their recommended alternative site. ‘This option has been provided to the government and would cost half of the current project being forced on Western Sydney.’ Read more

22 June, 2020
‘You can help shape the future of the new museum’
[And refer to final report, 8 October 2020:  ‘Powerhouse Parramatta: Response to Submissions’]
On its ‘New Powerhouse in Parramatta’ web page, Infrastructure NSW invites people to read the documents associated with the EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) about the new building, make submissions with comments on document before it is accepted, and participate in webinair consultation sessions.
They say: ‘Powerhouse Parramatta is at an important stage of planning. You can help shape the future of the new museum’, the EIS for the Powerhouse in Parramatta is currently on public exhibition until 7 July 2020: Read more
The community webinars are planned for the following dates and times: you need to register to participate:
Saturday 27 June 2020 between 10:00am – 11:30am
Tuesday 30 June 2020 between 6:00pm – 7:30pm
Friday 3 July 2020 between 2:00pm – 3:30pm
But read the opposition: On the Museum’s Facebook page, advertising this opportunity, more than 140 strong and informed comments, all against the move, were posted in less than 24 hours: Read more
And read Kylie Winkworth’s assessment of the site and its unsuitability for this state museum: ‘The government is liquidating the assets of the Powerhouse Museum to build Carriageworks West, a multi-purpose, commercially-focussed arts and entertainment complex. The winning building design is determinedly not a museum. It is hopelessly impractical and cannot work as designed, even as an entertainment centre.’ Winkworth PHM Size does Matter June 2020

21 June, 2020
The Powerhouse’s ‘Farcical move’
With the ‘Powerhouse Parramatta’ on exhibition on-line for public comment until 7 July, Greater Sydney Community  asks on its Facebook page: ‘please take the time to make a submission; either long or short is OK…To view the relevant files and plans: https://bit.ly/majorprojectswebsite A ‘Quick Guide’ to assist making a submission is available courtesy Save Willow Grove coalition: (See two page simple guideline on how to do this https://bit.ly/3e8R9qL ).’
They draw attention to recent newspaper articles (see PMA entries below also) condemning the proposed move of the Powerhouse Museum, saying ‘It looks like a long winter for the government as public anger grows over the Premier’s decision to push ahead with the Powerhouse’s relocation to a flood-prone site at Parramatta. In the latest news, government papers indicate the opening date for ‘Powerhouse Parramatta’ has blown out to 2025, with unforeseen costs also hitting the budget.’ They cite Linda Morris slamming it ‘as an entertainment pleasure palace, sucking up increasing amounts of Treasury revenue and public goodwill’ rather than a museum: https://bit.ly/3hJ6rEK  , and Henry Ergus saying the demolition of historic buildings, and lack of storage space: ‘that failure is merely a symptom of a decision-making process that has been flawed from the outset: https://bit.ly/3fHWeXh  They remind readers that the relocation is: ‘The subject of a second Parliamentary Inquiry that’s now underway  https://bit.ly/PHMinquiry  and that Chair, Robert Borsak describes the Powerhouse relocation, as ‘emblematic of how this government does business – fake consultation backed by a dodgy business case that lines the pockets of developers. In the meantime, planner Mike Brown describes the project as ‘a re-run of the Monty Python “dead parrot” sketch…and calls for ‘project delivery motivations to be ‘elevated from “what we can plausibly get away with” to “what is the most that we can achieve for Sydney”.’ https://bit.ly/3hJ6rEK  For full Facebook page:   Read more

21 June, 2020
‘Government barges ahead with cultural destruction’
Leo Schofield, former trustee of the Powerhouse Museum, writes in the Sun-Herald: ‘We are about to witness one of the most shameful acts of cultural vandalism in the history of this country. On June 30, the NSW government will shut down to the public the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, where it has existed as both a landmark and an attraction for 134 years, and gradually demolish it to make way for sale of the site to a preferred developer…This operation has, in my opinion, been deliberately and falsely described as a “relocation”. It is no such thing.’ After discussing in detail six years of public opposition including petitions and an inquiry whose report was rejected by government, and pursuit of other destructive projects, he says: ‘The government barged ahead anyway. Not even a pandemic has been able to deflect the Premier from this disastrous, profligate course of action. To the current government nothing is sacred, no beautiful sandstone buildings, no open spaces, nothing that can’t be swiftly monetised. …But these failures pale into insignificance beside the Powerhouse “relocation”, which is not only physically and environmentally disastrous but also culturally destructive.’…
‘Deaf to argument, blind to a need for fiscal sobriety and dumbly reciting her pro forma mantra, the Premier, Gladys Berejiklian, has declared the Parramatta move to be a project of state significance without giving a single good reason why it should jump the queue in front of social housing, schools, hospitals and regional cultural centres. We are now up to Business Case Four and have yet not sighted cogent description of the proposal or a plausible cost-benefit analysis that might justify the risible claim of 1 million visitors a year to Parramatta. …The chosen site in Parramatta is manifestly unsuitable. It is flood prone. There is no room for expansion as none is contemplated. When throughout the world, cultural institutions are expanding into satellite spaces, repurposing old buildings or creating new homes for expanding collections – we are shrinking them…’ Furthermore, ‘The public still has no idea of what is imagined for Ultimo or, for that matter, for Parramatta where the current chief executive – whose expertise is confined to the world of contemporary visual arts and who has no significant experience with museums – paints only the fuzziest picture of her vision. Which is perhaps why it is shaping up to be another Carriageworks…The inescapable fact is that apart from Berejiklian and the Mayor of Parramatta, there is little or no support for the scheme. There is however unequivocal enthusiasm for something in Parramatta that does not involve the obliteration of the Powerhouse in Ultimo.’ Read more   or: Leo S Sun-H 20 June   Listen also to interview with Leo Schofield on Radio 2GB 22 June: https://www.2gb.com/podcast/the-destruction-of-the-powerhouse-museum/

21 June, 2020
Powerhouse push slammed as more “pleasure palace” than museum’
Linda Morris writes in the Sun-Herald: ‘On June 30 the curtain will come down on the Catalina flying bird, the largest suspended plane in any museum in the world, Australia’s best collection of working steam engines and the train destination board that stood for 76 years at Central Station. The heritage halls of the Powerhouse Museum are to shut, the museum’s purpose-built galleries housing the Locomotive No 1 and the Boulton and Watt steam engine to close 12 months later… To its opponents including former and current staff, heritage and museum experts and advocates, the new Powerhouse will not be a museum at all, more an entertainment pleasure palace sucking up increasing amounts of Treasury revenue and public goodwill… ‘
‘This week thousands of documents were released by parliamentary order of Upper House MLC’s David Shoebridge and Robert Borsak ahead of a fresh inquiry into the Powerhouse’s $1.17 billion relocation – the same select committee that urged the Powerhouse be kept in Ultimo and western Sydney be given its own institution. Together the documents show that in mission and practice, the Parramatta Powerhouse will be much different from the institution it replaces.’…‘Refinement continues even as the Environment Impact Statement this month controversially recommended the demolition of Parramatta’s heritage sites Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace.  Missing from the 17 boxes of documents is the 2020 business plans developed by the Berejiklian government justifying the redevelopment of Ultimo and the building of the new Powerhouse. The architectural plans confirm the Powerhouse will open with no permanent collection display, no dedicated spaces for museum exhibitions and no on-site permanent storage for its vast collection. The collections team will be based at the museum’s Discovery Centre at Castle Hill which is to be expanded for the museum’s 500,000 collection items and it is where exhibitions will be built.’
Morris cites explanations from Museum CEO Lisa Havilah about the proposed flexible use of space, but notes that documents show that for design teams, ‘Already compromises have been made around the public floor space of the presentation spaces’, and inadequate climate control systems. And in Ultimo: ‘Staff giving the last tours are asking if it has to happen: why not leave Ultimo open until there is something built-in Parramatta? “Not one visitor has said they agree with the move,” says one. “In fact, overwhelmingly it is the opposite. The museum has provided visitors with beautiful, memorable experiences for literally generations, and the next generation will not have this family experience.” There have been tears from visitors and staff, they say: “All share a common mourning. The cold and unnecessary – and preventable – death of a perfectly healthy family member.” ‘ Read more or: Linda Morris Sun-H 21June -1

21 June, 2020
Parramatta Powerhouse opening delayed’
Linda Morris writes in the Sun-Herald: ‘Construction of the Parramatta Powerhouse is unlikely to finish before 2024, three years after the Ultimo building closes its doors, according to documents obtained by parliamentary order. The documents also disclose that the design team has been searching for ways to install Locomotive No 1 and other oversized steam engines and aircraft from its collection in the new museum. The Berejiklian government was forced to release thousands of documents this week around planning for the new Parramatta Powerhouse, the Ultimo creative precinct, and the fate of the museum’s very large objects. Upper House crossbenchers, including the Greens and the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party, united with Labor to enforce a call of papers ahead of new hearings into the $1.17 billion relocation project. The project’s timetable reveals the government is working towards ministerial approval for the new site by December, with a builder to be procured early next year and construction to wrap up sometime in 2024.’
Of considerable concern is: ‘A feasibility study commissioned in March confirmed at least 15 of the museum’s largest objects would not fit in the new building’s goods lift. This includes most of its steam engine collection, including NSW’s first train, railway carriages, its tram, helicopter, and the train indicator board that stood at Central Station directing passengers for 76 years…. Labor’s treasury spokesperson Walt Secord said the struggle to relocate the 26-tonne locomotive showed how farcical the business of moving the Powerhouse’s collection had become. “Documents show that it will cost almost a half-million dollars to simply lift the locomotive into the new Powerhouse. That is just crazy and shows that no due diligence was taken when they promised to relocate the locomotive…”.
A spokesperson for Infrastructure NSW would only say that “a timeframe for construction will be confirmed when planning approval is received and a building contractor is appointed”. One planning timetable shows the government factoring in delays this year around the cooperation of Parramatta City Council, a possible interim heritage order on the two historic sites scheduled for demolition at Parramatta, and community opposition around any fast-tracked demolition process. In March, Paris-based architects Moreau Kusunoki said concept designs for the Powerhouse, due in July and necessary before construction proceeds, were unlikely to be completed until late September. Read more    or: Linda Morris Sun-H 21 June-2

20-21 June, 2020
‘Powerhouse Museum will run out of puff in Parramatta’
Elizabeth Farrelly writes in the Sydney Morning Herald, about the forthcoming loss of the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, and the impact on significant collection items – and audiences: ‘Steam. Twenty-five years ago, when the Powerhouse was at its height – which is to say, properly funded and energised – you could bowl in off Harris Street and watch something astonishing. Standing centimetres from the immense, hissing and chugging 1785 Boulton and Watt steam engine, you could watch its great piston slide, its beam-arm pivot and its levers swing, forcing the massive flywheel into 20 smooth and relentless revolutions a minute.’ And ‘There’s a further level of poetry in the fact that the 1988 adaptive re-use of the old Ultimo Tramway Power House, designed by government architect Lionel Glendenning for the Bicentenary, specially installed a reticulated steam system, run from the old boiler house, to drive the dozen or so steam machines in its collection. After 30 years of neo-Liberal penny-pinching, such government investment in just making the city a more vivid and interesting place looks just as astonishing as the machine itself. Like, governments do that? Not anymore, apparently. Now, after decades of funding starvation and curatorial reductions, the Powerhouse is scheduled to close at month’s end, just as everything else reopens and years before any kind of replacement… It’s called a “move”, this project to reinstate the Powerhouse on the flood-prone south bank of the Parramatta River. But that’s not really accurate. The only thing that will relocate intact is the name. Everything else – building, site and priceless collection – will be broken up, separated, decontextualised, diminished, disrespected and mothballed. Part of the collection will go to Parramatta, but since every space in the new building is designed to double as an event space, the chance for any permanent display is slim.’
Farrelly concludes: ‘Despite ongoing public opposition and against the findings of at least one parliamentary inquiry, the Premier has reaffirmed her determination to proceed with the billion-dollar Powerhouse project. For that money, she could build Parramatta a proper museum on the Cumberland Hospital site, reinstate the demolished Moore Park stadium as parkland and revivify the Powerhouse. She heads a government whose only pride, it seems, is economic management. Why, then, waste taxpayer money downgrading priceless public assets? Oh for a little less hot air, a little more steam. The Powerhouse Environmental Impact Statement is open for public submissions until July 7.’ Read more   or: SMH 20 June EF

20-21 June, 2020
Unusual suspect behind act of cultural vandalism’
Writing in The Weekend Australian, economist Henry Ergas strongly criticises the NSW Liberal government’s persistence in moving the Powerhouse Museum, saying: ‘Ten days from now, when the bulk of the Powerhouse Museum is closed down, one of the greatest acts of cultural vandalism in Australian history will be committed not by the lunatic left but by a Liberal government. Twelve months later, the remaining parts of the museum will also be shuttered, bringing to an end a presence in the Sydney district of Ultimo that began in 1893. In theory, the closure is merely part of a shift to a new museum in Parramatta. However, ever since the Baird government announced the move in 2014, the Coalition has repeatedly failed to explain its underlying rationale.’
He discusses the significance of the buildings in Ultimo, the destruction of the collection’s integrity, the inability to address the future of the museum’s large objects, lack of future adequate storage and danger in transporting objects, the risibility of the cost-benefit analysis, and the inadequacy of the proposed site and program. Ergas says: ‘With those analyses comprehensively discredited, the government has fallen back on touting the number of jobs it claims the project will create. But far from justifying its plans, the fact that a great deal of work is involved in demolishing an outstanding building and constructing one that is not fit for purpose simply highlights the project’s folly. Of course, none of that has deterred the project’s proponents, including the Powerhouse’s handpicked board. They have, instead, descended into meaningless rhetoric, with the board claiming, in its latest submission to a Legislative Council inquiry, that the new museum, which is intended to champion the achievements of science and technology, will be a “hyper-platform” whose “social and cultural amplifiers … set a new benchmark in culturally diverse programming”.
Meanwhile, the museum’s purpose has been dramatically diluted. In 1961, it centred on exhibiting objects related to “the industrial advance of civilisation”. That objective, essentially unchanged for decades, informed the design of the current building. Now, however, the board describes the new project’s purpose as being to provide a structure that “will transcend scale to exist simultaneously as both intimate and iconic”, while exhibiting “the current state of place making through the themes of cultural anchors, resilience, disruption, identity and equity . But unending verbiage cannot disguise the fact that the museum element in the project is being downgraded as greater and greater weight is placed on what is little more than a retail and entertainment complex.’ But he also does not suggest the current museum should stay as it is: ‘As well as better governance, it clearly needs some refurbishing and an expanded budget for outreach and education. At most, however, that would involve outlays of $150m over three to five years — which pales into insignificance compared with the $1.2bn to $1.5bn the move to Parramatta could easily cost.’ Ergas argues that projects that ‘link this country’s past, present and future in a way that should be at the heart of Liberal values. Those are the values that lead Liberals to utterly reject the far left’s cultural vandals, who are intent on “cancelling” our heritage. And they are the values voters can and should expect the government of Gladys Berejiklian to uphold. It is not too late for that government to reverse a decision that shreds those values entirely. As the Powerhouse’s closure fast approaches, it needs to think carefully about which side it wants to be on.’  Read more   or: Unusual suspect – The Aust-20 June

19 June, 2020
Inquiry submissions on line: Select Committee on the Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects in NSW
Following the extensive first Inquiry into Museums and Galleries in NSW, which produced an exemplary report that was ignored by the NSW government, a second inquiry was established as a  ‘Select Committee on the Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects in New South Wales’ on 27 February 2020. While we wait to hear when the first hearings of this Inquiry may take place, the committee’s website has posted 139 submissions so far, and it is understood that more will be added. Of these, only two so far are in favour of the move: unbelievably, the trustees of the Powerhouse Museum  No87 (MAAS Trustees), and perhaps believably , the Western Sydney Business Chamber No80 (Borger). See all submissions so far here: Read more

18 June, 2020
Powerhouse Museum Alliance: Media callout

The Powerhouse Museum Alliance organised a media callout on the forecourt of the Powerhouse Museum at 11am on 18 June. Many people wanted to attend but numbers had to be kept below 20 because of COVID-19 safety regulations. Speakers were Jennifer Sanders (PMAlliance), Suzette Meade (North Parramatta Residents group) and Jamie Parker (Greens MP, Balmain) with others available for interview. They discussed points that have been agreed over some years: leave the museum in Ultimo in its longstanding role in a cultural and educational precinct; provision of a site in Parramatta more appropriate for its own audiences; concerns for heritage buildings in both locations; concerns for the safety and management of the collection, particularly significant engineering items; apprehension about the inadequacy of the design plans for the ‘iconic’ new museum for collection-based exhibitions; observations that the program proposals for Parramatta are to do with entertainment and that it will not be a ‘museum’ as we know it; concerns about the exorbitant cost of relocation, especially at this time when so many communities need support. See attached for information about speakers and other contacts, and key points  provided by Jennifer Sanders.
Read more: PMA Media Event 18 June 2020

18 June, 2020
Shooters Fishers and Farmers Party: Compact with NSW government
Robert Borsak, leader of SFF party and chair of the Legislative Council Inquiry into Museums, posted information about his recent discussions with the NSW government, announcing that: ‘that SFF have offered to work with the NSW Government to help the State recover from the economic damage and hardship caused by the drought, bushfires, and COVID-19… The Shooters Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) requires a detailed compact to be agreed with the NSW Government in return for parliamentary support in the Legislative Assembly and Legislative Council to ensure supply and passage of key policy reforms. This compact is based on the following key priorities:
• Immediate introduction of increased Parliamentary accountability measures;
• Immediate audit and reprioritisation of NSW infrastructure programs to incorporate key job creating investments in regional infrastructure; and
• New policy initiatives to help drive economic recovery in regional NSW.
Among several suggestions for key projects and initiatives that need support, he also insisted that: ‘As a gesture of goodwill in these difficult times, the Government must immediately announce the cancellation of the Powerhouse Museum relocation project,’ and that ‘This compact seeks the immediate audit of all infrastructure projects by Infrastructure NSW and other priorities to realign funding with a new vision to drive the State’s economic recovery. This will include … ‘Immediate announcement of the cancellation of the Powerhouse Museum move to Parramatta and other wasteful projects that will be identified through the infrastructure audit.’ Read more  and also  Read more

18 June, 2020
‘Shooters in secret talks with NSW Coalition over legislative support’
Yoni Bashan writes in The Australian with the surprise news that: ‘The Berejiklian government has entered secret negotiations with the NSW Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party to form an alliance to will give the Coalition more numbers in the upper house and allow more legislation to be made into law…NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian and her Treasurer, Dominic Perrottet, will meet with SFF MPs on Thursday (18 June) to continue negotiating a compact drawn up by the conservative crossbench party. A spokesman for Mr Perrottet confirmed negotiations were continuing and said the NSW government was “always willing to talk to other parties and MPs to ensure the best outcome for the people of NSW”. SFF leader Robert Borsak told The Australian he was approached by Mr Perrottet last month and asked about mending the fractious relationship. According to Mr Borsak, who has voiced his dissatisfaction with the government on numerous occasions, Mr Perrottet asked for a list of projects and requests the government could address as a show of good faith.’ With reference to the economy, infrastructure spending and parliamentary accountability, ‘The SFF states throughout the document that its concerns are largely focused on regional and rural NSW…The compact calls for the ­immediate cancellation of the Powerhouse Museum relocation and “other wasteful projects” that can have their funding redirected to regional infrastructure. It names dam projects, hospitals, ambulance stations and funding for roads as priorities…Mr Borsak said he could never guarantee his party’s co-operation with the government on all issues, but that delivery of priority projects would soften ­existing tensions and ensure a more collaborative approach…The SFF holds five seats in parliament: three in the lower house and two in the upper house. The government relies on crossbench support to move bills through the upper house.’ Read more  or Australian 18 June

18 June, 2020
‘Powerhouse Museum: message of support’
Art critic John McDonald writes in his newsletter that ‘Against my own inclinations I’m at home writing this newsletter when I’d prefer to be at a rally in support of the Powerhouse Museum. The only reason I’m not in Harris Street is a promise to avoid large groups of people while the coronavirus is still active. This is, of course, one of the reasons why the NSW Government is aiming to fast-track the shut down and demolition of the museum – to take advantage of the lingering restrictions on public assembly and people’s natural sense of caution. It’s the latest disgusting tactic in an affair which will remain as an indelible blot on Australia’s cultural landscape. … I’m still staggered at the thought that the state government intend to wilfully destroy a major public asset at a cost of well in excess of a billion dollars ($2 billion would be closer to the mark) – at a time when the virus lockdown has made a mess of the economy. The clincher is that nobody apart from the Premier and few croneys actually WANTS this to happen.
The plan now is to begin to close down the museum at the end of the month and start clearing out the collection. As the new venue is not intended to open until 2025 this will mean four years in which the Powerhouse collection is inaccessible to the public. A large percentage of staff will lose their jobs at a time of economic insecurity, while those that remain will be unable to work on exhibitions and displays – and all because of the government’s desire to thwart legitimate protests.
The final indignity is that the proposed new building in Parramatta will have only 25% of the exhibition space of the current museum, which means the vast bulk of the Powerhouse’s priceless collection will never be seen – and will most probably sold off to help pay for the government’s vandalism. Nothing will compensate for the demolition of Willow Grove, one of the last remaining pieces of Victorian architecture in Parramatta, which will be another casualty of this wildly insensitive scheme. There are a thousand good reasons why this project should not proceed and the government has turned a deaf ear to all of them… The destruction of the Powerhouse museum is a major scandal, and the Opposition should be fighting tooth and nail to raise awareness and prevent this disaster. At this stage there’s no longer any time to waste.’ Read more  or John McD 18 June

16 June, 2020
‘What we need is a more powerful house’
Writing for The Fifth Estate, urban planning and design expert Mike Brown says: ‘The idea of a new cultural facility for Parramatta is good. Stocking that facility with the Powerhouse collection just looks dumb. News of the post-pandemic economic fallout is steadily replacing the news of the pandemic itself.’ After discussions about cutbacks in the scope and programs of cultural institutions such as the National Library, the Australian Museum in Sydney and student enrolments in universities, he adds: ‘The NSW Greater Sydney Commission has moved to develop post-pandemic urban policy recommendations for government that focus particularly on the growth of long-term sustainable high-value jobs centred on its “three cities” urban structure.’ …‘At a more local level, the NSW premier’s post-pandemic policy position …to shelve the stadium refurbishment passed with little comment. However her commitment to recommence the pre-pandemic Powerhouse relocation project – MAAS, Museum of Applied Arts and Science – was met with public outcry… The original and now revived project was not reviled because Parramatta didn’t need more cultural infrastructure – it certainly does – but because the Powerhouse made sense and was loved in its current location. Attracting favourable public sentiment wasn’t helped when project incongruities were left unexplained. The cost and risk of exhibit relocation was reportedly exorbitant, as was the risk of damage to valuable ungainly yet fragile exhibits. Was the whole enterprise just about flogging government assets?  Where is the detailed business case? Is the Powerhouse relocation the only realistic post-pandemic option here? Well, it’s all a matter of perspective; of vision, ambition and legacy.’ He concludes: ‘There is considerable conceptual distance between a reaffirmed decision to move the Powerhouse to Parramatta and the construction of facilities that contribute to Parramatta’s appeal and Australia’s role as a regional leader. Yet viewed against these larger backdrops the current relocation decision looks more like a sleazy real estate deal than a genuine attempt to build a stronger outward-looking Sydney… Henceforth, project delivery motivations must be elevated from “what we can plausibly get away with” to “what is the most that we can achieve for Sydney”.’ Read more  or:  FifthEstate 16 June

 16 June, 2020:
‘… these questions still remain’
In its Facebook and email messages, the well-supported community group Save the Powerhouse writes: ‘In just 15 days’ time, the Berejiklian Government seems set to carry out its threat to close forever the mighty Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo and the Powerhouse Museum Alliance has issued a statement that speaks for all of us: ”The Berejiklian Government has the Powerhouse Museum on death row… Australia’s best exhibitions of planes, trains, working steam engines, science and applied arts – our history – will be dismantled. These collections will never be seen together again. The Museum’s site will be sold to developers”. They remind us that ‘The Powerhouse Museum and its collections belong to the people of NSW, not the Premier …(yet) the Berejiklian Government is spending $1.5 billion to ‘move’ (=destroy!)  the Museum 23kms west to Parramatta. But they are NOT building a museum.” This was confirmed by “Parra Milkcrate” architects Moreau Kusunoki & Genton in a recent video entitled “Powerhouse PRECINCT (NOT MUSEUM!) in Parramatta.” For video: Read more
Save the Powerhouse identifies some critical issues in the proposed ‘new museum’ including lack of adequate exhibition and storage space,  justification of costs, and loss of jobs, and asks ‘How the construction of a multi-purpose centre in Parramatta equates to the destruction of an internationally renowned museum?’
And: ‘The eagerly-awaited 2020 Parliamentary Inquiry may yet produce some answers, and don’t forget that the June 30 closure date of the Ultimo museum is just another step along the way, NOT the end. There is still time and room to halt this shameful, pointless project – and we will. Write to your MP, the Premier and her Ministers to make your voice heard!’
Read more: Save the Powerhouse 16 June

15 June, 2020
‘Protecting jobs: PSA and Powerhouse in the IRC’
Following the announcement of imminent job losses at the Powerhouse Museum, the Public Service Association, an organisation committed to both providing job opportunities and protecting those that are under threat, writes: ‘As you would be aware the PSA lodged a dispute with the Industrial Relations Commission (IRC) in relation to the pending closure of the Heritage Core part of the Powerhouse Museum. The basis of the dispute is the PSA’s view that management have not properly consulted with the PSA over the first stage Museum closure impact on employees’ jobs. The PSA estimates up to 120 employees will have their work impacted by the first stage closure’ and points out that: ‘Under s.65 of the Crown Employees (Public service Conditions of Employment) Award 2009 the employer is obliged to consult with the union on change that significantly impacts on employees.’ The PSA identifies a number of specific requests and says: ‘To date the PSA have been advised that a proposed Change Management Plan for discussion is yet to be signed by the Minister. As a result of the matter being before the IRC on 11 June the parties are to meet on 17 June and report back to the IRC on 19 June.’ Read more or: PSA 15 June

15 June, 2020
‘Costing dispute throws Powerhouse-Riverside Theatre deal in doubt’
in print as: ‘Costs stoush in Powerhouse, theatre deal’
Linda Morris reports in the Sydney Morning Herald that: ‘The financial deal underpinning the relocation of the Powerhouse Museum could be in doubt with Parramatta City Council and the Berejiklian government in dispute over the costs to expand the nearby Riverside Theatres. Parramatta Council’s chief executive Brett Newman last week disclosed plans to build a performing arts centre across the river from the Parramatta Powerhouse came with no guarantee of government funding. The admission surprised councillors who had expected the government’s arts agency, Create NSW, to contribute to the theatre redevelopment under an agreement to create a cultural precinct along the river. Some councillors now want government to return the $100 million that had been set aside for the theatre renovations on its behalf out of the proceeds from its 2017 sale of the new Powerhouse Museum site. Under the Heads of Agreement signed in July 2017, council can trigger an official dispute by issuing written notice to government. If a resolution cannot be reached between the mayor and department secretary the matter goes to the relevant minister and eventually the courts. Construction of the Parramatta Powerhouse site can proceed only with an approved development application free of legal challenge and with full control over the land.’
Morris traces how the ‘Tensions between the parties date to 2017 when Parramatta Council received $140 million from the government for the parcel of riverfront land’, as well as options for the council’s 20-year arts and culture plan, including the theatre development and which parties are responsible for annual operating expenses once the theatre complex opens. ‘Some councillors want the $100 million returned to council in cash so it can renovate the theatre complex itself. They are also bristling because any expenditure of the $40 million cultural fund, including help for arts companies struggling to reestablish themselves after the lockdown, requires the consent of the arts minister…A source close to government but not authorised to speak said Parramatta had been the beneficiary of significant state investment in infrastructure including the Parramatta Light Rail, WestConnex, the Powerhouse Museum itself and Western Sydney Stadium. Any additional government contribution to Riverside would be difficult given the extraordinary impact on the state’s budget of drought, summer fires, and COVID-19, they said.’ Read more or: Costs stoush 15 June

14 June, 2020
‘Powerhouse in jobs dispute with 95 out’
Linda Morris, in the Sun Herald, announces that: ‘Management of the Powerhouse Museum has been taken to the Industrial Relations Commission in a dispute over the loss of up to 95 jobs prompted by the closure of the museum’s heritage halls. The Public Service Association alleges the Ultimo museum’s early closure, from June 30, is being carried out without proper consultation of affected staff… The PSA and Professional Officers’ Association notified the Industrial Relations Commission of a dispute on June 4, with an initial hearing convened last Thursday. They estimate 95 people will lose work, while hundreds of others face significant uncertainty following the Berejiklian government’s decision to begin mothballing the museum from June 30 – years before the opening of the new Parramatta museum.
With the Parramatta Powerhouse yet to be approved, Public Service Association assistant secretary Troy Wright said there was no reason to close the Ultimo museum unless it was to stymie opposition to a deeply unpopular project as happened with Allianz Stadium. The move comes as an internal email, headed Powerhouse Consultant budget, reported ‘‘costs to date of $45m up to the end of 2019’’. … Labor’s treasury spokesman Walter Secord said the consultants’ budget was equal to that for a new Sydney primary school. …Infrastructure NSW denied the Powerhouse Museum had spent $46 million on consultants, saying $18 million had been allocated to the museum’s relocation to Parramatta up until June 2019. This had included costs associated with the Parramatta business case, the running of the International Design Competition, and relocation logistics. This figure does not capture the full costs of the Parramatta Powerhouse’s Environment Impact Statement and planning for the redevelopment of Ultimo due this calendar year, nor the winning architect’s multi-million dollar fee.
The Powerhouse employed casual staff for a range of purposes, including supporting various exhibitions, a museum spokesperson said. Where appropriate, the Powerhouse may offer work to casual staff to relocate or digitise the collection. Neither project would likely sustain staff for a hibernation period lasting five years, Mr Wright said.’ Read more  or PHM jobs dispute 14 June

13/14 June 2020
‘Parramatta should be our jewel but we’ve trashed its treasures’
In print as: ‘Parramatta could be a jewel but we trash its treasure’s
Elizabeth Farrelly writes in the Sydney Morning Herald, ‘Sydneysiders should treasure Parramatta. With her good bones, fine history and central locus, Parramatta should be a place like no other, a vivid and particular entwinement of nature and culture…Instead, we’ve largely treated her as our cesspool, chucking our dirtiest air and most cavalier attitudes her way. Now, there’s a chance to reconsider. Back when the colony was new, with a blow-in population too ignorant to grow food at Sydney Cove and too arrogant to fish from it like the locals, Parramatta saved us …Even now, Parramatta’s core plan-diagram is sweet as a nut. … Parramatta has everything a good city needs – except good government…But COVID demands we rethink…It suggests we reinstate localism, returning texture and engagement to our lives.’
Farrelly discusses types of transport, cities that are also neighbourhoods and other factors, especially: ‘It would start by taking heritage seriously, ditching a listing process that, says Councillor Donna Davis, “isn’t worth the paper it’s written on”. Actually giving a damn… Transport for NSW would no longer be able, as it did on the night of May 19, to rush in under cover of darkness and demolish one of Australia’s oldest surviving pubs. The Royal Oak Hotel was built by First Fleeter William Tunks and his convict wife in 1813.’…’Secret, too, is all detail as to the precise light rail route and infrastructure. … Already, demolition is under way – on Church Street but also on the light rail’s track across the beautiful and richly endowed Cumberland Hospital heritage precinct.’
And, after citing more concerns for overdevelopment in heritage areas, she says: ‘Then there’s the Powerhouse move, which breaks apart a priceless industrial-era collection then parachutes bits of it into a billion-dollar building on a flood-prone site, destroying the lovely, Italianate Willow Grove villa and an entire heritage terrace on the way. For half the money you could adaptively re-use the glorious hospital precinct as a museum of NSW, deploying some of the state’s oldest buildings to tell its remarkable stories, from the original custodians on. It’s not too late for Parramatta to resist the slide into a mediocrity of soulless towers. Never too late to pursue your truest, most interesting self.’ Read more  or: Farrelly 13-14 June

12 June, 2020
‘NSW Government takes a wrecking ball to heritage’
In her CultureHeist blog, Judith White summarises recent issues to do with the relocation of the Powerhouse Museum, and the urgency of appealing to politicians to cancel the proposal.  She writes: ‘The heritage core of the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, Sydney, is no longer open to the public. On 30 June the NSW Government will close it for good and begin tearing the institution apart. The threatened area of the award-winning building includes the turbine hall, the engine house that is home to priceless relics of the steam-age Industrial Revolution (including the 1785 Boulton & Watt beam engine, the oldest steam engine in existence), and the boiler hall with its space, flight and transport installations… However, beginning on 1 July the Government intends to disperse the collection so that demolition can begin to make way for real estate developers who will reap huge profits from the Ultimo site.’
‘…The decision to proceed flies in the face of growing public opposition. 98.6% of people surveyed by the National Trust in May are overwhelmingly against the Government’s plan, saying that the Powerhouse and its entire collection should stay in Ultimo. The Government is also acting in defiance of last year’s report from the Upper House Inquiry into Museums and Galleries, and of damning evidence it heard from expert witnesses. Opponents have now deluged a fresh Upper House Inquiry into the Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects …The bulk of submissions to the Upper House Inquiry are overwhelmingly against the plan…None of the objectors wishes to see Western Sydney deprived of cultural facilities. On the contrary, they want a more appropriate new museum built there – something that could be achieved at less than half the cost.’
As well, she observes that: ‘What the Government proposes to install at Parramatta is not a museum at all. It’s an entertainment centre. Leading museum and heritage expert Kylie Winkworth, a former Powerhouse trustee, has exposed multiple flaws in the design brief for the new building. She reveals that Parramatta will have only 25% of the Ultimo museum standard exhibition spaces, that it will have multiple entrances (a staffing and security nightmare), huge glass walls and open entrances (an air conditioning nightmare), no floors capable of supporting the large items from the collection, no conservation facilities, no adequate loading dock, a much reduced library and no secure working place for staff…It is, says Winkworth, a fantasy that “completely ignores the basic principles of museum planning”. And then, of course, there’s the well-documented risk of flooding from the Parramatta River – a disaster waiting to happen.
In Parliament meanwhile the Legislative Council faces an uphill battle to secure the release of the documents about the Powerhouse that it demanded a month ago. ..Supporters of the museum are urging people to write to both Premier Berejiklian and Treasurer Dominic Perrottet to insist that the Powerhouse at Ultimo must remain open with its collection intact. With the “heritage core” of the museum about to be demolished, it’s an urgent request. The vandals are at the doors. Read more  or: Judith White 12 June

12 June, 2020
‘The white elephants of NSW’

In the Pearls and Irritations newsletter, Alex Mitchell writes critically of wasteful government spending on unnecessary projects, saying that: ‘Recent economic policy in NSW requires the nimbleness of musical chairs. …As a result, billions of dollars have been wasted on projects that don’t stack up.’ He discusses spending on such as prisons, a desalination plant and football stadiums, where ‘public money has been squandered on projects of dubious or uncertain value…The new rationale for lavish spend is jobs, jobs, jobs. But on every major infrastructure project to date, costs have blown out without any commensurate increase in jobs: light rail, WestConnex, the Powerhouse project. How many more jobs at either of these projects? None. There are less jobs than before. An efficient public service would be able to intervene to limit the overspend. But the public service has been emasculated by the mania for getting costs off the books, i.e. reducing staff and getting rid of valuable experience…It is conservatively estimated that 3,000 public service jobs have been lost in the current financial year. The result of the purge is that staff are so terrified of losing their own jobs that no one is giving independent advice…We now have a Department of Planning that has become the tool of Coalition politics, and an “Independent” [sic] Planning Commission that rubber-stamps Government-preferred projects.’
‘With the budget in tatters as a result of the bushfires and COVID-19, the NSW Government has now announced a $3 billion “acceleration fund” for what Premier Berejiklian calls “shovel-ready” projects. But the choice of projects makes no sense at all. Why abandon the ANZ Stadium rebuild, but go ahead with the demolition of the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo and put up a completely unsuitable new building in Parramatta? It’s the wrong building for the Western Sydney city; it can’t house the museum’s collection; and it’s already known that the costs will blow out to at least $1.6 billion. All the new Keynesian spend will going into the pockets, ahem, balance sheets, of private developers and big building companies. If jobs are the priority, create them in the public sector – more health workers, more teachers, more fire fighters etc etc. You wouldn’t trust this lot to build your garden shed, let alone State significant infrastructure. NSW politicians are fond of saying “Money doesn’t grow on trees” and they’re right. Except when the money is ours.’ Read more  or: Alex Mitchell 12 June

11 June, 2020
‘… mystery … the Premier’s stubborn desire to destroy the Powerhouse Museum ‘

John McDonald writes in his regular arts newsletter: ‘There is no greater mystery in New South Wales than the Premier’s stubborn desire to destroy the Powerhouse Museum. Even after the COVID-19 lockdown which has drained billions from the public purse – and will continue to do so for months, perhaps years – Gladys still wants to bulldoze a much acclaimed museum, demolish one of the last remaining heritage buildings in Parramatta, and erect an expensive new structure that would not even pretend to act as a replacement for what is lost. Furthermore it’s a project that nobody seems to want – nobody that is, except the Premier; Chair of the Western Sydney branch of the Sydney Business Chamber, David Borger, and Liberal MP, Geoff Lee.’
He asks who benefits, how can the government justify the expense and exactly what kind of jobs will be created, and concludes: ‘If and when the new building is finished Parramatta will have a gigantic white elephant that has zero possibility of drawing long-term audiences and covering costs. To achieve this excellent result the government will have irretrievably vandalised a major Australian museum and wiped out another precious piece of heritage in a city already disfigured…’. Read more: John McDonald 11 June

10 June, 2020
‘Sydney’s Powerhouse Museum project powers on to next phase’
In The Australian, Ashleigh Wilson writes: ‘The Powerhouse Museum is steaming ahead with its relocation to western Sydney with the release of key planning documents underpinning the detail of the ambitious project. Ten days after the NSW government renewed its support for the proposed Powerhouse Parramatta, the museum has released a state significant development application and environmental impact statement for public comment until July 7, marking a milestone for a project that has divided cultural circles for the past two years. Powerhouse director Lisa Havilah said the development was moving into its “next phase” before construction begins at Parramatta River…The Berejiklian government recently considered scrapping the Powerhouse move … after revelations the COVID-19 pandemic would cost the state up to $20bn in lost revenue. The Premier decided to cancel its ANZ Stadium upgrade while proceeding with the Powerhouse’s move to Parramatta, citing more than 1000 jobs to be created in western Sydney. Moving the 141-year-old institution from inner-city Ultimo to Parramatta has attracted opposition from some high-profile Sydney arts figures, as well as inside the Coalition partyroom and the Berejiklian cabinet itself…But the project is set to become a reality with the backing of Gladys Berejiklian, who took over the arts portfolio in April following the resignation of Don Harwin.’ Read more  or  Sydney’s PHM project powers on

10 June, 2020
EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) for Powerhouse to Parramatta now on line
The EIS for the ‘Powerhouse Precinct at Parramatta’ is now on exhibition, on-line, for just 28 days until 7 JulyPrepared by Ethos Urban on behalf of Infrastructure NSW,  ‘This submission to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) comprises an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a State Significant Development Application under Part 4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act).’
It considers environmental and heritage matters, social and economic aspects, and (despite continuing opposition from the broader public platform) recommends the proposal to move the museum to the selected site and into the selected architectural design. The EIS could be effectively the Development Application for the project. In the link supplied here, under Attachments and Resources on the Powerhouse Parramatta page go to EIS (37). Click the down arrow for the documents and plans.  Read more  or for the specific document : Read more

9 June, 2020
‘Powerhouse Parramatta’: Finalists now on line
Designs, architects statements and jury comments for the five finalists for the proposed museum in Parramatta, have now been made accessible on the MAAS website. You can find them here: Read more

7 June, 2020
‘Powerhouse shortlisters go on public display’
on line as ‘Powerhouse finalists revealed’
Linda Morris writes in the Sydney Morning Herald (and reveals images on line), about how: ‘Sydney has received its first look at rival designs for Parramatta Powerhouse, showing modern interpretations of its new riverside home’ and that ‘The designs, along with design statements and jury feedback, are expected to be unveiled in an online exhibition next week.’
She reminds us that: ‘Architectural firms Moreau Kusunoki and Genton were selected as winners of the international design competition in December with their latticed steel structure of two towers. The seven-member international jury judged theirs to be a delicate and elegant design that would create a landmark cultural destination. The jury’s decision was unanimous…But it controversially necessitates demolition of the 1886 Italianate villa known as Willow Grove as well as a row of seven terraces known as St George’s Terrace.’
Providing images and descriptions of ‘rival designs’, she says: ‘The shortlisted design plans for the Parramatta Powerhouse Museum have been kept under wraps until now despite pressure from Australian Institute of Architects and the organiser of the taxpayer-funded International Design Competition, Malcolm Reading…A draft report prepared for Infrastructure NSW has recommended the development proceed despite finding the two historic buildings that are to be demolished were “one of a kind” in the Parramatta CBD and their loss would have a significant impact on the community’s connection with heritage. But the public benefits of western Sydney’s first major, world-class cultural institution outweighed heritage concerns and loss of the local community’s sense of place.’ Read more  or:  7 June, Linda Morris SMH

5 June, 2020
‘How Sydney was spared a giant upside down hairdryer on the skyline after rejecting architect’s plans for a new museum’
In the Daily Mail, Levi Parsons and Daniel Piotrowski publish long-awaited photographs of four of the alternative designs considered for the proposed Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta. They also write: ‘Political observers were beginning to suspect the ambitious Parramatta Powerhouse move would be shelved as Australia falls into a recession as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Earlier this week Premier Gladys Berejiklian pulled the pin on the $800 million rebuild of ANZ Stadium – at least until the coronavirus crisis is resolved. But she remains determined to go ahead with the Powerhouse move, hailing it as a major job creator at a time of economic downturn.’ Read more  or: 5 June Daily Mail

3 June, 2020
‘Berejiklian government’s push to freeze public servant wages blocked

Related to the issue of the costs of the stadium at Olympic Park, and the relocation of the Powerhouse Museum, Alexandra Smith reports in The Sydney Morning Herald, that: ‘The Berejiklian government is heading for a showdown with public sector workers in the Industrial Relations Commission after its push to freeze wages was blocked. Conservative crossbenchers joined Labor yesterday to stop the government’s proposed wage freeze for hundreds of thousands of public servants, including nurses and paramedics. ..The defeat in the upper house will force the government to the TRC tomorrow.’ Read more

2 June, 2020
‘Powerhouse Move to go ahead, saved from COVID’s axe’

In Arts Hub, Gina Fairley writes: ‘Parramatta Lord Mayor makes plea: “Don’t turn your back on us”, while the National Trust is disappointed as Powerhouse Museum relocation comes under scrutiny and NSW Premier scrambles for cash for COVID stimulus fund.’
‘In one way this story could be told as arts conquering sports. This past weekend (31 May), NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian struck a line through the $810 million refurbishment of Stadium Australia at Olympic Park, while confirming that the build and relocation of the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta would go ahead. Berejiklian election promises were split in their delivery. The decision came as her government announced a new $3 billion Infrastructure and Job Acceleration Fund to be used for smaller, shovel-ready projects that would create jobs, and is said will ‘touch every corner of the state’. The Stadium project was axed to fuel this fund. The Powerhouse Museum relocation – like Lazarus who will not sleep – remains on the table.’
Fairley continues with statements from supporters including Premier Berejiklian, City of Parramatta Lord Mayor, Bob Dwyer and City of Parramatta CEO Brett Newman. But she also documents opposition from such as Graham Quint, National Trust’s Director, Conservation, who said of their recent survey: ‘‘The overwhelming response to the survey we conducted was that people want the Powerhouse Museum and its collection to remain where it is’, and also notes that following the resignation of Arts Minister Don Harwin in April, ‘Labor’s Jodi McKay and Shadow Arts Minister Walt Secord made a charge in Parliament, again demanding the plug on the project be pulled, claiming it ‘has always been a property deal for the Berejiklian Government’ while ‘Just a couple of weeks earlier (23 March), a further Upper House Select Committee had been announced – the Inquiry into the Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects in New South Wales.’
In this precarious economic time: ‘The state government, through Create NSW, announced support via a $50 million relief fund. Many would argue it is not enough when the cost of the Powerhouse Museum’s relocation is mooted at $1.1 billion.In this territory of tensions and see-saw politics, it is hard to truly see the clear light of day. While Parramatta Lord Mayor’s pleas were heard and Berejilklian has marched forward with the project this week, it’s far from a fait accompli.’ Read more or: Arts Hub 2 June

2 June, 2020
‘Powerhouse Museum: The Community Speaks
National Trust (NSW) Survey Reveals Overwhelming Vote to Stay at Ultimo’

In a media release, the National Trust NSW provides a report on its recently-conducted survey about the Powerhouse Museum at Ultimo: ‘to quantify and qualify the significance of the museum in its current location at Ultimo, its built, social and cultural heritage, and the significance of its collection to the people of New South Wales.’ From 1320 responses to its survey, “The overwhelming response to the survey we conducted was that people want the Powerhouse Museum and its collection to remain where it is,” said Graham Quint, National Trust (NSW)’s Director, Conservation. “People from all postcodes across Sydney, throughout New South Wales and around the world participated and shared their views with us. The responses indicated that the Powerhouse is such a socially significant place, a fine example of built heritage in its own right and contains an extraordinary collection that tells the story of innovation, technological development, progress and advancement in Australia.” And he also advised: “The National Trust (NSW) was so dismayed to read over the weekend that the NSW Premier, in considering the relocation project for the Powerhouse, decided to proceed. We have more than 1,300 people who took the time to share their thoughts on how important this place is to them and they did this in the grips of a global pandemic as they watch the social and economic ramifications of this crisis unfold,” Graham Quint said. “It is that important to people.” ‘
‘As a result of the survey, the National Trust (NSW) has made a submission to the Heritage Council of New South Wales to consider placing the Powerhouse Museum at Ultimo and its permanent collection on the State Heritage Register.’ Read more   or:  National Trust NSW 2 June

31 May, 2020
Powerhouse Museum: opening and closing
The MAAS website announces, following the closure of public spaces due to COVID-19,  that: ‘We are excited to be welcoming you back to the Powerhouse Museum, Sydney Observatory and Museums Discovery Centre. Free timed-entry tickets and physical distancing are among the measures we’re implementing in line with the NSW Government’s health guidelines to keep visitors safe during COVID-19.  The 22nd Biennale of Sydney … will open from 1 June 2020. The Boulton and Watt Engine, Locomotive No. 1, the Strasburg Clock and the Touring Hall will also be open to visitors.’ ‘From 25 July – 11 October 2020, you can explore the new exhibition Maton: Australia’s Guitar, ‘ However, anticipating the proposed move of the Museum, it adds: ‘From 1 June 2020, the heritage core of the Powerhouse Museum will be closed, and the Museum will be offering bookable curator talks and small group sessions exploring the Powerhouse’s Transport, Steam Revolution and Space Galleries before the final closure of the heritage core on 30 June 2020. This program will provide visitors with a behind-the-scenes experience of the Powerhouse collection.’  Read more

31 May, 2020
‘Powerhouse ‘Move’ reconfirmation is not the end’

Save the Powerhouse Facebook group writes: ‘The overnight news that “Premier Gladys Berejiklian will keep her pledge to move the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta”
(http://tiny.cc/ign0pz) is undeniably disappointing but, realistically, not unexpected. And it certainly does not signal the end of the community’s five year battle to save the Ultimo Powerhouse and give Parramatta the new cultural facility it wants and deserves In the past weeks, rumours have been rife about intra-Cabinet discord over the whole project, especially the estimated $2 billion (and rising!) costs…Whatever happens next, one thing is certain. This battle is not over and the movement to save the Powerhouse – this campaign, the Powerhouse Museum Alliance, politicians, journalists and many dedicated individuals, will fight on until it is won. We know that Gladys is already struggling to control a rebellious Cabinet. How much longer can she hold out on the Powerhouse? Even if she has not listened to the public voice to date, could this be the last straw that finally breaks her?’ Save the Powerhouse makes suggestions about how to keep fighting, here: 31 May Save the Powerhouse

31 May, 2020
‘NSW government dumps Olympic stadium redevelopment as Covid-19 restrictions set to ease. Plans to relocate Sydney’s Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta will still go ahead’

The Guardian also reports on the NSW government’s decision to go ahead with the expensive, unwanted relocation: Read more  or: The Guardian 31 May

31 May, 2020
‘$3 billion boost creates $100 billion infrastructure and jobs pipeline’

In a media release, ‘The NSW Government has announced a new $3 billion acceleration fund to go towards job-creating projects, increasing the government’s infrastructure pipeline to a guaranteed $100 billion. The new $3 billion Infrastructure and Job Acceleration Fund will be used for smaller, shovel-ready projects touching every corner of the state, injecting up to an extra 20 thousand jobs back into the NSW workforce.’
However, while: ‘The government will no longer proceed with the refurbishment of Stadium Australia, redirecting around $800 million towards the new fund for job-creating infrastructure projects’, ‘The promised Parramatta Powerhouse museum will still be delivered through the infrastructure pipeline. This project alone will create more than 1100 construction jobs in Western Sydney, 2400 indirect jobs, and keep hundreds employed once it opens. The government is also looking at options to support the arts community at Ultimo.’
Read more:
 NSW Govt media release 31 May

31 May, 2020
‘NSW Premier pulls the plug on stadium refurb but will keep Powerhouse move’
in print as ‘Stadium plan axed to restart economy’
Michael Koziol announces in The Sun-Herald that ‘The Berejiklian government has dumped its controversial plan to redevelop ANZ Stadium and will redirect the $800 million saving to a new $3 billion Infrastructure and Job Acceleration Fund for “shovel-ready” projects to reboot the state’s shattered economy.’ However, ‘Premier Gladys Berejiklian will keep her pledge to move the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta, saying the project will create 1100 construction jobs in western Sydney, despite some ministers arguing for the relocation to be abandoned…Ms Berejiklian said the new $3 billion fund would increase the state’s total infrastructure pipeline to $100 billion and inject up to 20,000 extra jobs into the state’s workforce. The government did not provide examples of projects to be funded by the new $3 billion fund… The rebuild of Allianz Stadium at Moore Park is already underway and remains ongoing.’ The decision, taken by the Premier and her core leadership group, wards off internal division over what projects to jettison given budget constraints created by the pandemic. Skills and Tertiary Education Minister Geoff Lee, who holds the seat of Parramatta, had vigorously lobbied to keep the Powerhouse Museum move, which is now projected to cost up to $1.1 billion. In negotiating with crossbenchers over the proposed public sector pay freeze last week, Treasurer Dominic Perrottet said the stadium redevelopment and Powerhouse move were being reviewed.
Senior Liberals said there was agreement it had to be one or the other. But even after a $3 billion saving from the wage freeze and $810 million from abandoning the stadium refurbishment, they were well short of the $20 billion that could be wiped from the state’s coffers by the pandemic. “That’s $4 billion down, $16 billion to go,” one senior Liberal said.’
Read more  or: Sun Herald 31 May

31 May, 2020
‘Old stadium, new jobs: Premier dumps ANZ stadium but stands firm on Powerhouse’
Phil Rothfield reports in The Sunday Telegraph, that: ‘Premier Gladys Berejiklian has abandoned the promised $810 million rebuild of Sydney’s Olympic stadium at Homebush, a victim of the state’s COVID-19 financial disaster. Instead the NSW government has announced a new $3 billion fund for job-creating projects…The promised $1.1 billion Powerhouse Museum move to Parramatta will still be delivered, however ANZ stadium will remain untouched.’  It is claimed that ‘The Powerhouse Museum relocation will create more than 1100 construction jobs in Western Sydney, 2400 indirect jobs and keep hundreds employed once it opens.’
Read More:  D Telegraph 31 May
(But PMA notes that the government’s employment emphasis is on construction development with no acknowledgement of the wider issues associated with relocating a long-established state museum, or of side-lining local preferences.) 

31 May, 2020
The Powerhouse Museum, Sydney Observatory and Museums Discovery Centre will reopen free of charge from 1 June.
We are excited to be welcoming you back to the Powerhouse Museum, Sydney Observatory and Museums Discovery Centre. Free timed-entry tickets and physical distancing are among the measures we’re implementing in line with the NSW Government’s health guidelines to keep visitors safe during COVID-19. .. From 1 June 2020, the heritage core of the Powerhouse Museum will be closed, and the Museum will be offering bookable curator talks and small group sessions exploring the Powerhouse’s Transport, Steam Revolution and Space Galleries before the final closure of the heritage core on 30 June 2020. This program will provide visitors with a behind-the-scenes experience of the Powerhouse collection. Read more  or: 31 May PHM reopen

29 May, 2020
‘Huge budget hit puts stadium and Powerhouse plans in doubt’
on line 28 May as: ‘Future unclear for Powerhouse Museum and stadium upgrade’
Lisa Visentin writes in the Sydney Morning Herald that: ‘The controversial Powerhouse Museum relocation and the planned upgrade of ANZ Stadium are both under a cloud, with Treasurer Dominic Perrottet telling key crossbenchers the projects are being reviewed. It comes as NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian refused to guarantee the projects would proceed as planned, as she defended the government’s proposal to freeze public sector wages for 12 months. “I’m not going to comment on any of those things, suffice to say the one tool governments have to keep jobs going is infrastructure,” Ms Berejiklian said on Thursday.’ And ‘Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP Robert Borsak said Mr Perrottet described the Powerhouse move and the ANZ stadium upgrade as being “under review” during a meeting with the party’s five MPs on Thursday morning.’…’ Greens MP David Shoebridge said he also raised the issue of the Powerhouse move when he discussed the wage freeze with Mr Perrottet…Mr Shoebridge declined to reveal the specifics of the conversation but said: “It would be fair to say it (the Powerhouse relocation) doesn’t appear to be the Treasurer’s pet project.”’ Read more  or: SMH Visentin 29 May

28 May, 2020
‘Western Sydney Outraged if Powerhouse Museum and ANZ Stadium Projects are Abandoned.’
In a media release, Business and community groups today urged the Premier not to break her promises to the people of Western Sydney to relocate the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta and to redevelop ANZ Stadium at Olympic Park as media reports grow about Cabinet moves to dump these ‘shovel-ready’ projects as an austerity measure. The Western Sydney Business Chamber and the Western Sydney Leadership Dialogue joined forces to remind the Premier that she promised these projects to the people of the West during the last election.’ Read more   (see May 28) or: 28 May, Parramatta media release

28 May, 2020
NSW Treasurer confirms that the Powerhouse project is under review

Channel 10 News featured a short interview with Inquiry chair, Robert Borsak, who stated that Treasurer Dominic Perrottet had confirmed that the Powerhouse project is ‘under review.  https://youtu.be/UzcpZu7KSNQ
Save the Powerhouse Facebook says: ‘What’s more, the Premier is refusing to confirm that the project – and the ANZ stadium rebuild –  will go ahead. Meanwhile the Government has published a second list of 24 projects to be “fast-tracked” with the aim of stimulating the post-pandemic economy. The Powerhouse IS NOT ON THE LIST.’ (Tranche 1 Projects: http://tiny.cc/dvwupz & Tranche 2 Projects http://tiny.cc/9wwupz)

28 May, 2020
‘Two of the NSW government’s most controversial Western Sydney projects could be delayed or scrapped to save $2 billion’
Channel 7 News followed up their previous report of 27 May with further interviews that included revealing that relocating the Powerhouse Museum and upgrading the ANZ Stadium are now in doubt. Reporter Alex Hart’s Interviews included the Premier, Treasurer, Greens member David Shoebridge, Opposition leader Jody McKay and Western Sydney’s David Borger, as well as members of the Powerhouse Museum Alliance. It was noted that ‘Today an agitated Premier refused 8 times to confirm that the work will go ahead,’ and that they were advised that an official announcement about the state of the projects and the wage freeze should be made before the budget in November. Read more

27 May, 2020
‘400,000 state government workers hit with pay freeze’

During debate on the controversial issue of freezing 400,000 public sector wages as a result of the corona virus, it has been suggested that the Powerhouse move could even be scrapped.  Channel 7 News reported on interviews with the Premier and Treasurer, as well as those in opposition to the move.  Text included: “The govt could also scrap several major projects. The hit to the budget from this crisis will be huge and freezing public sector wages is just the start of the effort to improve the budget bottom line. Scrapping expensive, unpopular infrastructure projects is now being considered, among them the $1B plus relocation of the Powerhouse Museum from the city to Parramatta. Also the $810M upgrade of ANZ stadium. The Treasurer today pointedly refused to commit to either of those projects. It’s safe to say at the moment they are not guaranteed to go ahead but that no decision has been finalised. Ultimately it will be up to the cabinet to decide their fate.’ See news here:  (Go to 2 minutes in …) Read more

31 May, 2020
The Powerhouse Museum, Sydney Observatory and Museums Discovery Centre will reopen free of charge from 1 June.
The MAAS website announces: ‘We are excited to be welcoming you back to the Powerhouse Museum, Sydney Observatory and Museums Discovery Centre. Free timed-entry tickets and physical distancing are among the measures we’re implementing in line with the NSW Government’s health guidelines to keep visitors safe during COVID-19. .. From 1 June 2020, the heritage core of the Powerhouse Museum will be closed, and the Museum will be offering bookable curator talks and small group sessions exploring the Powerhouse’s Transport, Steam Revolution and Space Galleries before the final closure of the heritage core on 30 June 2020. This program will provide visitors with a behind-the-scenes experience of the Powerhouse collection.’  Read more  or: 31 May PHM reopen

27 May, 2020
‘Powerhouse Museum reopening left a mystery’
As museums and galleries start admitting audiences again, Linda Morris, in the Sydney Morning Herald, writes that: ‘Delays to the reopening of the Powerhouse Museum at Ultimo have sparked concerns that the NSW government intends to use health considerations linked to COVID-19 to prematurely close the institution to the public. While the Art Gallery of NSW and Museum of Contemporary Art are reopening their doors in June in the wake of the coronavirus lockdown, the museum remains closed with no date yet set for its reopening.’ ‘The museum’s heritage buildings, including the Turbine Hall with its suspended aircraft, had been scheduled to close on June 30 under plans to relocate the museum to Parramatta. The Wran Building with its entrance, theatrettes, and Touring Hall housing the Locomotive No 1 and Boulton & Watt Steam Engine – the latter regarded as one of the most significant technological artefacts to have ever reached Australia – was to have followed in 12 months.’
‘Greens MP David Shoebridge said he feared the government was attempting to refuse the people of NSW the chance to farewell the Powerhouse Museum”… “No doubt they realise the moment would be used to build opportunities to protest the government’s plans,” said Mr Shoebridge, the inquiry’s deputy chairman. “This is one of the worst examples of hiding a deeply unpopular government decision under the cover of a COVID-19 emergency response. I believe the Powerhouse will not go quietly into the night.”
Meanwhile, ‘The Environment Impact Statement for Parramatta Powerhouse still to be exhibited. Premature closure would leave the government vulnerable to protests that it was pre-empting the consultation process.’ Read more  or:  Linda M SMH 28 May

27 May, 2020
Pay freeze: and possibly scrap some major projects?

Alex Hart, political reporter on Seven News, reports on the NSW government’s proposal to freeze public sector wages, where more than 400,000 state government workers have been hit with a pay freeze blamed on the coronavirus. Among numerous rejections of the idea, he also reported strong opposition from leaders including Jodi McKay and David Shoebridge, and observed: ‘The govt could also scrap several major projects. The hit to the budget from this crisis will be huge and freezing public sector wages is just the start of the effort to improve the budget bottom line. Scrapping expensive, unpopular infrastructure projects is now being considered, among them the $1B plus relocation of the Powerhouse Museum from the city to Parramatta. Also the $810M upgrade of ANZ stadium.The Treasurer today pointedly refused to commit to either of those projects. It’s safe to say at the moment they are not guaranteed to go ahead but that no decision has been finalised. Ultimately it will be up to the cabinet to decide their fate.’ For TV interview: Read more

22 May, 2020
‘Don Harwin becomes cactus’

Alex Mitchell, former Sydney Sun-Herald State Political  Editor,  documents in ‘Pearls and Irritations’,  the career of ex-Arts Minister Don Harwin, saying: ‘In the halcyon days of the NSW Liberal Party’s ascendancy, Don Harwin was a fast-rising star. Then he hit a wall and fell from being one of State’s most powerful Liberal Ministers to the lowly status of an unloved backbencher. How and why?’ Among a number of examples, Mitchell says: ‘Above all, he made the demolition of the Powerhouse his pet project, despite a mass of evidence that the cost would rise to $1.6 or $2 billion, and that the move would mean splitting the prized collection…Hanging over the project has been the stench of secret property deals at both the Ultimo site and Parramatta. Last November one of his recent board appointees, Dexus CEO Darren Steinberg, had to resign over a conflict of interest in relation to Ultimo.’ And ‘A damning Upper House inquiry into museums and galleries, lasting two-and-a-half years, gathered reams of evidence from professionals that the Powerhouse project was unviable. When the inquiry’s meticulous report was published in February 2019, Harwin waited until after the Government was re-elected before contemptuously dismissing all its recommendations… At the same time, Gladys Berejiklian’s departure lounge is filling with alarming speed.’
Read more  or: Alex Mitchell 22 May

20 May, 2020
‘New Powerhouse in Parramatta: webinar follow up’

Following the recent on-line webinair consultation about the proposed new Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta, Infrastructure NSW sent out a notice saying: ‘…We appreciate the feedback and insights shared during the session which have been considered in our preparation of the State Significant Development Application (SSDA) and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).’ They note that ‘this session is expected to contribute to: the EIS which is currently being finalised as part of the SSDA for the new museum, and that  ‘An EIS outlines potential environmental impacts and what measures will be put in place to minimise them.’ They advise that the draft EIS will be exhibited (on their website) in full once finalised and that the community will be invited to provide feedback.
Key themes in the webinair presentation were: ‘Heritage impacts – particularly Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace ; The museum location – particularly other locations considered; The building design – particularly other designs considered ; The name of the new museum; The functionality and flexibility of the museum spaces; The creative residences – particularly how they will be managed; The timing of consultation – particularly during COVID-19.’ For report see Infrastructure NSW website: Read more  As well, they supplied answers to a number of further questions on notice. See alsoNew Powerhouse in Parramatta – Community webinar April 23

18 May, 2020
‘Museum showdown on Macquarie Street’

Judith White, writing in Culture Heist, says: ‘Today, Monday 18 May, is International Museum Day – so it’s ironic that some museum supporters and professionals in NSW will spend the day in yet another effort to protect cultural institutions from the predations of the government which has statutory responsibility for their care. They will be making submissions, which close today, to a fresh Select Committee appointed by the Legislative Council to examine “Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects in NSW”.’  She provided a  perceptive summary of how ‘the Upper House of State Parliament passed a motion obliging the Government to table a raft of hitherto secret documents relating to the Powerhouse plan also known as the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences (MAAS) project.’
And further, White notes that: ‘According to the International Council of Museums (ICOM), the body responsible for International Museum Day, “Museums are an important means of cultural exchange, enrichment of cultures and development of mutual understanding, cooperation and peace among peoples.” Traditionally, in line with this objective, Australian governments have funded public galleries and museums for the cultural benefit of the population. In recent years, following neoliberal precepts, they have pressured institutions to move towards self-funding through commercial activities – entertainment programs, corporate venue hire and the sale of merchandise. A reasonable level of commercial operations can help support museums, but they cannot be allowed to replace or undermine their core function. That function is to build and care for collections of life-enhancing objects of beauty or historical interest, and make them accessible to everyone.’ Read more  or  Culture Heist – JW – 18 May

14 May, 2020
‘MAAS suspends payments to long-term casuals’
The Public Service Association has circulated information saying: ‘The PSA has been made aware that approximately 143 MAAS employees have had casual support payments ceased. While cafes and restaurants start opening, this decision effectively sends 143 employees to Centrelink. … All long-term casuals who have been employed in a systematic regular fashion should be found other duties, and if none can be found, placed on special leave and paid as normal.’ ‘The PSA is currently in discussions with MAAS surrounding a commitment to continue the employment of long term casuals. Unless we can gain that commitment ASAP, we will seek the assistance of the Industrial Relations Commission.’
In addition, PSA advises that, working with the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA), ‘The Keep Our Icons Alive  campaign is calling on the Berejiklian NSW Government to increase funding for our state’s most treasured venues.’ The intent is to ‘highlight the plight of our affected members in the state’s most iconic institutions. These include Taronga Zoo, the Art Gallery of NSW, the Powerhouse Museum, Sydney Observatory, Sydney Living Museums and the Sydney Opera House.’  This includes boosting the PSA Keep our Icons Alive video on social media.
Read more   or  PSA campaign 14 May

14 May, 2020
‘New Powerhouse Museum report approves loss of heritage buildings’
Linda Morrisin the Sydney Morning Herald, comments on information provided in the draft report prepared for Infrastructure NSW (see 13 May, below), saying:  ‘Two historic buildings to be demolished to make way for the new Powerhouse Museum were “one of a kind” in the Parramatta CBD and their loss would have a significant impact on the community’s connection with heritage, it has been found. But a draft report prepared for Infrastructure NSW has recommended the development proceed as the public benefits of western Sydney’s first major, world-class cultural institution outweighed heritage concerns and loss of the local community’s sense of place …The loss of the 19th-century Italianate villa Willowgrove and a row of terraces known as St George’s Terrace are listed among the negative social and economic impacts by the Environment Impact Statement into the $1.1 billion relocation of the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences, known as the Powerhouse Museum. The 2.5-hectare riverside site was also likely to have high social and spiritual significance to the local Aboriginal community and its flood-prone position warranted an early warning flooding system, including alarms and alerts to clear the public from the museum’s undercroft during big downpours.’…
‘The draft EIS and associated reports briefly went online on Wednesday morning due to a technical error, before they were recalled..Suzette Meade of the North Parramatta Action Group said: “It’s highly suspicious the EIS was notified as on exhibition this morning and then pulled hours later – it’s just more alarm bells ringing for the community on the disastrous project.” Labor’s shadow Treasurer Walt Secord said there was no better time than in the wake of the COVID economic crisis to scrap the museum’s move from Ultimo to Parramatta.”Five years and the shovel hasn’t hit the ground and the only people to get work out of this is desk top consultants.” ’ Read more   or  14 May LMorris

13 May, 2020
‘NSW legislative Council: request for release of documents – motion agreed!’
As part of the lead-up to the second Inquiry into the management of Museums and Galleries, Chair of committee the Hon. Robert BORSAK, introduced a motion requesting release of current documents relating to the proposed move of the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta. The motion was strongly supported by The Hon. WALT SECORD as Labor’s Shadow treasurer and shadow arts minister; DAVID SHOEBRIDGE, from The Greens, and deputy-chair; The Hon. MARK LATHAM  from One Nation; Ms CATE FAEHRMANN from The Greens; and agreed to by Hon. NATASHA MACLAREN-JONES, representing the government.
Borsak moved – successfully: ‘That, under Standing Order 52, there be laid upon the table of the House within 28 days of the date of passing of this resolution the following documents, created since 12 April 2018, in the possession, custody or control of the Minister for the Public Service and Employee Relations, Aboriginal Affairs, and the Arts, the Premier, the Department of Premier and Cabinet, Create NSW, the Trustees of the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences Staff Agency, Infrastructure NSW or the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment:
(a) any 2019 revised business case or cost benefit analysis relating to the Museum of
Applied Arts and Sciences [MAAS] project;
(b) all documents relating to the MAAS project capital and recurrent costs, exhibition
concepts, and commercial and income-generating opportunities;
(c) all documents relating to any visitor studies, planning costs, and architectural,
museological, geotechnical, engineering, heritage and flood risk studies conducted
or the MAAS project;
(d) all documents relating to the Powerhouse Precinct at Parramatta International Design
(e) all documents relating to the Ultimo Creative Industries Precinct;
(f) all documents relating to the transfer and storage of large and very large objects for
the MAAS project;
(g) all documents relating to the proposed heritage listing of the Powerhouse museum; and
(h) any legal or other advice regarding the scope or validity of this order of the House created as aresult of this order of the House.’
Borsak said: ‘I am calling on these papers because we are now over five years into this fiasco.’ He, and other members (above), itemised a number of concerns about the purpose of the move, the future of the collection, the inadequacy of the design plans, the reality of attracting audiences, the costs that could be better spent in other ways, the future of the Ultimo site and other options for Parramatta and NSW. He added: ‘The $2 billion being spent on the vanity project could go a long way towards managing and funding irreplaceable heritage collections located all over regional and rural New South Wales. The money would go even further if it were spent on bushfire recovery or drought assistance. Why does this Government want to destroy our history for a few hectares on the harbour? The $2 billion Liberal-Nationals vanity project might seem like pocket change for the Government, but that money could be far better spent supporting regional and rural museums throughout the State. The project demands accountability and transparency from this Government, but we are getting none. So now we call on our standing orders and the power of this House to provide us with what the Government will not provide us.’ The motion was passed. For full transcript: Read more
… or  13 May Hansard – request for PHM documents

13 May 2020
‘Powerhouse Parramatta: Draft Environmental Impact Statement’

The Department of Planning, Industry and Development maintains a site for the development of the proposed new Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta, on its NSW Planning Portal for updating timelines for major projects, with relevant attached documents. For portal: Read more
For the Powerhouse project, these files include SEARS documents (Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements) for State Significant Development. On 13 May, 2020, it was announced in an email that ‘The Department is writing to inform you that the exhibition period for the Powerhouse Parramatta  SSD-10416   EXH-2839  has commenced.’ and that ‘You can make a submission on the project by visiting the Major Projects Website.’
It appears that what was meant by ‘exhibition’ were the online documents associated with the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), including Appendix B: Architectural plans and design report. However, these files were subsequently deleted and the Sydney Morning Herald reported that ‘The draft EIS and associated reports briefly went online on Wednesday morning due to a technical error, before they were recalled. A spokesperson for the Department of Planning said the EIS did not include important material including key plans, reports and consultation work and it would be exhibited in full once finalised.’ (See 14 May, above, or Read more )

14 May, 2020
‘Trainwreck at Carriageworks
Carriageworks and the Powerhouse: failures of government policy’

Judith White well summarises the many issues being discussed about arts funding, saying: ‘The collapse of Sydney arts and entertainment centre Carriageworks has sent tremors through the besieged arts sector; but it also shows up the deep flaws in the NSW Government’s cultural policy, and is fuelling demands to halt its disastrous $1.5 billion plan to relocate the Powerhouse Museum ‘… ‘When the old railway workshops at Eveleigh were repurposed into an arts centre in 2007, under the Labor Government of Premier Morris Iemma, it seemed a great idea: an inner-west venue that could attract big local audiences to an exciting program of festivals, exhibitions and performances, as well as becoming home to resident arts companies and making additional income from markets and corporate hire. But it required substantial public funding to be sustainable, and that was never guaranteed. State Coalition governments from 2011 onwards have been unwilling to provide support for such an eclectic, innovative program. In 2018 grants totalled only a quarter of the centre’s revenue.’
White includes comments from a number of experienced people, and concludes that: ‘A rescue plan for Carriageworks would require both funding commitment and the appointment of a suitably qualified board. … Berejiklian remains committed to the Powerhouse plan with a stubbornness inexplicable unless there is a secret deal with developers. Rumours are now swirling that the Ultimo site has already been sold. The Government’s asset sales mania bodes ill for Carriageworks, which has only a short-term tenancy on the big Eveleigh site. And it lends added urgency to a fresh examination of the Powerhouse issue by State Parliament’s Upper House committee, which is taking submissions up until 17 May.’
Read more  or  14 May J White – Cultureheist

9 May, 2020
‘Carriageworks and other threatened arts venues: PMA applauds expressions of support’
Following recent news reports, letters to editors and community petitions, the Powerhouse Museum Alliance (PMA) advises its wide constituency that ‘We are extremely concerned that Carriageworks Ltd has gone into voluntary administration. We applaud the many expressions of support from the arts and cultural industries, members of the media and concerned citizens, with the aim of securing funding to establishing Carriageworks Ltd on a more sound financial footing.  Knowing that this could be the first of many similar circumstances, we also commend the State Opposition’s call for an emergency Arts package to support the industry’s workers while events involving audience attendances are banned. The PMA strongly endorses the vital role that Carriageworks has played since its inception in 2007 – and will hopefully continue to play – in the cultural life of the city and State, alongside other significant, and equally threatened, arts institutions.
With reference to the Opera House, PMA member Kylie Winkworth adds: ‘The importance of Carriageworks for the small companies is that they are incubator of the next generation of musicians, singers, dancers, composers and cross media artists. These artists and small companies do need more support because rents are so high in Sydney, it is difficult for the small companies presenting new work to stay afloat, and they carry more risk. It would be a huge risk and loss if Carriageworks lost its artistic independence and was subsumed by the SOH. The two organisations have different roles. The SOH is already trying to operate like a municipal art centre; they don’t need any more encouragement to move into that space. They have a huge and controversial building program and already struggle to balance their obligations to manage a World Heritage listed site, which is Australia’s No 1 tourism attraction, and run a performing art centre. No other premier performing arts centre in the world is managing municipal off shoots with a big program of commercial events including a farmers market.’
See also, below, opinion pieces in the Sydney Morning Herald:
7 May, 2020: ‘Prowling, empire-building Opera House must leave Carriageworks to create its own art’, by Kim Williams, a former chairman of the Sydney Opera House Trust, and a supporter of the Sydney Chamber Opera, a resident company at Carriageworks.
Read more  or: SMH Opinion 7 May
10 May, 2020: ‘As young artists watch their dreams vanish, our cultural democracy is in peril’, by Lyndon Terracini, artistic director of Opera Australia. Read more or: Sun Herald, 10 May

7 May, 2020
‘Our income vanished’: Australia’s galleries and museums buckle in Covid-19 storm
Elissa Blake writes in The Guardian that ‘Carriageworks is only the first major casualty in what arts leaders say will be a string of closures without ‘enormous action’…The organisation had its income projections for the current financial year trashed as the coronavirus crisis unfurled, with big-ticket events cancelled or suspended. The decision to enter into administration was sealed when the New South Wales government – which currently does not have an arts minister after the recent resignation of Don Harwin – declined to guarantee future funding. Rumours are swirling about a possible takeover of the venue by the Sydney Opera House.’
Esther Anatolitis, executive director of the National Association of Visual Arts, points out: ‘But Carriageworks’ exposure to commercial headwinds is no greater than many others in the sector… The Covid-19 shutdown has come hard on the heels of cuts to Australia Council funding and a summer of bushfires that had an impact on gallery attendance and operations, most notably in Canberra… Regional galleries have been hard hit by drought, fire and the resulting loss of tourist traffic. “There’s barely been time to recover from that and now we have a global pandemic for which there is no treatment and no vaccine” ‘
Blake also reports on interviews directors of the Museum of Contemporary Arts, and the Art Gallery of NSW in Sydney, and the Art Gallery of South Australia, who are dealing with loss of revenue, apart from government funding.
Among many comments on the on-line site, one says: ‘It’s a bit rich for the director of the MCA to say how important it is to keep art galleries and museums afloat when it was her advocacy as Baird’s ‘cultural ambassador to western Sydney’ that led to the decision to ‘move’ the Powerhouse Museum. Moving the Powerhouse was the obvious pick she said, based on no knowledge of the museum and its collection, and without considering any other more equitable and affordable options, let alone actually asking the communities of Parramatta and western Sydney if they wanted the Powerhouse. Only the property development industry wants the Powerhouse moved. As it is, Parramatta is not even getting an actual museum, it’s another version of Carriageworks. The real museum is closed and its collections will disappear into storage.’ Read more    or:  Guardian 7 May

6 May, 2020
‘Sydney Opera House may take over Carriageworks as calls for state bailout grow’
Stephanie Convery, in The Guardian, writes that: ‘The Sydney Opera House has been approached to consult on the long-term viability of multi-arts precinct Carriageworks as reports emerge that the Berejiklian government is considering a proposal for the famous landmark’s trust to take over Carriageworks’ operations…. In a statement, an Opera House spokesperson said the trust “has been approached by the government to consult on the long-term sustainability of Carriageworks as an important cultural venue, particularly at this most difficult time”.’ But, she adds: ‘…there have been widespread calls for the bailout to come from the NSW government itself, as pressure grows on state and federal governments to do more to assist the arts sector in recovering from the Covid-19 pandemic,’ and cites comments from Labor’s Walt Secord, the shadow arts minister for NSW, Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore, and Greens MP Cate Faehrmann. Read more  or: Guardian 6 May

5 May, 2020
“NSW government considers Sydney Opera House takeover of Carriageworks’,
 in print as ‘Opera House poised to take over arts venue’
Linda Morris and Kylar Loussikian, in the Sydney Morning Herald, follow up the announcement of Carriageworks going into voluntary administration, with a report that ‘Sources close to discussions with the Opera House told The Sydney Morning Herald that a push to hand the venue to the Opera House Trust was under way before administrators were called.’
They continue: ‘In a statement issued on Monday night, Carriageworks said it had no choice but to call in administrators after restrictions on public gatherings had resulted in an “irreparable loss of income”. In April, Carriageworks froze spending and stood down half its core staff. Chief executive Blair French said he hoped the facility would be able to reopen to artists and the community once the state recovered from the effects of the pandemic.
Were Carriageworks’ corporate entity dissolved, the government would be free to appoint a new body to take over the lease via an open competitive tender process. The Opera House is regarded by senior arts bureaucrats as best placed to create a viable public program appealing to Carriagework’s traditional patrons’ However, ‘A source with knowledge of Carriageworks described the move as “a Sydney power play”. Carriageworks, the source said, had shifted cultural focus away from the harbour to communities and artists in a way that an organisation like the Opera House never could. “Sadly arts and culture for some people is about control and power and having the biggest voice.” ‘ Read more or: SMH Opera House-Carriageworks 5 May

6 May, 2020
‘NSW must protect its crucial arts institutions’
The Editorial in the Sydney Morning Herald follows up the news that Carriageworks arts centre had gone into administration saying this highlights ‘the severe impact the coronavirus pandemic has had on arts and culture. Everything from international shows at the Opera House to gigs in local pubs and from art galleries to craft markets have been cancelled as part of social-distancing. For culture lovers, who on some counts are more numerous than footy fans, the cancellation of this year’s arts programs adds to the pain of self-isolation. They have to get their fix online and while the arts community is showing its creativity by finding ways to reach an audience, it’s surely not quite the same…The collapse of Carriageworks raises the distinct likelihood that some treasured institutions will not survive the next few months’ and that ‘Governments, especially at the federal level, must think hard about how the arts and culture sector will emerge from this crisis.’
It also notes that: ‘The NSW government announced a welcome but fairly small $6.35 million relief package for the sector, which included tax relief for venues such as Carriageworks. Clearly, for Carriageworks it was not enough. The Australia Council has promised a $5 million national resilience fund for the arts.’ But significantly, it also reports that ‘Some are calling for NSW to drop grand plans, such as moving the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta, and to use the money for grassroots programs that will create more employment in the short-term. For a start, NSW should appoint a new arts minister to replace Don Harwin. There is still huge uncertainty about the road ahead but one thing is clear: Sydney will lose its soul without a vibrant arts community.’ Read more   or: SMH Editorial 6 May 2020

6 May, 2020
‘Scrap the Powerhouse plan and use the $1.5 billion to save Carriageworks’
Clover Moore, Lord mayor of Sydney, asks: ‘What is it about Australians that leads us to chronically undervalue our arts and culture? It has not always been so, but in recent decades, we have seen diminishing funding, dwindling federal and state support, a slackening of interest among our decision makers, and a sense almost of apathy about one of the most vital sectors of our society and economy. It’s beyond time the state and federal governments ended their abandonment of artists, performers and those administering the arts organisations…Arts and cultural activities are worth $110 billion a year in Australia and in Sydney, they underpin our tourism and hospitality sectors.. But the arts can never be reduced to mere economic facts. There is the unquantifiable but very real role of the creative sector in defining us, in critiquing society and celebrating it…The City of Sydney has been working for many years to support and strengthen our creative sector – … This year we had budgeted $4.8 million for grants programs to support cultural and creative organisations. In light of the disproportionate impact of the crisis on artists and creatives, we have increased that figure to $8.3 million and may raise it further still. We are also honouring all existing grants, regardless of whether the recipient can deliver their intended program.
Governments can find the money to support the arts – but they have to want to. The NSW government has committed $1.5 billion to the incredibly unpopular and shortsighted plan to relocate the Powerhouse Museum. That is money that could be better spent supporting Carriageworks and other organisations that are so vital to us all. It is crucial such institutions are supported through this period – to ensure they survive and are ready to house the performances, shows and exhibitions that will fill us with light and help interpret the world we find ourselves in when we’re able to move past the coronavirus.’
Read more  or:  Clover Moore, 6 May

6 May, 2020
Petitions: ‘
Save Carriageworks, scrap the Powerhouse move’
Jamie Parker, Greens member for Balmain, is one of many people and organisations seeking a review of the costs of moving the Powerhouse Museum, while other organisations close. For his petition he says ‘Carriageworks has gone into voluntary administration and It’s future is in doubt unless the government steps in. We can’t let one of our most iconic institutions slip away during this pandemic, especially when the government still wants to waste over $1.5 billion moving the Powerhouse Museum! We demand that the Premier scrap this wasteful and pointless relocation and spend the $1.5 billion saving our arts and creative industries – starting with Carriageworks.’ Sign the petition >> www.jamieparker.org/carriageworks

 5 May, 2020
‘Secord calls for emergency arts rescue package’
In a media release, ‘NSW Labor today accused Premier Gladys Berejiklian of ignoring the arts and entertainment sectors in her various COVID packages – putting thousands of jobs at risk. This followed the announcement last night (May 4) that Carriageworks has become the first major arts company to be forced to call in administrators –after the State Government refused to provide assistance.’ While comparing arts support programs in other states, Shadow arts minister, Walt Secord said: ‘“Carriageworks is the tip of the iceberg; there are so many other arts groups and organisations as well as individuals who are in absolute strife and at risk of going the same way…Sadly, the arts were the first hit and they will be the last to recover. They also do not have large cash reserves to fall back on.”
‘Mr Secord said he was “disgusted” by the State Government’s priorities, pointing to their decision to waste $1.5 billion on the Powerhouse Museum move from Ultimo to Parramatta. “They can spend $1.5 billion forcing the move of the Powerhouse Museum, but they refuse to artists and arts organisations survive this crisis.” Artists and arts workers have been severely impacted by restrictions brought about by the COVID-19 global pandemic, but the contract nature of their work means that they have fallen through the cracks of the Federal Government’s JobKeeper program.’ Read more: Labor media 5 May

4-5  May, 2020
‘Carriageworks shunted into voluntary administration’

Kylar Loussikian and Linda Morris announce, in the Sydney Morning Herald, that ‘Carriageworks, the cultural centre based in the historic Eveleigh rail yards, has become Sydney’s first major arts company to call in administrators as the coronavirus pandemic wreaks havoc across the industry… Sources close to discussions said the decision to put Carriageworks, the largest contemporary multi-arts centre in the country, into administration was made after it became clear the NSW government would not guarantee regular grant funding due in July.’
‘In a statement, Carriageworks said the sudden cancellation or postponement of six months of activities due to restrictions on public gatherings had resulted in an “irreparable loss of income”. Chief executive Blair French said he hoped Carriageworks would be able to reopen to artists and the community once the state recovered from the effects of the pandemic.’
‘The decision will bolster calls for an immediate, targeted stimulus from federal and state governments to allow struggling arts companies to survive the pandemic.’ Esther Anatolitis, executive director of the National Association of the Visual Arts, said: ‘”Australia’s leading economists have sounded the alarm on the risks to the nation of allowing the arts industry to collapse. I implore governments to take their calls seriously – as well as the united calls of the entire industry. Public investment in companies like Carriageworks enriches all of our lives. To ensure our post-COVID-19 future is bright, there’s no time to be lost in strengthening that investment.” ‘ Read more  or:  Carriageworks closure – 4 May 2020

1 May, 2020
Inquiry submission: from 3 May to 17 May – 14 more days!
‘Extension of submission closing date: Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects in New South Wales’
The Select Committee for this second Legislative Council Inquiry has advised by email that:
‘The original closing date for written submissions to this inquiry was 3 May 2020. Thank you to those who have already made a submission. In light of the unfolding COVID-19 pandemic, the submission closing date has now been extended to 17 May 2020.’
See the committee website here, for terms of reference, timeline and procedure for submissions: https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/committees/listofcommittees/Pages/committee-details.aspx?pk=264

24 April, 2020
‘Full Steam Behind: Tragedy as Museum Powers Down’

Henry Ergas writes in The Australian, that current decisions being made about relocating the Powerhouse Museum mean that: ‘A wonderful link to this country’s origins are about to be lost.’ As ANZAC day approaches, he reflects on some of the important events associated with Australia’s cultural identity, and regrets that many significant objects in the collection ‘are likely to be consigned to dusty warehouses, rarely exhibited and even more rarely seen. Nor will they be the only victims of the Berejiklian government’s determination to close Sydney’s historic Powerhouse Museum, sell its valuable site and transfer its remains to a far smaller building in Parramatta.’ He writes that gone also, will be the unique Steam Room, the space needed to properly exhibit the museum’s holdings, and the ‘150 years of Australia’s heritage, with its unbroken link connecting today’s Powerhouse to the great International Exhibition of 1879, which heralded Sydney’s emergence as a global city and spawned an integrated cluster of cultural and educational institutions in the area of Sydney that is now Ultimo.’
However, he says that: ‘Properly reinvigorated, it could be a landmark rivalling Britain’s Victoria and Albert Museum, showcasing its treasures not merely in Sydney but on the national and international stage. To allow its building to be destroyed, its collection effectively disbanded and its connection to Ultimo severed would therefore be an appalling waste. Yet even worse than that, it would be the surest sign that we no longer value the culture that helped make this a country worth fighting for… Closed for the lockdown, the Powerhouse may have seen its last Anzac Day. When the exhibits are dismantled, the steam turned off and the doors permanently shut, a fragment of Australia will be lost forever.’  Read more  or Read more

20 April, 2020
‘Powerhouse Museum now Berejiklian Dead Cat Project’
Robert Borsak, chair of the first Legislative Council Inquiry into Museums and Galleries, and also the second Inquiry which has submissions due on 3 May, ( Read more for submission process), sent out a media release, saying:
‘Just when we thought that the opportune resignation of the Arts Minister, Don Harwin, may have resulted in some sanity being brought into the Powerhouse project, it only gets worse. Now the Premier of New South Wales, Gladys Berejiklian, is taking over as Arts Minister. Given the disaster that has hit our community with the Covid-19 virus, the cost to the economy and the Arts community in NSW, one would think that perhaps sanity would prevail, and the government dump this vanity project? But no, it seems not.
Questions are being asked at every level, all over the state about why $1.5 billion should be spent moving the Powerhouse museum to a risky location, with a poorly designed “milk crate on stilts” that will not even have a ground floor exhibition space or underground parking, when better alternatives have been discussed for years.
“The Premier now as the Arts Minister can front the Upper House Select Committee into the Powerhouse move and explain the inadequate nomination to the State Heritage Register at the Ultimo site, the demolition of heritage buildings at Parramatta, the faulty consultation process that exploits the current inability to hold public meetings and much, much more. The scandal that has plagued this project from its very beginning, that has helped hound an arrogant Don Harwin out of office, will now be placed gently like a dead rotting cat around the neck of the Premier. Can she survive its stink? The money can and should be used better elsewhere in the NSW economy. Vanity has no place in a post Covid-19 world, especially vanity money spent in Sydney, when the bush is screaming for help and support,” Mr Borsak said.’
Read more: BORSAK MR 200420 IPowerhouse Vanity Project

17 April, 2020
‘Good news for our Powerhouse’
Jamie Parker, MP for Balmain, asks for people to sign a new petition to keep the Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo. He says: ‘If there is a silver lining from this pandemic, it could be in our Powerhouse Museum. Earlier this week the NSW Treasurer refused to answer when asked if the Powerhouse move would go ahead. This is the first strong signal that the government might finally back away from this wasteful and pointless relocation.’
Sign the petition to save the Powerhouse Museum.
‘The coronavirus has cost NSW around $10 billion and shifted priorities across our state. Moving the Powerhouse Museum is expected to cost a whopping $1 billion and deliver a measly cost-benefit ratio of just 1:02. You don’t need an economics degree to know that this move isn’t worth it. That is because the relocation of the Powerhouse has always been about a property deal for the government’s developer mates, not improving and investing in Sydney’s cultural institutions. It’s simple: NSW can’t afford to do sweetheart deals for developers during this pandemic.’
Read more: J Parker 17 April

16, 17 April, 2020
‘A House of cards in $10b hit’
On 16 April, Anna Caldwell reports in the Daily Telegraph, about how: ‘The NSW Treasurer refused to answer when quizzed in a party room meeting if the Powerhouse Museum move would proceed as the state battles a $10 billion virus dent in the coffers’. Dominic Perrottet ‘said the government was committed to bringing forward “shovel ready” infrastructure projects to keep the state’s economy moving, but skirted around re-committing to the Powerhouse relocation in its current terms. ‘…’Upper House Liberal Matthew Mason-Cox asked about the Powerhouse at yesterday’s meeting. The Daily Telegraph confirmed the exchange with three participants in the meeting, who agreed Mt Perrottet did not answer the question.’  Read more: Daily T 16 April
‘Got to go for Growth’
And on 17 April, Caldwell followed up, writing ‘While we may be in for an economic storm, the only way we will get through it will be by letting the private sector be free to innovate by a state government that gets it. Planning Minister Rob Stokes has been particularly adept  this month in slashing red tape to support economic activity.’ After many examples associated with such as small food and grocery businesses, she notes that many ‘major state developments like the Narrabri gas project and the Star Pyrmont tower, are still waiting in the wings.’ ‘The Government is united on the idea that development and building infrastructure will chart the state’s path back to economic prosperity, but there is debate at the most senior levels of the Berejilian team about which projects should go ahead. …Premier Berejiklian yesterday dismissed any idea that the Powerhouse museum or ANZ Stadium would be abandoned, but she has not stemmed the push back in her own cabinet that the investment in those big commitments should be diverted to more pressing projects that may drive more economic activity.’  Read more: Daily T April 17

17 April, 2020
‘Have we had the last laugh on Don Harwin?’
In his regular newsletter, art critic John McDonald writes: ‘…It’s a little ironic – like Al Capone being done for tax evasion – that a Minister who has presided over the ongoing scandal of ‘relocating’ (ie. destroying) the Powerhouse Museum, has been pinged for breaking a public health and safety order. The Powerhouse saga is such a travesty it should have brought down everyone associated with the scheme.
To recap briefly: The move is completely unnecessary; It will destroy museum visitation; Parramatta doesn’t want it, having originally asked the government for better arts facilities, not a tricked-up science museum; It will be wildly expensive, with no change fom $1.5 billion, and counting.
The entire process has been shrouded in secrecy, with the Minister leading the way in arrogant disregard of expert opinion and public opposition. The only compelling reason anybody has suggested is that the NSW government is eager to sell the Powerhouse site to its pals, the developers.  With the recovery from the Covid-19 lockdown expected to cost many billions it would be sheer madness to proceed with the Powerhouse project – but the government is still not prepared to face reality, even as another inquiry gets underway.
To be fair to Don Harwin, the Powerhouse is the nasty stain on his record, although regional galleries may argue they could have done better under his reign. .. Don Harwin gave the impression that he had a genuine enthusiasm for the arts, and was responsive to many appeals for support. The Powerhouse debacle showed the other side of his character as a ruthless political operative.’ Read more: JMcD 17 April

15 April, 2020
‘Harwin saw state become a construction powerhouse’
Writing on-line for The Australian, Matthew Westwood documents the achievements of former Arts Minister, Don Harwin, and also some of the controversies he aroused. ‘Don Harwin’s fall from grace as a minister in NSW’s Berejiklian government was as humiliatingly tabloid as they come. … among other things, he was leader of the government in the Legislative Council — but The Daily Telegraph zeroed in on his arts role and the implication of privilege while the rest are doing it tough.
And it was the arts that Harwin clearly loved. Even his detractors concede that his enjoyment and commitment were genuine.’
After listing many of the major arts development projects Harwin supported [many of which have been criticised for under budgeting, lack of consultation and transparency in planning], Westwood says: ‘By far the biggest of the state’s cultural projects is the new Powerhouse Museum, which the government intends moving from its present location at Ultimo in Sydney to a purpose-made building in Parramatta. … Opponents say the government, and in particular Harwin, has stubbornly resisted calls for a more responsible outcome for the Powerhouse’s existing home in Ultimo and its collections of historically significant industrial, scientific and design objects. The new Parramatta building, designed by Paris-based firm Moreau Kusunoki Architects, puts the museum on “stilts” because the riverside site is prone to flooding. Labor leader Jodi McKay has called for the plan to be scrapped and, as revealed by The Australian, Deputy Premier John Barilaro has urged his cabinet colleagues to abandon it.
An upper house inquiry last year rejected the Parramatta move and condemned the “staggering” lack of detail, analysis and evidence to support the costly plans. The government’s response, signed by Harwin, asserted its intention to proceed, full steam ahead. That was an unsatisfactory answer for inquiry chairman Robert Borsak, who last month launched a second inquiry, determined to bring greater transparency to the government’s plans.
With Harwin’s removal, Premier Gladys Berejiklian has taken over the arts portfolio. The obligations will be relatively few during the lockdown and perhaps a door has been left ajar for Harwin’s return. In his absence, the Premier could do worse than approve financial assistance for the state’s arts sector. While the cultural building works continue during the COVID-19 crisis, companies large and small are struggling to survive. Read more or here: M Westwood 15 April

15 April, 2020
‘Have your say on proposed development projects’
The two groups, Friends of Ultimo and Save the Powerhouse, summarise current opportunities to speak out, at a time when face-to-face meetings are impossible. They say, on Facebook, ‘The NSW Government is visibly using the current lockdown to attempt to push through controversial developments when the community has less power to oppose them. As well as listing opportunities to speak about 1) Harbourside shopping development, and 3) Pyrmont Peninsula place strategy (which includes building on the Powerhouse site), they advise:
–  …you can direct your submission to the Impending Upper House Inquiry on “the Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects in New South Wales” at http://tiny.cc/73m2mz  and/or take their survey (Survey Monkey) at http://tiny.cc/65m2mz. Submissions and survey close on 03 May 2020.
– You can also comment by taking a “SwipeEngage” online survey https://swipengage.com/#/new-powerhouse-parramatta  and/or by emailing your submission to powerhouse.parramatta@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au  before Monday 20 April 2020.
Read more:
 Have your say 16 April    [See also related news reports below]

13 April, 2020
‘Downfall of a NSW Minister and the future for the arts’
In her CultureHeist newsletter, Judith White summarises the background of Don Harwin’s tenure as Arts Minister, and his forced resignation. She discusses his relationships with the corporate sector and his colleagues in Parliament as well as opposition to some of his preferred arts projects. Among other issues, she says: ‘NSW Arts Minister Don Harwin’s resignation on 10 April has sparked renewed calls for Premier Gladys Berejiklian government to abandon his cherished $1.5 billion, developer-driven plan to demolish the Powerhouse Museum at Ultimo and relocate to a flood-prone site at Parramatta. But with Berejiklian herself taking over the arts portfolio for now, it will take a mighty upheaval to halt the destructive plan.’… ‘Not only has the Berejiklian government ignored the plight of arts workers; since the COVID crisis began it has ploughed on with its Powerhouse project. Infrastructure NSW has been running a “consultation” process that museum supporters describe as fake – a box-ticking exercise. She cites museum consultant Kylie Winkworth as writing of a webinar sessions in early April, that: “not one person spoke in favour of the move. The PHM’s CEO [Lisa Havilah, a Harwin appointee] outlined the facilities for conferences, performances, immersive digital experiences, events and functions, cafés, 40 apartments, a dormitory for schools, and some exhibition space… There was no mention of any museum until someone asked. Oops, that was revealing.” ’
‘But meanwhile a new door has opened’ says, White. ‘On 23 March came the announcement of a further Upper House Select Committee on the issue, under the cumbersome title: “Inquiry into the Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects in New South Wales”… The inquiry will also look at the issue of long-term funding of museums and galleries, including the damage done by the spending cuts known as “efficiency dividends”. Submissions by individuals or organisations can be made HERE, where there is also the option to complete a straightforward online questionnaire. Both submissions and questionnaire are open until 3 May.’ Read more   or here: Culture Heist HW 13 April

12 April, 2020
‘Calls to scrap new Powerhouse Museum after Arts Minister resigns’
Linda Morris, with Andrew Taylor in the Sydney Morning Herald, documents how ‘The Bereijklian government has been urged to abandon the new Parramatta Powerhouse Museum following the departure of the project’s leading advocate, the former Arts Minister Don Harwin. Opponents doubled down on their criticism of the $1 billion relocation project with the arts sector calling on the NSW Premier to instead give urgent priority to immediate heart-starter measures to revive the state’s cultural life.’ Despite expressions of support from Museum of Contemporary Arts chair, Simon Mordant, ‘Greens MP and deputy chair of the Upper House Inquiry into the Powerhouse project, David Shoebridge, said it was now time for the government to “admit its mistake, step back, and save this iconic institution”.’ And Executive director of the National Association of Visual Arts, Esther Anatolitis, asked ‘…if it still made sense to “relocate a world heritage 26-ton locomotive plus the rest of the museum’s important collection, when we could instead imagine a cultural institution that’s truly of and by western Sydney?”. “COVID-19 austerity aside, the new minister will need to assess this decision carefully,” she said.’
Read more  or: Calls to scrap new Powerhouse Museum – LM 12 April

12 April, 2020
‘At snoopy Pearl Beach, locals are asking: who dobbed in Don?’ Lisa Visentin and Jordan Baker, in the Sydney Morning Herald, attempt to trace the source of information for Arts Minister Don Harwin’s travel to the country: ‘Was it a local? His Labor rivals? Or his factional enemies? Questions are intensifying over who betrayed Don Harwin.’ Read more
‘Factional hit’: Blame game grips Liberals over minister’s downfall’
Lisa Visentin and Jordan Baker also investigate the background to Harwin’s resignation, suggesting, among other suggestions: ‘Liberal insiders say fallen state government minister Don Harwin was betrayed by his own party colleagues in a “factional hit” designed to destabilise Premier Gladys Berejiklian.’ Read more   See also: SMH Harwin 12 April

11 April, 2020
‘Top priorities for NSW’s next minister for the arts’
Executive Director of NAVA (National Association of Visual Arts),  Esther Anatolitis, writes: ‘Following the resignation of the New South Wales arts minister due to his infringements of COVID19 public health laws, NAVA outlines the key priorities facing the incoming minister. “There’s never been a more critical time to be NSW’s minister for the arts – nor a more impactful one,” said Anatolitis. “There is so much good work to be done right now, so I very much look forward to welcoming NSW’s new arts minister. After a number of critical examples of funding impacts, including cuts to funding from the Australia Council, she adds: “Another priority will be the Powerhouse Museum. Does it still make sense to devote a billion of the state’s dollars to the relocation of a world heritage 26-ton locomotive plus the rest of the museum’s important collection, when we could instead imagine a cultural institution that’s truly of and by Western Sydney? COVID19 austerity aside, the new minister will need to assess this decision carefully…”. Read more  or: Top priorities for NSW’s next minister for the arts – NAVA

11 April, 2020
‘Now is the time to save the Powerhouse and $1.5 billion’

In the midst of the Coronavirus crisis, [and aware of costs associated with the earlier NSW bushfires], Greens MPs David Shoebridge and Cate Faehrmann announce in a media release that: ‘With NSW in the grip of a pandemic that looks set to wipe out the state’s arts and entertainment industries without significant government support, along with the threat of a state-wide public sector wage freeze, proceeding with the controversial Powerhouse move now is a criminal waste of money.’
Shoebridge said: ‘“In the middle of a terrible pandemic this is not the time to flush $1.5 billion down the river on a controversial project with so few public benefits. These funds can and must be redirected to where they are needed right now, to refurbishing the existing Powerhouse, saving the arts and paying people’s wages.” And Faehrmann said: ‘The creative industries in NSW now have a completely different set of priorities to what it did when this budget was brought down. The Powerhouse move must be the first on the chopping block and the $1.5 billion saved should go straight towards keeping our creative industries afloat through a combination of wage subsidies and grants.’ Read more: The Greens 11 April

11 April, 2020
In a media release, Labor leader, Jody McKay, and Shadow treasurer and arts minister Walt Secord, write: ‘Last night (April 10), Mr Harwin resigned after police issued him with a $1000 fine for breaching public health orders involving his Pearl Beach holiday home. This will require the Premier to appoint a new Arts Minister. Ms Berejiklian should also take the opportunity to “ditch” the costly Powerhouse Museum plan.’ McKay says “The Powerhouse Museum has always been a property deal for the Berejiklian Government. We would rather see the $1.5 billion re-directed to other priorities.” And Secord adds: “…in these extreme economic circumstances with tens of thousands unemployed, it was hard for the Premier to justify the Powerhouse Museum splurge.” Read: Labor Media release 11 April

10 April, 2020
…and Arts Minister Don Harwin resigns!
Late on Good Friday, 10 April, 2020, Don Harwin announced his resignation, providing both reasons and apologies for his actions. SeeHarwin’s resignation statement 10 April
Again, the event hit headlines everywhere. See for example:
Anna Caldwell reports (in print as: Beach Blues: Out on his Arts’, ‘Don and Dusted’  and ‘Don’s party has crashed’) that ‘Embattled NSW MP Don Harwin has offered his resignation as Arts Minister to Premier Gladys Berejiklian for staying at his Central Coast holiday house and breaching coronavirus restrictions.’ Read more
11 April,  Sydney Morning Herald: ‘NSW Arts Minister Don Harwin quits after holiday house scandal’
Alexandra Smith and Lisa Visentin also announce Harwin’s resignation, and his apology, as well as Premier Berekjiklian’s regrets, and speculation of his successor as Minister. Read more
10-11 April, The Australian: ‘Arts Minister quits in holiday house scandal’
Yoni Bashan reports about how ‘NSW Arts Minister Don Harwin, who was fined $1000 for allegedly breaching a public health order set by his own government, resigned from cabinet on Friday, days after being photographed at his holiday house on the NSW central coast.’ He adds: ‘Several cabinet ministers told the Weekend Australian on Friday night Mt Harwin had acted recklessly by meeting with senior colleagues while, unbeknown to them, hosting a newly arrived guest at his property from the UK…’. Read here: The Australian Harwin Quits 10-11 April

 9-10 April, 2020
Scandal as Arts Minister Don Harwin flouts lock-down bans on non-essential travel
As the Easter holiday approached, and people everywhere obeyed current government rules about non-essential travel during the coronavirus crisis, and pleas for
Sydneysiders to stay out of regional NSW,  the Daily Telegraph discovered that Arts Minister Harwin (and advocate for relocation of the Powerhouse Museum) had moved to his holiday house at Pearl Beach with a visitor who was later identified as ‘self-isolating’ after returning from London. Dozens of news outlets across the country reported on Harwin’s situation; the Premier ordered him back; the police fined him $1000; and he apologised – but many of his colleagues criticised his selfishness and some across all political parties, and newspapers, demanded he be sacked. See below,
Photographs of Harwin in some of the reports: Harwin – news pics 9-10 April
Anna Caldwell in the Daily TelegraphRead more   or: Harwin’s hideaway – DT 9 April
Lisa Visentin in the Sydney Morning Herald:  Read more or: Harwin’s apology SMH 9 April
Riley Stuart at ABC:  Read more or: Harwin ABC 9 April
A list of dozens of responses in news media around NSW and Australia: Harwin’s list 9-10 April

9 April, 2020: Parramatta webinair: invitation for consultation feedback, by survey:
Following the announcement on 24 March (see earlier report below), where the North Parramatta Residents Action Group (NPRAG) expressed concern that: ‘Yesterday Sydneysiders found in their letterbox a postcard from the NSW Government telling them that due to COVID-19 there would be no public consultation regarding the hotly contested relocation of the Powerhouse Museum’, the organisers of the alternative ‘webinair consultation’ process,  sent this email to participants:
From: Powerhouse Parramatta <powerhouse.parramatta@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>
Thank you for attending this weeks’ webinar about the new Powerhouse in                          Parramatta. The presentation is available to download on the InfrastructureNSW          website http://www.infrastructure.nsw.gov.au/projects-nsw/new-powerhouse-  museum-in-parramatta. We appreciate you taking the time to attend the event and sharing your feedback on the project. We also encourage you to share feedback on our online survey, available here: https://swipengage.com/#/new-powerhouse-parramatta
Next week we will provide responses to all questions that were raised during the webinar and taken on notice.  As discussed during the event, we will be hosting a second webinar for the community to find out more about the project.
This session will be 23 April, 1pm – 3pm. To RSVP, please reply via email.’

8 April, 2020
‘Fake museum consultations under cover of Covid-19’
In CityHub, Kylie Winkworth  draws attention to the inadequate consultancy process associated with the recent ‘webonair’ event about the move of the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta, writing: ‘Years of crippling drought, devastating fires, and a pandemic with no end in sight. Any one of these disasters should give the NSW Government pause to review its unpopular, destructive and absurdly expensive scheme to demolish the Powerhouse Museum (PHM), and build something half the size at Parramatta. The government says it’s ‘the new Powerhouse’. To the rest of us, this is the building resembling two abandoned milk crates on the banks of the Parramatta River. Whatever it is, it’s not the real Powerhouse, and it’s not a museum. Read more  or: City Hub – KW – 9 April

6 April, 2020
‘Ticking the Consultation Box for the PHM’s `move’ to Parramatta’
Jennifer Sanders and Kylie Winkworth, from The Powerhouse Museum Alliance, write that the Alliance ‘rejects the faux consultations on the Parramatta museum, now underway by Infrastructure NSW, in the midst of the Covid-19 crisis. It is not community engagement when you are only consulting on decisions that have already been made.  That is called ‘ticking the box’. The government has made all the decisions on the Powerhouse Museum (PHM) and the Parramatta development, without regard to community opinion. Now it needs to show it has consulted.’
‘From Premier Mike Baird’s thought bubble in November 2014, the NSW Government has never considered any other options for a new museum in Parramatta, nor listened to community or expert views. The base case has always been that the Powerhouse Museum will be sold and demolished.  This is what has driven the government’s plans from day 1. And this is why the people of Parramatta will never be allowed a genuine say on a new museum, where it goes, and what it is about.’
‘… The `move’ of the Powerhouse is a front for a monstrous property play at the expense of NSW taxpayers and generations of donors to the Powerhouse Museum.  Communities have never been asked about keeping the PHM in Ultimo. The NSW Government does not have community consent for the closure and demolition of the Powerhouse Museum, and the eviction of its collections from their purpose designed buildings and state of the art facilities at Ultimo. Another round of faux consultations will not give this toxic project legitimacy.’ Read here: PMA Statement on Consultation 7 April 2020

3 April (and 4, 8, 10 April), 2020
Cuts in Australia Council arts funding 2021-2024
In an announcement with listed recipients, ‘The Australia Council has today announced that 144 arts organisations will receive a share of $31.7M per annum in funding offered through the revised Four Year Funding for Organisations program. CEO Adrian Collette AM said the new measures, delivered within the Council’s existing budget, were essential during this critical period when the cultural and creative sectors are experiencing immediate and enormous challenges due to the impact of COVID-19.’ Read more
However, this involved many serious cuts to funding for organisations, resulting in the following examples of concerns.
4 April, 2020
In ARTS SECTOR REELING AFTER LATEST AUSTRALIA COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENT, Clive Paget, from Limelight magazine, says: ‘While new funding has been allocated for some, all companies will face cuts of 30 percent over the next 12 months.’ Read more
8 April, 2020
Esther Anatolitis, CEO of NAVA (National Assn of Visual Arts, which missed out on funding), says in The Guardian, ‘Australia’s arts have been hardest hit by coronavirus. So why aren’t they getting support?’ Read more   or: Coronavirus and arts – Guardian 8 April
10 April, 2020

Angad Roy, in ‘Boomers vs Millennials: arts funding dropped, hits young artists over high-brow establishment’, in Michael West Media, refers also to: ‘In NSW, the Berejiklian government continues to remain obstinate on its plans to spend $1.5 billion relocating part of the Powerhouse Museum to a flooded site in Parramatta. Museums Consultant Kylie Winkworth suggested that 10% of the Powerhouse relocation costs would fund 15 new regional institutions, yet the governments continue to pursue its development plans instead of supporting the broader arts sector.’ Read here: Boomers vs Millennials – arts funding

31 March, 2020
‘Pyrmont planning strategy released’
newsletter comments: ‘The NSW government has released details of a strategy for the planning of the Pyrmont peninsula, pressing ahead with a community consultation process despite the COVID-19 outbreak,’ where, ‘In a statement, planning minister Rob Stokes said, “The planning system is keeping people in jobs, unlocking investment opportunities and keeping the economy moving through this unprecedented crisis.’ But the report also points out that ‘The Pyrmont Peninsula Place Strategy is the result of a controversial review by the Greater Sydney Commission of the planning framework for the area, which was initiated by the state government in the wake of a planning department recommendation that the proposed Star Casino hotel tower be refused planning permission. When the review was published in October 2019, it was criticized by the City of Sydney for its speed and for its intervention in the local planning system.’ “Feedback from the community and businesses will play a crucial role in setting the vision for this important precinct so we’ve moved consultation online to make it easier for everyone to share their ideas safely from home,” said Stokes.
See the NSW government announcement here.
On 2 April, Save the Powerhouse and Friends of Ultimo, on Facebook, criticise the government’s procedure for the inadequacy of on-line consultation, and for the elimination of issues such as the proposed relocation of the Powerhouse Museum from the planning project, in particular, where it says:  “…We’re not aiming to canvass your views on issues that have already been subject to consultation or that are subject to other processes, such as a new or developed Sydney Fish Market or the Powerhouse Museum relocation.”
Read more: Save the Powerhouse-Friends of Ultimo

25 March, 2020
‘Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects in New South Wales – Invitation to make a submission’
The Hon Robert Borsak MLC, Committee Chair of the first, and now second, Inquiry to be made into the Government’s management of museums and cultural projects, sent out an invitation to all interested people, saying:
‘A NSW Legislative Council Select Committee is currently conducting an inquiry into the Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects in New South Wales. The terms of reference for the inquiry, information guides and media release are attached for your information. On behalf of the committee, I would like to invite you to make a submission to the inquiry. The closing date for submissions is Sunday 3 May 2020.’ Also available is an on-line questionnaire: ‘Responses to the questionnaire may be used in the committee’s final report.’
For the full message, with all necessary information about making submissions to the Inquiry, and responding to the questionnaire, Read more here: Borsak – invitation to submit to 2nd Inquiry ;  Factsheet – Making a submission  ;  TOR – Museums and cultural projects in New South Wales

24 March, 2020
‘Sydneysiders shocked as Premier uses COVID-19 to bypass public consultation on the contested Powerhouse Museum Relocation’
The North Parramatta Residents Action Group (NPRAG) issued a media release, expressing concern that: ‘Yesterday Sydneysiders found in their letterbox a postcard from the NSW Government telling them that due to COVID-19 there would be no public consultation regarding the hotly contested relocation of the Powerhouse Museum … With the Premier just recently ignoring the community calls for the project; which plans to demolish Parramatta’s much loved heritage to be halted, this is just another slap in the face.’ [Refer: announcement of consultation on 19 February, below]
NPRAG Spokesperson, Suzette Meade said “ MAAS is forging ahead asking the community – whilst in the  middle of extreme uncertainty about their jobs, keeping their home and just staying alive during a worldwide pandemic – to scan a QR code or call them about a museum project, it is disgusting.”
“Public meetings are an essential part of any development process.  If the government cannot hold these due to a public health crisis, then they need to immediately suspend this until the public is able to meet. The country is in a crisis. We are in lockdown!  Does the Premier seriously expect the people of Sydney to discuss spending $1.5 billion dollars to unnecessarily relocate a museum while people are losing their lives? The Premier’s decision to go ahead with the Powerhouse Museum project while the country is being confronted by a pandemic, is totally irresponsible, inappropriate and incredibly insensitive.”
Read more: NPrag Media Release 25032020

23 March, 2020
The NSW Legislative Council announced that: ‘A new Upper House inquiry will shine a spotlight on the NSW Government’s management of the Powerhouse Museum – in particular, the rationale for its proposed relocation from Ultimo to Parramatta. The inquiry will also consider the adequacy of the NSW Government’s support for museum and cultural initiatives more broadly. A select committee has been established to conduct the inquiry, chaired by the Hon Robert Borsak MLC. Mr Borsak chaired the previous inquiry into the relocation of the Powerhouse Museum, which ended in February 2019, prior to the 2019 state election.’ After providing more details, it continues: ‘The committee is receiving submissions until 3 May 2020. Alternatively, interested individuals are invited to submit their comments by completing an online questionnaire, open until the same date. Public hearings will be held in the coming months. For information about the inquiry, including the committee membership and the terms of reference, please visit the Select Committee’s website. For media release and submission guidelines, Read more  or hereSecond Inquiry – submissions and questionnaire

18 March, 2020
‘Arts budgets in the age of catastrophe’

Judith White writes on her cultureheist website, that ‘In the panic over the coronavirus, arts organisations are pleading for support as performances and festivals are cancelled, museums and galleries close and whole areas of the country are threatened with lockdown … Brace, instead, for greater shocks to come. There’s a Federal Budget due on 12 May and State budgets in May and June. Faced with the final disappearance of the surplus that never was, Federal Treasurer Josh Frydenburg will be looking to cut spending wherever he can get away with it – and for Coalition governments, the arts are always first in line for the chop. Nowhere is this more so than in NSW, where Treasurer Dominic Perrottet has already warned that his June budget will be “horrible”. If the Berejiklian government had any vision or integrity it would take the dual climate and health emergencies as the opportunity to halt its ill-conceived “cultural infrastructure” plans, much criticised by eminent arts professionals, and redirect the money to sustaining the sector through the crisis.’
As part of this issue, she says: ‘There have always been better ways to use the $1.5 billion estimated cost of dismantling the historic Powerhouse Museum and relocating part of it to Parramatta, to a site repeatedly flooded as it was in the torrential rains of early February. Following that catastrophe a Sydney Morning Herald readers’ panel came down 85% in favour of abandoning the relocation. Perrottet and Premier Berejiklian will not be taking such an eminently sane course. In sticking to their Sydney-centric, pro-developer plans they paint themselves, as Perrottet did in the press on 28 February, as “championing progress against a throng of nominal progressives all standing athwart the city yelling ‘stop’.” This has enraged those who followed the previous parliament’s Inquiry into Museums and Galleries which probed the extreme secrecy surrounding the project and aired the many well-informed objections to it.’ After discussion about recent ‘… heated exchanges on Macquarie Street’, White continues: ‘The government remains obdurate, and that means questions remain about what secret deals have been done over the Ultimo site of the present museum. Late last year Darren Steinberg, chief executive of property developer group Dexus, resigned from the MAAS Trust which oversees the Powerhouse, citing conflict of interest over the potential acquisition of the Ultimo site. He had been on the board for less than a year – one of Arts Minister Don Harwin’s appointments. You have to wonder what has been going on.’ She reminds us that ‘Museums consultant Kylie Winkworth points out that an architect-designed regional museum could be built for $10-$15 million, so that 10% of the Powerhouse relocation costs would fund 15 new regional institutions, giving heart to local communities,’ and concludes that ‘The remaining funds should go to supporting the arts through the present crisis and beyond, restoring some of the spending cuts that have devastated organisations large and small.’
Read more  or here: Judith White – Arts budgets in the age of catastrophe

March, 2020
The world-wide CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) and its effect
The World Health Organisation has identified the Coronavirus, COVID-19, as a pandemic, becoming a serious threat to Australia by March 2020, with prospects of many months and even years before a solution is found. Sweeping across the globe, spread at first from local cities and communities overseas by travellers and then multiplying in numbers in new locations, it has caused the greatest social and economic disruption anyone can recall or imagine.
Repercussions in Australia? In efforts to reduce contagion, for example: individuals have to stay at home and ‘self-isolate’; thousands of businesses and education institutions have closed; tens of thousands of jobs lost; beaches, parks and other public places out of bounds; events reliant on crowds and audiences cancelled. Museums, galleries, theatres and sports venues are also closed, with events such as exhibitions, conferences and meetings held on line.
In NSW, with promises of substantial government financial compensation from the state and federal budgets, following on from the costs that still have to be met from bushfires early in the year, questions are continually asked about the NSW government’s rationale for persisting with expensive projects such as the relocation of the Powerhouse Museum. (See also, Letters to the Editor).

9 March 2020
‘Conflict of interest seemed to be a recent development’
In recently-obtained minutes of the MAAS Trust’s board meetings, Kylar Loussikian and Samantha Hutchinson, in their CBD report in the Sydney Morning Herald, uncover issues to do with government appointments of people to such Boards who have real or potential conflicts of interest. They ask: ‘Then there’s the question of what to do with the lucrative plot of land left over once the Powerhouse – officially the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences – moves. As CBD revealed in December, Dexus chief executive Darren Steinberg unexpectedly quit the museum’s board in August due to a “possible conflict” over the land’s sale. Cynics, of course, suggest the decision to move the Powerhouse to Parramatta had as much to do with unlocking its inner-city digs for apartment and commercial development as it did with bringing a valuable cultural institution to Sydney’s west.’
CBD draws attention to issues raised in Trust minutes including ‘ “[MAAS chief executive] Lisa Havilah updated Trust on the Creative Industries Precinct Business Case, the masterplan being developed and the proposed market sounding for the site”, the minutes of the July 10 Meeting, attended by Steinberg read,” …and … “Trust requested a full briefing of the draft master plan and market sounding from Annette Pitman, Create NSW”.’ Read more   or here: 9 March CBD

8 March, 2020
‘Why Parramatta won’t have a new ‘Powerhouse’ Museum’
A detailed summary on Save the Powerhouse group’s Facebook page notes: ‘For 5 years Save the Powerhouse has said that Parramatta deserves the Museum of its choice. Whatever structure the Parramatta community finally gets on its riverside flood plain, it won’t be the “New Powerhouse” museum – NOR EVEN A REAL MUSEUM – that the Government is desperately promoting. Why? THE ORIGINAL POWERHOUSE WAS CREATED AND CUSTOMISED FOR ULTIMO through the Sulman Prize-winning transformation of the former Ultimo Power Station by visionary architect Lionel Glendenning, so it cannot be transplanted anywhere else.’
The report considers issues including: FAR TOO SMALL, NOT A GENUINE MUSEUM and COST, and concludes: ‘For a fraction of this sum Parramattans could have had the museum they wanted, AND IT COULD HAVE BEEN COMPLETED BY NOW!’
For the full report: Read more   or here: 8 March Save the Powerhouse Summary

7-8 March, 2020
The Readers’ Panel – the Powerhouse Museum?

The weekly panel in the Sydney Morning Herald which documents feedback from readers on current issues, asked: ‘Should the $1.5 billion relocation of the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta be abandoned and the money put into regional communities?’
The graph shows that 85% recommended abandoning the relocation. See the figures here: 7-8 March SMH readers opinion

6 March, 2020
‘Hollywood historian to assess a rich heritage’
In their CBD column in the Sydney Morning Herald, Kylar Loussikian and Samantha Hutchinson ask: ‘How does one manage to bungle every angle of an astonishingly-expensive purpose-built new art precinct to be built smack bang in the centre of Greater Western Sydney? Just ask Arts Minister Don Harwin and his bureaucrats, who have managed to not only infuriate residents near the Powerhouse Museum’s current Pyrmont site but also those near its new home on the flood-prone banks of the Parramatta River…Cynics fear the museum’s current inner-city digs will soon make way for major commercial and residential developments.’
‘As CBD reported late last year, Dexus chief executive Darren Steinberg made a quiet exit from the MAAS Trust, which runs the museum, after it became clear the property giant had some interest in acquiring the site. He had been appointed less than a year earlier.
Now the Heritage Council is assessing what parts of the current museum site should be added to the state’s heritage register. The more of the site that ends up on that register, the more difficult (and expensive) it will be for development on the property…In January, a report to the government recommended nothing be added to the heritage register because renovations conducted in 1988 for the museum’s opening had trashed the original [1899] building.’
‘But this column can now report a curious new addition to the five-member Heritage Council, one which has yet to be announced or made public in any way. Harwin’s former chief-of-staff Brian Lindsay was added to the panel on February 6…“Mr Lindsay, as an historian, brings this particular expertise to the Council,” a spokesman said when we inquired on Thursday. Lindsay is, to be fair, a historian … at the very least of Hollywood films. His 2016 tome, Category Fraud, investigates how some actors and directors have gamed the, err, Academy Awards… Lindsay, meanwhile, was last year appointed to chair the State Archives board “representing the history profession”. He arrived just in time to oversee another of Harwin’s projects — inexplicably merging the Historic Houses Trust (now known as Sydney Living Museums) into the State Archives.’ Read more   or here: 6 March CBD comments

6 March, 2020
‘Think with your brains, not your bottom’
As one of 10 comments about the corona virus, NRL campaign anniversaries, cemetery land management, recent welcome regional rainfall and other issues, Ray Hadley asks:
6: The decision by former Premier Mike Baird to move the Powerhouse Museum out to Parramatta is fraught with danger. Firstly, while the government is rightly crying poor given the recent battles with fire and flood, it’s hard to justify the $1.5 billion spend. Then you have the problem of historic buildings being knocked over to accommodate a building housing historic items (I struggle to understand that concept) and the fact that the museum would be adjacent to the upper reaches of the Parramatta River which means, as we have seen recently, flooding becomes a problem. Knock it on the head, Premier. Read here:  6 March Hadley

4 March, 2020
‘Plans for high towers dwarfing Sydney’s Central station spark concerns’
Associated with concerns about over-development in the city (including redevelopment of the Powerhouse Museum site), Matt O’Sullivan writes in the Sydney Morning Herald: ‘Plans to allow for buildings up to 206 metres high at the southern end of Sydney’s CBD, including a 39-storey tower planned for tech giant Atlassian, have stoked fears that they will dwarf the landmark Central railway station and lead to “adverse visual impacts”. An area named the western gateway is the first stage of a massive redevelopment of the 24-hectare Central precinct, which extends from the railway station to Cleveland Street.
While the redevelopment of the precinct has received substantial support, the proposal to permit towers up to 206 metres high has raised concerns that the sandstone train station will be “overwhelmed” by the new high rises nearby.
The National Trust said the increase in the allowable building heights was “totally out of context with the surrounding area”, pointing out that Central Station’s clock tower is 75 metres tall and “even the nearby UTS tower is only 120 metres”. “No amount of design guidelines, setbacks or urban design provisions can negate such height,” it said in a submission to the Department of Planning. “There are only nine towers over 200 metres in height in Sydney, and certainly none of these are located in this area.”
The rezoning at Central is part of the biggest shake-up of planning controls in the core of the CBD in more than four decades. It will also allow for towers higher than 300 metres near Circular Quay, Town Hall and Barangaroo, which is significantly above the cap of 235 metres at present.
The Heritage Council argues that the significant increase in the maximum building heights at the western gateway is not in keeping with the character of the area, and will result in “adverse visual impacts” on Central station. It wants the planned building heights to be reduced. Read more  or: 5 March Central – SMH

4 March, 2020
‘NSW Premier’s deputy John Barilaro in bitter feud over Powerhouse Museum’
Yoni Bashan writes in The Australian, about how: ‘In a sign of escalating tensions within the Coalition over competing city and rural priorities, Deputy Premier John Barilaro has begun vigorously campaigning for cabinet colleagues to drop their commitment to the $1.5bn relocation of the Powerhouse Museum from the inner city to western Parramatta, saying the funding needs to be reallocated to struggling regional communities.’ …
‘Last week, Mr Barilaro was queried about the Powerhouse Museum by Ms McKay during question time. He provided a lengthy reply about rural and regional communities in distress — but he stopped short of denouncing the project. Instead, he endorsed it. “It is a fair question, a question about priorities,” he said. “If I thought that regional and rural NSW was missing out because we did not have the ability to support our regions, then of course I would have concerns.”  However, Barilaro then spoke privately with Opposition Leader Jodi McKay – and others –  in the lift ‘once question time had finished.’
‘Several government sources said they agreed that the Powerhouse Museum project was a thorn in the government’s side. But they were more concerned by Mr Barilaro’s indiscreet conversation with the Labor leader, and why he would provide her with ready ammunition against the government. “If he wants to have an argument about it, take it to cabinet,” one source said.
McKay is reported as saying:  ‘ “We have a government … that is privatising assets that belong to all of NSW, to fund those questionable projects in Sydney, and to pay for cost blowouts in Sydney.” The museum relocation was signed off by former NSW premier Mike Baird as an election commitment in 2015, a decision made after the museum submitted a business case requesting funding. “The current premises were designed for 19th and 20th-¬century collections and have constrained the museum’s capacity to move with the times,” government documents state.’ Read more   or here:  Australian 4 March 2020

4 March, 2020
Budget summary, proposed expenditure, Minister for the Arts  (including Powerhouse)
Portfolio Committee No. 1, Premier and Finance, examined the proposed expenditure for the various portfolio areas for Minister Don Harwin, including The Arts. On pages 4-11 of the Hansard transcript, questions were asked about the move of the Powerhouse Museum. These included potential display of all designs; involvement of the MAAS Trust; assessment of flood risks; access for audiences during floods; stages of design development;  consideration of heritage buildings; role of staff in Create NSW. To see full transcript:  Read more   And to read the extract about the Powerhouse Museum and Create NSW, read: 4 March Budget extract

4 March, 2020
‘CEO flummoxed over new Powerhouse access’
Save the Powerhouse Facebook reports on questions and answers in the Legislative Assembly Budget Estimates hearing on 3 March, and the news reports that followed. They say:  ‘…The flooding issue was a dominant theme at yesterday’s Legislative Assembly Budget Estimates hearing when Shoebridge, new Committee Chair Robert Borsak and Shadow Arts Minister Walt Secord, pressed Arts Minister Don Harwin, Powerhouse CEO Lisa Havilah and other Government officials for more details about the planned “New Powerhouse” at Parramatta. While the Minister gave his customary uninformative (slippery?) performance, Havilah was visibly more hesitant. Having asserted confidently that the MAAS Trust had “signed off” on the selected winning design for the new museum she conceded that it would necessarily be built at or above the “one in a hundred years flood level ‘ of 7.5 m above ground level. “Will it be on stilts?” Secord wondered. She added that “not all objects will be above the flood level – PARTS WILL BE ON A LEVEL THAT WOULD FLOOD.” Secord’s question “How does the public access a building so far above ground level? Lifts, escalators – or what?” appeared to fluster Havilah. Scratching her head, she launched a flurry of vague remarks about the planned creation of a “civic link” with public access “via elevation from the river side.” … Shoebridge wanted to know:
(1) if the Minister and panel were aware of the historical severity of floods at Parramatta – he was assured that “a flood impact assessment will be prepared.”- and
(2) the proposed completion date for the New Museum – Havilah revealed that the date is “not yet known” because the project (now at stage 3) has not yet reached the “procurement” stage, to select a builder, Only after that, she said, can a project completion date be decided…So long for the promised 2023 opening!’
For a full account of the day’s proceedings please check the Legislative Council Hansard transcript for March 3: To see transcript:  Read more   And to read the extract about the Powerhouse Museum and Create NSW, read: 4 March Budget extract

1 March, 2020
‘Rival Parramatta Powerhouse Museum Designs remain under wraps’
Following considerable criticism of both the arguably inappropriate design of the ‘new museum’, and the demolition of heritage buildings, Linda Morris, in the Sydney Morning Herald, announces that ‘The peak body of architects [Australian Institute of Architects] has called for the release of all shortlisted design plans for the Parramatta Powerhouse Museum, saying it would be in the interests of public and professional transparency. The organiser of the taxpayer-funded International Design Competition, Malcolm Reading, has also supported the exhibition of the shortlisted plans to demonstrate the relative merits of the winning design and protect the integrity of the competition process.
The runners up in the competition remain under wraps almost 10 weeks after the International Design Competition jury judged that the standout design for the riverfront site came from the partnership of French architecture practice Moreau Kusunoki and Melbourne-based practice Genton. Mr Reading said it is customary for the designs of all architect teams to be displayed as part of an online gallery at the same time as the winning design is announced…’
‘ A spokesperson for Arts Minister Don Harwin said the government looked forward to sharing the shortlisted designs with the public “in the near future”… The NSW president of the Australian Institute of Architects, Kathlyn Loseby, said before the institute endorsed the competition process, it was assured each proposal would be exhibited and the institute would be briefed. It was essential to ensure proper transparency of the taxpayer-funded competition process for the sake of both public and professional confidence, Ms Loseby said. It was preferable that any physical exhibition should take place in Parramatta. Mr Reading pointed to a page link showing that the government committed to the designs’ release by the end of 2019.
At least two other short-listed designs retained one heritage building, but how the six architecture teams resolved heritage issues and arrived at their concepts on the constrained flood-prone site remains unknown. All teams signed up to confidentiality clauses as part of competition terms.’ Read more   or here: Rival Designs under wraps

28 February, 2020
‘Parramatta: Powerhouse Museum relocation inquiry’
Joanne Vella writes in the Parramatta Advertiser that: ‘A fresh inquiry into the State Government’s $1.5 billion relocation of the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta has polarised the community.
The Greens and Labor have backed the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ Party motion to launch the inquiry. Greens MP David Shoebridge said the inquiry was made more urgent after the recent floods at the proposed new $645 million Powerhouse site. “We need to ensure the safety of the Powerhouse’s priceless collection and it really does beggar belief that the government is proposing to place it beside a river on a flood plain,’’ he said. “We will also be passing a close eye over the proposed budget given the billion dollar cost overruns that almost every infrastructure project has faced under the Coalition.”
Mr Shoebridge said the community’s campaign was also a key reason for maintaining scrutiny. “There is a compelling case for Parramatta to have its own world class cultural institution that responds to its unique history from First Nations, to invasion and colonisation and the vibrant surge of migrants in the post war period,” Mr Shoebridge said. Opposition arts spokesman Walt Secord described the design as a “monstrosity on stilts’’. The design also spells the demolition of heritage-listed Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace at Phillip St. North Parramatta Residents’ Action Group welcomed the inquiry particularly about the demolition of 1870s Italianate villa Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace. “NPRAG is very pleased to hear further scrutiny into the Powerhouse Museum debacle is starting soon,’’ spokeswoman Suzette Meade said.’ Read more: 28 Feb P Adv. Relocation Inquiry

27 February, 2020
‘Fresh inquiry into Powerhouse Museum’
Hard on the heels of all recent reports, Linda Morris , in the Sydney Morning Herald, advises: that: ‘A fresh parliamentary inquiry has been launched into the Berejiklian government’s $1.5 billion plan to relocate the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta, as well as disparities in funding support for city and regional galleries and museums. The future of the museum and its priceless collection will be scrutinised by the same select upper house committee which urged last year that the museum’s relocation to Parramatta be abandoned and western Sydney be given its own world-class institution.
The wide-ranging inquiry will investigate the vision behind the move, governance of the project, including the effectiveness and adequacy of planning, the business case, design briefs, project management, public reporting, costs and cultural and demographic justifications. Greens MP David Shoebridge said special focus would be given to the consequences of floods after the carpark on the riverfront site was on February 10 turned into a swimming pool during the one-in-a-10-year flood event. Terms of reference also include the heritage status of the site at Ultimo and Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace, historic buildings at Parramatta slated for demolition per the winning designs by Moreau Kusunoki and Genton. The motion to hold an inquiry was backed by Greens and Labor, and was carried on voices in the upper house without there being a vote.’ Read more or here: 27 Feb Fresh Inquiry

27 February, 2020
‘Plans made for Sydney to get its own Victoria and Albert Museum’
Linda Morris reports in the Sydney Morning Herald that ‘The former NSW Land Titles building would house a museum for the decorative arts under plans advanced by a government review to revamp the historic sandstone ribbon of Macquarie Street’, saying that documents show that: ‘The idea for Sydney’s answer to London’s Victoria & Albert Museum was raised by former Sydney Lord Mayor Lucy Turnbull with the director of the Powerhouse Museum last year.’
Turnbull and former Prime Minister Paul Keating have been working on a new ‘vision’ for Macquarie St and The Domain since late November 2018… “It is anticipated that the NSW government will respond to the review later this year,” the spokesperson said. ‘If such a museum was supported by NSW Cabinet and managed by the Powerhouse Museum, its collection would need to be split between the new CBD museum and the Parramatta Powerhouse, now in the detailed design phase …”Early discussions involve a proposed cultural precinct at the end of Macquarie St including a decorative arts museum,” according to Trust minutes obtained under freedom of information laws.  “Any work on this will require a business case to the NSW government, which will consider timeframes and budget.”
The Powerhouse Museum is expected to maintain a fashion and design gallery at Ultimo after it relocates to Parramatta in 2023. A second business case looking at Ultimo’s redevelopment is close to finalisation. Chairman of the Trust, Barney Glover, said on Wednesday the museum remained committed to the Powerhouse Museum having a major presence in Sydney and Parramatta.
The proposal comes as notice was given to list the Powerhouse Museum’s engine house and turbine hall, second boiler house, office building and switch hall for heritage listing,’ which ‘ “… does not even mention in the assessment criteria the Powerhouse Museum, its Sulman award-winning adaption, and elegant Wran building, the tram depot for which the power station was built, the in situ gantry cranes and relics, and collection items directly related to the functions of the site; its cultural significance as the major landmark of the 1988 bicentenary, nor the well demonstrated social value of the museum for the people of NSW,” she said.
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party MP Robert Borsak flagged in NSW’s Upper House the reopening of a parliamentary inquiry into the Powerhouse Museum’s relocation – its vision, governance, risks to the collection, issues of flooding, heritage status and its future presence in Ultimo. Labor and the Greens say they will back Mr Borsak’s motion.’
Morris notes: ‘In 2017, architects McGregor Coxall completed a masterplan to “unlock a hidden gem and create new linkages between Hyde Park, the Domain, the Royal Botanic Gardens and the CBD, tying the site into the wider ‘cultural ribbon’ that spans the Sydney CBD”. The plans show a pedestrian plaza at the rear of Sydney Hospital, with new government office space and a refurbished Land Titles office.
Like the V & A Museum, the priceless Powerhouse collection ranges across architecture, furniture, fashion, textiles, photography, sculpture, painting, jewellery, glass, ceramics, book arts, theatre and performance. Were Sydney to get its own standalone Powerhouse decorative arts museum, Parramatta’s museum would likely focus on science, technology, and engineering and maths.’ Read more   or here: SMH 27 Feb

26 February, 2020
Questions in Parliament: Robbie & Wendy show dominate NSW Parliament – Powerhouse and Harwin interview’
Walt Secord, Shadow Treasurer and Shadow Minister for the Arts, distributed documentation of a confrontation in Parliament, where Adam Searle, Leader of the Opposition, Penny Sharpe, Deputy Opposition Leader, and himself, Shadow Treasurer and Shadow Minister for the Arts, interrogate Don Harwin as Minister for the Arts, about the government’s approval to demolish heritage buildings in Parramatta to develop a site for the proposed relocated Powerhouse Museum. Searle asks: ‘My question is directed to the Leader of the Government in his capacity as Arts Minister. Given the Minister’s 10 April 2019 comments on ABC Radio where he told broadcasters Robbie Buck and Wendy Harmer when asked if heritage property Willow Grove would be demolished to make way for the new Powerhouse Museum that “No, we have not said that at all”, will he now admit that he misled the local community, the media and the people of this State?’ Penny Sharpe asked: ‘How does the Minister explain the disparity between his 18 April 2019 statement that Willow Grove will not be demolished and his 19 February 2020 statement that it was “an accurate answer at that particular point in time”?’ And Secord, after being asked to rephrase his question several times, persists in asking: ‘Would the Minister elucidate his answer in regard to the Willow Grove retention? Is it the Parramatta Council, the Premier or the Minister who fibbed to the community?’ The question appeared to remain unresolved. Read more: 25 Feb 2020 NSW Parliament

25 February, 2020
‘Intent to consider listing Ultimo Tramways Power House on the State Heritage Register’, and invitation for submissions
Writing as a Delegate of the Heritage Council of NSW, Tim Smith, Director Operations, Heritage NSW, in the Department of Premier and Cabinet, sent out a message to interested people and organisations, saying: ‘I am writing to advise that the Heritage Council of NSW resolved, at its meeting of 12 February 2020, to give notice of its intention to consider listing Ultimo Tramways Power House on the State Heritage Register in acknowledgement of its heritage significance to the people of New South Wales. This advice is in accordance with section 33(1)(a) of the Heritage Act 1977 (NSW).  Any members of the community, owners, managers, organisations or other interested parties are invited to make a written submission regarding the proposed listing and significance of Ultimo Tramways Power House. Submissions should be posted or emailed to the Heritage Council of NSW at the following address during the public submission period commencing on 26 February 2020 and closing on 24 March 2020 (to heritagemailbox@environment.nsw.gov.au  and see links below for address).’
However, it has been pointed out by others who have advocated over many years for heritage listing, that the ‘nomination that does not even mention in the assessment criteria the Powerhouse Museum, its Sulman award winning adaption and elegant Wran building, the tram depot for which the power station was built, the in situ gantry cranes and relics, and collection items directly related to the functions of the site, its cultural significance as the major landmark of the 1988 bicentenary, nor the well demonstrated social value of the museum for the people of NSW.’ For nomination document: Read more  and letter here: Ultimo Tramways Power House

Strong criticisms of 2020 Nomination for State Heritage Listing:
For those wanting to make submissions supporting the nomination for heritage listing, it should be pointed out that many who know the Powerhouse Museum well  find the revised nomination deeply flawed, poorly researched, and an exercise in understating the significance of the site, even the partial elements under consideration. The PMA will provide further advice on errors, omissions and mistakes, with a list of points people may wish to include in their response.
As well as the comments made at the time, (see 1 March, below), see also some of those submitted for review, before 24 March, 2020: Read here for some submissions made to review the inadequacies of the nomination.
1 March, 2020
‘Shonky State Heritage Register nomination must be rejected.’
A member of the Powerhouse Museum Alliance exposes critical issues with the nomination as it exists, saying ‘The Heritage Council has advertised a nomination for State Heritage Listing for the Ultimo Tramways Power House for the State Heritage Register. This shonky nomination grotesquely misrepresents the significance of this site and must be rejected. This is a nomination for a place which doesn’t exist. The nomination is deeply flawed, poorly researched and ignores the history of the site from Ultimo Power Station to Powerhouse Museum. The developer-friendly curtilage on which the nomination is based cuts the Powerhouse Museum in half. It is inexplicable that the Heritage Council has put this grossly distorted, factually incorrect nomination on exhibition to be considered. This substandard nomination ignores the last 40 years of the site’s rebirth as the Powerhouse Museum.‘

 1 March, 2020
Save the Powerhouse Facebook posted an extended critique of the proposed listing (see full entry, with explanatory plan here:  Save the Powerhouse- Heritage Listing a Hoax
It said that: ‘The Heritage Council of NSW (an “independent statutory body” in the Department of Premier and Cabinet!) … resolved, at its meeting of 12 February 2020, to give notice of its intention to consider listing Ultimo Tramways Power House on the State Heritage Register in acknowledgement of its heritage significance to the people of New South Wales.” The letter (sent to a local group) goes on to explain that the former “Ultimo Tramways Power House” (Station) is potentially of State significance historically for being the first large state-owned electricity generating station in NSW“ – completely true.
But what does this fictitious title “Ultimo Tramways Power House” that the Heritage Council has dreamed up actually refer to? Museum specialists who have analysed available information … fear that it is designed to mask the intention, not overtly stated, TO LIST ONLY THE EXTERIOR SHELL (without interiors) of the original Power Station building, not the “Museum“ as we know and understand it. A further puzzle is the fact that this part of the Museum (ie former Power Station + contents) was already locally heritage-listed years ago by the City of Sydney. So this proposal would effectively “delist” the Museum.
If you are confused by all this, so are we! A sick joke by our warped NSW Government? Another blatant attempt to stack the odds in the Government’s favour? Or merely one more example of such blundering ignorance that it cannot even get the right name for the institution it aims to place on the heritage list?
One thing that the Heritage Council’s letter makes clear is that we now have the opportunity to protest strongly against this travesty of a proposal, and demand that the Powerhouse Museum in its entirety (ie including the Sulman-price-winning Wran building and the Harwood Building) must be placed on the State Heritage list.’
25 March, 2020: Read here for some submissions made to review the inadequacies of the nomination.

February 28, 2020
‘Sydney’s seven deadly sins of development? No, I call it a symphony’
Dominic Perrottet, NSW Treasurer, provides a controversial critical response in the Sydney Morning Herald,  to Elizabeth Farrelly’s article [below] about the Seven Deadly Sins of city over-development, and lack of concern for heritage and environment. He says: ‘Truth is, I relish reading Farrelly’s Saturday columns, partly for their passion, purpose and prose, but mostly because I disagree with just about every word. Like some kind of inverted compass, they help to affirm my political bearings, in a back-to-front sort of way. There is one thing we do have in common: we both love Sydney. A lot. Where we diverge is in our vision for the kind of city we want Sydney to be. Hers, it seems to me, is terminally pedestrian – a Sydney returned to some romanticised mid-century heyday, a lightly bustling outpost with none of that nasty urban sprawl (working sprawlers be damned) or diabolical economic ambition. It’s a vision I find confusing, sad and out of touch with what 99 per cent of Sydneysiders know as reality.’ He provides his rationale for development, and adds: ‘So our government is getting on with it.  We’re building infrastructure – roads, rail, schools and hospitals, museums, stadiums – as if our children’s lives and livelihoods depend on it, because they do. We are putting an end to the wasteful squandering of our city’s talents, and investing to get centrepieces such as Circular Quay up to world-class scratch…But it also means the people proposing new developments need to get real, and design buildings that respect and augment Sydney’s unsurpassed beauty, not monuments to ego that trample all over it. This is a vital part of the balancing act we must perform: embracing the new, while preserving the heritage we love…If we get it right, Sydney’s global future will be a richly textured masterpiece: old and new, loud and soft, fast and slow, cities and suburbs, jobs and culture, industry and open space, utility and beauty – all in harmony for the greater good of our people. Sinful? No. Symphonic.’ Read more  or here: 28 Feb Perrottet

22/23 February, 2020
‘Sydney and the Seven Deadly Sins of City-Making’
Elizabeth Farrelly, in the Sydney Morning Herald, discusses the idea that : ’It’s often said that we get the cities we deserve. This implies that cities have a resonance that is not only emotional and aesthetic but also moral. And because our cities shape us, as much as we shape them, these fascinating habitable artefacts easily amplify our virtues – and our vices. Further, because in recent decades our cities have been so strongly shaped by neo-liberalism, and because neo-liberalism needs us to be our worst possible selves – the vices overwhelmingly dominate virtues. Therefore let us ask: what are the Seven Deadly Sins of City Planning?’
She reminds us that ‘Traditionally, the Seven Deadly Sins are as follows: sloth, wrath, gluttony, envy, lust, avarice and pride’, and traces a number of recent government projects that demonstrated these ‘sins’. Among them, she cites the proposed relocation of the Powerhouse Museum as an example of ‘Lust’, ‘Gluttony’ and ‘Sloth’.
‘Lust? Lust may sound improbable as a city-making ingredient but, at least at a metaphorical level, drives the habitual prostitution of our public lands, institutions and buildings to private corporations. Consider Barangaroo, pimping out hectares of the last remaining public inner-city waterfront for the private profit of Crown Casino, or the Bays Precinct or the Powerhouse, scandalously destroying a venerable public institution so the site can be privately redeveloped.
Gluttony is everywhere. On medieval definitions, gluttony is not just over-eating but dwelling overmuch in earthly thoughts. It drives our disdain for heritage, where refusal to transcend the mundane or recognise the critical importance of narrative in our shared lives allows the wanton destruction of treasured ancient fabric. In the new-Powerhouse destruction of Parramatta’s pretty Italianate villa Willow Grove, in the vast, ultra-shiny proposals for the Bays Precinct, Parramatta Road, Marrickville and Haberfield, the richly storeyed nature of our city is repeatedly trashed by planning tsars with little imagination and less courage.
And so to sloth. Again, you might think this plays no part in cities but, again, it’s everywhere. Sloth, or laziness, drives our government’s refusal properly to define contractual relationships – as in the new light rail, where even the Auditor-General recognised “inadequate planning and tight timeframes” increased costs by half a billion dollars and decreased benefits by a billion. Such sloth – evident too in the stadium redevelopments, and the Powerhouse move, where contracts were let before a business case was even developed – is a form of bad parenting that subjects public amenity to developer whim.’ Read more

Summer, 2019
‘The Powerhouse Museum:  Significance, Consequences, Opportunities; reviewing a museum’s history as a unique cultural asset in its state capital’
Jennifer Sanders, associated with the Powerhouse Museum as curator and Deputy Director from 1978, and a longstanding member of AMaGA and ICOM Australia, published an article in the Australian Museums and Galleries Association magazine, Vol 28/1, Summer 2020. She makes a strong argument for the Museum’s continuing location as a state museum in the centre of Sydney, while also advocating a regional cultural centre in Parramatta, saying: ‘The Museum’s building — its historic fabric and contemporary architecture, and its Ultimo location — together with its diverse collections, are intrinsic to the overarching narrative that forms the Powerhouse Museum. The Powerhouse Museum is born of the Industrial Revolution.  It is unique for the synergy between the Museum’s extraordinary collection and the magnificent spaces of the 1899 Ultimo Power House, one of Australia’s earliest and most imposing industrial buildings, and the contemporary architecture of 1988 that is the Powerhouse Museum today. The Museum has proven to be a well-purposed, award-winning museum with impressive flexibility, character and ambience. The Powerhouse encompasses a long history of distinctive cultural events inscribed in the heart of the city’s history.’
Sanders points out that: ‘A NSW Parliamentary Upper House Inquiry has for some years been examining many of these issues, and public submissions from people from across NSW, Australia and the world about various options that would retain the purpose-built Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo, and not see a major public building torn down. Despite all submissions carefully arguing a contrary case, the NSW Government is continuing with its $1.5bn-plus plan to ‘move’ the Museum to Parramatta…’.  She notes that ‘The historical overview in fact reveals why so many people and donors, who have always known the Powerhouse Museum and its distinctive technological history as an integral part of Sydney’s cultural infrastructure, became so astonished when the proposal arose to move the institution right out of the city and away from its long term partner-museums (notably the Australian Museum, the Art Gallery of New South Wales, and Sydney’s historic houses today forming Sydney Living Museums). This collection of historic public institutions with linked histories in the civic heart of a city forms a cluster that distinguishes the most vibrant capitals world-wide.’
She adds that: ‘For many of the Museum’s staff, the last few years have been very difficult and disheartening… Yet the redevelopment project describes a museum embarking on the ‘the largest cultural infrastructure project currently being undertaken in Australia’. Dozens of Powerhouse Museum alumni, and nine Directors emeriti, have raised reasoned and well-documented objections to the current plan, highlighting the project’s disruptive logic for what it is — in effect, the destruction of the Powerhouse Museum as a Sydney asset, arguing that a completely different cultural asset at Parramatta will be the outcome. It should be said that all defenders of the Powerhouse Museum’s retention support the case for a major facility at Parramatta — but believe that Parramatta’s own civic leaders and community should have been consulted about the best case for their cultural needs in the heart of a western-Sydney centre. The Powerhouse would be an ideal civic partner — along with other Sydney museums — to ensure that the state’s collections can be regularly shared with western Sydney citizens and form the basis of ongoing educational displays and exhibitions, as the greater Parramatta area deserves.’
Of the Parramatta site, she says: ‘It will have less exhibition space, with fewer Museum objects on display. It will have less on-site access to the varied Powerhouse collections — to be stored off-site and dispersed around NSW — that is, if sufficiently safe, secure and accessible locations can be identified and negotiated. The Powerhouse collection will never again be presented as an integrated and powerful statement of Australia’s cultural heritage, and our place in the world.’ Read moreJ Sanders MaG 2020

19 February, 2020
Expression of Interest: New Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta Community Reference Group’
The MAAS website advertises: ‘The Powerhouse is inviting members of the community to work with us during the design and planning of the new Powerhouse through the establishment of a Community Reference Group. The Community Reference group will represent a diverse range of local community organisations, the business community, schools, youth, cultural organisations, and/or neighbouring residents who have an interest in the project.’ It says: ‘If you are interested in becoming a member of the Community Reference Group, please provide a written submission of up to 500 words…’ (and identifies questions to respond to).
‘Expressions of interest will be received by 4 March 2020. The Powerhouse will then select the most appropriate respondents, with a short interview undertaken if required, and thank all those who expressed an interest. The first meeting will be held in March 2020 and selected members must be available to attend this meeting. In order to participate, you (or a representative from your organisation or community group) will be required to attend each meeting (to be held every six weeks, or at key project milestones). The meeting location will be provided upon appointment.’ For full information and contact details: Read more  or here: MAAS Community engagement Feb 2020
See also 24 March, for expressed concern from NPRAG for cancellation of public meetings: NPrag Media Release 25032020

18 February, 2020
‘Powerhouse design brief asked architects to consider historic demolition’
Linda Morris, in the Sydney Morning Herald, notes that: ‘The Stage 2 design brief, released to the public on Monday and prepared by Create NSW, did not push for the retention of the 1886 Italianate villa known as Willow Grove, and instead urged designers to consider its removal “should it be required”.’ Instead, she writes: ‘Architects were encouraged to consider the demolition of a historic Victorian building in order to make way for Parramatta’s new Powerhouse Museum, despite the NSW Premier’s assurance in 2019 that efforts would be made to try and save local heritage. …The International Jury was unanimous in its decision on the chosen concept, designed by Moreau Kusunoki. The winning architects did not opt to retain Willow Grove and a row of Victorian terraces, known as St. George’s Terrace, nearby.’
‘ “The documents show that Premier Gladys Berejiklian and her government never intended to protect Willow Grove – and engaged in a cruel hoax on the community,” Labor’s Walt Secord said. But a spokeswoman for the Premier denied Mr Secord’s claims and said …that all finalists were asked to consider heritage aspects and be “sympathetic to the local heritage site”. “The design brief also allowed for the removal of the heritage buildings, should it be required. The submitted concept designs made clear that it is not possible to deliver on the design ambitions of the brief and deliver city connectivity while retaining Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace.”’
‘The broad principles of the brief, prepared on behalf of Create NSW, show much attention was paid to the museum’s integration into the cultural fabric of Parramatta, and its orientation to the riverfront. Planners referred to the museum as being “fine grain” in its structure, meaning it would be made up of multiple smaller elements rather than one large block. According to the plans, there will be multiple entries, with no single front door, multiple places to stop, soft edges and no harsh lights. It will be open until late in the night and have intimate retail offerings, while also being a working precinct. A minimum 18,000 square metres of exhibition and public spaces was specified, configured across six column-free exhibition spaces. Three of these were commissioned without museum standard environmental controls.’
Read more  or here: SMH Linda M 18 Feb

17 February, 2020
Powerhouse Precinct Parramatta
International design competition: Stage 2 Design Brief
A Stage 2 Design Brief has been issued, following the announcement of the French company Moreau Kusunoki as Lead Design Architect, working with Australia’s Genton as Local Design Architect, to develop the plans for the proposed relocated Powerhouse Museum in Parramatta.
Public concerns continue to be expressed for the excessive cost of the unnecessary project, the inappropriateness of the spaces, the location on a flood-prone area, the demolition of heritage buildings, the lack of consultation with local people about their preferences for a local museum and gallery – and the strong opposition to removing the state Powerhouse Museum from Ultimo with no current advice about the future of that site.
The extensive Brief includes: ‘We envisage the Powerhouse Parramatta as a hyper-platform, a building with limitless potential which continuously evolves. The built form treads lightly on the site, creating a porous ground plane…’ And ‘A new curatorial strategy will focus on integrated and immersive programs that promote interaction and inspire and connect people of all ages and backgrounds.’
But the Brief also raises new issues. Some public responses include:
– ‘Concern for the 25% smaller space for exhibitions, not all with environmental controls’
– ‘Concern for the potential triviality of an emphasis on ‘iconic objects’, ‘immersive experiences’, a constantly changing rolling program, grand art commissions, and extravagant screen-based content.’
– ‘Inadequate attention to providing well-informed stories expressing the significance of the broad collection across science and technology, decorative arts and design and social history’, for reference, research and appreciation.’
-‘Little understanding of the time needed to plan a range of exhibitions with a vastly reduced professional staff.’ (See the record of exhibitions 1988-2018 here. )
Some public comments made to the PMAlliance sum up:
‘It is clear that the government never intended to create a museum as it is commonly understood. What they are doing is a big commercial development with some exhibition galleries attached that are far inferior and just a fraction of the size of the PHM … Class A asset stripping. What a con.’
‘They have no interest in the collection or in doing properly curated exhibitions. That is why there is not one person with museum experience at any level of the project structure, nor in the senior management, nor the neutered MAAS Trust, nor on the design competition jury.’
‘In the Stage 2 design brief they ask for the building to have a 100 year life…These people have had an irony bypass. Trashing the PHM after just 32 years.’
‘Sorry, that’s a multi-purpose arts facility with a small museum on top, NOT the Powerhouse Museum. Save the REAL Museum in Ultimo!’
To see the Design Brief: Read more  with attachments: Read more

12 February, 2020
‘The Site of the Future $645 Million Powerhouse Museum Copped Lots of Flooding Over the Weekend’
Sarah Ward, in Concrete Playground, asks: ‘Wild weather saw the Parramatta site inundated with floodwaters — what does this mean for its future?’ and reports: ‘As rain bucketed down on the city over the past weekend, it caused the Parramatta River to flood. In the process, it also inundated the Powerhouse Museum’s new site with water. As City of Parramatta Councillor Donna Davis has documented on Twitter, that led to a submerged carpark right where the relocated museum is set to stand. Obviously, that doesn’t bode all that well for an institution that’ll be filled with valuable artefacts.’ She continues: ‘Since 2017, the Powerhouse Museum Alliance — a body opposed to the move, advocating for the museum to stay at its current Ultimo location instead — has noted that the Parramatta spot is on a floodplain and susceptible to both river flooding and overland flash flooding. Its findings stem from council papers, plans and submissions, which place the riverside site in an area within the one-in-20 and one-in-100-year flood zones. That means that the odds that a flood will happen in any given year are as high as one in 20.’ Furthermore: ‘Since 2017, the Powerhouse Museum Alliance — a body opposed to the move, advocating for the museum to stay at its current Ultimo location instead — has noted that the Parramatta spot is on a floodplain and susceptible to both river flooding and overland flash flooding. Its findings stem from council papers, plans and submissions, which place the riverside site in an area within the one-in-20 and one-in-100-year flood zones. That means that the odds that a flood will happen in any given year are as high as one in 20.’
Read more  or here 12 Feb Concrete playground

 10 February, 2020
‘Labor calls on Premier to abandon Powerhouse relocation’
In a press statement, Labor Leader, Jodi McKay, ‘has renewed calls for the $1.5 billion Powerhouse Museum relocation to Parramatta to be abandoned, as Premier Gladys Berejiklian’s chosen site is flooded due to heavy rains spilling in to the Parramatta River.’ And ‘Labor Shadow Arts Minister Walt Secord has described the Parramatta design as a “monstrosity on stilts”.’ ‘Ms McKay concluded saying: “Rather than going through the ridiculous expense of moving museum exhibits across Sydney, Labor believes Parramatta deserves its own new arts and cultural precinct. We would save Willow Grove and honour the treasure that it is”.’
Read more: 10 Feb Jodi McKay

10 February, 2020
‘Parramatta Powerhouse site flooded’
Linda Morris, in the Sydney Morning Herald, reports: ‘The site of the new Powerhouse Museum has been inundated with floodwaters from the swollen Parramatta River, underlining the vulnerability of the $1 billion project to flood. The ground floor of the four-level car park and the grassy riverfront was partially submerged in an area where the museum is to stand.’ Despite reassurances provided to her about the design of the proposed new building to deal with flooding, Morris also notes: ‘In a letter to the upper house inquiry into the museum’s relocation from Ultimo to Parramatta, river hydrologist Dr John Macintosh said the decision to locate the museum on this site would result in visitors being exposed to “unacceptable flood hazard” and “potentially expose the collections to damage or destruction if the site was inundated with floodwaters”.  And: ‘Parramatta City councillor Donna Davis said the flooding was not unexpected. “This is a site where frequent flooding is common and that will always experience the fastest flowing and deepest water,” she said. “Why would you house items of international and cultural significance on a site that is at such a high risk of flooding?” ‘
Read more or here 10 Feb SMH parra flood

7 February, 2020
Museum billing ‘will allow steamrolling of objections’
Linda Morris, in the Sydney Morning Herald, documents the implications of how:  ‘The new Powerhouse Museum at Parramatta has been declared a state-significant project in what opponents say gives the Berejiklian government license to override community or council objections to bulldozing of historic buildings on site…. The designation of state significance bypasses Parramatta Council’s development controls and comes as Labor steps up opposition to the billion-dollar project in the wake of the state’s ‘‘black summer’’, proposing the taxpayers’ contribution of $645 million be diverted to bushfire recovery… Infrastructure NSW deemed the project to be of state significance in a letter dated January 13 requesting the Department of Planning start assessment. Its application specifies demolition of the existing fourlevel Riverbank car park, Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace. Built in the 1870s, Willow Grove is an example of a Victorian Italianate two-storey villa and once served as a maternity hospital. Along with St George’s Terrace, it is a locally listed heritage item.’
‘Opposition spokesman for the arts and treasury, Walt Secord, predicted the views of the local council, locals and community groups would be subverted by the development process as they were for WestConnex when, he said, the views of the community had been ‘‘steamrolled’’. ‘‘Because the Berejiklian government does not have the community on board, it will ram the Powerhouse Museum through the approvals process,’’ the shadow treasurer said.’
Lisa Havilah, the museum’s chief executive officer, also confirmed there would be no traditional planetarium in the new museum. Instead, a largescale contemporary, immersive screen space would present science and astronomy programs…‘‘We are trying to create a space for the future that is flexible, immersive and will continue to present great frontend technology programs for young people.’’ ‘
‘Museum consultant Kylie Winkworth said planning for the Parramatta facility had been secretive, compared to Museum of London’s open process of community involvement when it proposed shifting to the abandoned Smithfield market. In NSW, the public had had no say in the site selection assessment and on the museum’s themes and content, she said. The public had yet to see the shortlisted competition designs, let alone voice a preference… was not so much a museum for the people but a statement of architecture, with the museum’s collection deemed unimportant. ‘‘It is much cheaper to deliver with empty spaces than to develop an actual museum with proper exhibitions,’’ she said. Read more  or here: 7 Feb Linda Morris SMH

30 January, 2020
‘Lisa Havilah’s ambitious plans for Sydney’s Powerhouse Museum’
In the February issue of the Australian Financial Review’s arts magazine, Jane Albert documents the career path of Lisa Havilah, chief executive of the Museum of Applied Arts & Sciences, and interviews her about her plans and visions for the relocated museum. ‘For an arts administrator, getting one’s hands on the reins of any state-backed arts institution is a plum job. Being put in charge of one that’s on the cusp of a top-to-toe transformation is especially attractive. Certainly the NSW state government, with a weather eye on the voters of western Sydney, is keen to tout the new Powerhouse as being its largest cultural investment since the Sydney Opera House.
Running the Powerhouse is also a controversy-prone job. Uprooting the museum has angered some powerful and influential figures…’. ‘Indeed the move, first mooted in 2014, caused so much anger that a NSW Upper House inquiry recommended the existing Powerhouse be revitalised and a new institution built in Parramatta. Nevertheless, the current NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian, Arts Minister Don Harwin and his close ally Havilah are ploughing ahead towards an opening date of 2023.’ As well as discussing plans for the museum spaces and programs, comparisons are made with previous working relationships and  her art gallery, rather than museum, experience and expectations. Read more or here: AFR Mag Feb 2020 Havilah
or: 30 Jan AFR Havilah

30 January, 2020
‘Premier Gladys Berejiklian rejects questions about Parramatta’s heritage’
Joanne Vella, in the Parramatta Advertiser, records that: ‘Premier Gladys Berejiklian deflected questions about saving a heritage-listed Parramatta building despite talks to students about Parramatta’s rich history. Read more: 

29 January, 2020
‘Taking out the Trash while NSW Burns‘
Museum expert Kylie Winkworth writes for City Hub/Alt Media, about the impact of unprecedented bushfires where ‘Repairing the impacts of the fires and drought will take years, even decades… The government’s spending priorities need to change; or so one would think.  But while people were distracted by the bushfire crisis, the hazardous air quality, and the seeming death of nature itself, the government got to work, taking out the trash for its most extravagant and toxic project. In mid-January it pressed on with the next stage of the demolition of the Powerhouse Museum, setting in motion the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Parramatta museum.’
‘It was left to community activist Suzette Meade to winkle out of the government that the new museum will be built on the rubble of St George’s Terrace and Willow Grove. Only last February the Premier promised to retain these listed heritage buildings, at least for the duration of the election campaign. If the government had any qualms about the contradiction of building a museum on a heritage crime scene it wasn’t letting on. There was no mention of these heritage losses in the media releases. It seems that Parramatta’s big new cultural landmark requires the sacrifice of its authentic places, culture and heritage.’ …
‘And as for the fate of the real Powerhouse Museum, it is already being written out of history and barely rates a mention in the EIS letter. Even so, the hidden purpose of the faux museum Architecture project at Parramatta is to provide cover for the demolition of the PHM, and the appropriation of its land and assets for property development. The Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences Act is not listed in the section covering the statutory framework… The Trustees are not mentioned as agents or stakeholders in the project, they are already disempowered and irrelevant. Nor are the museum’s donors, members, volunteers, former trustees and Life Fellows identified as stakeholders. The people who have done most to create the Powerhouse Museum and its collections are written off,  like the museum itself… All this a double cultural tragedy for NSW and Parramatta. There is the missed opportunity for a new museum about Parramatta’s remarkable history and contemporary cultures. And there’s the demolition of the real Powerhouse Museum, Australia’s only museum of applied arts and sciences which has been in Ultimo since 1893. Read more   or here: 29 Jan 2020, KW CityHub

13 January 2020
‘Request for Environmental Assessment Requirements, for new Powerhouse in Parramatta’
On its Major Projects Planning Portal, the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment opened a page for the construction of the New Powerhouse at Parramatta. It includes a range of design plans showing proposed elevations, site maps and layouts.
A timeline identifies points in the process of development, the current status starting point being a heading ‘Prepare SEARs’. It is possible to register interest in this page for access to updates. For the PortalRead more   or here  Read more
But what is the SEARs Request?
 Attached to the planning portal is a letter from Michael Oliver (director of Planning for ETHOS Urban, a ‘national urban solutions company)’, to the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, written ‘on behalf of  Infrastructure NSW, the proponent for the proposed the development of the New Powerhouse’. The letter is a ‘Request for Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEAR)’ document, for the New Powerhouse at 30B Phillip Street, Parramatta’, which is needed ‘for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed development.’
Attached to the letter is a substantial supporting document
 which ‘provides an overview of the proposed development, sets out the statutory context, and identifies the key likely environmental and planning issues associated with the proposal. This request is accompanied by concept plans prepared by [successful architects] Moreau Kusunoki with Genton which illustrate the proposed development.’ For letter and attached document: Read more or here: New Powerhouse- Request for SEARs

Responses to the Ethos letter and document:
22 January, 2020
Kylie Winkworth raises issues with the letter and its attached document:
‘The EIS request for the new museum at Parramatta has quietly gone up on the Dept of Planning website. This must be stage 2 of the ‘taking out the trash’ project. The letter/briefing paper has been prepared by a firm called Ethos. Apparently.
For the first time there are cross sections of the Parramatta museum showing a few planes and helicopters in a trophy hall but otherwise it is a museum in name only, with no vision, no compelling concept or rationale and nothing to say about the content. It is a brutal, overbearing building. The larger building is set so far forward on the site it leaves just a few metres for a vestigial river walk. One artist rendering from the north looking across the river shows a bridge across the river connecting to what they have called Civic Link, located on the site of the demolished Willow Grove. It will be a massive wind tunnel. The bridge will not actually be built as part of the project, although it was in the original brief. The cost of this, if it is feasible, will be pushed onto Parramatta City Council. So the Civic Link has no destination, it just dumps people on the narrowest bit of the riverbank.
MAAS is barely mentioned in the letter. Its Act is not listed in 6.6 covering the statutory framework. The Trustees are not mentioned as agents or stakeholders; nor are the museum’s donors, members, volunteers, former trustees and Life Fellows identified under 9.0 community and other stakeholder engagement. It is clear the actual Powerhouse is being stolen and downsized to a regional arts centre.
It is very concerning that the government is forging ahead despite the bushfires, the grinding drought in regional NSW and the consequent cost, and the need for more cultural and tourism investment in regional communities. The letter is dated 13 Jan. It would seem our letters to all Liberal and National Party MPs calling for a re-think have had no effect.
It is concerning that the contact person noted on p. 2 of the letter is Tom Kennedy who managed the demolition of the Sydney Football Stadium. That does not bode well for the longevity of Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace, set for certain demolition.
Half the PHM will be closed by June so things are getting to the pointy end. There is very concerning news on the move of the collection. They intend to move the 1855 No1 Loco and its carriages to the rail museum at Thirlmere. This museum was under direct attack by the Green Wattle fire and had to close for some weeks in December:  Read more
I understand at least one carriage was moved out of the museum. It is incredible that the trustees would agree to move the museum’s most significant item of rail heritage, the foundation object for the history of railways in Australia, to an under-resourced museum at risk of bushfire when it is safe and so well displayed in a purpose designed, climate controlled museum environment at Ultimo. The money wasted putting this priceless object in harm’s way would be better spent restoring the Zig Zag Railway, damaged by fires in December. Read more   I am afraid the government’s fearless recovery leader Mr Barilaro just doesn’t get it.

 25 January, 2020
Tom Lockley responded to the Ethos letter, about erroneous ‘facts’:
‘I submit that this letter should not be accepted by your department because there is a fundamental error of fact in the first line, where Ethos Urban refers to Infrastructure NSW as the proponent for the proposed the development of the New Powerhouse at 30B Phillip Street, Parramatta. The facts are that Infrastructure NSW only called for the urgent investigation of the idea of moving the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta in the State Infrastructure Strategy Update (November)  2014. The project was announced by the then Premier on 26 November 2014 and thus the Government was the proponent of the ‘move’ idea.
No investigation of the merits of the idea was ever done by any competent authority, no investigation of alternatives was ever made, there was no prior consultation with stakeholders (even with the Trustees of the Museum) so no professional organisation such as Infrastructure NSW could possibly be the proponent.
Infrastructure NSW made the position clear in its Business Case Summary, released on April 18 2018. It is the agent of the government, ordered to carry out the project. ‘The Business Case takes as its starting point the Government’s decision to locate the Powerhouse Museum on the Riverbank site in Parramatta’ (page 2).
Ethos Urban’s letter should be withdrawn and replaced by an accurate letter making it clear that the sole proponent of this project is the Government itself.’

23 and 25 January, 2020
Save the Powerhouse Facebook raises 
concerns over “New Powerhouse” Development approval timeline (https://www.facebook.com/savethepowerhouse/)
Writing of the Ethos document associated with the SEARs request, Save the Powerhouse notes: ‘The document is very long, and adds nothing to what we already knew, while failing to address any of the questions that still hang over the “move” project … Nonetheless, a few points stand out, most obviously:
– With three cosily associated departments involved, this is a blatant case of Government “marking its own homework”, virtually guaranteeing a favourable environmental assessment statement.
– The “pro-movers’ have always had problems with naming this project. Since the move was announced in early 2015, the proposed museum has been called variously the “Parramatta Powerhouse”, the “Parramatta (cultural) precinct”, the “new MAAS museum”, etc… And now it becomes simply the “New Powerhouse”, ambitiously promoted as the future jewel in Parramatta’s cultural crown, but with no indication of its location in the title, which won’t be helpful to potential visitors.
In any case, as has often been observed the real Powerhouse museum in Ultimo took its name from the old power station that was adapted to house it. There is no disused power station at Parramatta.
– We learn that one of the “Alternatives considered” was “Do nothing”, which would result in cancelling the “move” while “the existing museum at Ultimo would continue to operate “WITH INFRASTRUCTURE REACHING THE END OF ITS USEFUL LIFE”. “This approach was not supported as IT WOULD RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT EXPENDITURE FOR LOW BENEFIT.” According to expert analysis, both these statements are untrue…
As we are still hearing rumours that some Cabinet Ministers are increasingly worried about this huge and escalating cost, we urge them to speak out now and earn the eternal respect of thousands of community members in Ultimo who want the real Powerhouse to stay where it belongs and in Parramatta, where they have rejected the idea of a “second-hand”, cut-down Powerhouse, because they want their own museum to REFLECT LOCAL HISTORY AND CULTURAL VALUES… Please SIGN and SHARE our PETITION http://chng.it/2cNV29SDZc asking the NSW Government to donate the $1.5 billion to bushfire and drought relief.

22 January, 2020
‘Jodi McKay calls on Berejiklian government to keep promise to Parramatta and save Willow Grove’
In a press release: ‘NSW Labor Leader Jodi McKay has demanded the Berejiklian Government consult with the people of Parramatta over its controversial and increasingly troubled $1.5 billion Powerhouse Museum relocation – ensuring the beloved heritage building Willow Grove is saved and incorporated into a future Parramatta arts and cultural facility.
On a visit to Willow Grove today, joined by Shadow Minister for Heritage Kate Washington and Federal Labor Parramatta MP Julie Owens, Ms McKay accused the Premier of breaking a promise to the people of Parramatta [February 2019]. Instead, in mid-December, with NSW distracted by devastating bushfires, her Government approved a bizarre, heritage-destroying design that was described by Labor as a “monstrosity on stilts”.
“The people of Parramatta weren’t consulted – and even worse, they were lied to.” Ms McKay noted the Government was preparing to knock over another local icon, the Royal Oak Hotel established in 1813, which has long been cherished by Parramatta Eels fans after a big game. She said Labor supported bestowing a brilliant arts and cultural facility upon Parramatta that respects heritage.  “There are so many new buildings going up these days, and people in Parramatta know we need to balance that with a sensitivity to the rich history that makes this area so special,” Ms McKay said.  Ms Washington added: “You don’t celebrate history by destroying history. The awful irony of bulldozing irreplaceable heritage buildings to make way for a new museum seems to have been lost on Gladys Berejiklian and her Government.”
Read more:  22 Jan Jody McKay

January, 2020
Visiting the Powerhouse Museum 2020-2021′
The Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences (MAAS) website provides a brief schedule for the proposed closure of the museum. It says: ‘The Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo will remain open to the community until June 2021 with a staged closure commencing from July 2020… From July 2020 to June 2021, the community will be able to access the Museum via the Harris Street entrance when the Goods Line entrance is closed. The Museum’s program of temporary exhibitions, education programs, Lab digital workshops, Members’ Lounge and its café and store will continue to operate until June 2021. The Museum’s permanent exhibitions will close in June 2020. Following 2021, a targeted community and regional program will allow the Museum to continue to engage with the people of NSW.’
As well, amid speculation of sale to developers and various proposals from Arts Minister Don Harwin, it says: ‘The Government has previously announced the Business Case would be expanded to include an arts and cultural space in Ultimo so that it could consider the best possible use of the space at Ultimo. A masterplan will be developed for Ultimo followed by a rigorous Business Case process. When this is finalised an announcement will be made by Government.’ In the meantime, it is understood that packing of the collection is taking place, and that controversial plans for moving precious large items such as the No 1 Locomotive and others, are being made. Read more  or here, [with corrections to earlier relocation history]: Powerhouse closure dates 2020-2021

January, 2020
A new decade, with new priorities? Australia in bush-fire crisis
Across Australia, the New Year opened during weeks of news documenting devastating bushfires raging across rural land, forests and towns, and city outskirts, particularly in the coastal areas of NSW, Victoria and South Australia, as well as in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania, while spreading smoke for thousands of kilometres in all directions, from the ACT to New Zealand. Hundreds of homes and properties were lost, with farm stock, native animals and crops destroyed and thousands of hectares burned out, often in national parks. Notable was the generosity of thousands of volunteers who joined those in the Fire Services, working to points of exhaustion, and some brave firefighters died along with those who sadly lost their lives in trying to save their homes. Mass evacuations took place in some locations, sometimes by naval ships or local boats.
Immediately, communities everywhere, from well-known public figures to ordinary folk at home and at work, joined funds to raise millions of dollars to support those who were suffering such losses. Questions were asked of governments regarding what should now be identified as necessary changes of priorities in government expenditure in these circumstances, as well as about the effects of climate change, and the best precautions for the future.
Every newspaper in Australia, and  those in many other countries maintained constant headline updates, including on this Google bushfire update link: Read more